Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
With the increasing integration of frontier large language models (LLMs) into society and the economy, decisions related to their training, deployment, and use have far-reaching implications.
A. B. Association et al. , “United states district court for the district of columbia, civil no. 95-1211 (crr); united states of america, plaintiff, v. american bar association, defendant: Report of the american bar association board of govenors,” American Bar Association, 1996
1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. M. Healy and K. G. Palepu, “The fall of enron,” Journal of economic perspectives , vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 3–26, 2003
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Coglianese, R. Zeckhauser, and E. Parson, “Seeking truth for power: Informational strategy and regulatory policymaking,” Minn. L. Rev. , vol. 89, p. 277, 2004
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. C. Stephenson, “Information acquisition and institutional design,” Harvard Law Review , vol. 124, p. 1422, 2010
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. R. Baumgartner and B. D. Jones, The politics of information: Problem definition and the course of public policy in America . University of Chicago Press, 2015
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. C. Jung and E. Sharon, “The Volkswagen emissions scandal and its aftermath,” Global business and organizational excellence , vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 6–15, 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Buchanan, J. Bansemer, D. Cary, J. Lucas, and M. Musser, “Automating cyber attacks,” Center for Security and Emerging Technology, Tech. Rep., November 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.51593/2020CA002
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Gehman, S. Gururangan, M. Sap, Y. Choi, and N. A. Smith, “RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating neural toxic degeneration in language models,” in Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020 , T. Cohn, Y. He, and Y. Liu, Eds. Online: Association for Computational Linguistics, Nov. 2020, pp. 3356–3369. [Online]. Available: https://aclanthology.org/2020.findings-emnlp.301
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. DeFazio and R. Larsen, “Final committee report—the design, development & certification of the Boeing 737 MAX,” The US House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, Subcommittee on Aviation. Washington, DC: US House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure , 2020
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Cihon, J. Schuett, and S. D. Baum, “Corporate governance of artificial intelligence in the public interest,” Information , vol. 12, no. 7, p. 275, Jul. 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. Weidinger, J. Uesato, M. Rauh, C. Griffin, P.-S. Huang, J. Mellor, A. Glaese, M. Cheng, B. Balle, A. Kasirzadeh, C. Biles, S. Brown, Z. Kenton, W. Hawkins, T. Stepleton, A. Birhane, L. A. Hendricks, L. Rimell, W. Isaac, J. Haas, S. Legassick, G. Irving, and I. Gabriel, “Taxonomy of risks posed by language models,” 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , jun 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145%2F3531146.3533088
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
I. D. Raji, P. Xu, C. Honigsberg, and D. Ho, “Outsider oversight: Designing a third party audit ecosystem for AI governance,” in Proceedings of the 2022 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society , 2022, pp. 557–571
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
I. D. Raji, P. Xu, C. Honigsberg, and D. Ho, “Outsider oversight: Designing a third party audit ecosystem for AI governance,” in Proceedings of the 2022 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society , 2022, pp. 557–571
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Shevlane, “Structured Access: An Emerging Paradigm for Safe AI Deployment,” in The Oxford Handbook of AI Governance . Oxford University Press, 2022
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
2023
Earlier work this paper cites.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
E. Seger, A. Ovadya, D. Siddarth, B. Garfinkel, and A. Dafoe, “Democratising AI: Multiple meanings, goals, and methods,” in Proceedings of the 2023 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society , 2023, pp. 715–722
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Mökander, J. Schuett, H. R. Kirk, and L. Floridi, “Auditing large language models: a three-layered approach,” AI and Ethics , pp. 1–31, 2023
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
R. Burnell, W. Schellaert, J. Burden, T. D. Ullman, F. Martinez-Plumed, J. B. Tenenbaum, D. Rutar, L. G. Cheke, J. Sohl-Dickstein, M. Mitchell, and et al., “Rethink reporting of evaluation results in ai,” Science , vol. 380, no. 6641, p. 136–138, 2023
2023
Closest in time.
O’Brien, Ee, and Williams, “Deployment corrections: An incident response framework for frontier AI models,” Institute for AI Policy and Strategy, Tech. Rep., November 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.iaps.ai/research/deployment-corrections
2023
Closest in time.
B. Bucknall and R. Trager, “Structured access for third-party research on frontier AI models,” Oxford Martin School, Tech. Rep., 2023. [Online]. Available: https://cdn.governance.ai/Structured_Access_for_Third-Party_Research.pdf
2023
Closest in time.
