Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
In this paper, we present our system for the SemEval Task 5, The Legal Argument Reasoning Task in Civil Procedure Challenge.
Roberta: A robustly optimized bert pretraining approach
Yinhan Liu, Myle Ott, Naman Goyal, Jingfei Du, Mandar Joshi, Danqi Chen, Omer Levy, Mike Lewis, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Veselin Stoyanov. 2019 · 1907
Earlier work this paper cites.
Legal-bert: The muppets straight out of law school
Ilias Chalkidis, Manos Fergadiotis, Prodromos Malakasiotis, Nikolaos Aletras, and Ion Androutsopoulos. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Answering legal questions by learning neural attentive text representation
Phi Manh Kien, Ha-Thanh Nguyen, Ngo Xuan Bach, Vu Tran, Minh Le Nguyen, and Tu Minh Phuong. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Echr: Legal corpus for argument mining
Prakash Poudyal, Jaromír Šavelka, Aagje Ieven, Marie Francine Moens, Teresa Goncalves, and Paulo Quaresma. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
A free format legal question answering system
Soha Khazaeli, Janardhana Punuru, Chad Morris, Sanjay Sharma, Bert Staub, Michael Cole, Sunny Chiu-Webster, and Dhruv Sakalley. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Effectively leveraging bert for legal document classification
Nut Limsopatham. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
jurbert: A romanian bert model for legal judgement prediction
Mihai Masala, Radu Cristian Alexandru Iacob, Ana Sabina Uban, Marina Cidota, Horia Velicu, Traian Rebedea, and Marius Popescu. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Automatic resolution of domain name disputes
Wayan Oger Vihikan, Meladel Mistica, Inbar Levy, Andrew Christie, and Timothy Baldwin. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
The legal argument reasoning task in civil procedure
Leonard Bongard, Lena Held, and Ivan Habernal. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Scaling instruction-finetuned language models
Hyung Won Chung, Le Hou, Shayne Longpre, Barret Zoph, Yi Tay, William Fedus, Yunxuan Li, Xuezhi Wang, Mostafa Dehghani, Siddhartha Brahma, et al. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Detecting relevant differences between similar legal texts
Xiang Li, Jiaxun Gao, Diana Inkpen, and Wolfgang Alschner. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
What makes good in-context examples for gpt-3?
Jiachang Liu, Dinghan Shen, Yizhe Zhang, William B Dolan, Lawrence Carin, and Weizhu Chen. 2022a · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Interpretable online log analysis using large language models with prompt strategies
Yilun Liu, Shimin Tao, Weibin Meng, Jingyu Wang, Wenbing Ma, Yuhang Chen, Yanqing Zhao, Hao Yang, and Yanfei Jiang. 2022b · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Dynamic prompt learning via policy gradient for semi-structured mathematical reasoning
Pan Lu, Liang Qiu, Kai-Wei Chang, Ying Nian Wu, Song-Chun Zhu, Tanmay Rajpurohit, Peter Clark, and Ashwin Kalyan. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models
Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Fei Xia, Ed Chi, Quoc V Le, Denny Zhou, et al. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Legal prompting: Teaching a language model to think like a lawyer
Fangyi Yu, Lee Quartey, and Frank Schilder. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Can gpt-3 perform statutory reasoning?
Andrew Blair-Stanek, Nils Holzenberger, and Benjamin Van Durme. 2023 · 2023
Retrieval-based evaluation for llms: A case study in korean legal qa
Cheol Ryu, Seolhwa Lee, Subeen Pang, Chanyeol Choi, Hojun Choi, Myeonggee Min, and Jy-Yong Sohn. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Text classification via large language models
Xiaofei Sun, Xiaoya Li, Jiwei Li, Fei Wu, Shangwei Guo, Tianwei Zhang, and Guoyin Wang. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models
Hugo Touvron, Louis Martin, Kevin Stone, Peter Albert, Amjad Almahairi, Yasmine Babaei, Nikolay Bashlykov, Soumya Batra, Prajjwal Bhargava, Shruti Bhosale, et al. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
On the role of negative precedent in legal outcome prediction
Josef Valvoda, Ryan Cotterell, and Simone Teufel. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Maud: An expert-annotated legal nlp dataset for merger agreement understanding
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Cited alongside, same era.
Model interpretability and rationale extraction by input mask optimization
Marc Brinner and Sina Zarrieß. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Chatgpt may pass the bar exam soon, but has a long way to go for the lexglue benchmark
Ilias Chalkidis. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Bb25hlegalsum: Leveraging bm25 and bert-based clustering for the summarization of legal documents
Leonardo de Andrade and Karin Becker. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Custodiai: A system for predicting child custody outcomes
Yining Juan, Chung-Chi Chen, Hsin-Hsi Chen, and Daw-Wei Wang. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Chain of reference prompting helps llm to think like a lawyer
Aditya Kuppa, Nikon Rasumov-Rahe, and Marc Voses. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
A survey on legal question–answering systems
Jorge Martinez-Gil. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Steven H Wang, Antoine Scardigli, Leonard Tang, Wei Chen, Dimitry Levkin, Anya Chen, Spencer Ball, Thomas Woodside, Oliver Zhang, and Dan Hendrycks. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Large language models as analogical reasoners
Michihiro Yasunaga, Xinyun Chen, Yujia Li, Panupong Pasupat, Jure Leskovec, Percy Liang, Ed H Chi, and Denny Zhou. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Exploring the effectiveness of prompt engineering for legal reasoning tasks
Fangyi Yu, Lee Quartey, and Frank Schilder. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Ruizhe Zhang, Qingyao Ai, Yueyue Wu, Yixiao Ma, and Yiqun Liu. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Legalbench: A collaboratively built benchmark for measuring legal reasoning in large language models
Neel Guha, Julian Nyarko, Daniel Ho, Christopher Ré, Adam Chilton, Alex Chohlas-Wood, Austin Peters, Brandon Waldon, Daniel Rockmore, Diego Zambrano, et al. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
SemEval-2024 Task 5: Argument Reasoning in Civil Procedure
Lena Held and Ivan Habernal. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Tree of thoughts: Deliberate problem solving with large language models
Shunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran, Tom Griffiths, Yuan Cao, and Karthik Narasimhan. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.