Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Given the complexity and lack of transparency in deep neural networks (DNNs), extensive efforts have been made to make these systems more interpretable or explain their behaviors in accessible terms.
E. Smirnov, A. Melnikov, S. Novoselov, E. Luckyanets, and G. Lavrentyeva, “Doppelganger mining for face representation learning,” in Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision workshops , 2017, pp. 1916–1923
1923
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. S. Shapley et al. , “A value for n-person games,” 1953
1953
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Rosenblatt, “The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain.” Psychological review , vol. 65, no. 6, p. 386, 1958
1958
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Rostamzadeh, D. Mincu, S. Roy, A. Smart, L. Wilcox, M. Pushkarna, J. Schrouff, R. Amironesei, N. Moorosi, and K. Heller, “Healthsheet: development of a transparency artifact for health datasets,” in Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , 2022, pp. 1943–1961
1961
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. D. Cook and S. Weisberg, “Characterizations of an empirical influence function for detecting influential cases in regression,” Technometrics , vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 495–508, 1980
1980
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Hayes-Roth, “Rule-based systems,” Communications of the ACM , vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 921–932, 1985
1985
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. A. Waterman, A Guide to Expert Systems . Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., 1985
1985
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. R. Quinlan, “Generating production rules from decision trees.” in IJCAI , vol. 87. Citeseer, 1987, pp. 304–307
1987
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. E. Roth, The Shapley value: essays in honor of Lloyd S. Shapley . Cambridge University Press, 1988
1988
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. L. Kolodner, “An introduction to case-based reasoning,” Artificial Intelligence Review , vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 3–34, 1992
1992
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Efron, “Jackknife-after-bootstrap standard errors and influence functions,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology , vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 83–111, 1992
1992
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Frye, P. D. Zelazo, and T. Palfai, “Theory of mind and rule-based reasoning,” Cognitive Development , vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 483–527, 1995
1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Cortes and V. Vapnik, “Support-vector networks,” Machine Learning , vol. 20, pp. 273–297, 1995
1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
M.-S. Chen, J. Han, and P. S. Yu, “Data mining: an overview from a database perspective,” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and data Engineering , vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 866–883, 1996
1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Dutta, “Strategies for implementing knowledge-based systems,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management , vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 79–90, 1997
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. E. Brodley and M. A. Friedl, “Identifying mislabeled training data,” Journal of artificial intelligence research , vol. 11, pp. 131–167, 1999
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. E. Harrell et al. , Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis . Springer, 2001, vol. 608
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. T. Barlow and P. Neville, “Case study: Visualization for decision tree analysis in data mining.” in infovis , 2001, pp. 149–152
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. H. Friedman, “Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine,” Annals of statistics , pp. 1189–1232, 2001
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Kamath, “On mining scientific datasets,” Data Mining for Scientific and Engineering Applications , pp. 1–21, 2001
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
O. Boz, “Extracting decision trees from trained neural networks,” in Proceedings of the eighth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining , 2002, pp. 456–461
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. Friedl and E. Stampfer, “Jackknife resampling,” Encyclopedia of environmetrics , vol. 2, pp. 1089–1098, 2002
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. F. MARTINEZ, “A visual empirical region of influence pattern recognition tool for leave-one-out data analysis,” Sandia National Lab.(SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States); Sandia …, Tech. Rep., 2002
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Cao and G. Lugosi, “Goodness-of-fit tests based on the kernel density estimator,” Scandinavian Journal of Statistics , vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 599–616, 2005
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Golfarelli, S. Rizzi, and A. Proli, “Designing what-if analysis: towards a methodology,” in Proceedings of the 9th ACM International Workshop on Data Warehousing and OLAP , 2006, pp. 51–58
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. Valizadegan and P.-N. Tan, “Kernel based detection of mislabeled training examples,” in Proceedings of the 2007 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining . SIAM, 2007, pp. 309–319
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
J.-w. Sun, F.-y. Zhao, C.-j. Wang, and S.-f. Chen, “Identifying and correcting mislabeled training instances,” in Future generation communication and networking (FGCN 2007) , vol. 1. IEEE, 2007, pp. 244–250
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Strobl, A.-L. Boulesteix, T. Kneib, T. Augustin, and A. Zeileis, “Conditional variable importance for random forests,” BMC Bioinformatics , vol. 9, pp. 1–11, 2008
