Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Bayesian optimal experimental design (OED) seeks experiments that maximize the expected information gain (EIG) in model parameters.
doi:10.1007/s10208-021-09537-5
T. Cui, S. Dolgov, Deep composition of tensor-trains using squared inverse Rosenblatt transports, Foundations of Computational Mathematics 22 (6) (2021) 1863–1922 · 1922
Earlier work this paper cites.
doi:10.1214/aoms/1177728069
D. V. Lindley, On a measure of the information provided by an experiment, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 27 (4) (1956) 986–1005 · 1956
Earlier work this paper cites.
doi:10.1214/ss/1177009939
K. Chaloner, I. Verdinelli, Bayesian experimental design: A review, Statistical Science 10 (3) (1995) 273–04 · 1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
doi:10.1109/7.705889
J. C. Spall, Implementation of the simultaneous perturbation algorithm for stochastic optimization, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems 34 (3) (1998) 817–823 · 1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
doi:10.1162/089976600300015015
F. Gers, J. Schmidhuber, F. Cummins, Learning to forget: continual prediction with LSTM, Neural Computation 12 (2000) 2451–2471 · 2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. P. Minka, Expectation Propagation for approximate Bayesian inference, in: Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI 2001), 2001, pp. 362–369
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
doi:10.1198/1061860032012
K. J. Ryan, Estimating expected information gains for experimental designs with application to the random fatigue-limit model, Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 12 (3) (2003) 585–603 · 2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Barber, F. Agakov, The IM Algorithm: A variational approach to information maximization, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 16, 2003, p. 201–208
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
V. I. Bogachev, A. V. Kolesnikov, K. V. Medvedev, Triangular transformations of measures, Sbornik: Mathematics 196 (3) (2005) 309
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
doi:10.1016/j.mbs.2005.07.009
J. Matis, T. Kiffe, T. Matis, D. Stevenson, Nonlinear stochastic modeling of aphid population growth, Mathematical Biosciences 198 (2) (2006) 148–168 · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Pukelsheim, Optimal Design of Experiments, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2006
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
doi:10.1093/oso/9780199296590.001.0001
A. Atkinson, A. Donev, R. Tobias, Optimum Experimental Designs, with SAS, Oxford University Press, 2007 · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Villani, Optimal Transport: Old and New, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Germany, 2008
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
doi:10.1111/j.1467-9876.2009.00696.x
C. S. Gillespie, A. Golightly, Bayesian inference for generalized stochastic population growth models with application to aphids, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics 59 (2) (2010) 341–357 · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
doi:10.1109/TIT.2010.2068870
X. Nguyen, M. J. Wainwright, M. I. Jordan, Estimating divergence functionals and the likelihood ratio by convex risk minimization, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 56 (11) (2010) 5847–5861 · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. G. Tabak, E. Vanden-Eijnden, Density estimation by dual ascent of the log-likelihood, Communications in Mathematical Sciences 8 (1) (2010) 217–233
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
doi:10.1007/s11222-011-9288-2
J.-M. Marin, P. Pudlo, C. P. Robert, R. J. Ryder, Approximate Bayesian computational methods, Statistics and Computing 22 (2011) 1167–1180 · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2012.08.013
X. Huan, Y. M. Marzouk, Simulation-based optimal Bayesian experimental design for nonlinear systems, Journal of Computational Physics 232 (1) (2013) 288–317 · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2012.07.022
T. A. El Moselhy, Y. M. Marzouk, Bayesian inference with optimal maps, Journal of Computational Physics 231 (23) (2012) 7815–7850 · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
doi:10.1016/j.cma.2013.02.017
Q. Long, M. Scavino, R. Tempone, S. Wang, Fast estimation of expected information gains for Bayesian experimental designs based on Laplace approximations, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 259 (2013) 24–39 · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. G. Tabak, C. V. Turner, A family of nonparametric density estimation algorithms, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 66 (2) (2013) 145–164
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3437-9
A. Doucet, N. Freitas, K. Murphy, S. Russell, Sequential Monte Carlo Methods in Practice, Springer New York, 2013 · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
doi:10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuantification.2014006730
X. Huan, Y. Marzouk, Gradient-based stochastic optimization methods in Bayesian experimental design, International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification 4 (6) (2014) · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. D. Hoffman, A. Gelman, The No-U-Turn sampler: adaptively setting path lengths in Hamiltonian Monte Carlo, Journal of Machine Learning Research 15 (47) (2014) 1593–1623
2014
Cited alongside, same era.
D. Rezende, S. Mohamed, Variational inference with normalizing flows, in: Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning, Vol. 37 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, PMLR, 2015, pp. 1530–1538
2015
Cited alongside, same era.
doi:10.1111/insr.12107
E. G. Ryan, C. C. Drovandi, J. M. McGree, A. N. Pettitt, A review of modern computational algorithms for Bayesian optimal design, International Statistical Review 84 (1) (2016) 128–154 · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
doi:10.1007/978-3-319-11259-6_23-1
Y. Marzouk, T. Moselhy, M. Parno, A. Spantini, Sampling via measure transport: An introduction, in: Handbook of Uncertainty Quantification, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2016, pp. 1–41 · 2016
doi:10.1109/ICASSP.2019.8683143
R. Prenger, R. Valle, B. Catanzaro, Waveglow: a flow-based generative network for speech synthesis, in: ICASSP 2019-2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), IEEE, 2019, pp. 3617–3621 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
L. Ardizzone, J. Kruse, C. Rother, U. Köthe, Analyzing inverse problems with invertible neural networks, in: International Conference on Learning Representations, 2019
2019
Later among the works it cites.
