LLMorpheus: Mutation Testing using Large Language Models

Hints on Test Data Selection: Help for the Practicing Programmer

R.A. DeMillo, R.J. Lipton, and F.G. Sayward. 1978 · 1978

Earlier work this paper cites.

Constraint-Based Automatic Test Data Generation

Richard A. DeMillo and A. Jefferson Offutt. 1991 · 1991

Earlier work this paper cites.

MuJava: a mutation system for Java. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Software Engineering (Shanghai, China) (ICSE ’06) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 827–830

Yu-Seung Ma, Jeff Offutt, and Yong-Rae Kwon. 2006 · 2006

Earlier work this paper cites.

Jumble Java Byte Code to Measure the Effectiveness of Unit Tests. In Proceedings of the Testing: Academic and Industrial Conference Practice and Research Techniques - MUTATION (TAICPART-MUTATION ’07) . IEEE Computer Society, USA, 169–175

Sean A. Irvine, Tin Pavlinic, Leonard Trigg, John G. Cleary, Stuart Inglis, and Mark Utting. 2007 · 2007

Earlier work this paper cites.

Randoop: Feedback-directed Random Testing for Java. In Companion to the 22Nd ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-oriented Programming Systems and Applications Companion (Montreal, Quebec, Canada) (OOPSLA ’07) . ACM, New York, NY, USA, 815–816

Carlos Pacheco and Michael D. Ernst. 2007 · 2007

Earlier work this paper cites.

Judy – a mutation testing tool for Java

L. Madeyski. 2010 · 2008

Earlier work this paper cites.

Higher Order Mutation Testing

Yue Jia and Mark Harman. 2009 · 2009

Earlier work this paper cites.

Javalanche: efficient mutation testing for Java. In Proceedings of the 7th Joint Meeting of the European Software Engineering Conference and the ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on The Foundations of Software Engineering (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) (ESEC/FSE ’09) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 297–298

David Schuler and Andreas Zeller. 2009 · 2009

Earlier work this paper cites.

Mutation-driven generation of unit tests and oracles. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis, ISSTA 2010, Trento, Italy, July 12-16, 2010 , Paolo Tonella and Alessandro Orso (Eds.). ACM, 147–158

Gordon Fraser and Andreas Zeller. 2010 · 2010

Earlier work this paper cites.

An Analysis and Survey of the Development of Mutation Testing

Yue Jia and Mark Harman. 2011 · 2011

Earlier work this paper cites.

The Major mutation framework: efficient and scalable mutation analysis for Java. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis (San Jose, CA, USA) (ISSTA 2014) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 433–436

René Just. 2014 · 2014

Earlier work this paper cites.

Are mutants a valid substitute for real faults in software testing?. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering (FSE 2014) (Hong Kong, China). 654–665

René Just, Darioush Jalali, Laura Inozemtseva, Michael D. Ernst, Reid Holmes, and Gordon Fraser. 2014 · 2014

Earlier work this paper cites.

Higher accuracy and lower run time: Efficient mutation analysis using non-redundant mutation operators

René Just and Franz Schweiggert. 2015 · 2015

Earlier work this paper cites.

Static analysis of event-driven Node.js JavaScript applications. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications, OOPSLA 2015, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, October 25-30, 2015 , Jonathan Aldrich and Patrick Eugster (Eds.). ACM, 505–519

Magnus Madsen, Frank Tip, and Ondrej Lhoták. 2015 · 2015

Earlier work this paper cites.

PIT: a practical mutation testing tool for Java (demo). In Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis (Saarbrücken, Germany) (ISSTA 2016) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 449–452

Henry Coles, Thomas Laurent, Christopher Henard, Mike Papadakis, and Anthony Ventresque. 2016 · 2016

Earlier work this paper cites.

The care and feeding of wild-caught mutants. In Proceedings of the 2017 11th Joint Meeting on Foundations of Software Engineering (Paderborn, Germany) (ESEC/FSE 2017) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 511–522

David Bingham Brown, Michael Vaughn, Ben Liblit, and Thomas Reps. 2017 · 2017

Earlier work this paper cites.

Higher order mutation testing: A Systematic Literature Review

Ahmed S. Ghiduk, Moheb R. Girgis, and Marwa H. Shehata. 2017 · 2017

Earlier work this paper cites.

Does choice of mutation tool matter?

Rahul Gopinath, Iftekhar Ahmed, Mohammad Amin Alipour, Carlos Jensen, and Alex Groce. 2017 · 2017

Earlier work this paper cites.

Inferring Mutant Utility from Program Context. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis (ISSTA) . Santa Barbara, CA, USA, 284–294

René Just, Bob Kurtz, and Paul Ammann. 2017 · 2017

Earlier work this paper cites.

Automated Test Case Generation as a Many-Objective Optimisation Problem with Dynamic Selection of the Targets

Annibale Panichella, Fitsum Meshesha Kifetew, and Paolo Tonella. 2018 · 2017

Cited alongside, same era.

BugJS: A Benchmark of JavaScript Bugs. In Proceedings of 12th IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST)

Péter Gyimesi, Béla Vancsics, Andrea Stocco, Davood Mazinanian, Árpád Beszédes, Rudolf Ferenc, and Ali Mesbah. 2019 · 2019

Cited alongside, same era.

Bart: Denoising sequence-to-sequence pre-training for natural language generation, translation, and comprehension

Original

Mike Lewis, Yinhan Liu, Naman Goyal, Marjan Ghazvininejad, Abdelrahman Mohamed, Omer Levy, Ves Stoyanov, and Luke Zettlemoyer. 2019 · 2019

Cited alongside, same era.

Mutation Testing Advances: An Analysis and Survey

Mike Papadakis, Marinos Kintis, Jie Zhang, Yue Jia, Yves Le Traon, and Mark Harman. 2019 · 2019

Cited alongside, same era.

Towards Objective-Tailored Genetic Improvement Through Large Language Models. In IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Genetic Improvement, GI@ICSE 2023, Melbourne, Australia, May 20, 2023 . IEEE, 19–20

Sungmin Kang and Shin Yoo. 2023 · 2023

Later among the works it cites.

Efficient Mutation Testing via Pre-Trained Language Models

Original

Ahmed Khanfir, Renzo Degiovanni, Mike Papadakis, and Yves Le Traon. 2023 · 2023

Later among the works it cites.

Fuzzing for CPS Mutation Testing. In 38th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, ASE 2023, Luxembourg, September 11-15, 2023 . IEEE, 1377–1389

Jaekwon Lee, Enrico Viganò, Oscar Cornejo, Fabrizio Pastore, and Lionel C. Briand. 2023 · 2023

Later among the works it cites.

CodaMOSA: Escaping Coverage Plateaus in Test Generation with Pre-trained Large Language Models. In 45th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)

Caroline Lemieux, Jeevana Priya Inala, Shuvendu K. Lahiri, and Siddhartha Sen. 2023 · 2023

Later among the works it cites.