Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Do large language models (LLMs) know the law? These models are increasingly being used to augment legal practice, education, and research, yet their revolutionary potential is threatened by the presence of hallucinations -- textual output that is not consistent with legal facts.
“Verified Uncertainty Calibration”
Ananya Kumar, Percy Liang and Tengyu Ma · 1909
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Verified Uncertainty Calibration”
Ananya Kumar, Percy Liang and Tengyu Ma · 1909
Earlier work this paper cites.
“On Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarization”
Joshua Maynez, Shashi Narayan, Bernd Bohnet and Ryan McDonald · 1919
Earlier work this paper cites.
“On Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarization”
Joshua Maynez, Shashi Narayan, Bernd Bohnet and Ryan McDonald · 1919
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus”
C.. Ogden · 1921
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus”
C.. Ogden · 1921
Earlier work this paper cites.
“The Johari Window as a Graphic Model of Interpersonal Awareness”
Joseph Luft and Harrington Ingham · 1955
Earlier work this paper cites.
“The Johari Window as a Graphic Model of Interpersonal Awareness”
Joseph Luft and Harrington Ingham · 1955
Earlier work this paper cites.
“A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales”
Jacob Cohen · 1960
Earlier work this paper cites.
“A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales”
Jacob Cohen · 1960
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases”
Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman · 1974
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases”
Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman · 1974
Earlier work this paper cites.
“The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data”
J. Landis and Gary. Koch · 1977
Earlier work this paper cites.
“The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data”
J. Landis and Gary. Koch · 1977
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Law’s Empire”
Ronald Dworkin · 1986
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Law’s Empire”
Ronald Dworkin · 1986
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Language Models Are Few-Shot Learners”, 2020
Tom. Brown et al · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Language Models Are Few-Shot Learners”, 2020
Tom. Brown et al · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Network Analysis and the Law: Measuring the Legal Importance of Precedents at the U.S. Supreme Court”
James. Fowler et al · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Network Analysis and the Law: Measuring the Legal Importance of Precedents at the U.S. Supreme Court”
James. Fowler et al · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Network Analysis and the Law: Measuring the Legal Importance of Precedents at the U.S. Supreme Court”
James. Fowler et al · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Network Analysis and the Law: Measuring the Legal Importance of Precedents at the U.S. Supreme Court”
James. Fowler et al · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
“The United States Courts of Appeals Database, 1925–1996”
Donald. Songer · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
“The United States Courts of Appeals Database, 1925–1996”
Donald. Songer · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
“The United States Courts of Appeals Database, 1925–1996”
Donald. Songer · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
“The United States Courts of Appeals Database, 1925–1996”
Donald. Songer · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Update to the Appeals Courts Database (1997–2002)”
Ashlyn. Kuersten and Susan. Haire · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Update to the Appeals Courts Database (1997–2002)”
Ashlyn. Kuersten and Susan. Haire · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Update to the Appeals Courts Database (1997–2002)”
Ashlyn. Kuersten and Susan. Haire · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Update to the Appeals Courts Database (1997–2002)”
Ashlyn. Kuersten and Susan. Haire · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
“The Citation and Depreciation of U.S. Supreme Court Precedent”
Ryan. Black and James. Spriggs II · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
“The Citation and Depreciation of U.S. Supreme Court Precedent”
Ryan. Black and James. Spriggs II · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
“The Citation and Depreciation of U.S. Supreme Court Precedent”
Ryan. Black and James. Spriggs II · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
“The Citation and Depreciation of U.S. Supreme Court Precedent”
Ryan. Black and James. Spriggs II · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Big Data’s Disparate Impact”
Solon Barocas and Andrew. Selbst · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Big Data’s Disparate Impact”
Solon Barocas and Andrew. Selbst · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
“How AI Can Improve Access to Justice”
Joel Tito · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
“On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks”
Chuan Guo, Geoff Pleiss, Yu Sun and Kilian. Weinberger · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
“How AI Can Improve Access to Justice”
Joel Tito · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
