Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Despite differing from the human language processing mechanism in implementation and algorithms, current language models demonstrate remarkable human-like or surpassing language capabilities.
J. Hale, “A probabilistic earley parser as a psycholinguistic model,” in Second meeting of the north american chapter of the association for computational linguistics
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Hale, “The information conveyed by words in sentences,” Journal of psycholinguistic research
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Hale, “Uncertainty about the rest of the sentence,” Cognitive science
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. F. Boston, J. Hale, R. Kliegl, U. Patil, and S. Vasishth, “Parsing costs as predictors of reading difficulty: An evaluation using the potsdam sentence corpus,” Journal of Eye Movement Research
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
V. Demberg and F. Keller, “Data from eye-tracking corpora as evidence for theories of syntactic processing complexity,” Cognition
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Wu, A. Bachrach, C. Cardenas, and W. Schuler, “Complexity metrics in an incremental right-corner parser,” in Proceedings of the 48th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Mikolov, S. Kombrink, L. Burget, J. Černockỳ, and S. Khudanpur, “Extensions of recurrent neural network language model,” in 2011 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP)
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. L. Frank and R. Bod, “Insensitivity of the human sentence-processing system to hierarchical structure,” Psychological science
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Rauzy and P. Blache, “Robustness and processing difficulty models. a pilot study for eye-tracking data on the french treebank,” in Proceedings of the First Workshop on Eye-tracking and Natural Language Processing
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Brennan, Y. Nir, U. Hasson, R. Malach, D. J. Heeger, and L. Pylkkänen, “Syntactic structure building in the anterior temporal lobe during natural story listening,” Brain and language
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. L. Frank, L. J. Otten, G. Galli, and G. Vigliocco, “Word surprisal predicts n400 amplitude during reading,” 2013
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. L. Frank, “Uncertainty reduction as a measure of cognitive load in sentence comprehension,” Topics in cognitive science
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. J. Anderson, E. Bruni, U. Bordignon, M. Poesio, and M. Baroni, “Of words, eyes and brains: Correlating image-based distributional semantic models with neural representations of concepts,” in Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. Wehbe, A. Vaswani, K. Knight, and T. Mitchell, “Aligning context-based statistical models of language with brain activity during reading,” in Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Pennington, R. Socher, and C. D. Manning, “Glove: Global vectors for word representation,” in Proceedings of the 2014 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP)
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Q. Le and T. Mikolov, “Distributed representations of sentences and documents,” in International conference on machine learning
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. Wehbe, A. Vaswani, K. Knight, and T. M. Mitchell, “Aligning context-based statistical models of language with brain activity during reading,” in Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. Wehbe, B. Murphy, P. P. Talukdar, A. Fyshe, A. Ramdas, and T. M. Mitchell, “Simultaneously uncovering the patterns of brain regions involved in different story reading subprocesses,” PLoS ONE
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Fu, J. Guo, B. Qin, W. Che, H. Wang, and T. Liu, “Learning semantic hierarchies via word embeddings,” in Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Hale, D. Lutz, W.-M. Luh, and J. Brennan, “Modeling fmri time courses with linguistic structure at various grain sizes,” in Proceedings of the 6th workshop on cognitive modeling and computational linguistics
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. L. Frank, L. J. Otten, G. Galli, and G. Vigliocco, “The erp response to the amount of information conveyed by words in sentences,” Brain and language
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Huettig and N. Mani, “Is prediction necessary to understand language? probably not,” Language, Cognition and Neuroscience
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. R. Brennan, E. P. Stabler, S. E. Van Wagenen, W.-M. Luh, and J. T. Hale, “Abstract linguistic structure correlates with temporal activity during naturalistic comprehension,” Brain and language
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. M. Henderson, W. Choi, M. W. Lowder, and F. Ferreira, “Language structure in the brain: A fixation-related fmri study of syntactic surprisal in reading,” Neuroimage
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Linzen and T. F. Jaeger, “Uncertainty and expectation in sentence processing: Evidence from subcategorization distributions,” Cognitive science
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Hale, “Information-theoretical complexity metrics,” Language and Linguistics Compass
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Brennan, “Naturalistic sentence comprehension in the brain,” Language and Linguistics Compass
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. J. Anderson, B. D. Zinszer, and R. D. Raizada, “Representational similarity encoding for fmri: Pattern-based synthesis to predict brain activity using stimulus-model-similarities,” NeuroImage
