Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Large Language Models (LLMs) have sparked substantial interest and debate concerning their potential emergence of Theory of Mind (ToM) ability.
Chapter 50 bargaining with incomplete information
Lawrence M. Ausubel, Peter Cramton, and Raymond J. Deneckere. 2002 · 1945
Earlier work this paper cites.
Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters
Joseph L Fleiss. 1971 · 1971
Earlier work this paper cites.
Belief, truth and knowledge
David Malet Armstrong. 1973 · 1973
Earlier work this paper cites.
Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?
David Premack and Guy Woodruff. 1978 · 1978
Earlier work this paper cites.
Intentionality: An essay in the philosophy of mind
John R Searle. 1983 · 1983
Earlier work this paper cites.
Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”?
Simon Baron-Cohen, Alan M Leslie, and Uta Frith. 1985 · 1985
Earlier work this paper cites.
Intention, plans, and practical reason
Michael Bratman. 1987 · 1987
Earlier work this paper cites.
Précis of the intentional stance
Daniel C Dennett. 1988 · 1988
Earlier work this paper cites.
Explicit communication and bargaining outcome
Vincent P Crawford. 1990 · 1990
Earlier work this paper cites.
Why the child’s theory of mind really is a theory
Alison Gopnik and Henry M Wellman. 1992 · 1992
Earlier work this paper cites.
Young children’s understanding of belief constraints on intention
Louis J Moses. 1993 · 1993
Earlier work this paper cites.
Autism and theory of mind in everyday life
Uta Frith. 1994 · 1994
Earlier work this paper cites.
How Are Kids SMART?: Multiple Intelligences in the Classroom
Howard Gardner, Robert M Hanson, and Steve Hamilton. 1995 · 1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind
Simon Baron-Cohen. 1997 · 1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
Recognition of faux pas by normally developing children and children with asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism
Simon Baron-Cohen, Michelle O’riordan, Valerie Stone, Rosie Jones, and Kate Plaisted. 1999 · 1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
Negotiation
Max H. Bazerman, Jared R. Curhan, Don A. Moore, and Kathleen L. Valley. 2000 · 2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
The distinction between desire and intention: A folk-conceptual analysis
Bertram F Malle and Joshua Knobe. 2001 · 2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
Imaginary relish and exquisite torture: the elaborated intrusion theory of desire
David J Kavanagh, Jackie Andrade, and Jon May. 2005 · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Conceptual alignment in conversation
Michael F Schober. 2005 · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
The valley task: Understanding intention from goal-directed motion in typical development and autism
Fulvia Castelli. 2006 · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Theory of mind and the evolution of social intelligence
Valerie E Stone. 2006 · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
The development of morality
Elliot Turiel. 2008 · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Mindreaders: the cognitive basis of" theory of mind"
Ian Apperly. 2010 · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Early words that work: When and how virtual linguistic mimicry facilitates negotiation outcomes
Roderick I. Swaab, William W. Maddux, and Marwan Sinaceur. 2011 · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Higher-order theory of mind in negotiations under incomplete information
Harmen de Weerd, Rineke Verbrugge, and Bart Verheij. 2013 · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Reporting bias and knowledge acquisition
Jonathan Gordon and Benjamin Van Durme. 2013 · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Negotiation behavior
Dean G Pruitt. 2013 · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Negotiating language, meaning and intention: Strategy infrastructure as the outcome of using a strategy tool through transforming strategy objects
Cécile Belmondo and Caroline Sargis-Roussel. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
A study of social intelligence & academic achievement of college students of district srinagar, j&k, india
MY Ganaie and Hafiz Mudasir. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Integrating social power into the decision-making of cognitive agents
Gonçalo Duarte Garcia Pereira, Rui Prada, and Pedro Alexandre Santos. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences
Paul F. Christiano, Jan Leike, Tom B. Brown, Miljan Martic, Shane Legg, and Dario Amodei. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Negotiating with other minds: the role of recursive theory of mind in negotiation with incomplete information
Harmen de Weerd, Rineke Verbrugge, and Bart Verheij. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
How can memory-augmented neural networks pass a false-belief task?
