Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
We show that GPT-4's reasoning and planning capabilities extend to the 1993 first-person shooter Doom.
G. Aloupis, E. D. Demaine, A. Guo, and G. Viglietta, “Classic nintendo games are (computationally) hard,” Theoretical Computer Science , vol. 586, pp. 135–160, 2015, fun with Algorithms. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304397515001735
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Alvernaz and J. Togelius, “Autoencoder-augmented neuroevolution for visual Doom playing,” in 2017 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games (CIG) , 2017, pp. 1–8
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Lample and D. S. Chaplot, “Playing FPS games with deep reinforcement learning,” in Proceedings of the Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , ser. AAAI’17. AAAI Press, 2017, p. 2140–2146
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Song, J. Weng, H. Su, D. Yan, H. Zou, and J. Zhu, “Playing FPS games with environment-aware hierarchical reinforcement learning,” in Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence , ser. IJCAI’19. AAAI Press, 2019, p. 3475–3482
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Wright, Y. Wang, and M. P. Wellman, “Iterated deep reinforcement learning in games: History-aware training for improved stability,” in Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation , ser. EC ’19. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2019, p. 617–636. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3328526.3329634
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Liu, Z. Zheng, H. Li, K. Bian, and L. Song, “Playing card-based RTS games with deep reinforcement learning,” in Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence , ser. IJCAI’19. AAAI Press, 2019, p. 4540–4546
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Zhou, Y. Chen, Y. Wen, Y. Yang, Y. Su, W. Zhang, D. Zhang, and J. Wang, “Factorized q-learning for large-scale multi-agent systems,” in Proceedings of the First International Conference on Distributed Artificial Intelligence , ser. DAI ’19. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3356464.3357707
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Wydmuch, M. Kempka, and W. Jaśkowski, “ViZDoom Competitions: Playing Doom from Pixels,” IEEE Transactions on Games , vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 248–259, 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
V. Blake. (2020) You can now play DOOM in Minecraft. [Online]. Available: https://www.gamesradar.com/you-can-now-play-doom-in-minecraft/
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Kanervisto, J. Pussinen, and V. Hautamäki, “Benchmarking end-to-end behavioural cloning on video games,” in 2020 IEEE Conference on Games (CoG) , 2020, pp. 558–565
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. S. Chaplot, D. Gandhi, A. Gupta, and R. Salakhutdinov, “Object goal navigation using goal-oriented semantic exploration,” in Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems , ser. NIPS’20. Red Hook, NY, USA: Curran Associates Inc., 2020
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. Zhang, Q. Chen, J. Siebert, and B. Tang, “Semi-supervised visual feature integration for language models through sentence visualization,” in Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction , ser. ICMI ’21. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2021, p. 682–686. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3462244.3479965
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Brahman, V. Shwartz, R. Rudinger, and Y. Choi, “Learning to rationalize for nonmonotonic reasoning with distant supervision,” Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , vol. 35, no. 14, pp. 12 592–12 601, May 2021. [Online]. Available: https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/17492
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Chiet. (2022) DOOMpad. [Online]. Available: https://samperson.itch.io/doompad
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Liu, D. Shen, Y. Zhang, B. Dolan, L. Carin, and W. Chen, “What makes good in-context examples for GPT-3?” in Proceedings of Deep Learning Inside Out (DeeLIO 2022): The 3rd Workshop on Knowledge Extraction and Integration for Deep Learning Architectures , E. Agirre, M. Apidianaki, and I. Vulić, Eds. Dublin, Ireland and Online: Association for Computational Linguistics, May 2022, pp. 100–114. [Online]. Available: https://aclanthology.org/2022.deelio-1.10
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Y. Lu, M. Bartolo, A. Moore, S. Riedel, and P. Stenetorp, “Fantastically ordered prompts and where to find them: Overcoming few-shot prompt order sensitivity,” in Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) . Dublin, Ireland: Association for Computational Linguistics, May 2022, pp. 8086–8098. [Online]. Available: https://aclanthology.org/2022.acl-long.556
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Wei, X. Wang, D. Schuurmans, M. Bosma, b. ichter, F. Xia, E. Chi, Q. V. Le, and D. Zhou, “Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , S. Koyejo, S. Mohamed, A. Agarwal, D. Belgrave, K. Cho, and A. Oh, Eds., vol. 35. Curran Associates, Inc., 2022, pp. 24 824–24 837. [Online]. Available: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2022/file/9d5609613524ecf4f15af0f7b31abca4-Paper-Conference.pdf
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
T. Kojima, S. S. Gu, M. Reid, Y. Matsuo, and Y. Iwasawa, “Large language models are zero-shot reasoners,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , S. Koyejo, S. Mohamed, A. Agarwal, D. Belgrave, K. Cho, and A. Oh, Eds., vol. 35. Curran Associates, Inc., 2022, pp. 22 199–22 213. [Online]. Available: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2022/file/8bb0d291acd4acf06ef112099c16f326-Paper-Conference.pdf
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
S. J. Han, K. J. Ransom, A. Perfors, and C. Kemp, “Human-like property induction is a challenge for large language models,” in Proceedings of the 44th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2022) . Toronto, Canada: Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci), 2022, pp. 1–8
A. Saparov and H. He, “Language models are greedy reasoners: A systematic formal analysis of chain-of-thought,” in International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
M. Suzgun, N. Scales, N. Schärli, S. Gehrmann, Y. Tay, H. W. Chung, A. Chowdhery, Q. Le, E. Chi, D. Zhou, and J. Wei, “Challenging BIG-bench tasks and whether chain-of-thought can solve them,” in Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023 . Toronto, Canada: Association for Computational Linguistics, Jul. 2023, pp. 13 003–13 051. [Online]. Available: https://aclanthology.org/2023.findings-acl.824
2023
Later among the works it cites.
