Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
A chief goal of artificial intelligence is to build machines that think like people.
The perception of causality. (Basic Books, Inc, 1963)
Michotte, A · 1963
Earlier work this paper cites.
Cognitive science: The newest science of the artificial
Simon, H. A · 1980
Earlier work this paper cites.
Visual perception of relative mass in dynamic events
Todd, J. T. & Warren Jr, W. H · 1982
Earlier work this paper cites.
Parallel distributed processing
Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L., Group, P. R. et al · 1988
Earlier work this paper cites.
On the origin of causal understanding. (1995)
Carey, S · 1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
From covariation to causation: A causal power theory
Cheng, P. W · 1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
Instability in students’ use of intuitive and newtonian models to predict motion: the critical effect of the parameters involved
Mildenhall, P. & Williams, J · 2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
A theory of causal learning in children: causal maps and bayes nets
Gopnik, A. et al · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Structure and strength in causal induction
Griffiths, T. L. & Tenenbaum, J. B · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Theory of mind
Frith, C. & Frith, U · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Intuitive theories of mind: A rational approach to false belief
Goodman, N. D. et al · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Beyond covariation
Lagnado, D. A., Waldmann, M. R., Hagmayer, Y. & Sloman, S. A · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Learning from doing: Intervention and causal inference
Schulz, L., Kushnir, T. & Gopnik, A · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Matplotlib: A 2d graphics environment
Hunter, J. D · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Causality (Cambridge university press, 2009)
Pearl, J · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Theory-based causal induction
Griffiths, T. L. & Tenenbaum, J. B · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Learning the form of causal relationships using hierarchical bayesian models
Lucas, C. G. & Griffiths, T. L · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Internal physics models guide probabilistic judgments about object dynamics
Hamrick, J., Battaglia, P. & Tenenbaum, J. B · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Causal learning and inference as a rational process: The new synthesis
Holyoak, K. J. & Cheng, P. W · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Bayesian theory of mind: Modeling joint belief-desire attribution
Baker, C., Saxe, R. & Tenenbaum, J · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
How to grow a mind: Statistics, structure, and abstraction
Tenenbaum, J. B., Kemp, C., Griffiths, T. L. & Goodman, N. D · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Computational models of intuitive physics
Battaglia, P. et al · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
The origins of inquiry: Inductive inference and exploration in early childhood
Schulz, L · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Simulation as an engine of physical scene understanding
Battaglia, P. W., Hamrick, J. B. & Tenenbaum, J. B · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Core social cognition (2013)
Spelke, E. S., Bernier, E. P. & Skerry, A · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Modeling human plan recognition using bayesian theory of mind
Baker, C. L. & Tenenbaum, J. B · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
A decision network account of reasoning about other people’s choices
Jern, A. & Kemp, C · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
On the nature and origin of intuitive theories: learning, physics and psychology
Ullman, T. D · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Inferring mass in complex scenes by mental simulation
Hamrick, J. B., Battaglia, P. W., Griffiths, T. L. & Tenenbaum, J. B · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Generative adversarial text to image synthesis
Reed, S. et al · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Learning physical intuition of block towers by example
Lerer, A., Gross, S. & Fergus, R · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Attention is all you need
Vaswani, A. et al · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Building machines that learn and think like people
Lake, B. M., Ullman, T. D., Tenenbaum, J. B. & Gershman, S. J · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Mind games: Game engines as an architecture for intuitive physics
Ullman, T. D., Spelke, E., Battaglia, P. & Tenenbaum, J. B · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
The Oxford handbook of causal reasoning (Oxford University Press, 2017)
Waldmann, M · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Formalizing neurath’s ship: Approximate algorithms for online causal learning
Bramley, N. R., Dayan, P., Griffiths, T. L. & Lagnado, D. A · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Eye-tracking causality
Gerstenberg, T., Peterson, M. F., Goodman, N. D., Lagnado, D. A. & Tenenbaum, J. B · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Formalizing emotion concepts within a bayesian model of theory of mind
Saxe, R. & Houlihan, S. D · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Rational quantitative attribution of beliefs, desires and percepts in human mentalizing
Baker, C. L., Jara-Ettinger, J., Saxe, R. & Tenenbaum, J. B · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Visual question answering: A survey of methods and datasets
Wu, Q. et al · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Faulty towers: A hypothetical simulation model of physical support
Gerstenberg, T., Zhou, L., Smith, K. A. & Tenenbaum, J. B · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
brms: An R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan
Bürkner, P.-C · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K. & Toutanova, K · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Deep learning: A critical appraisal
Marcus, G · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
The deep learning revolution (MIT press, 2018)
Sejnowski, T. J · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Different physical intuitions exist between tasks, not domains
Smith, K. A., Battaglia, P. W. & Vul, E · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Intuitive experimentation in the physical world
Bramley, N. R., Gerstenberg, T., Tenenbaum, J. B. & Gureckis, T. M · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Intphys: A framework and benchmark for visual intuitive physics reasoning
Riochet, R. et al · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Time in causal structure learning
Bramley, N. R., Gerstenberg, T., Mayrhofer, R. & Lagnado, D. A · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Machine theory of mind
Rabinowitz, N. et al · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Towards understanding how machines can learn causal overhypotheses
Kosoy, E. et al · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Beyond the imitation game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language models
Srivastava, A. et al · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Prompting visual-language models for efficient video understanding
Ju, C., Han, T., Zheng, K., Zhang, Y. & Xie, W · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Interactive and visual prompt engineering for ad-hoc task adaptation with large language models
Strobelt, H. et al · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Sparks of artificial general intelligence: Early experiments with gpt-4
Bubeck, S. et al · 2023
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Multimodal machine learning: A survey and taxonomy
Baltrušaitis, T., Ahuja, C. & Morency, L.-P · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Artificial intelligence: A guide for thinking humans (Penguin UK, 2019)
Mitchell, M · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Modeling human intuitions about liquid flow with particle-based simulation
Bates, C. J., Yildirim, I., Tenenbaum, J. B. & Battaglia, P · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Phyre: A new benchmark for physical reasoning
Bakhtin, A., van der Maaten, L., Johnson, J., Gustafson, L. & Girshick, R · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Causal reasoning from meta-reinforcement learning
Dasgupta, I. et al · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Theory of minds: Understanding behavior in groups through inverse planning
Shum, M., Kleiman-Weiner, M., Littman, M. L. & Tenenbaum, J. B · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Closest in time.