Erin Grant, Aida Nematzadeh, and Thomas L. Griffiths. 2017 · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
“i can’t pay more” versus “it’s not worth more”: Divergent effects of constraint and disparagement rationales in negotiations
Alice J Lee and Daniel R Ames. 2017 · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Deal or no deal? end-to-end learning of negotiation dialogues
Mike Lewis, Denis Yarats, Yann Dauphin, Devi Parikh, and Dhruv Batra. 2017 · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Machine common sense concept paper
David Gunning. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Decoupling strategy and generation in negotiation dialogues
He He, Derek Chen, Anusha Balakrishnan, and Percy Liang. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Models and algorithms for human-aware task planning with integrated theory of mind
Anthony Favier, Shashank Shekhar, and Rachid Alami. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Mathematical capabilities of chatgpt
Simon Frieder, Luca Pinchetti, Ryan-Rhys Griffiths, Tommaso Salvatori, Thomas Lukasiewicz, Philipp Christian Petersen, Alexis Chevalier, and Julius Berner. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Understanding social reasoning in language models with language models
Kanishk Gandhi, Jan-Philipp Fränken, Tobias Gerstenberg, and Noah D. Goodman. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Language of bargaining
Mourad Heddaya, Solomon Dworkin, Chenhao Tan, Rob Voigt, and Alexander Zentefis. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Lion: Adversarial distillation of proprietary large language models
Yuxin Jiang, Chunkit Chan, Mingyang Chen, and Wei Wang. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Aida Nematzadeh, Kaylee Burns, Erin Grant, Alison Gopnik, and Thomas L. Griffiths. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Communicating with warmth in distributive negotiations is surprisingly counterproductive
Martha Jeong, Julia Minson, Michael Yeomans, and Francesca Gino. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Revisiting the evaluation of theory of mind through question answering
Matthew Le, Y-Lan Boureau, and Maximilian Nickel. 2019a · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Revisiting the evaluation of theory of mind through question answering
Matthew Le, Y-Lan Boureau, and Maximilian Nickel. 2019b · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Language models are few-shot learners
Tom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Sandhini Agarwal, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Gretchen Krueger, Tom Henighan, Rewon Child, Aditya Ramesh, Daniel M. Ziegler, Jeffrey Wu, Clemens Winter, Christopher Hesse, Mark Chen, Eric Sigler, Mateusz Litwin, Scott Gray, Benjamin Chess, Jack Clark, Christopher Berner, Sam McCandlish, Alec Radford, Ilya Sutskever, and Dario Amodei. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Bargaining experiments
Alvin E Roth. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Theory of mind and decision science: Towards a typology of tasks and computational models
Tessa Rusch, Saurabh Steixner-Kumar, Prashant Doshi, Michael Spezio, and Jan Gläscher. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Fantom: A benchmark for stress-testing machine theory of mind in interactions
Hyunwoo Kim, Melanie Sclar, Xuhui Zhou, Ronan Le Bras, Gunhee Kim, Yejin Choi, and Maarten Sap. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Theory of mind may have spontaneously emerged in large language models
Michal Kosinski. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Privacy in large language models: Attacks, defenses and future directions
Haoran Li, Yulin Chen, Jinglong Luo, Yan Kang, Xiaojin Zhang, Qi Hu, Chunkit Chan, and Yangqiu Song. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Analyzing leakage of personally identifiable information in language models
Nils Lukas, Ahmed Salem, Robert Sim, Shruti Tople, Lukas Wutschitz, and Santiago Zanella Béguelin. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Towards A holistic landscape of situated theory of mind in large language models
Ziqiao Ma, Jacob Sansom, Run Peng, and Joyce Chai. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Multi3nlu++: A multilingual, multi-intent, multi-domain dataset for natural language understanding in task-oriented dialogue
Nikita Moghe, Evgeniia Razumovskaia, Liane Guillou, Ivan Vulic, Anna Korhonen, and Alexandra Birch. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
OpenAI. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Leveraging large language models for multiple choice question answering
Joshua Robinson and David Wingate. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Minding language models’ (lack of) theory of mind: A plug-and-play multi-character belief tracker
Melanie Sclar, Sachin Kumar, Peter West, Alane Suhr, Yejin Choi, and Yulia Tsvetkov. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
How well do large language models perform on faux pas tests?