A. Foster, M. Jankowiak, M. O’Meara, Y. W. Teh, T. Rainforth, A unified stochastic gradient approach to designing Bayesian-optimal experiments, in: Proceedings of the Twenty Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, Vol. 108 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, PMLR, 2020, pp. 2959–2969
2020
Later among the works it cites.
Z. Ao, J. Li, An approximate KLD based experimental design for models with intractable likelihoods, in: Proceedings of the Twenty Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, Vol. 108 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, PMLR, 2020, pp. 3241–3251
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Cited alongside, same era.
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
D. P. Kingma, T. Salimans, R. Jozefowicz, X. Chen, I. Sutskever, M. Welling, Improved variational inference with inverse autoregressive flow, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 29, 2016
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
doi:10.1016/j.jprocont.2017.03.011
J. Yu, V. M. Zavala, M. Anitescu, A scalable design of experiments framework for optimal sensor placement, Journal of Process Control 67 (2018) 44–55 · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
C. Louizos, M. Welling, Multiplicative normalizing flows for variational Bayesian neural networks, in: Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, Vol. 70 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, PMLR, 2017, pp. 2218–2227
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
G. Papamakarios, T. Pavlakou, I. Murray, Masked autoregressive flow for density estimation, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30, 2017
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
doi:10.1016/j.cma.2018.01.053
J. Beck, B. M. Dia, L. F. Espath, Q. Long, R. Tempone, Fast Bayesian experimental design: Laplace-based importance sampling for the expected information gain, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 334 (2018) 523–553 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
2020
Later among the works it cites.
S. Kleinegesse, M. U. Gutmann, Bayesian experimental design for implicit models by mutual information neural estimation, in: Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning, Vol. 119 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, PMLR, 2020, pp. 5316–5326
2020
Later among the works it cites.
doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2020.2992934
I. Kobyzev, S. J. Prince, M. A. Brubaker, Normalizing flows: An introduction and review of current methods, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 43 (11) (2020) 3964–3979 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
doi:10.1109/TNNLS.2020.3042395
S. T. Radev, U. K. Mertens, A. Voss, L. Ardizzone, U. Köthe, BayesFlow: learning complex stochastic models with invertible neural networks, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems 33 (4) (2020) 1452–1466 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
D. R. Ivanova, A. Foster, S. Kleinegesse, M. U. Gutmann, T. Rainforth, Implicit deep adaptive design: Policy-based experimental design without likelihoods, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34 (2021) 25785–25798
2021
Later among the works it cites.
G. Papamakarios, E. T. Nalisnick, D. J. Rezende, S. Mohamed, B. Lakshminarayanan, Normalizing flows for probabilistic modeling and inference, Journal of Machine Learnine Research 22 (57) (2021) 1–64
2021
Later among the works it cites.
doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i9.16997
J. Kruse, G. Detommaso, U. Köthe, R. Scheichl, HINT: Hierarchical invertible neural transport for density estimation and Bayesian inference, in: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 35, 2021, pp. 8191–8199 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110194
G. A. Padmanabha, N. Zabaras, Solving inverse problems using conditional invertible neural networks, Journal of Computational Physics 433 (2021) 110194 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Y. Song, C. Durkan, I. Murray, S. Ermon, Maximum likelihood training of score-based diffusion models, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34, 2021, pp. 1415–1428
2021
Later among the works it cites.
doi:10.1214/23-STS915
T. Rainforth, A. Foster, D. R. Ivanova, F. B. Smith, Modern Bayesian experimental design, Statistical Science 39 (1) (2023) 100–114 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
doi:10.1137/21M1466499
K. Wu, P. Chen, O. Ghattas, A fast and scalable computational framework for large-scale high-dimensional Bayesian optimal experimental design, SIAM/ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification 11 (1) (2023) 235–261 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
R. Baptista, Y. Marzouk, O. Zahm, On the representation and learning of monotone triangular transport maps, Foundations of Computational Mathematics (2023) 1–46 doi:10.1007/s10208-023-09630-x
2023
Later among the works it cites.
N. Kennamer, S. Walton, A. Ihler, Design amortization for Bayesian optimal experimental design, in: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 37, 2023, pp. 8220–8227
2023
Later among the works it cites.
doi:10.1016/j.cma.2023.116304
W. Shen, X. Huan, Bayesian sequential optimal experimental design for nonlinear models using policy gradient reinforcement learning, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 416 (2023) 116304 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
X. Huan, J. Jagalur, Y. Marzouk, Optimal experimental design: Formulations and computations, Acta Numerica 33 (2024) 715–840
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.