Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
The open-ended nature of language generation makes the evaluation of autoregressive large language models (LLMs) challenging.
Think you have solved question answering? try arc, the ai2 reasoning challenge
Peter Clark, Isaac Cowhey, Oren Etzioni, Tushar Khot, Ashish Sabharwal, Carissa Schoenick, and Oyvind Tafjord. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Social IQa: Commonsense reasoning about social interactions
Maarten Sap, Hannah Rashkin, Derek Chen, Ronan Le Bras, and Yejin Choi. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
CommonsenseQA: A question answering challenge targeting commonsense knowledge
Alon Talmor, Jonathan Herzig, Nicholas Lourie, and Jonathan Berant. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
HellaSwag: Can a machine really finish your sentence?
Rowan Zellers, Ari Holtzman, Yonatan Bisk, Ali Farhadi, and Yejin Choi. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Piqa: Reasoning about physical commonsense in natural language
Yonatan Bisk, Rowan Zellers, Jianfeng Gao, Yejin Choi, et al. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Measuring massive multitask language understanding
Dan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou, Mantas Mazeika, Dawn Song, and Jacob Steinhardt. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Winogrande: An adversarial winograd schema challenge at scale
Keisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, and Yejin Choi. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Holistic evaluation of language models
Percy Liang, Rishi Bommasani, Tony Lee, Dimitris Tsipras, Dilara Soylu, Michihiro Yasunaga, Yian Zhang, Deepak Narayanan, Yuhuai Wu, Ananya Kumar, et al. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
TruthfulQA: Measuring how models mimic human falsehoods
Stephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, and Owain Evans. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Peft: State-of-the-art parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods
Sourab Mangrulkar, Sylvain Gugger, Lysandre Debut, Younes Belkada, Sayak Paul, and Benjamin Bossan. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback
Long Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida, Carroll Wainwright, Pamela Mishkin, Chong Zhang, Sandhini Agarwal, Katarina Slama, Alex Ray, et al. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Beyond the imitation game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language models
BIG bench authors. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Questioning the survey responses of large language models
Ricardo Dominguez-Olmedo, Moritz Hardt, and Celestine Mendler-Dünner. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Towards measuring the representation of subjective global opinions in language models
Esin Durmus, Karina Nyugen, Thomas I Liao, Nicholas Schiefer, Amanda Askell, Anton Bakhtin, Carol Chen, Zac Hatfield-Dodds, Danny Hernandez, Nicholas Joseph, et al. 2023 · 2023
Evaluating the moral beliefs encoded in llms
Nino Scherrer, Claudia Shi, Amir Feder, and David Blei. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Do LLMs exhibit human-like response biases? a case study in survey design
Lindia Tjuatja, Valerie Chen, Sherry Tongshuang Wu, Ameet Talwalkar, and Graham Neubig. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models
Hugo Touvron, Louis Martin, Kevin Stone, Peter Albert, Amjad Almahairi, Yasmine Babaei, Nikolay Bashlykov, Soumya Batra, Prajjwal Bhargava, Shruti Bhosale, et al. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Large language models are not robust multiple choice selectors
Chujie Zheng, Hao Zhou, Fandong Meng, Jie Zhou, and Minlie Huang. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Qlora: Efficient finetuning of quantized llms
Tim Dettmers, Artidoro Pagnoni, Ari Holtzman, and Luke Zettlemoyer. 2024 · 2024
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Cited alongside, same era.
A framework for few-shot language model evaluation
Leo Gao, Jonathan Tow, Baber Abbasi, Stella Biderman, Sid Black, Anthony DiPofi, Charles Foster, Laurence Golding, Jeffrey Hsu, Alain Le Noac’h, Haonan Li, Kyle McDonell, Niklas Muennighoff, Chris Ociepa, Jason Phang, Laria Reynolds, Hailey Schoelkopf, Aviya Skowron, Lintang Sutawika, Eric Tang, Anish Thite, Ben Wang, Kevin Wang, and Andy Zou. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Prompting is not a substitute for probability measurements in large language models
Jennifer Hu and Roger Levy. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Albert Q Jiang, Alexandre Sablayrolles, Arthur Mensch, Chris Bamford, Devendra Singh Chaplot, Diego de las Casas, Florian Bressand, Gianna Lengyel, Guillaume Lample, Lucile Saulnier, et al. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Whose opinions do language models reflect?
Shibani Santurkar, Esin Durmus, Faisal Ladhak, Cinoo Lee, Percy Liang, and Tatsunori Hashimoto. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Closest in time.
What’s going on with the open LLM leaderboard?
Clémentine Fourrier, Nathan Habib, Julien Launay, and Julien Wolf. 2023 · 2024
Closest in time.
Albert Q Jiang, Alexandre Sablayrolles, Antoine Roux, Arthur Mensch, Blanche Savary, Chris Bamford, Devendra Singh Chaplot, Diego de las Casas, Emma Bou Hanna, Florian Bressand, et al. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Beyond probabilities: Unveiling the misalignment in evaluating large language models
Chenyang Lyu, Minghao Wu, and Alham Fikri Aji. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Xinpeng Wang, Chengzhi Hu, Bolei Ma, Paul Röttger, and Barbara Plank. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.