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. A. Boden, Mind as machine: A history of cognitive science . Oxford University Press, 2008
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, D. G. Altman, and P. Group*, “Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the prisma statement,” Annals of Internal Medicine , vol. 151, no. 4, pp. 264–269, 2009
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Pearl et al. , “Causal inference in statistics: An overview,” Statistics surveys , 2009
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, J. Friedman, T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman, “Boosting and additive trees,” The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction , pp. 337–387, 2009
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Chechik, V. Sharma, U. Shalit, and S. Bengio, “Large scale online learning of image similarity through ranking.” Journal of Machine Learning Research , vol. 11, no. 3, 2010
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. M. Weston, E. B. Bass, D. E. Ford, and J. B. Segal, “Faculty involvement in translational research and interdisciplinary collaboration at a us academic medical center,” Journal of Investigative Medicine , vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 770–776, 2010
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Bien and R. Tibshirani, “Prototype selection for interpretable classification,” The Annals of Applied Statistics , 2011
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Basu, L. O. Hall, D. B. Goldgof, Y. Gu, V. Kumar, J. Choi, R. J. Gillies, and R. A. Gatenby, “Developing a classifier model for lung tumors in ct-scan images,” in 2011 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics . IEEE, 2011, pp. 1306–1312
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Wah, S. Branson, P. Welinder, P. Perona, and S. Belongie, “The caltech-ucsd birds-200-2011 dataset,” 2011
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. L. Maas, R. E. Daly, P. T. Pham, D. Huang, A. Y. Ng, and C. Potts, “Learning word vectors for sentiment analysis,” in Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies . Portland, Oregon, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, June 2011, pp. 142–150. [Online]. Available: http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P11-1015
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. R. Hampel, E. M. Ronchetti, P. J. Rousseeuw, and W. A. Stahel, Robust statistics: the approach based on influence functions . John Wiley & Sons, 2011
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Glazer, M. Lindenbaum, and S. Markovitch, “Learning high-density regions for a generalized kolmogorov-smirnov test in high-dimensional data,” Advances in neural information processing systems , vol. 25, 2012
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
X. Wu, X. Zhu, G.-Q. Wu, and W. Ding, “Data mining with big data,” IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering , vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 97–107, 2013
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Guan and W. Yuan, “A survey of mislabeled training data detection techniques for pattern classification,” IETE Technical Review , vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 524–530, 2013
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. De Ville, “Decision trees,” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics , vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 448–455, 2013
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. E. Schapire, “Explaining adaboost,” in Empirical Inference: Festschrift in Honor of Vladimir N. Vapnik . Springer, 2013, pp. 37–52
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. D. Zeiler and R. Fergus, “Visualizing and understanding convolutional networks,” in Computer Vision–ECCV 2014: 13th European Conference, Zurich, Switzerland, September 6-12, 2014, Proceedings, Part I 13 . Springer, 2014, pp. 818–833
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Štrumbelj and I. Kononenko, “Explaining prediction models and individual predictions with feature contributions,” Knowledge and information systems , vol. 41, pp. 647–665, 2014
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Y. Ma and G. Guo, Support vector machines applications . Springer, 2014, vol. 649
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio, and G. Hinton, “Deep learning,” Nature , 2015
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Kontschieder, M. Fiterau, A. Criminisi, and S. R. Bulo, “Deep neural decision forests,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision , 2015
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Mahendran and A. Vedaldi, “Understanding deep image representations by inverting them,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , 2015
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. T. Ribeiro, S. Singh, and C. Guestrin, “" why should i trust you?" explaining the predictions of any classifier,” in Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining , 2016
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Datta, S. Sen, and Y. Zick, “Algorithmic transparency via quantitative input influence: Theory and experiments with learning systems,” in 2016 IEEE symposium on security and privacy (S&P) . IEEE, 2016, pp. 598–617
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Zhou, A. Khosla, A. Lapedriza, A. Oliva, and A. Torralba, “Learning deep features for discriminative localization,” in IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2016
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Shrivastava, A. Gupta, and R. Girshick, “Training region-based object detectors with online hard example mining,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , 2016, pp. 761–769
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
W. Samek, A. Binder, G. Montavon, S. Lapuschkin, and K.-R. Müller, “Evaluating the visualization of what a deep neural network has learned,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems , vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 2660–2673, 2016