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. G. Huth, W. A. de Heer, T. L. Griffiths, F. E. Theunissen, and J. L. Gallant, “Natural speech reveals the semantic maps that tile human cerebral cortex,” Nature
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. Xu, B. Murphy, and A. Fyshe, “Brainbench: A brain-image test suite for distributional semantic models,” in Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. W. Barsalou, “What does semantic tiling of the cortex tell us about semantics?,” Neuropsychologia
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, Ł. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, “Attention is all you need,” Advances in neural information processing systems
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Nelson, S. Dehaene, C. Pallier, and J. Hale, “Entropy reduction correlates with temporal lobe activity,” in Proceedings of the 7th workshop on cognitive modeling and computational linguistics (CMCL 2017)
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. R. Brennan and L. Pylkkänen, “Meg evidence for incremental sentence composition in the anterior temporal lobe,” Cognitive science
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. J. Nelson, I. El Karoui, K. Giber, X. Yang, L. Cohen, H. Koopman, S. S. Cash, L. Naccache, J. T. Hale, C. Pallier, et al
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
W. A. de Heer, A. G. Huth, T. L. Griffiths, J. L. Gallant, and F. E. Theunissen, “The hierarchical cortical organization of human speech processing,” The Journal of Neuroscience
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. J. Anderson, D. Kiela, S. Clark, and M. Poesio, “Visually grounded and textual semantic models differentially decode brain activity associated with concrete and abstract nouns,” Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Kriegeskorte and P. K. Douglas, “Cognitive computational neuroscience,” Nature neuroscience
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Sun, S. Wang, and C. Zong, “Memory, show the way: Memory based few shot word representation learning,” in Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Jain and A. G. Huth, “Incorporating context into language encoding models for fmri,” bioRxiv
J. S. Bowers, G. Malhotra, M. Dujmović, M. L. Montero, C. Tsvetkov, V. Biscione, G. Puebla, F. Adolfi, J. E. Hummel, R. F. Heaton, et al
2022
Later among the works it cites.
M. Toneva, T. M. Mitchell, and L. Wehbe, “Combining computational controls with natural text reveals aspects of meaning composition,” Nature computational science
2022
Later among the works it cites.
X. Zhang, S. Wang, N. Lin, J. Zhang, and C. Zong, “Probing word syntactic representations in the brain by a feature elimination method,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2022
Later among the works it cites.
M. Baroni, “On the proper role of linguistically-oriented deep net analysis in linguistic theorizing,” Algebraic structures in natural language
2022
Later among the works it cites.
J. T. Hale, L. Campanelli, J. Li, S. Bhattasali, C. Pallier, and J. R. Brennan, “Neurocomputational models of language processing,” Annual Review of Linguistics
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
M. P. Broderick, A. J. Anderson, G. M. Di Liberto, M. J. Crosse, and E. C. Lalor, “Electrophysiological correlates of semantic dissimilarity reflect the comprehension of natural, narrative speech,” Current Biology
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
F. Pereira, B. Lou, B. Pritchett, S. Ritter, S. J. Gershman, N. Kanwisher, M. Botvinick, and E. Fedorenko, “Toward a universal decoder of linguistic meaning from brain activation,” Nature communications
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
N. Hollenstein, J. Rotsztejn, M. Troendle, A. Pedroni, C. Zhang, and N. Langer, “Zuco, a simultaneous eeg and eye-tracking resource for natural sentence reading,” Scientific data
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
A. M. Zador, “A critique of pure learning and what artificial neural networks can learn from animal brains,” Nature communications
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
R. M. Cichy and D. Kaiser, “Deep neural networks as scientific models,” Trends in cognitive sciences
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Radford, J. Wu, R. Child, D. Luan, D. Amodei, I. Sutskever, et al
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
2022
Later among the works it cites.
M. Heilbron, K. Armeni, J.-M. Schoffelen, P. Hagoort, and F. P. De Lange, “A hierarchy of linguistic predictions during natural language comprehension,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2022
Later among the works it cites.
X. Zhang, S. Wang, N. Lin, and C. Zong, “Is the brain mechanism for hierarchical structure building universal across languages? an fmri study of chinese and english,” in Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
2022
Later among the works it cites.
S. R. Oota, J. Arora, M. Gupta, R. S. Bapi, and M. Toneva, “Deep learning for brain encoding and decoding,” in Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society
2022
Later among the works it cites.
C. Caucheteux, A. Gramfort, and J.-R. King, “Deep language algorithms predict semantic comprehension from brain activity,” Scientific reports
2022
Later among the works it cites.
2022
Later among the works it cites.
S. R. Oota, F. Alexandre, and X. Hinaut, “Long-term plausibility of language models and neural dynamics during narrative listening,” in Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society
2022
Later among the works it cites.
2022
Later among the works it cites.
S. R. Oota, M. Gupta, and M. Toneva, “Joint processing of linguistic properties in brains and language models,” 2022
2022
Later among the works it cites.
