Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Statistical learning algorithms provide a generally-applicable framework to sidestep time-consuming experiments, or accurate physics-based modeling, but they introduce a further source of error on top of the intrinsic limitations of the experimental or theoretical setup.
1904
Earlier work this paper cites.
1905
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. A. Brown, Admissible Scoring Systems for Continuous Distributions , Tech. Rep. (The Rand Corporation, 1700 Main Street, Santa Monica, California 90406 (P-5235, $1, 1974)
1974
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. M. Torrie and J. P. Valleau, Nonphysical sampling distributions in Monte Carlo free-energy estimation: Umbrella sampling, J. Comput. Phys. 23
1977
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. J. Frisch, J. A. Pople, and J. S. Binkley, Self-consistent molecular orbital methods 25. Supplementary functions for Gaussian basis sets, The Journal of Chemical Physics 80
1984
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. D. Becke, Density-functional exchange-energy approximation with correct asymptotic behavior, Physical Review A 38
1988
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Lee, W. Yang, and R. G. Parr, Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density, Physical Review B 37
1988
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. S. Seung, M. Opper, and H. Sompolinsky, Query by committee, in Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory , COLT ’92 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1992) pp. 287–294
1992
Earlier work this paper cites.
Z. Toth and E. Kalnay, Ensemble Forecasting at NMC: The Generation of Perturbations, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 74
1993
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. D. Becke, Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange, The Journal of Chemical Physics 98
1993
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Nix and A. Weigend, Estimating the mean and variance of the target probability distribution, in Proceedings of 1994 IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks (ICNN’94) (IEEE, Orlando, FL, USA, 1994) pp. 55–60 vol.1
1994
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. V. Okhulkov, Yu. N. Demianets, and Yu. E. Gorbaty, X-ray scattering in liquid water at pressures of up to 7.7 kbar: Test of a fluctuation model, The Journal of Chemical Physics 100
1994
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. M. Williams, Using neural networks to model conditional multivariate densities, Neural computation 8
1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple, Physical Review Letters 77
1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
Y. Zhang and W. Yang, Comment on “Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple”, Physical Review Letters 80
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Adamo and V. Barone, Toward reliable density functional methods without adjustable parameters: The PBE0 model, The Journal of Chemical Physics 110
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. Hersbach, Decomposition of the Continuous Ranked Probability Score for Ensemble Prediction Systems, Weather and Forecasting 15
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. K. Soper, The radial distribution functions of water and ice from 220 to 673 K and at pressures up to 400 MPa, Chemical Physics 258
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. B. Hitchcock, A History of the Metropolis–Hastings Algorithm, The American Statistician 57
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. E. Raftery, T. Gneiting, F. Balabdaoui, and M. Polakowski, Using Bayesian Model Averaging to Calibrate Forecast Ensembles, Monthly Weather Review 133
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Gneiting, A. E. Raftery, A. H. Westveld, and T. Goldman, Calibrated Probabilistic Forecasting Using Ensemble Model Output Statistics and Minimum CRPS Estimation, Monthly Weather Review 133
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Behler and M. Parrinello, Generalized Neural-Network Representation of High-Dimensional Potential-Energy Surfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Gneiting and A. E. Raftery, Strictly Proper Scoring Rules, Prediction, and Estimation, Journal of the American Statistical Association 102
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Gneiting, F. Balabdaoui, and A. E. Raftery, Probabilistic Forecasts, Calibration and Sharpness, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology 69
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. E. Rasmussen and C. K. I. Williams, Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning , 3rd ed., Adaptive Computation and Machine Learning (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 2008) pp. 23, 177
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. P. Perdew, A. Ruzsinszky, G. I. Csonka, O. A. Vydrov, G. E. Scuseria, L. A. Constantin, X. Zhou, and K. Burke, Restoring the Density-Gradient Expansion for Exchange in Solids and Surfaces, Physical Review Letters 100
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. P. Bartók, M. C. Payne, R. Kondor, and G. Csányi, Gaussian Approximation Potentials: The Accuracy of Quantum Mechanics, without the Electrons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Grimme, J. Antony, S. Ehrlich, and H. Krieg, A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu, The Journal of Chemical Physics 132
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Vega, M. M. Conde, C. McBride, J. L. F. Abascal, E. G. Noya, R. Ramirez, and L. M. Sesé, Heat capacity of water: A signature of nuclear quantum effects, J. Chem. Phys. 132
