Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Generating user-friendly explanations regarding why an item is recommended has become increasingly common, largely due to advances in language generation technology, which can enhance user trust and facilitate more informed decision-making when using online services.
Resnick, P., Varian, H.R.: Recommender systems. Communications of the ACM 40
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
Bilgic, M., Mooney, R.J.: Explaining recommendations: Satisfaction vs. promotion. In: Beyond personalization workshop, IUI. vol. 5, p. 153 (2005)
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Tintarev, N., Masthoff, J.: Designing and evaluating explanations for recommender systems. In: Recommender systems handbook, pp. 479–510. Springer (2010)
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
McAuley, J., Leskovec, J.: Hidden factors and hidden topics: understanding rating dimensions with review text. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Recommender systems. pp. 165–172 (2013)
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Sharma, A., Cosley, D.: Do social explanations work? studying and modeling the effects of social explanations in recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web. pp. 1133–1144 (2013)
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Diao, Q., Qiu, M., Wu, C.Y., Smola, A.J., Jiang, J., Wang, C.: Jointly modeling aspects, ratings and sentiments for movie recommendation (jmars). In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. pp. 193–202 (2014)
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Zhang, Y., Lai, G., Zhang, M., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., Ma, S.: Explicit factor models for explainable recommendation based on phrase-level sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the 37th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research & development in information retrieval. pp. 83–92 (2014)
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Harper, F.M., Konstan, J.A.: The movielens datasets: History and context. Acm transactions on interactive intelligent systems (tiis) 5
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
McAuley, J., Targett, C., Shi, Q., Van Den Hengel, A.: Image-based recommendations on styles and substitutes. In: Proceedings of the 38th international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval. pp. 43–52 (2015)
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Wong, T.T.: Performance evaluation of classification algorithms by k-fold and leave-one-out cross validation. Pattern recognition 48
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Chen, C., Zhang, M., Liu, Y., Ma, S.: Neural attentional rating regression with review-level explanations. In: Proceedings of the 2018 world wide web conference. pp. 1583–1592 (2018)
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Kang, W.C., McAuley, J.: Self-attentive sequential recommendation. In: 2018 IEEE international conference on data mining (ICDM). pp. 197–206. IEEE (2018)
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Wang, X., Chen, Y., Yang, J., Wu, L., Wu, Z., Xie, X.: A reinforcement learning framework for explainable recommendation. In: 2018 IEEE international conference on data mining (ICDM). pp. 587–596. IEEE (2018)
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Cheng, M., Liu, Z., Liu, Q., Ge, S., Chen, E.: Towards automatic discovering of deep hybrid network architecture for sequential recommendation. In: Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022. pp. 1923–1932 (2022)
2022
Later among the works it cites.
2022
Later among the works it cites.
Geng, S., Liu, S., Fu, Z., Ge, Y., Zhang, Y.: Recommendation as language processing (rlp): A unified pretrain, personalized prompt & predict paradigm (p5). In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. pp. 299–315 (2022)
2022
Later among the works it cites.
Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Xia, F., Chi, E., Le, Q.V., Zhou, D., et al.: Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35
2022
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Radford, A., Wu, J., Child, R., Luan, D., Amodei, D., Sutskever, I., et al.: Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI blog 1
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Brown, T., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J.D., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al.: Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems 33
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
He, X., Deng, K., Wang, X., Li, Y., Zhang, Y., Wang, M.: Lightgcn: Simplifying and powering graph convolution network for recommendation. In: Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in Information Retrieval. pp. 639–648 (2020)
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Wu, F., Qiao, Y., Chen, J.H., Wu, C., Qi, T., Lian, J., Liu, D., Xie, X., Gao, J., Wu, W., et al.: Mind: A large-scale dataset for news recommendation. In: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. pp. 3597–3606 (2020)
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Zhang, Y., Chen, X., et al.: Explainable recommendation: A survey and new perspectives. Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval 14
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Cheng, M., Yuan, F., Liu, Q., Xin, X., Chen, E.: Learning transferable user representations with sequential behaviors via contrastive pre-training. In: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM). pp. 51–60. IEEE (2021)
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Closest in time.
tatsu lab: Alpaca (2023), https://github.com/tatsu-lab/stanford_alpaca
2023
Closest in time.
OpenAI: Chatgpt (mar 14 version) (2023), https://chat.openai.com/chat
2023
Closest in time.
OpenAI: Gpt-4 technical report. CoRR abs/2303.08774 (2023)
2023
Closest in time.
THUDM: Chatglm2-6b (2023), https://github.com/THUDM/ChatGLM2-6B
2023
Closest in time.