Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
The rapid evolution of Web UI incurs time and effort in UI test maintenance.
R. F. Tate, “Correlation between a discrete and a continuous variable. point-biserial correlation,” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics , vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 603–607, 1954. [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2236844
1954
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. S. Ristad and P. N. Yianilos, “Learning string-edit distance,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 522–532, 1998. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/34.682181
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. Briechle and U. D. Hanebeck, “Template matching using fast normalized cross correlation,” in Optical Pattern Recognition XII , vol. 4387. SPIE, 2001, pp. 95–102. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.421129
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. R. Choudhary, D. Zhao, H. Versee, and A. Orso, “Water: Web application test repair,” in Proceedings of the First International Workshop on End-to-End Test Script Engineering , 2011, pp. 24–29. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/2002931.2002935
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Daniel, D. Dig, T. Gvero, V. Jagannath, J. Jiaa, D. Mitchell, J. Nogiec, S. H. Tan, and D. Marinov, “Reassert: a tool for repairing broken unit tests,” in Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Software Engineering , 2011, pp. 1010–1012. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/1985793.1985978
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Zhang, H. Lü, and M. D. Ernst, “Automatically repairing broken workflows for evolving gui applications,” in Proceedings of the 2013 International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis , 2013, pp. 45–55. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/2483760.2483775
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Houston, Instant Jsoup How-To , ser. Instant : short, fast, focused. Packt Publishing, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.ca/books?id=24I9oaxuvowC
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Z. Gao, Z. Chen, Y. Zou, and A. M. Memon, “Sitar: Gui test script repair,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering , vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 170–186, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2015.2454510
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Leotta, A. Stocco, F. Ricca, and P. Tonella, “Using multi-locators to increase the robustness of web test cases,” in 2015 IEEE 8th International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST) . IEEE, 2015, pp. 1–10. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICST.2015.7102611
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Hammoudi, G. Rothermel, and P. Tonella, “Why do record/replay tests of web applications break?” in 2016 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST) , 2016, pp. 180–190. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICST.2016.16
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
X. Li, N. Chang, Y. Wang, H. Huang, Y. Pei, L. Wang, and X. Li, “Atom: Automatic maintenance of gui test scripts for evolving mobile applications,” in 2017 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST) , 2017, pp. 161–171. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICST.2017.22
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Stocco, R. Yandrapally, and A. Mesbah, “Visual web test repair,” in Proceedings of the 2018 26th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering , 2018, pp. 503–514. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3236024.3236063
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Chang, L. Wang, Y. Pei, S. K. Mondal, and X. Li, “Change-based test script maintenance for android apps,” in 2018 IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS) . IEEE, 2018, pp. 215–225. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/QRS.2018.00035
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Jnoub, W. Klas, P. Kalchgruber, and E. Momeni, “A flexible algorithmic approach for identifying conflicting/deviating data on the web,” in 2018 International Conference on Computer, Information and Telecommunication Systems (CITS) , 2018, pp. 1–5. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/CITS.2018.8440185
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. Kirinuki, H. Tanno, and K. Natsukawa, “Color: correct locator recommender for broken test scripts using various clues in web application,” in 2019 IEEE 26th International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER) . IEEE, 2019, pp. 310–320. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/SANER.2019.8667976
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. M. Shariff, H. Li, C.-P. Bezemer, A. E. Hassan, T. H. Nguyen, and P. Flora, “Improving the testing efficiency of selenium-based load tests,” in 2019 IEEE/ACM 14th International Workshop on Automation of Software Test (AST) . IEEE, 2019, pp. 14–20. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/AST.2019.00008
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Imtiaz, M. Z. Iqbal, and et al., “An automated model-based approach to repair test suites of evolving web applications,” Journal of Systems and Software , vol. 171, p. 110841, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2020.110841
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Pan, T. Xu, Y. Pei, Z. Li, T. Zhang, and X. Li, “Gui-guided test script repair for mobile apps,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering , pp. 1–1, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2020.3007664
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Lutellier, H. V. Pham, L. Pang, Y. Li, M. Wei, and L. Tan, “Coconut: combining context-aware neural translation models using ensemble for program repair,” in Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGSOFT international symposium on software testing and analysis , 2020, pp. 101–114. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3395363.3397369
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Li, R. Jin, J. Gao, and Z. Liu, “On sampling top-k recommendation evaluation,” in Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining , ser. KDD ’20. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2020, p. 2114–2124. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3394486.3403262
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
T. Xu, M. Pan, Y. Pei, G. Li, X. Zeng, T. Zhang, Y. Deng, and X. Li, “Guider: Gui structure and vision co-guided test script repair for android apps,” in Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis (ISSTA) , 2021, pp. 191–203. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3460319.3464830
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
