Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
In this paper, we address the issue of using logic rules to explain the results from legal case retrieval.
Language models are few-shot learners
Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, et al. 2020 · 1901
Earlier work this paper cites.
Everything has a cause: Leveraging causal inference in legal text analysis
Xiao Liu, Da Yin, Yansong Feng, Yuting Wu, and Dongyan Zhao. 2021 · 1941
Earlier work this paper cites.
Why cannot an effect precede its cause?
Max Black. 1956 · 1956
Earlier work this paper cites.
Weighted fuzzy pattern matching
Didier Dubois, Henri Prade, and Claudette Testemale. 1988 · 1988
Earlier work this paper cites.
Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval
Gerard Salton and Christopher Buckley. 1988 · 1988
Earlier work this paper cites.
Fuzzy logic
Lotfi A Zadeh. 1988 · 1988
Earlier work this paper cites.
Okapi at trec-3
Stephen E Robertson, Steve Walker, Susan Jones, Micheline M Hancock-Beaulieu, Mike Gatford, et al. 1995 · 1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
The Role of Logic in Legal Reasoning , pages 15–31. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht
Henry Prakken. 1997 · 1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
Triangular norm-based mathematical fuzzy logics
Siegfried Gottwald and Petr Hájek. 2005 · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Knowledge representation for the intelligent legal case retrieval
Yiming Zeng, Ruili Wang, John Zeleznikow, and Elizabeth Kemp. 2005 · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Ryan Riegel, Alexander Gray, Francois Luus, Naweed Khan, Ndivhuwo Makondo, Ismail Yunus Akhalwaya, Haifeng Qian, Ronald Fagin, Francisco Barahona, Udit Sharma, et al. 2020 · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Reciprocal rank fusion outperforms condorcet and individual rank learning methods
Gordon V Cormack, Charles LA Clarke, and Stefan Buettcher. 2009 · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Improving legal information retrieval using an ontological framework
Manavalan Saravanan, Balaraman Ravindran, and Shivani Raman. 2009 · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Similarity analysis of legal judgments
Sushanta Kumar, P. Krishna Reddy, V. Balakista Reddy, and Aditya Singh. 2011 · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
A history of ai and law in 50 papers: 25 years of the international conference on ai and law
Trevor Bench-Capon, Michał Araszkiewicz, Kevin Ashley, Katie Atkinson, Floris Bex, Filipe Borges, Daniele Bourcier, Paul Bourgine, Jack G Conrad, Enrico Francesconi, et al. 2012 · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Triangular norms , volume 8
Erich Peter Klement, Radko Mesiar, and Endre Pap. 2013 · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Link analysis for representing and retrieving legal information
Alfredo López Monroy, Hiram Calvo, Alexander F. Gelbukh, and Georgina García Pacheco. 2013 · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
A method for stochastic
Diederik P Kingma and Jimmy Ba Adam. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Finding relevant indian judgments using dispersion of citation network
Akshay Minocha, Navjyoti Singh, and Arjit Srivastava. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Law and logic: A review from an argumentation perspective
Henry Prakken and Giovanni Sartor. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
A language modeling approach to information retrieval
Jay M Ponte and W Bruce Croft. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Towards robust interpretability with self-explaining neural networks
David Alvarez Melis and Tommi Jaakkola. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding
Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Deepproblog: Neural probabilistic logic programming
Robin Manhaeve, Sebastijan Dumancic, Angelika Kimmig, Thomas Demeester, and Luc De Raedt. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Legal judgment prediction via topological learning
Haoxi Zhong, Zhipeng Guo, Cunchao Tu, Chaojun Xiao, Zhiyuan Liu, and Maosong Sun. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Neuro-symbolic= neural+ logical+ probabilistic
Luc De Raedt and Thomas Demeester. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Attention is not explanation
Sarthak Jain and Byron C Wallace. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
A review on big data with machine learning and fuzzy logic for better decision making
Weakly supervised explainable phrasal reasoning with neural fuzzy logic
Zijun Wu, Atharva Naik, Zi Xuan Zhang, and Lili Mou. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Lawformer: A pre-trained language model for chinese legal long documents
Chaojun Xiao, Xueyu Hu, Zhiyuan Liu, Cunchao Tu, and Maosong Sun. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Entropy-based logic explanations of neural networks