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Chen and C. Guestrin, “Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system,” in Proceedings of the 22nd acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining , 2016, pp. 785–794
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
O. Canévet and F. Fleuret, “Large scale hard sample mining with monte carlo tree search,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2016, pp. 5128–5137
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. R. Selvaraju, M. Cogswell, A. Das, R. Vedantam, D. Parikh, and D. Batra, “Grad-cam: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision , 2017
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. W. Koh and P. Liang, “Understanding black-box predictions via influence functions,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning . PMLR, 2017
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. M. Lundberg and S.-I. Lee, “A unified approach to interpreting model predictions,” in Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 2017
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Shrikumar, P. Greenside, and A. Kundaje, “Learning important features through propagating activation differences,” in International conference on machine learning . PMLR, 2017, pp. 3145–3153
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Montavon, S. Lapuschkin, A. Binder, W. Samek, and K.-R. Müller, “Explaining nonlinear classification decisions with deep taylor decomposition,” Pattern Recognition , 2017
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Bau, B. Zhou, A. Khosla, A. Oliva, and A. Torralba, “Network dissection: Quantifying interpretability of deep visual representations,” in IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , 2017
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
T.-Y. Lin, P. Goyal, R. Girshick, K. He, and P. Dollár, “Focal loss for dense object detection,” in Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision , 2017, pp. 2980–2988
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Krishnan and E. Wu, “Palm: Machine learning explanations for iterative debugging,” in Proceedings of the 2Nd workshop on human-in-the-loop data analytics , 2017, pp. 1–6
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Gross and I. Bloch, “Quantum simulations with ultracold atoms in optical lattices,” Science , vol. 357, no. 6355, pp. 995–1001, 2017
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, Ł. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, “Attention is all you need,” Advances in neural information processing systems , vol. 30, 2017
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Ke, Q. Meng, T. Finley, T. Wang, W. Chen, W. Ma, Q. Ye, and T.-Y. Liu, “Lightgbm: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree,” Advances in neural information processing systems , vol. 30, 2017
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Q. Dong, S. Gong, and X. Zhu, “Class rectification hard mining for imbalanced deep learning,” in Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision , 2017, pp. 1851–1860
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Karpatne, G. Atluri, J. H. Faghmous, M. Steinbach, A. Banerjee, A. Ganguly, S. Shekhar, N. Samatova, and V. Kumar, “Theory-guided data science: A new paradigm for scientific discovery from data,” IEEE Transactions on knowledge and data engineering , vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 2318–2331, 2017
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Guerrero, E. Hahn, T. Khachikian, E. Chuang, A. Brown et al. , “Interdisciplinary dissemination and implementation research to advance translational science: challenges and opportunities,” Journal of clinical and translational science , vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 67–72, 2017
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
X. Zhang, X. Zhu, and S. Wright, “Training set debugging using trusted items,” in Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence , vol. 32, no. 1, 2018
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Zhou, D. Bau, A. Oliva, and A. Torralba, “Interpreting deep visual representations via network dissection,” IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence , vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 2131–2145, 2018
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Kim, M. Wattenberg, J. Gilmer, C. Cai, J. Wexler, F. Viegas et al. , “Interpretability beyond feature attribution: Quantitative testing with concept activation vectors (tcav),” in International conference on machine learning . PMLR, 2018, pp. 2668–2677
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Smirnov, A. Melnikov, A. Oleinik, E. Ivanova, I. Kalinovskiy, and E. Luckyanets, “Hard example mining with auxiliary embeddings,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops , 2018, pp. 37–46
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Toneva, A. Sordoni, R. T. des Combes, A. Trischler, Y. Bengio, and G. J. Gordon, “An empirical study of example forgetting during deep neural network learning,” in International Conference on Learning Representations , 2018
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Madras, E. Creager, T. Pitassi, and R. Zemel, “Learning adversarially fair and transferable representations,” in International Conference on Machine Learning . PMLR, 2018, pp. 3384–3393
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Ancona, E. Ceolini, C. Öztireli, and M. Gross, “Towards better understanding of gradient-based attribution methods for deep neural networks,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations , 2018
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Guidotti, A. Monreale, S. Ruggieri, F. Turini, F. Giannotti, and D. Pedreschi, “A survey of methods for explaining black box models,” ACM computing surveys (CSUR) , vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 1–42, 2018