J. Chen, S. Yuan, R. Ye, B. P. Majumder, and K. Richardson, “Put your money where your mouth is: Evaluating strategic planning and execution of LLM agents in an auction arena,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://openreview.net/forum?id=crMMk4I8Wy
2023
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
C. Anil, Y. Wu, A. J. Andreassen, A. Lewkowycz, V. Misra, V. V. Ramasesh, A. Slone, G. Gur-Ari, E. Dyer, and B. Neyshabur, “Exploring length generalization in large language models,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , A. H. Oh, A. Agarwal, D. Belgrave, and K. Cho, Eds., 2022. [Online]. Available: https://openreview.net/forum?id=zSkYVeX7bC4
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
W. Huang, P. Abbeel, D. Pathak, and I. Mordatch, “Language models as zero-shot planners: Extracting actionable knowledge for embodied agents,” in Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Machine Learning , ser. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, K. Chaudhuri, S. Jegelka, L. Song, C. Szepesvari, G. Niu, and S. Sabato, Eds., vol. 162. PMLR, 17–23 Jul 2022, pp. 9118–9147. [Online]. Available: https://proceedings.mlr.press/v162/huang22a.html
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
X. Liu, D. Yin, Y. Feng, and D. Zhao, “Things not written in text: Exploring spatial commonsense from visual signals,” in Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , S. Muresan, P. Nakov, and A. Villavicencio, Eds. Dublin, Ireland: Association for Computational Linguistics, May 2022, pp. 2365–2376. [Online]. Available: https://aclanthology.org/2022.acl-long.168
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Y. Lu, W. Zhu, X. Wang, M. Eckstein, and W. Y. Wang, “Imagination-augmented natural language understanding,” in Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies , M. Carpuat, M.-C. de Marneffe, and I. V. Meza Ruiz, Eds. Seattle, United States: Association for Computational Linguistics, Jul. 2022, pp. 4392–4402. [Online]. Available: https://aclanthology.org/2022.naacl-main.326
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Y. Yang, W. Yao, H. Zhang, X. Wang, D. Yu, and J. Chen, “Z-LaVI: Zero-shot language solver fueled by visual imagination,” in Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , Y. Goldberg, Z. Kozareva, and Y. Zhang, Eds. Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates: Association for Computational Linguistics, Dec. 2022, pp. 1186–1203. [Online]. Available: https://aclanthology.org/2022.emnlp-main.78
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
S. M. Goodman, E. Buehler, P. Clary, A. Coenen, A. Donsbach, T. N. Horne, M. Lahav, R. MacDonald, R. B. Michaels, A. Narayanan, M. Pushkarna, J. Riley, A. Santana, L. Shi, R. Sweeney, P. Weaver, A. Yuan, and M. R. Morris, “LaMPost: Design and evaluation of an AI-assisted email writing prototype for adults with dyslexia,” in Proceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility , ser. ASSETS ’22. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3517428.3544819
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Lee, T. Le, J. Chen, and D. Lee, “Do language models plagiarize?” in Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 , ser. WWW ’23. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2023, p. 3637–3647. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3543507.3583199
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
N. Carlini, D. Ippolito, M. Jagielski, K. Lee, F. Tramer, and C. Zhang, “Quantifying memorization across neural language models,” in International Conference on Learning Representations , 2023. [Online]. Available: https://openreview.net/forum?id=TatRHT_1cK
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
L. Wang, W. Xu, Y. Lan, Z. Hu, Y. Lan, R. K.-W. Lee, and E.-P. Lim, “Plan-and-solve prompting: Improving zero-shot chain-of-thought reasoning by large language models,” in Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , A. Rogers, J. Boyd-Graber, and N. Okazaki, Eds. Toronto, Canada: Association for Computational Linguistics, Jul. 2023, pp. 2609–2634. [Online]. Available: https://aclanthology.org/2023.acl-long.147
2023
Later among the works it cites.
C. H. Song, J. Wu, C. Washington, B. M. Sadler, W.-L. Chao, and Y. Su, “LLM-Planner: Few-shot grounded planning for embodied agents with large language models,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , October 2023, pp. 2998–3009
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
Q. Wang, M. Li, H. P. Chan, L. Huang, J. Hockenmaier, G. Chowdhary, and H. Ji, “Multimedia generative script learning for task planning,” in Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023 , A. Rogers, J. Boyd-Graber, and N. Okazaki, Eds. Toronto, Canada: Association for Computational Linguistics, Jul. 2023, pp. 986–1008. [Online]. Available: https://aclanthology.org/2023.findings-acl.63
2023
Later among the works it cites.
Z. Wang, S. Cai, G. Chen, A. Liu, X. Ma, and Y. Liang, “Describe, explain, plan and select: Interactive planning with LLMs enables open-world multi-task agents,” in Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems , 2023. [Online]. Available: https://openreview.net/forum?id=KtvPdGb31Z
2023
Later among the works it cites.
S. Milani, A. Juliani, I. Momennejad, R. Georgescu, J. Rzepecki, A. Shaw, G. Costello, F. Fang, S. Devlin, and K. Hofmann, “Navigates like me: Understanding how people evaluate human-like AI in video games,” in Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , ser. CHI ’23. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581348
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
DoomWiki.org. E1m1: Hangar (doom). Accessed 7 February 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doomwiki.org/wiki/E1M1:_Hangar_(Doom)
2024
Closest in time.