Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Single document news summarization has seen substantial progress on faithfulness in recent years, driven by research on the evaluation of factual consistency, or hallucinations.
On faithfulness and factuality in abstractive summarization
Joshua Maynez, Shashi Narayan, Bernd Bohnet, and Ryan McDonald. 2020 · 1919
Earlier work this paper cites.
Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters
Joseph L. Fleiss. 1971 · 1971
Earlier work this paper cites.
Bleu: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation
Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, Todd Ward, and Wei-Jing Zhu. 2002 · 2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
ROUGE: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries
Chin-Yew Lin. 2004 · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Evaluating content selection in summarization: The pyramid method
Ani Nenkova and Rebecca Passonneau. 2004 · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic
Marry L. McHugh. 2012 · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
An Introduction to Functional Grammar
M.A.K. Halliday, Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen, Michael Halliday, and Christian Matthiessen. 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Ranking generated summaries by correctness: An interesting but challenging application for natural language inference
Tobias Falke, Leonardo F. R. Ribeiro, Prasetya Ajie Utama, Ido Dagan, and Iryna Gurevych. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
SAMSum corpus: A human-annotated dialogue dataset for abstractive summarization
Bogdan Gliwa, Iwona Mochol, Maciej Biesek, and Aleksander Wawer. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Neural text summarization: A critical evaluation
Wojciech Kryscinski, Nitish Shirish Keskar, Bryan McCann, Caiming Xiong, and Richard Socher. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Evaluating the factual consistency of abstractive text summarization
Wojciech Kryscinski, Bryan McCann, Caiming Xiong, and Richard Socher. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
BERTScore: Evaluating text generation with BERT
Tianyi Zhang*, Varsha Kishore*, Felix Wu*, Kilian Q. Weinberger, and Yoav Artzi. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
CLIFF: Contrastive learning for improving faithfulness and factuality in abstractive summarization
Shuyang Cao and Lu Wang. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
SummEval: Re-evaluating summarization evaluation
Alexander R. Fabbri, Wojciech Kryściński, Bryan McCann, Caiming Xiong, Richard Socher, and Dragomir Radev. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Annotating and modeling fine-grained factuality in summarization
Tanya Goyal and Greg Durrett. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Understanding factuality in abstractive summarization with FRANK: A benchmark for factuality metrics
Artidoro Pagnoni, Vidhisha Balachandran, and Yulia Tsvetkov. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
MediaSum: A large-scale media interview dataset for dialogue summarization
Chenguang Zhu, Yang Liu, Jie Mei, and Michael Zeng. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
QAFactEval: Improved QA-based factual consistency evaluation for summarization
Alexander Fabbri, Chien-Sheng Wu, Wenhao Liu, and Caiming Xiong. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
DialSummEval: Revisiting summarization evaluation for dialogues
RARR: Researching and revising what language models say, using language models
Luyu Gao, Zhuyun Dai, Panupong Pasupat, Anthony Chen, Arun Tejasvi Chaganty, Yicheng Fan, Vincent Zhao, Ni Lao, Hongrae Lee, Da-Cheng Juan, and Kelvin Guu. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
MeetingBank: A benchmark dataset for meeting summarization
Yebowen Hu, Timothy Ganter, Hanieh Deilamsalehy, Franck Dernoncourt, Hassan Foroosh, and Fei Liu. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
SummEdits: Measuring LLM ability at factual reasoning through the lens of summarization
Philippe Laban, Wojciech Kryscinski, Divyansh Agarwal, Alexander Fabbri, Caiming Xiong, Shafiq Joty, and Chien-Sheng Wu. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Alpacaeval: An automatic evaluator of instruction-following models
Xuechen Li, Tianyi Zhang, Yann Dubois, Rohan Taori, Ishaan Gulrajani, Carlos Guestrin, Percy Liang, and Tatsunori B. Hashimoto. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
ChatGPT as a factual inconsistency evaluator for abstractive text summarization
Zheheng Luo, Qianqian Xie, and Sophia Ananiadou. 2023 · 2023
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Mingqi Gao and Xiaojun Wan. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
News summarization and evaluation in the era of GPT-3
Tanya Goyal, Junyi Jessy Li, and Greg Durrett. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
SummaC: Re-visiting NLI-based models for inconsistency detection in summarization
Philippe Laban, Tobias Schnabel, Paul N. Bennett, and Marti A. Hearst. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Self-critiquing models for assisting human evaluators
William Saunders, Catherine Yeh, Jeff Wu, Steven Bills, Long Ouyang, Jonathan Ward, and Jan Leike. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
CONFIT: Toward faithful dialogue summarization with linguistically-informed contrastive fine-tuning
Xiangru Tang, Arjun Nair, Borui Wang, Bingyao Wang, Jai Desai, Aaron Wade, Haoran Li, Asli Celikyilmaz, Yashar Mehdad, and Dragomir Radev. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models
Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Brian Ichter, Fei Xia, Ed H. Chi, Quoc V. Le, and Denny Zhou. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Vicuna: An open-source chatbot impressing GPT-4 with 90%* ChatGPT quality
Wei-Lin Chiang, Zhuohan Li, Zi Lin, Ying Sheng, Zhanghao Wu, Hao Zhang, Lianmin Zheng, Siyuan Zhuang, Yonghao Zhuang, Joseph E. Gonzalez, Ion Stoica, and Eric P. Xing. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Later among the works it cites.
Self-refine: Iterative refinement with self-feedback
Aman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan, Luyu Gao, Sarah Wiegreffe, Uri Alon, Nouha Dziri, Shrimai Prabhumoye, Yiming Yang, Sean Welleck, Bodhisattwa Prasad Majumder, Shashank Gupta, Amir Yazdanbakhsh, and Peter Clark. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
OpenAI. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
LLaMA: Open and efficient foundation language models
Hugo Touvron, Thibaut Lavril, Gautier Izacard, Xavier Martinet, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Timothée Lacroix, Baptiste Rozière, Naman Goyal, Eric Hambro, Faisal Azhar, Aurelien Rodriguez, Armand Joulin, Edouard Grave, and Guillaume Lample. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Is ChatGPT a good NLG evaluator? a preliminary study
Jiaan Wang, Yunlong Liang, Fandong Meng, Haoxiang Shi, Zhixu Li, Jinan Xu, Jianfeng Qu, and Jie Zhou. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
WizardLM: Empowering large language models to follow complex instructions
Can Xu, Qingfeng Sun, Kai Zheng, Xiubo Geng, Pu Zhao, Jiazhan Feng, Chongyang Tao, and Daxin Jiang. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
AlignScore: Evaluating factual consistency with a unified alignment function
Yuheng Zha, Yichi Yang, Ruichen Li, and Zhiting Hu. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Benchmarking large language models for news summarization
Tianyi Zhang, Faisal Ladhak, Esin Durmus, Percy Liang, Kathleen McKeown, and Tatsunori Hashimoto. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.