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. M. Lundberg, G. G. Erion, and S.-I. Lee, “Consistent individualized feature attribution for tree ensembles,” Methods , vol. 5, no. 13, p. 25, 2018
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Robnik-Šikonja and M. Bohanec, “Perturbation-based explanations of prediction models,” Human and Machine Learning: Visible, Explainable, Trustworthy and Transparent , pp. 159–175, 2018
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Chattopadhay, A. Sarkar, P. Howlader, and V. N. Balasubramanian, “Grad-cam++: Generalized gradient-based visual explanations for deep convolutional networks,” in Proceedings of the Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision , 2018
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. V. Carvalho, E. M. Pereira, and J. S. Cardoso, “Machine learning interpretability: A survey on methods and metrics,” Electronics , 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Z. Qi, S. Khorram, and F. Li, “Visualizing deep networks by optimizing with integrated gradients.” in CVPR Workshops , vol. 2, 2019, pp. 1–4
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. Merrick, “Randomized ablation feature importance,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.00174 , 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Z. T. Fernando, J. Singh, and A. Anand, “A study on the interpretability of neural retrieval models using deepshap,” in Proceedings of the 42nd international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval , 2019, pp. 1005–1008
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Voita, D. Talbot, F. Moiseev, R. Sennrich, and I. Titov, “Analyzing multi-head self-attention: Specialized heads do the heavy lifting, the rest can be pruned,” in Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics , 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Di Castro and E. Bertini, “Surrogate decision tree visualization interpreting and visualizing black-box classification models with surrogate decision tree,” in CEUR Workshop Proceedings , vol. 2327. CEUR-WS, 2019
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
V. Couteaux, O. Nempont, G. Pizaine, and I. Bloch, “Towards interpretability of segmentation networks by analyzing deepdreams,” in Interpretability of Machine Intelligence in Medical Image Computing and Multimodal Learning for Clinical Decision Support: Second International Workshop, iMIMIC 2019, and 9th International Workshop, ML-CDS 2019, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2019, Shenzhen, China, October 17, 2019, Proceedings 9 . Springer, 2019, pp. 56–63
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Q. Zhang, Y. Yang, H. Ma, and Y. N. Wu, “Interpreting cnns via decision trees,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2019
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
2021
Later among the works it cites.
V. Pulastya, G. Nuti, Y. K. Atri, and T. Chakraborty, “Assessing the quality of the datasets by identifying mislabeled samples,” in Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining , 2021, pp. 18–22
2021
Later among the works it cites.
N. Gupta, S. Mujumdar, H. Patel, S. Masuda, N. Panwar, S. Bandyopadhyay, S. Mehta, S. Guttula, S. Afzal, R. Sharma Mittal et al. , “Data quality for machine learning tasks,” in Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD conference on knowledge discovery & data mining , 2021, pp. 4040–4041
2021
Later among the works it cites.
2021
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
T. Laugel, M.-J. Lesot, C. Marsala, X. Renard, and M. Detyniecki, “Unjustified classification regions and counterfactual explanations in machine learning,” in Joint European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases . Springer, 2019
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Ilyas, S. Santurkar, L. Engstrom, B. Tran, and A. Madry, “Adversarial examples are not bugs, they are features,” in Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 2019
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
C. Chen, O. Li, D. Tao, A. Barnett, C. Rudin, and J. K. Su, “This looks like that: deep learning for interpretable image recognition,” Advances in neural information processing systems , vol. 32, 2019
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Ghorbani and J. Zou, “Data shapley: Equitable valuation of data for machine learning,” in International conference on machine learning . PMLR, 2019, pp. 2242–2251
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Xiang, X. Ye, J. Xia, J. Wu, Y. Chen, and S. Liu, “Interactive correction of mislabeled training data,” in 2019 IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST) . IEEE, 2019, pp. 57–68
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Huang, L. Qu, R. Jia, and B. Zhao, “O2u-net: A simple noisy label detection approach for deep neural networks,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , 2019, pp. 3326–3334
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Gupta and A. Gupta, “Dealing with noise problem in machine learning data-sets: A systematic review,” Procedia Computer Science , vol. 161, pp. 466–474, 2019
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
D. Ardila, A. P. Kiraly, S. Bharadwaj, B. Choi, J. J. Reicher, L. Peng, D. Tse, M. Etemadi, W. Ye, G. Corrado et al. , “End-to-end lung cancer screening with three-dimensional deep learning on low-dose chest computed tomography,” Nature medicine , vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 954–961, 2019
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Later among the works it cites.
N. Burkart and M. F. Huber, “A survey on the explainability of supervised machine learning,” Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research , vol. 70, pp. 245–317, 2021
2021
Later among the works it cites.
2021
Later among the works it cites.
T. Jing, H. Xia, R. Tian, H. Ding, X. Luo, J. Domeyer, R. Sherony, and Z. Ding, “Inaction: Interpretable action decision making for autonomous driving,” in European Conference on Computer Vision . Springer, 2022, pp. 370–387
2022
Later among the works it cites.