W. Chen, H. Cao, and X. Blanc, “An improving approach for dom-based web test suite repair,” in Web Engineering . Springer International Publishing, 2021, pp. 372–387. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74296-6_29_WTSR
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
F. R. M. Leotta, A. Stocco and P. Tonella, “Robula+: An algorithm for generating robust xpath locators for web testing,” in J. Softw. Evol. Process , vol. 28, no. 3, 2016, pp. 177–204. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE48619.2023.00129
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
C. Lemieux, J. P. Inala, S. K. Lahiri, and S. Sen, “Codamosa: Escaping coverage plateaus in test generation with pre-trained large language models,” in Proceedings of the 45th International Conference on Software Engineering , ser. ICSE ’23. IEEE Press, 2023, p. 919–931. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE48619.2023.00085
2023
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
L. Mariani, A. Mohebbi, M. Pezzè, and V. Terragni, “Semantic matching of GUI events for test reuse: Are we there yet?” in Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis (ISSTA) . New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2021, p. 177–190. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3460319.3464827
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
E. Mashhadi and H. Hemmati, “Applying codebert for automated program repair of java simple bugs,” in 2021 IEEE/ACM 18th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR) , 2021, pp. 505–509. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/MSR52588.2021.00063
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
F. Shao, R. Xu, W. Haque, J. Xu, Y. Zhang, W. Yang, Y. Ye, and X. Xiao, “Webevo: taming web application evolution via detecting semantic structure changes,” in Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis , 2021, pp. 16–28. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3460319.3464800
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Yoon, S. Chung, K. Shin, J. Kim, S. Hong, and S. Yoo, “Repairing fragile gui test cases using word and layout embedding,” in 2022 IEEE Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST) , 2022, pp. 291–301. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICST53961.2022.00038
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Y. Ren, Y. Gu, Z. Ma, H. Zhu, and F. Yin, “Cross-device difference detector for mobile application gui compatibility testing,” in 2022 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW) . IEEE, 2022, pp. 253–260. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSTW55395.2022.00052
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Fatima, T. A. Ghaleb, and L. Briand, “Flakify: A black-box, language model-based predictor for flaky tests,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering , vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 1912–1927, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2022.3201209
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
OpenAI, “Openai gpt-3 api documentation,” https://platform.openai.com/docs/api-reference , 2022
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
“Mantisbt bug tracker repository,” https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt , 2022
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Brisset, R. Rouvoy, L. Seinturier, and R. Pawlak, “Sftm: Fast matching of web pages using similarity-based flexible tree matching,” Information Systems , vol. 112, p. 102126, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2022.102126
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
T.-O. Li, W. Zong, Y. Wang, H. Tian, Y. Wang, S.-C. Cheung, and J. Kramer, “Nuances are the key: Unlocking chatgpt to find failure-inducing tests with differential prompting,” in 2023 38th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) . IEEE, 2023, pp. 14–26. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ASE56229.2023.00089
2023
Closest in time.
Z. Liu, C. Chen, J. Wang, X. Che, Y. Huang, J. Hu, and Q. Wang, “Fill in the blank: Context-aware automated text input generation for mobile gui testing,” in 2023 IEEE/ACM 45th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) , 2023, pp. 1355–1367. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE48619.2023.00119
2023
Closest in time.
H. Joshi, J. Cambronero Sanchez, S. Gulwani, V. Le, G. Verbruggen, and I. Radiček, “Repair is nearly generation: Multilingual program repair with llms,” Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 5131–5140, Jun. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v37i4.25642
2023
Closest in time.
R. Santhosh, M. Abinaya, V. Anusuya, and D. Gowthami, “Chatgpt: Opportunities, features and future prospects,” in 2023 7th International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICOEI) , 2023, pp. 1614–1622. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOEI56765.2023.10125747
2023
Closest in time.
OpenAI Help. (2023) Chatgpt api transition guide. Accessed: November 15, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://help.openai.com/en/articles/7042661-chatgpt-api-transition-guide
2023
Closest in time.
OpenAI. (2023) Six strategies for getting better results with gpt. Accessed: November 15, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/prompt-engineering/six-strategies-for-getting-better-results
2023
Closest in time.
OpenAI. (2023) Strategy: Split complex tasks into simpler subtasks. Accessed: November 15, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/prompt-engineering/strategy-split-complex-tasks-into-simpler-subtasks
2023
Closest in time.
F. Khalili, L. Mariani, A. Mohebbi, M. Pezzè, and V. Terragni, “Semantic matching in GUI test reuse,” Empirical Software Engineering , vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 1–58, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-023-10406-8
2024
Closest in time.
T. Xiao, C. Treude, H. Hata, and K. Matsumoto, “Devgpt: Studying developer-chatgpt conversations,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR 2024) , 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3643991.3648400
2024
Closest in time.
K. El Haji, C. Brandt, and A. Zaidman, “Using github copilot for test generation in python: An empirical study,” in The 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Automation of Software Test , 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3644032.3644443
2024
Closest in time.
S. Feng and C. Chen, “Prompting is all you need: Automated android bug replay with large language models,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 46th International Conference on Software Engineering , ser. ICSE ’24. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3597503.3608137
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
Z. Xu, “Chatgpt ui test repair repository,” https://github.com/xuzhi2021/ChatGPTUITestRepair , 2025
2025
Closest in time.