S. R. Oota, J. Arora, V. Agarwal, M. Marreddy, M. Gupta, and B. Surampudi, “Neural language taskonomy: Which NLP tasks are the most predictive of fMRI brain activity?,” in Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies
2022
Later among the works it cites.
A. Goldstein, Z. Zada, E. Buchnik, M. Schain, A. Price, B. Aubrey, S. A. Nastase, A. Feder, D. Emanuel, A. Cohen, et al
2022
Later among the works it cites.
C. Caucheteux and J.-R. King, “Brains and algorithms partially converge in natural language processing,” Communications biology
2022
Later among the works it cites.
S. Chan, A. Santoro, A. Lampinen, J. Wang, A. Singh, P. Richemond, J. McClelland, and F. Hill, “Data distributional properties drive emergent in-context learning in transformers,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
2022
Later among the works it cites.
S. Wang, Y. Zhang, X. Zhang, J. Sun, N. Lin, J. Zhang, and C. Zong, “An fmri dataset for concept representation with semantic feature annotations,” Scientific Data
2022
Later among the works it cites.
S. Wang, X. Zhang, J. Zhang, and C. Zong, “A synchronized multimodal neuroimaging dataset for studying brain language processing,” Scientific Data
2022
Later among the works it cites.
G. Zhang, P. Yao, G. Ma, J. Wang, J. Zhou, L. Huang, P. Xu, L. Chen, S. Chen, J. Gu, et al
2022
Later among the works it cites.
O. Guest and A. E. Martin, “On logical inference over brains, behaviour, and artificial neural networks,” Computational Brain & Behavior
2023
Later among the works it cites.
N. Kanwisher, M. Khosla, and K. Dobs, “Using artificial neural networks to ask ‘why’questions of minds and brains,” Trends in Neurosciences
2023
Later among the works it cites.
S. Arana, J. Pesnot Lerousseau, and P. Hagoort, “Deep learning models to study sentence comprehension in the human brain,” Language, Cognition and Neuroscience
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
E. Kasneci, K. Seßler, S. Küchemann, M. Bannert, D. Dementieva, F. Fischer, U. Gasser, G. Groh, S. Günnemann, E. Hüllermeier, et al
2023
Later among the works it cites.
M. Stanojević, J. R. Brennan, D. Dunagan, M. Steedman, and J. T. Hale, “Modeling structure-building in the brain with ccg parsing and large language models,” Cognitive Science
2023
Later among the works it cites.
J. von Seth, V. I. Nicholls, L. K. Tyler, and A. Clarke, “Recurrent connectivity supports higher-level visual and semantic object representations in the brain,” Mar 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
Z. Fu, X. Wang, X. Wang, H. Yang, J. Wang, T. Wei, X. Liao, Z. Liu, H. Chen, and Y. Bi, “Different computational relations in language are captured by distinct brain systems,” Cerebral Cortex
2023
Later among the works it cites.
H. Balabin, A. G. Liuzzi, J. Sun, P. Dupont, R. Vanderberghe, and M.-F. Moens, “Investigating neural fit approaches for sentence embedding model paradigms,” in ECAI 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
K. L. Aw and M. Toneva, “Training language models to summarize narratives improves brain alignment,” in The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations
2023
Later among the works it cites.
C. Caucheteux, A. Gramfort, and J.-R. King, “Evidence of a predictive coding hierarchy in the human brain listening to speech,” Nature human behaviour
2023
Later among the works it cites.
Main Track
S. Jingyuan and M. Marie-Francine, “Fine-tuned vs. prompt-tuned supervised representations: Which better account for brain language representations?,” in Proceedings of the Thirty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-23 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Main Track
S. Jingyuan, Z. Xiaohan, and M. Marie-Francine, “Tuning in to neural encoding: Linking human brain and artificial supervised representations of language,” in Proceedings of the 26th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence ECAI-23 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
J. Zou, Y. Zhang, J. Li, X. Tian, and N. Ding, “Human attention during goal-directed reading comprehension relies on task optimization,” jun 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
B. Min, H. Ross, E. Sulem, A. P. B. Veyseh, T. H. Nguyen, O. Sainz, E. Agirre, I. Heintz, and D. Roth, “Recent advances in natural language processing via large pre-trained language models: A survey,” ACM Computing Surveys
2023
Later among the works it cites.
J. Von Oswald, E. Niklasson, E. Randazzo, J. Sacramento, A. Mordvintsev, A. Zhmoginov, and M. Vladymyrov, “Transformers learn in-context by gradient descent,” in International Conference on Machine Learning
2023
Later among the works it cites.