C.-K. Yeh, A. Taly, M. Sundararajan, F. Liu, and P. Ravikumar, “First is better than last for language data influence,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , S. Koyejo, S. Mohamed, A. Agarwal, D. Belgrave, K. Cho, and A. Oh, Eds., vol. 35. Curran Associates, Inc., 2022, pp. 32 285–32 298. [Online]. Available: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2022/file/d07022783ff6f7bf7a288c207b7dcbd1-Paper-Conference.pdf
2022
Later among the works it cites.
C. Zednik and H. Boelsen, “Scientific exploration and explainable artificial intelligence,” Minds and Machines , vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 219–239, 2022
2022
Later among the works it cites.
X. Li, H. Xiong, X. Li, X. Wu, X. Zhang, J. Liu, J. Bian, and D. Dou, “Interpretable deep learning: Interpretation, interpretability, trustworthiness, and beyond,” Knowledge and Information Systems , vol. 64, no. 12, pp. 3197–3234, 2022
2022
Later among the works it cites.
J. Han, J. Pei, and H. Tong, Data mining: concepts and techniques . Morgan kaufmann, 2022
2022
Later among the works it cites.
D. D. Lundstrom, T. Huang, and M. Razaviyayn, “A rigorous study of integrated gradients method and extensions to internal neuron attributions,” in International Conference on Machine Learning . PMLR, 2022, pp. 14 485–14 508
2022
Later among the works it cites.
J. Chen, X. Li, L. Yu, D. Dou, and H. Xiong, “Beyond intuition: Rethinking token attributions inside transformers,” Transactions on Machine Learning Research , 2022
2022
Later among the works it cites.
J. Donnelly, A. J. Barnett, and C. Chen, “Deformable protopnet: An interpretable image classifier using deformable prototypes,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2022, pp. 10 265–10 275
2022
Later among the works it cites.
G. Singh, “Think positive: An interpretable neural network for image recognition,” Neural Networks , vol. 151, pp. 178–189, 2022
2022
Later among the works it cites.
J. Crabbé and M. van der Schaar, “Concept activation regions: A generalized framework for concept-based explanations,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 35, pp. 2590–2607, 2022
2022
Later among the works it cites.
R. Liu, Y. Lin, X. Yang, and J. S. Dong, “Debugging and explaining metric learning approaches: An influence function based perspective,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 35, pp. 7824–7837, 2022
2022
Later among the works it cites.
J. Bae, N. Ng, A. Lo, M. Ghassemi, and R. B. Grosse, “If influence functions are the answer, then what is the question?” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 35, pp. 17 953–17 967, 2022
2022
Later among the works it cites.
A. Silva, R. Chopra, and M. Gombolay, “Cross-loss influence functions to explain deep network representations,” in International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics . PMLR, 2022, pp. 1–17
2022
Later among the works it cites.
Y. Kwon and J. Zou, “Beta shapley: a unified and noise-reduced data valuation framework for machine learning.” in International Conference on AI and Statistics , 2022
2022
Later among the works it cites.
S. Schoch, H. Xu, and Y. Ji, “Cs-shapley: Class-wise shapley values for data valuation in classification,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 35, pp. 34 574–34 585, 2022
2022
Later among the works it cites.
H. A. Just, F. Kang, T. Wang, Y. Zeng, M. Ko, M. Jin, and R. Jia, “Lava: Data valuation without pre-specified learning algorithms,” in The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations , 2022
2022
Later among the works it cites.
H. Song, M. Kim, D. Park, Y. Shin, and J.-G. Lee, “Learning from noisy labels with deep neural networks: A survey,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems , 2022
2022
Later among the works it cites.
A. Martinez-Seras, J. Del Ser, and P. Garcia-Bringas, “Can post-hoc explanations effectively detect out-of-distribution samples?” in 2022 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE) . IEEE, 2022, pp. 1–9
2022
Later among the works it cites.
S. Grafberger, P. Groth, J. Stoyanovich, and S. Schelter, “Data distribution debugging in machine learning pipelines,” The VLDB Journal , vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1103–1126, 2022
2022
Later among the works it cites.
E. A. Stanley, M. Wilms, P. Mouches, and N. D. Forkert, “Fairness-related performance and explainability effects in deep learning models for brain image analysis,” Journal of Medical Imaging , vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 061 102–061 102, 2022
2022
Later among the works it cites.
M. Jakesch, Z. Buçinca, S. Amershi, and A. Olteanu, “How different groups prioritize ethical values for responsible ai,” in Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , 2022, pp. 310–323
2022
Later among the works it cites.