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. Goerigk and S. Grimme, A thorough benchmark of density functional methods for general main group thermochemistry, kinetics, and noncovalent interactions, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 13
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Rupp, A. Tkatchenko, K.-R. Müller, and O. A. von Lilienfeld, Fast and Accurate Modeling of Molecular Atomization Energies with Machine Learning, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Ceriotti, G. A. Brain, O. Riordan, and D. E. Manolopoulos, The inefficiency of re-weighted sampling and the curse of system size in high-order path integration, Proc. R. Soc. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 468
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Hamra, R. MacLehose, and D. Richardson, Markov Chain Monte Carlo: An introduction for epidemiologists, International Journal of Epidemiology 42
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. P. Bartók, R. Kondor, and G. Csányi, On representing chemical environments, Phys. Rev. B 87
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Ramakrishnan, P. O. Dral, M. Rupp, and O. A. Von Lilienfeld, Quantum chemistry structures and properties of 134 kilo molecules, Sci. Data 1
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. B. Skinner, C. J. Benmore, J. C. Neuefeind, and J. B. Parise, The structure of water around the compressibility minimum, The Journal of Chemical Physics 141
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. M. Hernandez-Lobato and R. Adams, Probabilistic Backpropagation for Scalable Learning of Bayesian Neural Networks, in Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning (PMLR, 2015) pp. 1861–1869
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Behler, Perspective: Machine learning potentials for atomistic simulations, J. Chem. Phys. 145
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. A. Peterson, R. Christensen, and A. Khorshidi, Addressing uncertainty in atomistic machine learning, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 19
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
B. Lakshminarayanan, A. Pritzel, and C. Blundell, Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensembles, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , Vol. 30, edited by I. Guyon, U. V. Luxburg, S. Bengio, H. Wallach, R. Fergus, S. Vishwanathan, and R. Garnett (Curran Associates, Inc., 2017)
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
C. Guo, G. Pleiss, Y. Sun, and K. Q. Weinberger, On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks, in Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning (PMLR, 2017) pp. 1321–1330
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
J. S. Smith, O. Isayev, and A. E. Roitberg, ANI-1: An extensible neural network potential with DFT accuracy at force field computational cost, Chem. Sci. 8
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Zhang, Modern Monte Carlo methods for efficient uncertainty quantification and propagation: A survey, WIREs Computational Statistics 13
2021
Later among the works it cites.
J. Degrave, F. Felici, J. Buchli, M. Neunert, B. Tracey, F. Carpanese, T. Ewalds, R. Hafner, A. Abdolmaleki, D. De Las Casas, C. Donner, L. Fritz, C. Galperti, A. Huber, J. Keeling, M. Tsimpoukelli, J. Kay, A. Merle, J.-M. Moret, S. Noury, F. Pesamosca, D. Pfau, O. Sauter, C. Sommariva, S. Coda, B. Duval, A. Fasoli, P. Kohli, K. Kavukcuoglu, D. Hassabis, and M. Riedmiller, Magnetic control of tokamak plasmas through deep reinforcement learning, Nature 602
2022
Later among the works it cites.
M. Ceriotti, Beyond potentials: Integrated machine learning models for materials, MRS Bulletin 47
2022
Later among the works it cites.
S. N. Pozdnyakov and M. Ceriotti, Incompleteness of graph neural networks for points clouds in three dimensions, Machine Learning: Science and Technology 3
2022
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
V. Kuleshov, N. Fenner, and S. Ermon, Accurate uncertainties for deep learning using calibrated regression, in International conference on machine learning (PMLR, 2018) pp. 2796–2804
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
H. Wang, L. Zhang, J. Han, and W. E, DeePMD-kit: A deep learning package for many-body potential energy representation and molecular dynamics, Computer Physics Communications 228
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
M. J. Willatt, F. Musil, and M. Ceriotti, Feature optimization for atomistic machine learning yields a data-driven construction of the periodic table of the elements, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 20
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
J. S. Smith, B. Nebgen, N. Lubbers, O. Isayev, and A. E. Roitberg, Less is more: Sampling chemical space with active learning, The Journal of Chemical Physics 148
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
H. Takahashi, T. Iwata, Y. Yamanaka, M. Yamada, and S. Yagi, Student-t Variational Autoencoder for Robust Density Estimation, in Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, Stockholm, Sweden, 2018) pp. 2696–2702
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
G. Carleo, I. Cirac, K. Cranmer, L. Daudet, M. Schuld, N. Tishby, L. Vogt-Maranto, and L. Zdeborová, Machine learning and the physical sciences, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
R. Jinnouchi, F. Karsai, and G. Kresse, On-the-fly machine learning force field generation: Application to melting points, Physical Review B 100
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Busk, P. Bjørn Jørgensen, A. Bhowmik, M. N. Schmidt, O. Winther, and T. Vegge, Calibrated uncertainty for molecular property prediction using ensembles of message passing neural networks, Machine Learning: Science and Technology 3
2022
Later among the works it cites.
