Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
The pervasive spread of misinformation and disinformation in social media underscores the critical importance of detecting media bias.
Classifying party affiliation from political speech
Bei Yu, Stefan Kaufmann, and Daniel Diermeier. 2008 · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
We can detect your bias: Predicting the political ideology of news articles
Ramy Baly, Giovanni Da San Martino, James Glass, and Preslav Nakov. 2020 · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Shedding (a thousand points of) light on biased language
Tae Yano, Philip Resnik, and Noah A Smith. 2010 · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Political ideology detection using recursive neural networks
Mohit Iyyer, Peter Enns, Jordan Boyd-Graber, and Philip Resnik. 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Demographic dialectal variation in social media: A case study of african-american english
Su Lin Blodgett, Lisa Green, and Brendan O’Connor. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Learning to flip the bias of news headlines
Wei-Fan Chen, Henning Wachsmuth, Khalid Al-Khatib, and Benno Stein. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
How stereotypes are shared through language: a review and introduction of the aocial categories and stereotypes communication (scsc) framework
Camiel J Beukeboom and Christian Burgers. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big?
Emily M Bender, Timnit Gebru, Angelina McMillan-Major, and Shmargaret Shmitchell. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Mitigating political bias in language models through reinforced calibration
Ruibo Liu, Chenyan Jia, Jason Wei, Guangxuan Xu, Lili Wang, and Soroush Vosoughi. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Demographic-aware language model fine-tuning as a bias mitigation technique
Aparna Garimella, Rada Mihalcea, and Akhash Amarnath. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Debiasing pre-trained language models via efficient fine-tuning
Michael Gira, Ruisu Zhang, and Kangwook Lee. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Przemyslaw Joniak and Akiko Aizawa. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Yujian Liu, Xinliang Frederick Zhang, David Wegsman, Nick Beauchamp, and Lu Wang. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Perturbation augmentation for fairer nlp
Rebecca Qian, Candace Ross, Jude Fernandes, Eric Smith, Douwe Kiela, and Adina Williams. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
“i’m sorry to hear that”: Finding new biases in language models with a holistic descriptor dataset
Eric Michael Smith, Melissa Hall, Melanie Kambadur, Eleonora Presani, and Adina Williams. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Text style transfer for bias mitigation using masked language modeling
Ewoenam Kwaku Tokpo and Toon Calders. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Using artificial French data to understand the emergence of gender bias in transformer language models
The political biases of chatgpt
David Rozado. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
The silence of the llms: Cross-lingual analysis of political bias and false information prevalence in chatgpt, google bard, and bing chat
Aleksandra Urman and Mykola Makhortykh. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Nationality bias in text generation
Pranav Narayanan Venkit, Sanjana Gautam, Ruchi Panchanadikar, Ting-Hao’Kenneth’ Huang, and Shomir Wilson. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Unraveling downstream gender bias from large language models: A study on AI educational writing assistance
Thiemo Wambsganss, Xiaotian Su, Vinitra Swamy, Seyed Neshaei, Roman Rietsche, and Tanja Käser. 2023a · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
A causal view of entity bias in (large) language models
Fei Wang, Wenjie Mo, Yiwei Wang, Wenxuan Zhou, and Muhao Chen. 2023 · 2023
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Lina Conti and Guillaume Wisniewski. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Robbie: Robust bias evaluation of large generative language models
David Esiobu, Xiaoqing Tan, Saghar Hosseini, Megan Ung, Yuchen Zhang, Jude Fernandes, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Eleonora Presani, Adina Williams, and Eric Smith. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Bias of ai-generated content: an examination of news produced by large language models
Xiao Fang, Shangkun Che, Minjia Mao, Hongzhe Zhang, Ming Zhao, and Xiaohang Zhao. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Bias and fairness in large language models: A survey
Isabel O Gallegos, Ryan A Rossi, Joe Barrow, Md Mehrab Tanjim, Sungchul Kim, Franck Dernoncourt, Tong Yu, Ruiyi Zhang, and Nesreen K Ahmed. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
The capacity for moral self-correction in large language models
Deep Ganguli, Amanda Askell, Nicholas Schiefer, Thomas Liao, Kamilė Lukošiūtė, Anna Chen, Anna Goldie, Azalia Mirhoseini, Catherine Olsson, Danny Hernandez, et al. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Understanding the effect of model compression on social bias in large language models
Gustavo Gonçalves and Emma Strubell. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
“fifty shades of bias”: Normative ratings of gender bias in gpt generated english text
Rishav Hada, Agrima Seth, Harshita Diddee, and Kalika Bali. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Ruoling Peng, Kang Liu, Po Yang, Zhipeng Yuan, and Shunbao Li. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Later among the works it cites.
Deep learning on a healthy data diet: Finding important examples for fairness
Abdelrahman Zayed, Prasanna Parthasarathi, Gonçalo Mordido, Hamid Palangi, Samira Shabanian, and Sarath Chandar. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Evaluating gender bias in large language models via chain-of-thought prompting
Masahiro Kaneko, Danushka Bollegala, Naoaki Okazaki, and Timothy Baldwin. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Luyang Lin, Lingzhi Wang, Xiaoyan Zhao, Jing Li, and Kam-Fai Wong. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Teller: A trustworthy framework for explainable, generalizable and controllable fake news detection
Hui Liu, Wenya Wang, Haoru Li, and Haoliang Li. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
More human than human: Measuring chatgpt political bias
Fabio Motoki, Valdemar Pinho Neto, and Victor Rodrigues. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
The political preferences of llms
David Rozado. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Systematic biases in llm simulations of debates
Amir Taubenfeld, Yaniv Dover, Roi Reichart, and Ariel Goldstein. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.