G. Lima, N. Grgić-Hlača, J. K. Jeong, and M. Cha, “The conflict between explainable and accountable decision-making algorithms,” in Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , 2022, pp. 2103–2113
2022
Later among the works it cites.
J. Donia, “Normative logics of algorithmic accountability,” in 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , 2022, pp. 598–598
2022
Later among the works it cites.
B. Rozemberczki, L. Watson, P. Bayer, H.-T. Yang, O. Kiss, S. Nilsson, and R. Sarkar, “The shapley value in machine learning,” in The 31st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence and the 25th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence . International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2022, pp. 5572–5579
2022
Later among the works it cites.
2022
Later among the works it cites.
G. Carloni, A. Berti, C. Iacconi, M. A. Pascali, and S. Colantonio, “On the applicability of prototypical part learning in medical images: breast masses classification using protopnet,” in International Conference on Pattern Recognition . Springer, 2022, pp. 539–557
2022
Later among the works it cites.
S. S. Kim, N. Meister, V. V. Ramaswamy, R. Fong, and O. Russakovsky, “Hive: Evaluating the human interpretability of visual explanations,” in European Conference on Computer Vision . Springer, 2022, pp. 280–298
2022
Later among the works it cites.
J. Lin, A. Zhang, M. Lécuyer, J. Li, A. Panda, and S. Sen, “Measuring the effect of training data on deep learning predictions via randomized experiments,” in Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Machine Learning , ser. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, K. Chaudhuri, S. Jegelka, L. Song, C. Szepesvari, G. Niu, and S. Sabato, Eds., vol. 162. PMLR, 17–23 Jul 2022, pp. 13 468–13 504. [Online]. Available: https://proceedings.mlr.press/v162/lin22h.html
2022
Later among the works it cites.
P. Sattigeri, S. Ghosh, I. Padhi, P. Dognin, and K. R. Varshney, “Fair infinitesimal jackknife: Mitigating the influence of biased training data points without refitting,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 35, pp. 35 894–35 906, 2022
2022
Later among the works it cites.
T. Formal, C. Lassance, B. Piwowarski, and S. Clinchant, “From distillation to hard negative sampling: Making sparse neural ir models more effective,” in Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval , 2022, pp. 2353–2359
2022
Later among the works it cites.
S. Zhang, M. Liu, J. Yan, H. Zhang, L. Huang, X. Yang, and P. Lu, “M-mix: Generating hard negatives via multi-sample mixing for contrastive learning,” in Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining , 2022, pp. 2461–2470
2022
Later among the works it cites.
2022
Later among the works it cites.
V. Yepmo, G. Smits, and O. Pivert, “Anomaly explanation: A review,” Data & Knowledge Engineering , vol. 137, p. 101946, 2022
2022
Later among the works it cites.
M. Krenn, R. Pollice, S. Y. Guo, M. Aldeghi, A. Cervera-Lierta, P. Friederich, G. dos Passos Gomes, F. Häse, A. Jinich, A. Nigam et al. , “On scientific understanding with artificial intelligence,” Nature Reviews Physics , vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 761–769, 2022
2022
Later among the works it cites.
2022
Later among the works it cites.
S. Wang, X. Du, G. Liu, H. Xing, Z. Jiao, J. Yan, Y. Liu, H. Lv, and Y. Xia, “An interpretable data-driven medical knowledge discovery pipeline based on artificial intelligence,” IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics , 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
Q. Jia, X. Li, L. Yu, J. Bian, P. Zhao, S. Li, H. Xiong, and D. Dou, “Learning from training dynamics: Identifying mislabeled data beyond manually designed features,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
R. Marcinkevičs and J. E. Vogt, “Interpretable and explainable machine learning: A methods-centric overview with concrete examples,” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery , p. e1493, 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
X. Li, H. Xiong, X. Li, X. Zhang, J. Liu, H. Jiang, Z. Chen, and D. Dou, “G-lime: Statistical learning for local interpretations of deep neural networks using global priors,” Artificial Intelligence , vol. 314, p. 103823, 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
L. Xu, X. Yan, W. Ding, and Z. Liu, “Attribution rollout: a new way to interpret visual transformer,” Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing , vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 163–173, 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
L.-D. Quach, K. N. Quoc, A. N. Quynh, N. N. Thai, and T. G. Nguyen, “Using gradient-weighted class activation mapping to explain deep learning models on agricultural dataset,” IEEE Access , 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
M. Nauta, J. Schlötterer, M. van Keulen, and C. Seifert, “Pip-net: Patch-based intuitive prototypes for interpretable image classification,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2023, pp. 2744–2753
2023
Later among the works it cites.