GOV.UK, “Safety and security risks of generative artificial intelligence to 2025 (annex b),” GOV.UK, Nov. 2023, available online. [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/frontier-ai-capabilities-and-risks-discussion-paper/safety-and-security-risks-of-generative-artificial-intelligence-to-2025-annex-b
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
E. P. Goodman and J. Trehu, “ALGORITHMIC AUDITING: CHASING AI ACCOUNTABILITY,” Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal , vol. 39, no. 3, p. 289, 2023
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
C. Criddle, “UK pushes for greater access to AI’s inner workings to assess risks,” Financial Times , Sep. 2023
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Article 28b: Proposal for a regulation recital 9 b. Accessed on August 24, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2023-0236_EN.html
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Meta. Meta and microsoft introduce the next generation of llama. Accessed on August 24, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://about.fb.com/news/2023/07/llama-2/
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Model card and evaluations for claude models. Accessed on 26 July 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www-files.anthropic.com/production/images/Model-Card-Claude-2.pdf
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Elizabeth Seger, Noemi Dreksler, Richard Moulange, Emily Dardaman, Jonas Schuett, K. Wei, Christoph Winter, Mackenzie Arnold, Seán Ó hÉigeartaigh, Anton Korinek, Markus Anderljung, Ben Bucknall, Alan Chan, Eoghan Sta!ord, Leonie Koessler, Aviv Ovadya, Ben Garfinkel, Emma Bluemke, Michael Aird, Patrick Levermore, Julian Hazell, Abhishek Gupta, “Open-Sourcing highly capable foundation models,” Centre for the Governance of AI, Tech. Rep., Sep. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://cdn.governance.ai/Open_Sourcing_Highly_Capable_Foundation_Models_GovAI_2023.pdf
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2025
Closest in time.
J. Whittlestone and J. Clark, “Why and how governments should monitor ai development,” accessed on August 24, 2026
2026
Closest in time.
Christchurch Call. Christchurch call initiative on algorithmic outcomes. Accessed on August 24, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.christchurchcall.com/media-and-resources/news-and-updates/christchurch-call-initiative-on-algorithmic-outcomes/
2026
Closest in time.
N. Mulani and J. Whittlestone. Proposing a foundation model information sharing regime for the UK. Accessed on August 24, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.governance.ai/post/proposing-a-foundation-model-information-sharing-regime-for-the-uk
2026
Closest in time.
Frontier AI taskforce: First progress report. Accessed on August 24, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/frontier-ai-taskforce-first-progress-report/frontier-ai-taskforce-first-progress-report
2026
Closest in time.
The White House. Fact sheet: Biden-harris administration secures voluntary commitments from leading artificial intelligence companies to manage the risks posed by AI. Accessed on August 24, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://tinyurl.com/3cavwczp
2026
Closest in time.
ED Markey. Sens. markey, budd announce legislation to assess health security risks of AI. Accessed on August 24, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.markey.senate.gov/news/press-releases/sens-markey-budd-announce-legislation-to-assess-health-security-risks-of-ai
2026
Closest in time.
Schumer. Schumer safe innovation framework. Accessed on August 24, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.democrats.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/schumer_ai_framework.pdf
2026
Closest in time.
Open AI. GPT-4 system card. Accessed on August 24, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://cdn.openai.com/papers/gpt-4-system-card.pdf
2026
Closest in time.
Open AI. Announcing OpenAI’s bug bounty program. Accessed on August 24, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://openai.com/blog/bug-bounty-program
2026
Closest in time.
F. A. Administration. Airworthiness certification. Accessed on August 24, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.faa.gov/aircraft/air_cert/airworthiness_certification#:~:text=By%20comparison%2C%20the%20certification%20of,control%20system%2C%20including%20the%20MCAS%20
2026
Closest in time.
A. Sertkaya, A. Birkenbach, A. Berlind, and J. Eyraud, “Examination of clinical trial costs and barriers for drug development,” accessed on August 24, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://aspe.hhs.gov/reports/examination-clinical-trial-costs-barriers-drug-development-0
2026
Closest in time.
P. Liang, R. Bommasani, K. Creel, and R. Reich. The time is now to develop community norms and release foundation models. Accessed on August 24, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://hai.stanford.edu/news/time-now-develop-community-norms-release-foundation-models
2026
Closest in time.
J. Bansemer and A. Lohn. Securing AI makes for safer AI. Accessed on August 24, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://cset.georgetown.edu/article/securing-ai-makes-for-safer-ai/
2026
Closest in time.
A. Trask, A. Sukumar, A. Kalliokoski, B. Farkas, C. Ezenwaka, C. Popa, C. Mitchell, D. Hrebenach, G.-C. Muraru, I. Junior, I. Bejan, I. Mishra, I. Ngong, J. Bandy, J. Stahl, J. Cardonnet, K. Trask, K. Nguyen, K. Dang, K. van der Veen, K. Eng, L. Strahm, L. Ayre, M. Jay, O. Lytvyn, O. Kyemenu-Sarsah, P. Chung, P. Smith, R. S, R. Falcon, S. Gupta, S. Gabriel, T. Milea, T. Thoraldson, T. Porto, T. Cebere, Y. Gorana, and Z. Reza. How to audit an AI model owned by someone else (part 1). Accessed on August 24, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://blog.openmined.org/ai-audit-part-1/
2026
Closest in time.