Pietro Barbiero, Gabriele Ciravegna, Francesco Giannini, Pietro Lió, Marco Gori, and Stefano Melacci. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Out-of-domain semantics to the rescue! zero-shot hybrid retrieval models
Tao Chen, Mingyang Zhang, Jing Lu, Michael Bendersky, and Marc Najork. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Glm: General language model pretraining with autoregressive blank infilling
Zhengxiao Du, Yujie Qian, Xiao Liu, Ming Ding, Jiezhong Qiu, Zhilin Yang, and Jie Tang. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
J Betty Jane and EN Ganesh. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding
Jacob Devlin Ming-Wei Chang Kenton and Lee Kristina Toutanova. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Augmenting neural networks with first-order logic
Tao Li and Vivek Srikumar. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Sentence-bert: Sentence embeddings using siamese bert-networks
Nils Reimers and Iryna Gurevych. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Open chinese language pre-trained model zoo
Haoxi Zhong, Zhengyan Zhang, Zhiyuan Liu, and Maosong Sun. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Methods for computing legal document similarity: A comparative study
Paheli Bhattacharya and Ghosh et al. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Hier-SPCNet: A Legal Statute Hierarchy-Based Heterogeneous Network for Computing Legal Case Document Similarity , page 1657–1660. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA
Paheli Bhattacharya, Kripabandhu Ghosh, Arindam Pal, and Saptarshi Ghosh. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Extending logic explained networks to text classification
Rishabh Jain, Gabriele Ciravegna, Pietro Barbiero, Francesco Giannini, Davide Buffelli, and Pietro Lio. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Internet-augmented language models through few-shot prompting for open-domain question answering
Angeliki Lazaridou, Elena Gribovskaya, Wojciech Stokowiec, and Nikolai Grigorev. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Self-explaining deep models with logic rule reasoning
Seungeon Lee, Xiting Wang, Sungwon Han, Xiaoyuan Yi, Xing Xie, and Meeyoung Cha. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Holistic evaluation of language models
Percy Liang, Rishi Bommasani, Tony Lee, Dimitris Tsipras, Dilara Soylu, Michihiro Yasunaga, Yian Zhang, Deepak Narayanan, Yuhuai Wu, Ananya Kumar, et al. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback
Long Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida, Carroll Wainwright, Pamela Mishkin, Chong Zhang, Sandhini Agarwal, Katarina Slama, Alex Ray, et al. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Understandingunderstanding relevance judgments in legal case retrieval
Yunqiu Shao, Yueyue Wu, Yiqun Liu, Jiaxin Mao, and Shaoping Ma. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Chain of thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models
Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Ed Chi, Quoc Le, and Denny Zhou. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
A multitask, multilingual, multimodal evaluation of chatgpt on reasoning, hallucination, and interactivity
Yejin Bang, Samuel Cahyawijaya, Nayeon Lee, Wenliang Dai, Dan Su, Bryan Wilie, Holy Lovenia, Ziwei Ji, Tiezheng Yu, Willy Chung, Quyet V. Do, Yan Xu, and Pascale Fung. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Language models can explain neurons in language models
Steven Bills, Nick Cammarata, Dan Mossing, Henk Tillman, Leo Gao, Gabriel Goh, Ilya Sutskever, Jan Leike, Jeff Wu, and William Saunders. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Chatgpt may pass the bar exam soon, but has a long way to go for the lexglue benchmark
Ilias Chalkidis. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Logic explained networks
Gabriele Ciravegna, Pietro Barbiero, Francesco Giannini, Marco Gori, Pietro Lió, Marco Maggini, and Stefano Melacci. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Augmented language models: a survey
Grégoire Mialon, Roberto Dessì, Maria Lomeli, Christoforos Nalmpantis, Ram Pasunuru, Roberta Raileanu, Baptiste Rozière, Timo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Asli Celikyilmaz, et al. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
OpenAI. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Incorporating judgment prediction into legal case retrieval via law-aware generative retrieval
Weicong Qin, Zelin Cao, Weijie Yu, Zihua Si, Sirui Chen, and Jun Xu. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Reliable natural language understanding with large language models and answer set programming
Abhiramon Rajasekharan, Yankai Zeng, Parth Padalkar, and Gopal Gupta. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
A short survey of viewing large language models in legal aspect
Zhongxiang Sun. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.