“On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks”
Chuan Guo, Geoff Pleiss, Yu Sun and Kilian. Weinberger · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Faithful to the Original: Fact Aware Neural Abstractive Summarization”
Ziqiang Cao, Furu Wei, Wenjie Li and Sujian Li · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Discrimination in the Age of Algorithms”
Jon Kleinberg, Jens Ludwig, Sendhil Mullainathan and Cass Sunstein · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Faithful to the Original: Fact Aware Neural Abstractive Summarization”
Ziqiang Cao, Furu Wei, Wenjie Li and Sujian Li · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Discrimination in the Age of Algorithms”
Jon Kleinberg, Jens Ludwig, Sendhil Mullainathan and Cass Sunstein · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Big Data and Discrimination”
Talia. Gillis and Jann. Spiess · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Remedies for Robots”
Mark. Lemley and Bryan Casey · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Bias In, Bias Out”
Sandra. Mayson · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Big Data and Discrimination”
Talia. Gillis and Jann. Spiess · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Remedies for Robots”
Mark. Lemley and Bryan Casey · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Bias In, Bias Out”
Sandra. Mayson · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Algorithmic Accountability in the Administrative State”
David Engstrom and Daniel. Ho · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Government by Algorithm: Artificial Intelligence in Federal Administrative Agencies”, 2020
David Engstrom, Daniel. Ho, Catherine. Sharkey and Mariano-Florentino Cuéllar · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Administering Artificial Intelligence”
Alicia Solow-Niederman · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Effect of Confidence and Explanation on Accuracy and Trust Calibration in AI-assisted Decision Making”
Yunfeng Zhang, Q. Liao and Rachel.. Bellamy · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Algorithmic Accountability in the Administrative State”
David Engstrom and Daniel. Ho · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Government by Algorithm: Artificial Intelligence in Federal Administrative Agencies”, 2020
David Engstrom, Daniel. Ho, Catherine. Sharkey and Mariano-Florentino Cuéllar · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Administering Artificial Intelligence”
Alicia Solow-Niederman · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Effect of Confidence and Explanation on Accuracy and Trust Calibration in AI-assisted Decision Making”
Yunfeng Zhang, Q. Liao and Rachel.. Bellamy · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Eyecite: A Tool for Parsing Legal Citations”
Jack Cushman, Matthew Dahl and Michael Lissner · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Machine Advice with a Warning about Machine Limitations: Experimentally Testing the Solution Mandated by the Wisconsin Supreme Court”
Christoph Engel and Nina Grgić-Hlača · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Algorithmic Monoculture and Social Welfare”
Jon Kleinberg and Manish Raghavan · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Hurdles to Progress in Long-form Question Answering”
Kalpesh Krishna, Aurko Roy and Mohit Iyyer · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Retrieval Augmentation Reduces Hallucination in Conversation”
Kurt Shuster et al · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Entailment as Few-Shot Learner”
Sinong Wang et al · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Eyecite: A Tool for Parsing Legal Citations”
Jack Cushman, Matthew Dahl and Michael Lissner · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Machine Advice with a Warning about Machine Limitations: Experimentally Testing the Solution Mandated by the Wisconsin Supreme Court”
Christoph Engel and Nina Grgić-Hlača · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Algorithmic Monoculture and Social Welfare”
Jon Kleinberg and Manish Raghavan · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Hurdles to Progress in Long-form Question Answering”
Kalpesh Krishna, Aurko Roy and Mohit Iyyer · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Retrieval Augmentation Reduces Hallucination in Conversation”
Kurt Shuster et al · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Entailment as Few-Shot Learner”
Sinong Wang et al · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
“On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models”, 2022
Rishi Bommasani et al · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Hallucinated but Factual! Inspecting the Factuality of Hallucinations in Abstractive Summarization”
Meng Cao, Yue Dong and Jackie Cheung · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language Models”, 2022
Nicholas Carlini et al · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
“ChatGPT Goes to Law School”
Jonathan. Choi, Kristin. Hickman, Amy Monahan and Daniel Schwarcz · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
“The Algorithmic Leviathan: Arbitrariness, Fairness, and Opportunity in Algorithmic Decision-Making Systems”
Kathleen Creel and Deborah Hellman · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Pile of Law: Learning Responsible Data Filtering from the Law and a 256GB Open-Source Legal Dataset”, 2022