Natalie Shapira, Guy Zwirn, and Yoav Goldberg. 2023b · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Stanford alpaca: An instruction-following llama model
Rohan Taori, Ishaan Gulrajani, Tianyi Zhang, Yann Dubois, Xuechen Li, Carlos Guestrin, Percy Liang, and Tatsunori B. Hashimoto. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models
Hugo Touvron, Louis Martin, Kevin Stone, Peter Albert, Amjad Almahairi, Yasmine Babaei, Nikolay Bashlykov, Soumya Batra, Prajjwal Bhargava, Shruti Bhosale, Dan Bikel, Lukas Blecher, Cristian Canton-Ferrer, Moya Chen, Guillem Cucurull, David Esiobu, Jude Fernandes, Jeremy Fu, Wenyin Fu, Brian Fuller, Cynthia Gao, Vedanuj Goswami, Naman Goyal, Anthony Hartshorn, Saghar Hosseini, Rui Hou, Hakan Inan, Marcin Kardas, Viktor Kerkez, Madian Khabsa, Isabel Kloumann, Artem Korenev, Punit Singh Koura, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Thibaut Lavril, Jenya Lee, Diana Liskovich, Yinghai Lu, Yuning Mao, Xavier Martinet, Todor Mihaylov, Pushkar Mishra, Igor Molybog, Yixin Nie, Andrew Poulton, Jeremy Reizenstein, Rashi Rungta, Kalyan Saladi, Alan Schelten, Ruan Silva, Eric Michael Smith, Ranjan Subramanian, Xiaoqing Ellen Tan, Binh Tang, Ross Taylor, Adina Williams, Jian Xiang Kuan, Puxin Xu, Zheng Yan, Iliyan Zarov, Yuchen Zhang, Angela Fan, Melanie Kambadur, Sharan Narang, Aurélien Rodriguez, Robert Stojnic, Sergey Edunov, and Thomas Scialom. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Large language models fail on trivial alterations to theory-of-mind tasks
Tomer D. Ullman. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Survey on factuality in large language models: Knowledge, retrieval and domain-specificity
Cunxiang Wang, Xiaoze Liu, Yuanhao Yue, Xiangru Tang, Tianhang Zhang, Jiayang Cheng, Yunzhi Yao, Wenyang Gao, Xuming Hu, Zehan Qi, Yidong Wang, Linyi Yang, Jindong Wang, Xing Xie, Zheng Zhang, and Yue Zhang. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Can a machine know that we know what it knows
Oliver Whang. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
How far are large language models from agents with theory-of-mind?
Pei Zhou, Aman Madaan, Srividya Pranavi Potharaju, Aditya Gupta, Kevin R. McKee, Ari Holtzman, Jay Pujara, Xiang Ren, Swaroop Mishra, Aida Nematzadeh, Shyam Upadhyay, and Manaal Faruqui. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Exploring the potential of chatgpt on sentence level relations: A focus on temporal, causal, and discourse relations
Chunkit Chan, Jiayang Cheng, Weiqi Wang, Yuxin Jiang, Tianqing Fang, Xin Liu, and Yangqiu Song. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Zheye Deng, Chunkit Chan, Weiqi Wang, Yuxi Sun, Wei Fan, Tianshi Zheng, Yauwai Yim, and Yangqiu Song. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Time travel in llms: Tracing data contamination in large language models
Shahriar Golchin and Mihai Surdeanu. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Eventground: Narrative reasoning by grounding to eventuality-centric knowledge graphs
Cheng Jiayang, Lin Qiu, Chunkit Chan, Xin Liu, Yangqiu Song, and Zheng Zhang. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Task contamination: Language models may not be few-shot anymore
Changmao Li and Jeffrey Flanigan. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Privlm-bench: A multi-level privacy evaluation benchmark for language models
Haoran Li, Dadi Guo, Donghao Li, Wei Fan, Qi Hu, Xin Liu, Chunkit Chan, Duanyi Yao, Yuan Yao, and Yangqiu Song. 2024b · 2024
Closest in time.
Constrained reasoning chains for enhancing theory-of-mind in large language models
Zizheng Lin, Chunkit Chan, Yangqiu Song, and Xin Liu. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Clever hans or neural theory of mind? stress testing social reasoning in large language models
Natalie Shapira, Mosh Levy, Seyed Hossein Alavi, Xuhui Zhou, Yejin Choi, Yoav Goldberg, Maarten Sap, and Vered Shwartz. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Testing theory of mind in large language models and humans
James WA Strachan, Dalila Albergo, Giulia Borghini, Oriana Pansardi, Eugenio Scaliti, Saurabh Gupta, Krati Saxena, Alessandro Rufo, Stefano Panzeri, Guido Manzi, et al. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
CANDLE: iterative conceptualization and instantiation distillation from large language models for commonsense reasoning
Weiqi Wang, Tianqing Fang, Chunyang Li, Haochen Shi, Wenxuan Ding, Baixuan Xu, Zhaowei Wang, Jiaxin Bai, Xin Liu, Cheng Jiayang, Chunkit Chan, and Yangqiu Song. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Yauwai Yim, Chunkit Chan, Tianyu Shi, Zheye Deng, Wei Fan, Tianshi Zheng, and Yangqiu Song. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.