Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Mathematical equations have been unreasonably effective in describing complex natural phenomena across various scientific disciplines.
Data-driven discovery of physical laws
Pat Langley · 1981
Earlier work this paper cites.
Practical Methods of Optimization
Roger Fletcher · 1987
Earlier work this paper cites.
An analysis of selection procedures with particular attention paid to proportional and boltzmann selection
Michael de la Maza and Bruce Tidor · 1993
Earlier work this paper cites.
Genetic programming as a means for programming computers by natural selection
John R. Koza · 1994
Earlier work this paper cites.
Declarative bias in equation discovery
Ljupco Todorovski and Saso Dzeroski · 1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
Integrating Domain Knowledge in Equation Discovery , pp. 69–97
Ljupčo Todorovski and Sašo Džeroski · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Distilling free-form natural laws from experimental data
Michael Schmidt and Hod Lipson · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Adam: A method for stochastic optimization
Diederik P Kingma and Jimmy Ba · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Stress-strain data for aluminum 6061-t651 from 9 lots at 6 temperatures under uniaxial and plane strain tension
B.S. Aakash, JohnPatrick Connors, and Michael D. Shields · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Language models are few-shot learners
Tom B Brown · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Ai feynman: A physics-inspired method for symbolic regression
Silviu-Marian Udrescu and Max Tegmark · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Neural symbolic regression that scales
Luca Biggio, Tommaso Bendinelli, Alexander Neitz, Aurelien Lucchi, and Giambattista Parascandolo · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Probabilistic grammars for equation discovery
Jure Brence, Ljupčo Todorovski, and Sašo Džeroski · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Contemporary symbolic regression methods and their relative performance
William La Cava, Patryk Orzechowski, Bogdan Burlacu, Fabricio de Franca, Marco Virgolin, Ying Jin, Michael Kommenda, and Jason Moore · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Symbolic regression via deep reinforcement learning enhanced genetic programming seeding
Terrell N. Mundhenk, Mikel Landajuela, Ruben Glatt, Claudio P. Santiago, Daniel faissol, and Brenden K. Petersen · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradients
Brenden K Petersen, Mikel Landajuela Larma, Terrell N. Mundhenk, Claudio Prata Santiago, Soo Kyung Kim, and Joanne Taery Kim · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Language models can teach themselves to program better
Patrick Haluptzok, Matthew Bowers, and Adam Tauman Kalai · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
End-to-end symbolic regression with transformers
Pierre-Alexandre Kamienny, Stéphane d’Ascoli, Guillaume Lample, and Francois Charton · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
A unified framework for deep symbolic regression
Mikel Landajuela, Chak Lee, Jiachen Yang, Ruben Glatt, Claudio P. Santiago, Ignacio Aravena, Terrell N. Mundhenk, Garrett Mulcahy, and Brenden K. Petersen · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Symbolic regression is NP-hard
Marco Virgolin and Solon P Pissis · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Execution-based code generation using deep reinforcement learning
Parshin Shojaee, Aneesh Jain, Sindhu Tipirneni, and Chandan K Reddy · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Symbolic physics learner: Discovering governing equations via monte carlo tree search
Fangzheng Sun, Yang Liu, Jian-Xun Wang, and Hao Sun · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Zhaofeng Wu, Linlu Qiu, Alexis Ross, Ekin Akyürek, Boyuan Chen, Bailin Wang, Najoung Kim, Jacob Andreas, and Yoon Kim · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Connecting large language models with evolutionary algorithms yields powerful prompt optimizers
Qingyan Guo, Rui Wang, Junliang Guo, Bei Li, Kaitao Song, Xu Tan, Guoqing Liu, Jiang Bian, and Yujiu Yang · 2024
Closest in time.
Scimon: Scientific inspiration machines optimized for novelty
Heng Ji, Qingyun Wang, Doug Downey, and Tom Hope · 2024
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Josh Achiam, Steven Adler, Sandhini Agarwal, Lama Ahmad, Ilge Akkaya, Florencia Leoni Aleman, Diogo Almeida, Janko Altenschmidt, Sam Altman, Shyamal Anadkat, et al · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
The impact of large language models on scientific discovery: a preliminary study using gpt-4
Microsoft Research AI4Science and Microsoft Azure Quantum · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Evoprompting: Language models for code-level neural architecture search
Angelica Chen, David Dohan, and David So · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Interpretable machine learning for science with pysr and symbolicregression. jl
Miles Cranmer · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Evolution through large models
Joel Lehman, Jonathan Gordon, Shawn Jain, Kamal Ndousse, Cathy Yeh, and Kenneth O Stanley · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Starcoder: may the source be with you!
Raymond Li, Loubna Ben Allal, Yangtian Zi, Niklas Muennighoff, Denis Kocetkov, Chenghao Mou, Marc Marone, Christopher Akiki, Jia Li, Jenny Chim, et al · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Large language models to enhance bayesian optimization
Tennison Liu, Nicolás Astorga, Nabeel Seedat, and Mihaela van der Schaar · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Closest in time.
Albert Q Jiang, Alexandre Sablayrolles, Antoine Roux, Arthur Mensch, Blanche Savary, Chris Bamford, Devendra Singh Chaplot, Diego de las Casas, Emma Bou Hanna, Florian Bressand, et al · 2024
Closest in time.
Large language models as evolution strategies
Robert Tjarko Lange, Yingtao Tian, and Yujin Tang · 2024
Closest in time.
Automated statistical model discovery with language models
Michael Y Li, Emily B Fox, and Noah D Goodman · 2024
Closest in time.
Llm and simulation as bilevel optimizers: A new paradigm to advance physical scientific discovery
Pingchuan Ma, Tsun-Hsuan Wang, Minghao Guo, Zhiqing Sun, Joshua B Tenenbaum, Daniela Rus, Chuang Gan, and Wojciech Matusik · 2024
Closest in time.
Self-refine: Iterative refinement with self-feedback
Aman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan, Luyu Gao, Sarah Wiegreffe, Uri Alon, Nouha Dziri, Shrimai Prabhumoye, Yiming Yang, et al · 2024
Closest in time.
Data-driven discovery with large generative models
Bodhisattwa Prasad Majumder, Harshit Surana, Dhruv Agarwal, Sanchaita Hazra, Ashish Sabharwal, and Peter Clark · 2024
Closest in time.
Mathematical discoveries from program search with large language models
Bernardino Romera-Paredes, Mohammadamin Barekatain, Alexander Novikov, Matej Balog, M. Pawan Kumar, Emilien Dupont, Francisco J. R. Ruiz, Jordan S. Ellenberg, Pengming Wang, Omar Fawzi, Pushmeet Kohli, and Alhussein Fawzi · 2024
Closest in time.
Transformer-based planning for symbolic regression
Parshin Shojaee, Kazem Meidani, Amir Barati Farimani, and Chandan Reddy · 2024
Closest in time.
Evolutionary computation in the era of large language model: Survey and roadmap
Xingyu Wu, Sheng-hao Wu, Jibin Wu, Liang Feng, and Kay Chen Tan · 2024
Closest in time.