Peter Henderson et al · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Capturing Failures of Large Language Models via Human Cognitive Biases”, 2022
Erik Jones and Jacob Steinhardt · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Know”, 2022
Saurav Kadavath et al · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
“TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoods”, 2022
Stephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton and Owain Evans · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Access to A.I. Justice: Avoiding an Inequitable Two-Tiered System of Legal Services”
Drew Simshaw · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
“2022 Supreme Court Database, Version 2022 Release 01”, 2022
Harold. Spaeth et al · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
“2022 Supreme Court Database, Version 2022 Release 01”, 2022
Harold. Spaeth et al · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
“On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models”, 2022
Rishi Bommasani et al · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Hallucinated but Factual! Inspecting the Factuality of Hallucinations in Abstractive Summarization”
Meng Cao, Yue Dong and Jackie Cheung · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language Models”, 2022
Nicholas Carlini et al · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
“ChatGPT Goes to Law School”
Jonathan. Choi, Kristin. Hickman, Amy Monahan and Daniel Schwarcz · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
“The Algorithmic Leviathan: Arbitrariness, Fairness, and Opportunity in Algorithmic Decision-Making Systems”
Kathleen Creel and Deborah Hellman · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Pile of Law: Learning Responsible Data Filtering from the Law and a 256GB Open-Source Legal Dataset”, 2022
Peter Henderson et al · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Capturing Failures of Large Language Models via Human Cognitive Biases”, 2022
Erik Jones and Jacob Steinhardt · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Know”, 2022
Saurav Kadavath et al · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
“TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoods”, 2022
Stephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton and Owain Evans · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
“Access to A.I. Justice: Avoiding an Inequitable Two-Tiered System of Legal Services”
Drew Simshaw · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
“2022 Supreme Court Database, Version 2022 Release 01”, 2022
Harold. Spaeth et al · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
“2022 Supreme Court Database, Version 2022 Release 01”, 2022
Harold. Spaeth et al · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
“Do Language Models Know When They’re Hallucinating References?”, 2023
Ayush Agrawal, Mirac Suzgun, Lester Mackey and Adam Kalai · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
“Navigating the Jagged Technological Frontier: Field Experimental Evidence of the Effects of AI on Knowledge Worker Productivity and Quality”, 2023
Fabrizio Dell’Acqua et al · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“How Ready Are Pre-trained Abstractive Models and LLMs for Legal Case Judgement Summarization?”, 2023
Aniket Deroy, Kripabandhu Ghosh and Saptarshi Ghosh · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“Chain-of-Verification Reduces Hallucination in Large Language Models”
Shehzaad Dhuliawala et al · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“The Potential for Jurisdictional Challenges to AI or LLM Training Datasets”
Chris Draper and Nicky Gillibrand · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“GPTs Are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Models”, 2023
Tyna Eloundou, Sam Manning, Pamela Mishkin and Daniel Rock · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
“As Allen & Overy Deploys GPT-based Legal App Harvey Firmwide, Founders Say Other Firms Will Soon Follow”
Bob Ambrogi · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
“PaLM 2 Technical Report”, 2023
Rohan Anil et al · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
“The Internal State of an LLM Knows When It’s Lying”, 2023
Amos Azaria and Tom Mitchell · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
“Algorithmic Harm in Consumer Markets”
Oren Bar-Gill, Cass Sunstein and Inbal Talgam-Cohen · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
“Privacy Protection, At What Cost? Exploring the Regulatory Resistance to Data Technology in Auto Insurance”
Omri Ben-Shahar · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
“Can GPT-3 Perform Statutory Reasoning?”
Andrew Blair-Stanek, Nils Holzenberger and Benjamin Van · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
“LawBench: Benchmarking Legal Knowledge of Large Language Models”, 2023
Zhiwei Fei et al · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“Improving Abstractive Summarization of Legal Rulings through Textual Entailment”
Diego Feijo and Viviane. Moreira · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey”, 2023
Yunfan Gao et al · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“LegalBench: A Collaboratively Built Benchmark for Measuring Legal Reasoning in Large Language Models”
Neel Guha et al · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“Where’s the Liability in Harmful AI Speech?”
