The AI Review Lottery: Widespread AI-Assisted Peer Reviews Boost Paper Scores and Acceptance Rates

Regression models for ordinal data

Peter McCullagh · 1980

Earlier work this paper cites.

Peerless science: Peer review and US science policy

Daryl E Chubin and Edward J Hackett · 1990

Earlier work this paper cites.

Peer review of grant applications: what do we know?

Simon Wessely · 1998

Earlier work this paper cites.

Sensitivity analysis in observational studies

Paul R Rosenbaum · 2005

Earlier work this paper cites.

Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals

Richard Smith · 2006

Earlier work this paper cites.

Reviewing peer review, 2008

Bruce Alberts, Brooks Hanson, and Katrina L Kelner · 2008

Earlier work this paper cites.

Open scholarship and peer review: a time for experimentation

David Soergel, Adam Saunders, and Andrew McCallum · 2013

Earlier work this paper cites.

Epistemic trust in science

Torsten Wilholt · 2013

Earlier work this paper cites.

Open access is tiring out peer reviewers

Martijn Arns · 2014

Earlier work this paper cites.

Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references

Lutz Bornmann and Rüdiger Mutz · 2015

Earlier work this paper cites.

Reviewer fatigue? why scholars decline to review their peers’ work

Marijke Breuning, Jeremy Backstrom, Jeremy Brannon, Benjamin Isaak Gross, and Michael Widmeier · 2015

Earlier work this paper cites.

The stm report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing, 2015

Mark Ware and Michael Mabe · 2015

Earlier work this paper cites.

Let’s make peer review scientific

Drummond Rennie · 2016

Earlier work this paper cites.

Does peer review identify the best papers? a simulation study of editors, reviewers, and the scientific publication process

Justin Esarey · 2017

Earlier work this paper cites.

Recruitment of reviewers is becoming harder at some journals: a test of the influence of reviewer fatigue at six journals in ecology and evolution

Charles W Fox, Arianne YK Albert, and Timothy H Vines · 2017

Earlier work this paper cites.

Misclassification in binary choice models

Bruce D Meyer and Nikolas Mittag · 2017

Earlier work this paper cites.

The ipcc and the new map of science and politics

Silke Beck and Martin Mahony · 2018

Earlier work this paper cites.

Global State of peer review report

Clarivate · 2018

Earlier work this paper cites.

Analyzing ordinal data with metric models: What could possibly go wrong?

Torrin M Liddell and John K Kruschke · 2018

Cited alongside, same era.

The state of the art in peer review

Jonathan P Tennant · 2018

Cited alongside, same era.

Peer reviewers unmasked: largest global survey reveals trends

Inga Vesper · 2018

Cited alongside, same era.

Working 9 to 5, not the way to make an academic living: observational analysis of manuscript and peer review submissions over time

Adrian Barnett, Inger Mewburn, and Sara Schroter · 2019

Cited alongside, same era.

Ordinal regression models in psychology: A tutorial

Paul-Christian Bürkner and Matti Vuorre · 2019

Cited alongside, same era.

Sentence-bert: Sentence embeddings using siamese bert-networks

Nils Reimers and Iryna Gurevych · 2019

Cited alongside, same era.

Leakage and the reproducibility crisis in machine-learning-based science

Sayash Kapoor and Arvind Narayanan · 2023

Later among the works it cites.

Scholarly Peer Review is an Age-Old Practice, But Publishing is Changing

Taryn MacKinney · 2023

Later among the works it cites.

Can ai-generated text be reliably detected?

Original

Vinu Sankar Sadasivan, Aounon Kumar, Sriram Balasubramanian, Wenxiao Wang, and Soheil Feizi · 2023

Later among the works it cites.

Gptzero: Towards detection of ai-generated text using zero-shot and supervised methods, 2023

Edward Tian, Alexander Cui, and Alex Adam · 2023

Later among the works it cites.

Benchmarking foundation models with language-model-as-an-examiner

Yushi Bai, Jiahao Ying, Yixin Cao, Xin Lv, Yuze He, Xiaozhi Wang, Jifan Yu, Kaisheng Zeng, Yijia Xiao, Haozhe Lyu, et al · 2024

Closest in time.