M. Nauta and C. Seifert, “The co-12 recipe for evaluating interpretable part-prototype image classifiers,” in World Conference on Explainable Artificial Intelligence . Springer, 2023, pp. 397–420
2023
Later among the works it cites.
J. Wang, P. Jiajie, Z. Liu, and H. Zhao, “Hqprotopnet: An evidence-based model for interpretable image recognition,” in 2023 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) . IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–8
2023
Later among the works it cites.
M. Moayeri, K. Rezaei, M. Sanjabi, and S. Feizi, “Text2concept: Concept activation vectors directly from text,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2023, pp. 3743–3748
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
S. Bates, T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani, “Cross-validation: what does it estimate and how well does it do it?” Journal of the American Statistical Association , pp. 1–12, 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
J. T. Wang and R. Jia, “Data banzhaf: A robust data valuation framework for machine learning,” in International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics . PMLR, 2023, pp. 6388–6421
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
X. Zhou and O. Wu, “Which samples should be learned first: Easy or hard?” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems , 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
M. Cinquini, F. Giannotti, R. Guidotti, and A. Mattei, “Handling missing values in local post-hoc explainability,” in World Conference on Explainable Artificial Intelligence . Springer, 2023, pp. 256–278
2023
Later among the works it cites.
R. Dua, S. Yang, Y. Li, and E. Choi, “Task agnostic and post-hoc unseen distribution detection,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision , 2023, pp. 1350–1359
2023
Later among the works it cites.
L. Holmberg, “Exploring out-of-distribution in image classification for neural networks via concepts,” in International Congress on Information and Communication Technology . Springer, 2023, pp. 155–171
2023
Later among the works it cites.
G. De Bernardi, S. Narteni, E. Cambiaso, M. Muselli, and M. Mongelli, “Weighted mutual information for out-of-distribution detection,” in World Conference on Explainable Artificial Intelligence . Springer, 2023, pp. 318–331
2023
Later among the works it cites.
J. Zhou and T. Joachims, “How to explain and justify almost any decision: Potential pitfalls for accountability in ai decision-making,” in Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , 2023, pp. 12–21
2023
Later among the works it cites.
J. J. Smith, A. Buhayh, A. Kathait, P. Ragothaman, N. Mattei, R. Burke, and A. Voida, “The many faces of fairness: Exploring the institutional logics of multistakeholder microlending recommendation,” in Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , 2023, pp. 1652–1663
2023
Later among the works it cites.
J. Gardner, R. Yu, Q. Nguyen, C. Brooks, and R. Kizilcec, “Cross-institutional transfer learning for educational models: Implications for model performance, fairness, and equity,” in Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , 2023, pp. 1664–1684
2023
Later among the works it cites.
B. Benbouzid, “Fairness in machine learning from the perspective of sociology of statistics: How machine learning is becoming scientific by turning its back on metrological realism,” in Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , 2023, pp. 35–43
2023
Later among the works it cites.
H. Shrestha, K. Cachel, M. Alkhathlan, E. Rundensteiner, and L. Harrison, “Help or hinder? evaluating the impact of fairness metrics and algorithms in visualizations for consensus ranking,” in Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , 2023, pp. 1685–1698
2023
Later among the works it cites.
B. Rakova and R. Dobbe, “Algorithms as social-ecological-technological systems: an environmental justice lens on algorithmic audits,” in Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , 2023, pp. 491–491
2023
Later among the works it cites.
M. Mccradden, O. Odusi, S. Joshi, I. Akrout, K. Ndlovu, B. Glocker, G. Maicas, X. Liu, M. Mazwi, T. Garnett et al. , “What’s fair is… fair? presenting justefab, an ethical framework for operationalizing medical ethics and social justice in the integration of clinical machine learning: Justefab,” in Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , 2023, pp. 1505–1519
2023
Later among the works it cites.
W. Hawkins and B. Mittelstadt, “The ethical ambiguity of ai data enrichment: Measuring gaps in research ethics norms and practices,” in Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , 2023, pp. 261–270
2023
Later among the works it cites.
T. Schmude, L. Koesten, T. Möller, and S. Tschiatschek, “On the impact of explanations on understanding of algorithmic decision-making,” in Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , 2023, pp. 959–970
2023
Later among the works it cites.
A. Marian, “Algorithmic transparency and accountability through crowdsourcing: A study of the nyc school admission lottery,” in Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , 2023, pp. 434–443
2023
Later among the works it cites.
