Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
$ $Large Language Models (LLMs) are being increasingly utilized in various applications, with code generations being a notable example.
T. McCabe, “1976 index,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering , vol. SE-2, no. 4, pp. 308–320, dec 1976
1976
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Pletea, B. Vasilescu, and A. Serebrenik, “Security and emotion: Sentiment analysis of security discussions on github,” 05 2014, pp. 348–351
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, L. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, “Attention is all you need,” in Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems , ser. NIPS’17. Red Hook, NY, USA: Curran Associates Inc., 2017, p. 6000–6010
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Radford and K. Narasimhan, “Improving language understanding by generative pre-training,” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:49313245
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Zahedi, M. Ali Babar, and C. Treude, “An empirical study of security issues posted in open source projects,” 01 2018
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Radford, J. Wu, R. Child, D. Luan, D. Amodei, and I. Sutskever, “Language models are unsupervised multitask learners,” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:160025533
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Rahman, C. Parnin, and L. Williams, “The seven sins: Security smells in infrastructure as code scripts,” in Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Software Engineering , ser. ICSE ’19. IEEE Press, 2019, p. 164–175. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.2019.00033
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. B. Brown, B. Mann, N. Ryder, M. Subbiah, J. Kaplan, P. Dhariwal, A. Neelakantan, P. Shyam, G. Sastry, A. Askell, S. Agarwal, A. Herbert-Voss, G. Krueger, T. Henighan, R. Child, A. Ramesh, D. M. Ziegler, J. Wu, C. Winter, C. Hesse, M. Chen, E. Sigler, M. Litwin, S. Gray, B. Chess, J. Clark, C. Berner, S. McCandlish, A. Radford, I. Sutskever, and D. Amodei, “Language models are few-shot learners,” in Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems , ser. NIPS’20. Red Hook, NY, USA: Curran Associates Inc., 2020
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
O. Foundation, “Owasp top 10:2021,” https://owasp.org/Top10/, 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Verdi, A. Sami, J. Akhondali, F. Khomh, G. Uddin, and A. K. Motlagh, “An empirical study of c++ vulnerabilities in crowd-sourced code examples,” 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. L. Siddiq and J. C. S. Santos, “Securityeval dataset: Mining vulnerability examples to evaluate machine learning-based code generation techniques,” in Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Mining Software Repositories Applications for Privacy and Security , ser. MSR4P&S 2022. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2022, p. 29–33. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3549035.3561184
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Thoppilan, D. D. Freitas, J. Hall, N. Shazeer, A. Kulshreshtha, H.-T. Cheng, A. Jin, T. Bos, L. Baker, Y. Du, Y. Li, H. Lee, H. S. Zheng, A. Ghafouri, M. Menegali, Y. Huang, M. Krikun, D. Lepikhin, J. Qin, D. Chen, Y. Xu, Z. Chen, A. Roberts, M. Bosma, V. Zhao, Y. Zhou, C.-C. Chang, I. Krivokon, W. Rusch, M. Pickett, P. Srinivasan, L. Man, K. Meier-Hellstern, M. R. Morris, T. Doshi, R. D. Santos, T. Duke, J. Soraker, B. Zevenbergen, V. Prabhakaran, M. Diaz, B. Hutchinson, K. Olson, A. Molina, E. Hoffman-John, J. Lee, L. Aroyo, R. Rajakumar, A. Butryna, M. Lamm, V. Kuzmina, J. Fenton, A. Cohen, R. Bernstein, R. Kurzweil, B. Aguera-Arcas, C. Cui, M. Croak, E. Chi, and Q. Le, “Lamda: Language models for dialog applications,” 2022
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. F. Xu, U. Alon, G. Neubig, and V. J. Hellendoorn, “A systematic evaluation of large language models of code,” in Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGPLAN International Symposium on Machine Programming , 2022, pp. 1–10
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
“Google ai updates: Bard and new ai features in search,” https://blog.google/technology/ai/bard-google-ai-search-updates/, (Accessed on 12/11/2023)
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Deshpande, V. Murahari, T. Rajpurohit, A. Kalyan, and K. Narasimhan, “Toxicity in chatgpt: Analyzing persona-assigned language models,” in Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023 , H. Bouamor, J. Pino, and K. Bali, Eds. Singapore: Association for Computational Linguistics, Dec. 2023, pp. 1236–1270. [Online]. Available: https://aclanthology.org/2023.findings-emnlp.88
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Google, “Bard - chat based ai tool from google, powered by palm 2,” https://bard.google.com/, 11 2023, (Accessed on 11/07/2023)
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Wang, L. Cao, X. Luo, Z. Zhou, J. Xie, A. Jatowt, and Y. Cai, “Enhancing large language models for secure code generation: A dataset-driven study on vulnerability mitigation,” 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
L. Zhong and Z. Wang, “Can chatgpt replace stackoverflow? a study on robustness and reliability of large language model code generation,” 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
“Hello gpt-4o,” https://openai.com/index/hello-gpt-4o/, accessed: 2024-11-07
2024
Closest in time.
“Models,” https://platform.openai.com/docs/models/gpt-4o, accessed: 2024-11-07
2024
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
H. Hajipour, K. Hassler, T. Holz, L. Schönherr, and M. Fritz, “Codelmsec benchmark: Systematically evaluating and finding security vulnerabilities in black-box code language models,” 2023
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Manyika and S. Hsiao, “An overview of bard: an early experiment with generative ai,” 2023
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
OpenAI, “Models - openai api,” https://platform.openai.com/docs/models, (Accessed on 11/07/2023)
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
——, “Gpt-4 technical report,” 2023
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
N. Perry, M. Srivastava, D. Kumar, and D. Boneh, “Do users write more insecure code with ai assistants?” in Proceedings of the 2023 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security , ser. CCS ’23. ACM, Nov. 2023. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3576915.3623157
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Closest in time.
“Radon,” https://pypi.org/project/radon/, accessed: 2024-11-05
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
B. Formgren, “Capabilities of large language models in generating complex code: Comparing code generation capabilities of two large language models: A software architecture perspective,” Ph.D. dissertation, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-352307
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
L. C. Ramirez, X. Limon, A. J. Sanchez-García, and J. C. Perez-Arriaga, “State of the art of the security of code generated by llms: A systematic literature review,” in 2024 12th International Conference in Software Engineering Research and Innovation (CONISOFT) , 2024, pp. 331–339
2024
Closest in time.
M. L. Siddiq, J. C. da Silva Santos, S. Devareddy, and A. Muller, “Sallm: Security assessment of generated code,” in Proceedings of the 39th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering Workshops , ser. ASEW ’24. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2024, p. 54–65. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3691621.3694934
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
L. Wang, X. Chen, X. Deng et al. , “Prompt engineering in consistency and reliability with the evidence-based guideline for llms,” npj Digital Medicine , vol. 7, p. 41, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-024-01029-4
2024
Closest in time.
W. Cai, J. Jiang, F. Wang, J. Tang, S. Kim, and J. Huang, “A survey on mixture of experts in large language models,” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering , p. 1–20, 2025. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2025.3554028
2025
Closest in time.
M. Kharma, S. Choi, M. AlKhanafseh, and D. Mohaisen, “Security and quality in llm-generated code: A multi-language, multi-model analysis,” 02 2025
2025
Closest in time.