Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools in artificial intelligence, especially in complex decision-making scenarios, but their static problem-solving strategies often limit their adaptability to dynamic environments.
R. A. Fisher, “The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems,” Annals of eugenics , vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 179–188, 1936
1936
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Kennedy and R. Eberhart, “Particle swarm optimization,” in Proceedings of ICNN’95 - International Conference on Neural Networks , vol. 4, 1995, pp. 1942–1948 vol.4
1948
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. H. Ackley, G. E. Hinton, and T. J. Sejnowski, “A learning algorithm for boltzmann machines,” Cognitive science , vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 147–169, 1985
1985
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Vesterstrom and R. Thomsen, “A comparative study of differential evolution, particle swarm optimization, and evolutionary algorithms on numerical benchmark problems,” in Proceedings of the 2004 congress on evolutionary computation (IEEE Cat. No. 04TH8753) , vol. 2. IEEE, 2004, pp. 1980–1987
1987
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Storn and K. Price, “Differential evolution–a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces,” Journal of global optimization , vol. 11, pp. 341–359, 1997
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Brest, S. Greiner, B. Boskovic, M. Mernik, and V. Zumer, “Self-adapting control parameters in differential evolution: A comparative study on numerical benchmark problems,” IEEE transactions on evolutionary computation , vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 646–657, 2006
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Zhang and A. C. Sanderson, “Jade: adaptive differential evolution with optional external archive,” IEEE Transactions on evolutionary computation , vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 945–958, 2009
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Radford, K. Narasimhan, T. Salimans, I. Sutskever et al. , “Improving language understanding by generative pre-training,” 2018
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Radford, J. Wu, R. Child, D. Luan, D. Amodei, I. Sutskever et al. , “Language models are unsupervised multitask learners,” OpenAI blog , vol. 1, no. 8, p. 9, 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Brown, B. Mann, N. Ryder, M. Subbiah, J. D. Kaplan, P. Dhariwal, A. Neelakantan, P. Shyam, G. Sastry, A. Askell et al. , “Language models are few-shot learners,” Advances in neural information processing systems , vol. 33, pp. 1877–1901, 2020
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Gao, A. Fisch, and D. Chen, “Making pre-trained language models better few-shot learners,” in Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) , 2021, pp. 3816–3830
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Wei, X. Wang, D. Schuurmans, M. Bosma, F. Xia, E. Chi, Q. V. Le, D. Zhou et al. , “Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models,” Advances in neural information processing systems , vol. 35, pp. 24 824–24 837, 2022
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
B. Pang, E. Nijkamp, W. Kryściński, S. Savarese, Y. Zhou, and C. Xiong, “Long document summarization with top-down and bottom-up inference,” in Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EACL 2023 , 2023, pp. 1267–1284
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
P. Liu, W. Yuan, J. Fu, Z. Jiang, H. Hayashi, and G. Neubig, “Pre-train, prompt, and predict: A systematic survey of prompting methods in natural language processing,” ACM Computing Surveys , vol. 55, no. 9, pp. 1–35, 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
Q. Guo, R. Wang, J. Guo, B. Li, K. Song, X. Tan, G. Liu, J. Bian, and Y. Yang, “Connecting large language models with evolutionary algorithms yields powerful prompt optimizers,” in The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations , 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2023
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
C.-H. Chiang and H.-Y. Lee, “Can large language models be an alternative to human evaluations?” in Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , 2023, pp. 15 607–15 631
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Later among the works it cites.
S. Yao, D. Yu, J. Zhao, I. Shafran, T. Griffiths, Y. Cao, and K. Narasimhan, “Tree of thoughts: Deliberate problem solving with large language models,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 36, 2024
2024
Closest in time.
L. Li, “Cpseg: Finer-grained image semantic segmentation via chain-of-thought language prompting,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision , 2024, pp. 513–522
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
Y. Zhu, J. Li, G. Li, Y. Zhao, Z. Jin, and H. Mei, “Hot or cold? adaptive temperature sampling for code generation with large language models,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , vol. 38, no. 1, 2024, pp. 437–445
2024
Closest in time.
M. Besta, N. Blach, A. Kubicek, R. Gerstenberger, M. Podstawski, L. Gianinazzi, J. Gajda, T. Lehmann, H. Niewiadomski, P. Nyczyk et al. , “Graph of thoughts: Solving elaborate problems with large language models,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , vol. 38, no. 16, 2024, pp. 17 682–17 690
2024
Closest in time.