J. P. Lapostol Piderit, R. Garrido Iglesias, and M. P. Hermosilla Cornejo, “Algorithmic transparency from the south: Examining the state of algorithmic transparency in chile’s public administration algorithms,” in Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , 2023, pp. 227–235
2023
Later among the works it cites.
M. Proietti, A. Ragno, B. L. Rosa, R. Ragno, and R. Capobianco, “Explainable ai in drug discovery: self-interpretable graph neural network for molecular property prediction using concept whitening,” Machine Learning , pp. 1–32, 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
P. Lemos, N. Jeffrey, M. Cranmer, S. Ho, and P. Battaglia, “Rediscovering orbital mechanics with machine learning,” Machine Learning: Science and Technology , vol. 4, no. 4, p. 045002, 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
H. Heberle, L. Zhao, S. Schmidt, T. Wolf, and J. Heinrich, “Xsmiles: interactive visualization for molecules, smiles and xai attribution scores,” Journal of Cheminformatics , vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
K. Borys, Y. A. Schmitt, M. Nauta, C. Seifert, N. Krämer, C. M. Friedrich, and F. Nensa, “Explainable ai in medical imaging: An overview for clinical practitioners–beyond saliency-based xai approaches,” European journal of radiology , p. 110786, 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
P. Keyl, P. Bischoff, G. Dernbach, M. Bockmayr, R. Fritz, D. Horst, N. Blüthgen, G. Montavon, K.-R. Müller, and F. Klauschen, “Single-cell gene regulatory network prediction by explainable ai,” Nucleic Acids Research , vol. 51, no. 4, pp. e20–e20, 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
A. Li, S. Wu, H. Chen, Z. Du, and Q. Xia, “Explainable machine learning to uncover hydrogen diffusion mechanism in clinopyroxene,” Chemical Geology , vol. 641, p. 121776, 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
A. Notovich, H. Chalutz-Ben Gal, and I. Ben-Gal, “Explainable artificial intelligence (xai): Motivation, terminology, and taxonomy,” in Machine Learning for Data Science Handbook: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook . Springer, 2023, pp. 971–985
2023
Later among the works it cites.
X. Li, H. Xiong, S. Huang, S. Ji, and D. Dou, “Cross-model consensus of explanations and beyond for image classification models: An empirical study,” Machine Learning , vol. 112, no. 5, pp. 1627–1662, 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
X. Li, H. Xiong, Y. Liu, D. Zhou, Z. Chen, Y. Wang, and D. Dou, “Distilling ensemble of explanations for weakly-supervised pre-training of image segmentation models,” Machine Learning , vol. 112, no. 6, pp. 2193–2209, 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
S. Gautam, M. M.-C. Höhne, S. Hansen, R. Jenssen, and M. Kampffmeyer, “This looks more like that: Enhancing self-explaining models by prototypical relevance propagation,” Pattern Recognition , vol. 136, p. 109172, 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
H. Behzadi-Khormouji and J. Oramas, “A protocol for evaluating model interpretation methods from visual explanations,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision , 2023, pp. 1421–1429
2023
Later among the works it cites.
J. Brophy, Z. Hammoudeh, and D. Lowd, “Adapting and evaluating influence-estimation methods for gradient-boosted decision trees,” Journal of Machine Learning Research , vol. 24, no. 154, pp. 1–48, 2023. [Online]. Available: http://jmlr.org/papers/v24/22-0449.html
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
Y. Liu, X. Yang, S. Zhou, X. Liu, Z. Wang, K. Liang, W. Tu, L. Li, J. Duan, and C. Chen, “Hard sample aware network for contrastive deep graph clustering,” in Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence , vol. 37, no. 7, 2023, pp. 8914–8922
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
B. Blili-Hamelin and L. Hancox-Li, “Making intelligence: Ethical values in iq and ml benchmarks,” in Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , 2023, pp. 271–284
2023
Later among the works it cites.
G. P. Wellawatte, H. A. Gandhi, A. Seshadri, and A. D. White, “A perspective on explanations of molecular prediction models,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation , vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 2149–2160, 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
X. Li, M. Du, J. Chen, Y. Chai, H. Lakkaraju, and H. Xiong, “M4: A unified xai benchmark for faithfulness evaluation of feature attribution methods across metrics, modalities and models,” in Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track , 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
H. Zhao, H. Chen, F. Yang, N. Liu, H. Deng, H. Cai, S. Wang, D. Yin, and M. Du, “Explainability for large language models: A survey,” ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) , 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.