Peter Henderson, Tatsunori Hashimoto and Mark Lemley · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generation”
Ziwei Ji et al · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“Towards Mitigating LLM Hallucination via Self Reflection”
Ziwei Ji et al · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“Calibrated Language Models Must Hallucinate”, 2023
Adam Kalai and Santosh. Vempala · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“GPT-4 Passes the Bar Exam”, 2023
Daniel Katz, Michael Bommarito, Shang Gao and Pablo Arredondo · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“The Privacy-Bias Tradeoff: Data Minimization and Racial Disparity Assessments in U.S. Government”
Jennifer King et al · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“A Mathematical Investigation of Hallucination and Creativity in GPT Models”
Minhyeok Lee · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“Factuality Enhanced Language Models for Open-Ended Text Generation”, 2023
Nayeon Lee et al · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“Chain of Natural Language Inference for Reducing Large Language Model Ungrounded Hallucinations”, 2023
Deren Lei et al · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“HaluEval: A Large-Scale Hallucination Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Models”, 2023
Junyi Li et al · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“Fighting Fire with Fire: The Dual Role of LLMs in Crafting and Detecting Elusive Disinformation”
Jason Lucas et al · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“When Not to Trust Language Models: Investigating Effectiveness of Parametric and Non-Parametric Memories”
Alex Mallen et al · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“SelfCheckGPT: Zero-Resource Black-Box Hallucination Detection for Generative Large Language Models”, 2023
Potsawee Manakul, Adian Liusie and Mark.. Gales · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generation”, 2023
Sewon Min et al · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“Self-Contradictory Hallucinations of Large Language Models: Evaluation, Detection and Mitigation”, 2023
Niels Mündler, Jingxuan He, Slobodan Jenko and Martin Vechev · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“Large Language Models as Tax Attorneys: A Case Study in Legal Capabilities Emergence”, 2023
John. Nay et al · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“GPT-4 Technical Report”, 2023
OpenAI · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“Introducing ChatGPT”, 2023
OpenAI · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“Check Your Facts and Try Again: Improving Large Language Models with External Knowledge and Automated Feedback”, 2023
Baolin Peng et al · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“The Implications of ChatGPT for Legal Services and Society”
Andrew Perlman · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“Tool Learning with Foundation Models”, 2023
Yujia Qin et al · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“In-context Retrieval-Augmented Language Models”
Ori Ram et al · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“Dial BeInfo for Faithfulness: Improving Factuality of Information-Seeking Dialogue via Behavioural Fine-Tuning”, 2023
Evgeniia Razumovskaia et al · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“2023 Year-End Report on the Federal Judiciary”, 2023
John. Roberts · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“How Technology Is (or Is Not) Transforming Law Firms”
Ian Rodgers, John Armour and Mari Sako · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“No, Ruth Bader Ginsburg Did Not Dissent in Obergefell — and Other Things ChatGPT Gets Wrong about the Supreme Court”
James Romoser · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“Explaining Legal Concepts with Augmented Large Language Models (GPT-4)”, 2023
Jaromir Savelka et al · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Models”, 2023
Mrinank Sharma et al · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“Trusting Your Evidence: Hallucinate Less with Context-aware Decoding”, 2023
Weijia Shi et al · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“Prompting GPT-3 To Be Reliable”
Chenglei Si et al · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“Improving the Domain Adaptation of Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) Models for Open Domain Question Answering”
Shamane Siriwardhana et al · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“Do Large Language Models Show Decision Heuristics Similar to Humans? A Case Study Using GPT-3.5”, 2023
Gaurav Suri, Lily. Slater, Ali Ziaee and Morgan Nguyen · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“ChatGPT as an Artificial Lawyer?”
Jinzhe Tan, Hannes Westermann and Karim Benyekhlef · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“Fine-Tuning Language Models for Factuality”, 2023
Katherine Tian et al · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“Just Ask for Calibration: Strategies for Eliciting Calibrated Confidence Scores from Language Models Fine-Tuned with Human Feedback”, 2023
Katherine Tian et al · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models”, 2023
Hugo Touvron et al · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“Large Language Models in Cryptocurrency Securities Cases: Can ChatGPT Replace Lawyers?”, 2023
Arianna Trozze, Toby Davies and Bennett Kleinberg · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“Large Libel Models? Liability for AI Output”
Eugene Volokh · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“Survey on Factuality in Large Language Models: Knowledge, Retrieval and Domain-Specificity”, 2023
Cunxiang Wang et al · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“Simple Synthetic Data Reduces Sycophancy in Large Language Models”, 2023
Jerry Wei et al · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“Here’s What Happens When Your Lawyer Uses ChatGPT”
Benjamin Weiser · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMs”, 2023
Miao Xiong et al · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“Understanding and Detecting Hallucinations in Neural Machine Translation via Model Introspection”, 2023
Weijia Xu et al · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“Do Large Language Models Know What They Don’t Know?”, 2023
Zhangyue Yin et al · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“Chain-of-Note: Enhancing Robustness in Retrieval-Augmented Language Models”, 2023
Wenhao Yu et al · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“R-Tuning: Teaching Large Language Models to Refuse Unknown Questions”, 2023
Hanning Zhang et al · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“Siren’s Song in the AI Ocean: A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models”, 2023
Yue Zhang et al · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“Caselaw Access Project”
Caselaw Access Project · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“Table of Supreme Court Decisions Overruled by Subsequent Decisions”, 2023
Congress.gov · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“Translating Legalese: Enhancing Public Understanding of Court Opinions with Legal Summarizers”
Elliott Ash et al · 2024
Closest in time.
