Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Since the natural language processing (NLP) community started to make large language models (LLMs) act as a critic to evaluate the quality of generated texts, most of the existing works train a critique generation model on the evaluation data labeled by GPT-4's direct prompting.
Bleu: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation
Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, Todd Ward, and Wei-Jing Zhu. 2002 · 2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
Rouge: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries
Chin-Yew Lin. 2004 · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
METEOR: an automatic metric for MT evaluation with improved correlation with human judgments
Satanjeev Banerjee and Alon Lavie. 2005 · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Evaluation of text generation: A survey
Asli Celikyilmaz, Elizabeth Clark, and Jianfeng Gao. 2020 · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Adam: A method for stochastic optimization
Diederik P. Kingma and Jimmy Ba. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
The curious case of neural text degeneration
Ari Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes, and Yejin Choi. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Zero: memory optimizations toward training trillion parameter models
Samyam Rajbhandari, Jeff Rasley, Olatunji Ruwase, and Yuxiong He. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Deepspeed: System optimizations enable training deep learning models with over 100 billion parameters
Jeff Rasley, Samyam Rajbhandari, Olatunji Ruwase, and Yuxiong He. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Measuring massive multitask language understanding
Dan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou, Mantas Mazeika, Dawn Song, and Jacob Steinhardt. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Constitutional ai: Harmlessness from ai feedback
Yuntao Bai, Saurav Kadavath, Sandipan Kundu, Amanda Askell, Jackson Kernion, Andy Jones, Anna Chen, Anna Goldie, Azalia Mirhoseini, Cameron McKinnon, et al. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Infolm: A new metric to evaluate summarization & data2text generation
Pierre Jean A Colombo, Chloé Clavel, and Pablo Piantanida. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Glm: General language model pretraining with autoregressive blank infilling
Zhengxiao Du, Yujie Qian, Xiao Liu, Ming Ding, Jiezhong Qiu, Zhilin Yang, and Jie Tang. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Introducing chatgpt
OpenAI. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models
Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, brian ichter, Fei Xia, Ed Chi, Quoc V Le, and Denny Zhou. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Jinze Bai, Shuai Bai, Yunfei Chu, Zeyu Cui, Kai Dang, Xiaodong Deng, Yang Fan, Wenbin Ge, Yu Han, Fei Huang, et al. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
A survey on evaluation of large language models
Yupeng Chang, Xu Wang, Jindong Wang, Yuan Wu, Kaijie Zhu, Hao Chen, Linyi Yang, Xiaoyuan Yi, Cunxiang Wang, Yidong Wang, Wei Ye, Yue Zhang, Yi Chang, Philip S. Yu, Qiang Yang, and Xing Xie. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Yi Chen, Rui Wang, Haiyun Jiang, Shuming Shi, and Ruifeng Xu. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Ultrafeedback: Boosting language models with high-quality feedback
Ganqu Cui, Lifan Yuan, Ning Ding, Guanming Yao, Wei Zhu, Yuan Ni, Guotong Xie, Zhiyuan Liu, and Maosong Sun. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Baichuan 2: Open large-scale language models
Aiyuan Yang, Bin Xiao, Bingning Wang, Borong Zhang, Chao Yin, Chenxu Lv, Da Pan, Dian Wang, Dong Yan, Fan Yang, et al. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
GLM-130B: an open bilingual pre-trained model
Aohan Zeng, Xiao Liu, Zhengxiao Du, Zihan Wang, Hanyu Lai, Ming Ding, Zhuoyi Yang, Yifan Xu, Wendi Zheng, Xiao Xia, Weng Lam Tam, Zixuan Ma, Yufei Xue, Jidong Zhai, Wenguang Chen, Zhiyuan Liu, Peng Zhang, Yuxiao Dong, and Jie Tang. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Safetybench: Evaluating the safety of large language models with multiple choice questions