Gpt-4 passes the bar exam
Katz, D. M., Bommarito, M. J., Gao, S. & Arredondo, P · 2023
Closest in time.
On the power of special-purpose gpt models to create and evaluate new poetry in old styles
Sawicki, P. et al · 2023
Closest in time.
Audiolm: a language modeling approach to audio generation
Borsos, Z. et al · 2023
Closest in time.
Ai-assisted coding: Experiments with gpt-4
Poldrack, R. A., Lu, T. & Beguš, G · 2023
Closest in time.
Chatgpt for good? on opportunities and challenges of large language models for education
Kasneci, E. et al · 2023
Closest in time.
Navigating the jagged technological frontier: Field experimental evidence of the effects of ai on knowledge worker productivity and quality
Dell’Acqua, F. et al · 2023
Closest in time.
Better by you, better than me? chatgpt-3 as writing assistance in students’ essays
Bašić, Ž., Banovac, A., Kružić, I. & Jerković, I · 2023
Closest in time.
Playing repeated games with large language models
Akata, E. et al · 2023
Closest in time.
Are deep neural networks adequate behavioral models of human visual perception?
Wichmann, F. A. & Geirhos, R · 2023
Closest in time.
On the importance of severely testing deep learning models of cognition
Bowers, J. S. et al · 2023
Closest in time.
The acquisition of physical knowledge in generative neural networks
Schulze Buschoff, L. M., Schulz, E. & Binz, M · 2023
Closest in time.
Cladder: A benchmark to assess causal reasoning capabilities of language models
Jin, Z. et al · 2023
Closest in time.
Theory of mind may have spontaneously emerged in large language models
Kosinski, M · 2023
Closest in time.
Large language models fail on trivial alterations to theory-of-mind tasks
Ullman, T · 2023
Closest in time.
Using cognitive psychology to understand gpt-3
Binz, M. & Schulz, E · 2023
Closest in time.
Arb: Advanced reasoning benchmark for large language models
Sawada, T. et al · 2023
Closest in time.
Emergent analogical reasoning in large language models
Webb, T., Holyoak, K. J. & Lu, H · 2023
Closest in time.
Inducing anxiety in large language models increases exploration and bias
Coda-Forno, J. et al · 2023
Closest in time.
A systematic comparison of syllogistic reasoning in humans and language models
Eisape, T. et al · 2023
Closest in time.
Human-like intuitive behavior and reasoning biases emerged in large language models but disappeared in chatgpt
Hagendorff, T., Fabi, S. & Kosinski, M · 2023
Closest in time.
Grounding visual illusions in language: Do vision-language models perceive illusions like humans?
Zhang, Y., Pan, J., Zhou, Y., Pan, R. & Chai, J · 2023
Closest in time.
Comparing humans, gpt-4, and gpt-4v on abstraction and reasoning tasks (2023)
Mitchell, M., Palmarini, A. B. & Moskvichev, A · 2023
Closest in time.
Causal parrots: Large language models may talk causality but are not causal
Zečević, M., Willig, M., Dhami, D. S. & Kersting, K · 2023
Closest in time.
Grounded physical language understanding with probabilistic programs and simulated worlds
Zhang, C., Wong, L., Grand, G. & Tenenbaum, J · 2023
Closest in time.
Grasp: A novel benchmark for evaluating language grounding and situated physics understanding in multimodal language models (2023)
Jassim, S. et al · 2023
Closest in time.
Understanding social reasoning in language models with language models
Gandhi, K., Fränken, J.-P., Gerstenberg, T. & Goodman, N. D · 2023
Closest in time.
Mental jenga: A counterfactual simulation model of causal judgments about physical support
Zhou, L., Smith, K. A., Tenenbaum, J. B. & Gerstenberg, T · 2023
Closest in time.
A computational model of responsibility judgments from counterfactual simulations and intention inferences
Wu, S. A., Sridhar, S. & Gerstenberg, T · 2023
Closest in time.
Turning large language models into cognitive models
Binz, M. & Schulz, E · 2023
Closest in time.
Using games to understand the mind
Allen, K. R. et al · 2023
Closest in time.
Video-chatgpt: Towards detailed video understanding via large vision and language models
Maaz, M., Rasheed, H., Khan, S. & Khan, F. S · 2023
Closest in time.
Testing the limits of natural language models for predicting human language judgements
Golan, T., Siegelman, M., Kriegeskorte, N. & Baldassano, C · 2023
Closest in time.
Pre-train, prompt, and predict: A systematic survey of prompting methods in natural language processing
Liu, P. et al · 2023
Closest in time.
A systematic survey of prompt engineering on vision-language foundation models
Gu, J. et al · 2023
Closest in time.
Meta-in-context learning in large language models
Coda-Forno, J. et al · 2023
Closest in time.
A cookbook of self-supervised learning
Balestriero, R. et al · 2023
Closest in time.
Wong, L. et al · 2023
Closest in time.
Grounding large language models in interactive environments with online reinforcement learning
Carta, T. et al · 2023
Closest in time.
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team · 2064
Closest in time.