“Lift Yourself Up: Retrieval-augmented Text Generation with Self Memory”
Xin Cheng et al · 2024
Closest in time.
“How Generative AI Can Help Address the Access to Justice Gap Through the Courts”
Colleen. Chien, Miriam Kim, Raj Akhil and Rohit Rathish · 2024
Closest in time.
“AI Assistance in Legal Analysis: An Empirical Study”
Jonathan. Choi and Daniel Schwarcz · 2024
Closest in time.
“DoLa: Decoding by Contrasting Layers Improves Factuality in Large Language Models”
Yung-Sung Chuang et al · 2024
Closest in time.
“Don’t Hallucinate, Abstain: Identifying LLM Knowledge Gaps via Multi-LLM Collaboration”, 2024
Shangbin Feng et al · 2024
Closest in time.
“CRITIC: Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Tool-Interactive Critiquing”
Zhibin Gou et al · 2024
Closest in time.
“Comparing Hallucination Detection Metrics for Multilingual Generation”, 2024
Haoqiang Kang, Terra Blevins and Luke Zettlemoyer · 2024
Closest in time.
“Inference-time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language model”
Kenneth Li et al · 2024
Closest in time.
“Language Model Interpretability and Empirical Legal Studies”
Michael. Livermore, Felix Herron and Daniel Rockmore · 2024
Closest in time.
“Meta-prompting: Enhancing Language Models with Task-agnostic Scaffolding”, 2024
Mirac Suzgun and Adam Kalai · 2024
Closest in time.
“A Comprehensive Survey of Hallucination Mitigation Techniques in Large Language Models”, 2024
SM Tonmoy et al · 2024
Closest in time.
“The Pitfalls of Defining Hallucination”
Kees van Deemter · 2024
Closest in time.
“How Well Do LLMs Cite Relevant Medical References? An Evaluation Framework and Analyses”, 2024
Kevin Wu et al · 2024
Closest in time.
“Hallucination Is Inevitable: An Innate Limitation of Large Language Models”, 2024
Ziwei Xu, Sanjay Jain and Mohan Kankanhalli · 2024
Closest in time.
“Translating Legalese: Enhancing Public Understanding of Court Opinions with Legal Summarizers”
Elliott Ash et al · 2024
Closest in time.
“Lift Yourself Up: Retrieval-augmented Text Generation with Self Memory”
Xin Cheng et al · 2024
Closest in time.
“How Generative AI Can Help Address the Access to Justice Gap Through the Courts”
Colleen. Chien, Miriam Kim, Raj Akhil and Rohit Rathish · 2024
Closest in time.
“AI Assistance in Legal Analysis: An Empirical Study”
Jonathan. Choi and Daniel Schwarcz · 2024
Closest in time.
“DoLa: Decoding by Contrasting Layers Improves Factuality in Large Language Models”
Yung-Sung Chuang et al · 2024
Closest in time.
“Don’t Hallucinate, Abstain: Identifying LLM Knowledge Gaps via Multi-LLM Collaboration”, 2024
Shangbin Feng et al · 2024
Closest in time.
“CRITIC: Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Tool-Interactive Critiquing”
Zhibin Gou et al · 2024
Closest in time.
“Comparing Hallucination Detection Metrics for Multilingual Generation”, 2024
Haoqiang Kang, Terra Blevins and Luke Zettlemoyer · 2024
Closest in time.
“Inference-time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language model”
Kenneth Li et al · 2024
Closest in time.
“Language Model Interpretability and Empirical Legal Studies”
Michael. Livermore, Felix Herron and Daniel Rockmore · 2024
Closest in time.
“Meta-prompting: Enhancing Language Models with Task-agnostic Scaffolding”, 2024
Mirac Suzgun and Adam Kalai · 2024
Closest in time.
“A Comprehensive Survey of Hallucination Mitigation Techniques in Large Language Models”, 2024
SM Tonmoy et al · 2024
Closest in time.
“The Pitfalls of Defining Hallucination”
Kees van Deemter · 2024
Closest in time.
“How Well Do LLMs Cite Relevant Medical References? An Evaluation Framework and Analyses”, 2024
Kevin Wu et al · 2024
Closest in time.
“Hallucination Is Inevitable: An Innate Limitation of Large Language Models”, 2024
Ziwei Xu, Sanjay Jain and Mohan Kankanhalli · 2024
Closest in time.