Zhexin Zhang, Leqi Lei, Lindong Wu, Rui Sun, Yongkang Huang, Chong Long, Xiao Liu, Xuanyu Lei, Jie Tang, and Minlie Huang. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Judging LLM-as-a-judge with MT-bench and chatbot arena
Lianmin Zheng, Wei-Lin Chiang, Ying Sheng, Siyuan Zhuang, Zhanghao Wu, Yonghao Zhuang, Zi Lin, Zhuohan Li, Dacheng Li, Eric Xing, Hao Zhang, Joseph E. Gonzalez, and Ion Stoica. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Agieval: A human-centric benchmark for evaluating foundation models
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Jinlan Fu, See-Kiong Ng, Zhengbao Jiang, and Pengfei Liu. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Roscoe: A suite of metrics for scoring step-by-step reasoning
Olga Golovneva, Moya Peng Chen, Spencer Poff, Martin Corredor, Luke Zettlemoyer, Maryam Fazel-Zarandi, and Asli Celikyilmaz. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
On the blind spots of model-based evaluation metrics for text generation
Tianxing He, Jingyu Zhang, Tianle Wang, Sachin Kumar, Kyunghyun Cho, James Glass, and Yulia Tsvetkov. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
DecompEval: Evaluating generated texts as unsupervised decomposed question answering
Pei Ke, Fei Huang, Fei Mi, Yasheng Wang, Qun Liu, Xiaoyan Zhu, and Minlie Huang. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
A systematic study and comprehensive evaluation of ChatGPT on benchmark datasets
Md Tahmid Rahman Laskar, M Saiful Bari, Mizanur Rahman, Md Amran Hossen Bhuiyan, Shafiq Joty, and Jimmy Huang. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
G-eval: NLG evaluation using gpt-4 with better human alignment
Yang Liu, Dan Iter, Yichong Xu, Shuohang Wang, Ruochen Xu, and Chenguang Zhu. 2023b · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
OpenAI. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Gpt-4 doesn’t know it’s wrong: An analysis of iterative prompting for reasoning problems
Kaya Stechly, Matthew Marquez, and Subbarao Kambhampati. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Wanjun Zhong, Ruixiang Cui, Yiduo Guo, Yaobo Liang, Shuai Lu, Yanlin Wang, Amin Saied, Weizhu Chen, and Nan Duan. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Judgelm: Fine-tuned large language models are scalable judges
Lianghui Zhu, Xinggang Wang, and Xinlong Wang. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Gaining wisdom from setbacks: Aligning large language models via mistake analysis
Kai Chen, Chunwei Wang, Kuo Yang, Jianhua Han, Lanqing Hong, Fei Mi, Hang Xu, Zhengying Liu, Wenyong Huang, Zhenguo Li, Dit-Yan Yeung, Lifeng Shang, Xin Jiang, and Qun Liu. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Albert Q Jiang, Alexandre Sablayrolles, Antoine Roux, Arthur Mensch, Blanche Savary, Chris Bamford, Devendra Singh Chaplot, Diego de las Casas, Emma Bou Hanna, Florian Bressand, et al. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Prometheus: Inducing fine-grained evaluation capability in language models
Seungone Kim, Jamin Shin, Yejin Cho, Joel Jang, Shayne Longpre, Hwaran Lee, Sangdoo Yun, Seongjin Shin, Sungdong Kim, James Thorne, et al. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Generative judge for evaluating alignment
Junlong Li, Shichao Sun, Weizhe Yuan, Run-Ze Fan, Hai Zhao, and Pengfei Liu. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Agentbench: Evaluating llms as agents
Xiao Liu, Hao Yu, Hanchen Zhang, Yifan Xu, Xuanyu Lei, Hanyu Lai, Yu Gu, Hangliang Ding, Kaiwen Men, Kejuan Yang, et al. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Shichao Sun, Junlong Li, Weizhe Yuan, Ruifeng Yuan, Wenjie Li, and Pengfei Liu. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Pandalm: An automatic evaluation benchmark for LLM instruction tuning optimization
Yidong Wang, Zhuohao Yu, Zhengran Zeng, Linyi Yang, Cunxiang Wang, Hao Chen, Chaoya Jiang, Rui Xie, Jindong Wang, Xing Xie, Wei Ye, Shikun Zhang, and Yue Zhang. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Llmeval: A preliminary study on how to evaluate large language models
Yue Zhang, Ming Zhang, Haipeng Yuan, Shichun Liu, Yongyao Shi, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang, and Xuanjing Huang. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.