Y. Hu, J. Musielewicz, Z. W. Ulissi, and A. J. Medford, Robust and scalable uncertainty estimation with conformal prediction for machine-learned interatomic potentials, Machine Learning: Science and Technology 3
2022
Later among the works it cites.
L. Itza Vazquez-Salazar, E. D. Boittier, and M. Meuwly, Uncertainty quantification for predictions of atomistic neural networks, Chemical Science 13
2022
Later among the works it cites.
L. Kahle and F. Zipoli, Quality of uncertainty estimates from neural network potential ensembles, Physical Review E 105
2022
Later among the works it cites.
2022
Later among the works it cites.
F. Küppers, J. Schneider, and A. Haselhoff, Parametric and multivariate uncertainty calibration for regression and object detection, in European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) Workshops (Springer, 2022)
2022
Later among the works it cites.
L. Gigli, M. Veit, M. Kotiuga, G. Pizzi, N. Marzari, and M. Ceriotti, Thermodynamics and dielectric response of BaTiO3 by data-driven modeling, npj Comput Mater 8
2022
Later among the works it cites.
I. Batatia, D. P. Kovacs, G. N. C. Simm, C. Ortner, and G. Csanyi, MACE: Higher order equivariant message passing neural networks for fast and accurate force fields, in Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. , edited by A. H. Oh, A. Agarwal, D. Belgrave, and K. Cho (2022)
2022
Later among the works it cites.
Y. Zhou, W. Zhang, E. Ma, and V. L. Deringer, Device-scale atomistic modelling of phase-change memory materials, Nat Electron 10.1038/s41928-023-01030-x (2023)
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
Y. Zhai, A. Caruso, S. L. Bore, Z. Luo, and F. Paesani, A “short blanket” dilemma for a state-of-the-art neural network potential for water: Reproducing experimental properties or the physics of the underlying many-body interactions?, J. Chem. Phys. 158
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
J. Busk, M. N. Schmidt, O. Winther, T. Vegge, and P. B. Jørgensen, Graph neural network interatomic potential ensembles with calibrated aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty on energy and forces, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 25
2023
Later among the works it cites.
S. Thaler, G. Doehner, and J. Zavadlav, Scalable Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification for Neural Network Potentials: Promise and Pitfalls, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 19
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
A. Zhu, S. Batzner, A. Musaelian, and B. Kozinsky, Fast uncertainty estimates in deep learning interatomic potentials, The Journal of Chemical Physics 158
2023
Later among the works it cites.
J. Carrete, H. Montes-Campos, R. Wanzenböck, E. Heid, and G. K. H. Madsen, Deep ensembles vs committees for uncertainty estimation in neural-network force fields: Comparison and application to active learning, The Journal of Chemical Physics 158
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
Y. Xie, J. Vandermause, S. Ramakers, N. H. Protik, A. Johansson, and B. Kozinsky, Uncertainty-aware molecular dynamics from Bayesian active learning for phase transformations and thermal transport in SiC, npj Computational Materials 9
2023
Later among the works it cites.
C.-I. Yang and Y.-P. Li, Explainable uncertainty quantifications for deep learning-based molecular property prediction, Journal of Cheminformatics 15
2023
Later among the works it cites.
A. Thomas-Mitchell, G. Hawe, and P. L. A. Popelier, Calibration of uncertainty in the active learning of machine learning force fields, Machine Learning: Science and Technology 4
2023
Later among the works it cites.
L. Clarte, B. Loureiro, F. Krzakala, and L. Zdeborova, On double-descent in uncertainty quantification in overparametrized models, in Proceedings of The 26th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (PMLR, 2023) pp. 7089–7125
2023
Later among the works it cites.
L. Clarté, B. Loureiro, F. Krzakala, and L. Zdeborová, Theoretical characterization of uncertainty in high-dimensional linear classification, Machine Learning: Science and Technology 4
2023
Later among the works it cites.
S. Chong, F. Grasselli, C. Ben Mahmoud, J. D. Morrow, V. L. Deringer, and M. Ceriotti, Robustness of Local Predictions in Atomistic Machine Learning Models, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 19
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
G. Fraux, Luthaf/rascaline (2024)
2024
Closest in time.
L. Gigli, D. Tisi, F. Grasselli, and M. Ceriotti, Mechanism of Charge Transport in Lithium Thiophosphate, Chemistry of Materials 36
2024
Closest in time.
G. Simeon and G. De Fabritiis, TensorNet: Cartesian Tensor Representations for Efficient Learning of Molecular Potentials, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
Kin family of datasets, https://www.cs.toronto.edu/~delve/data/kin/desc.html (2024), accessed: 2024-05-13
2024
Closest in time.
Statlib archive, http://lib.stat.cmu.edu/datasets/boston (2024), accessed: 2024-05-13
2024
Closest in time.