Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
When individuals are subject to adverse outcomes from machine learning models, providing a recourse path to help achieve a positive outcome is desirable.
Model explanations with differential privacy. In 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency . 1895–1904
Neel Patel, Reza Shokri, and Yair Zick. 2022 · 1904
Earlier work this paper cites.
Adult Dataset
Barry Becker and Ronny Kohavi. 1996 · 1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
Differentially private empirical risk minimization
Kamalika Chaudhuri, Claire Monteleoni, and Anand D Sarwate. 2011 · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Adverse action notice requirements under the ECOA and the FCRA
Sarah Ammermann. 2013 · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
The algorithmic foundations of differential privacy
Cynthia Dwork, Aaron Roth, et al · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Deep learning with differential privacy. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC conference on computer and communications security . 308–318
Martin Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian Goodfellow, H Brendan McMahan, Ilya Mironov, Kunal Talwar, and Li Zhang. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Algorithmic transparency via quantitative input influence: Theory and experiments with learning systems. In 2016 IEEE symposium on security and privacy (SP) . IEEE, 598–617
Anupam Datta, Shayak Sen, and Yair Zick. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Examples are not enough, learn to criticize! criticism for interpretability
Been Kim, Rajiv Khanna, and Oluwasanmi O Koyejo. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a “right to explanation”
Bryce Goodman and Seth Flaxman. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Counterfactual explanations without opening the black box: Automated decisions and the GDPR
Sandra Wachter, Brent Mittelstadt, and Chris Russell. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
HELOC Dataset
2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Scalable private learning with pate
Nicolas Papernot, Shuang Song, Ilya Mironov, Ananth Raghunathan, Kunal Talwar, and Úlfar Erlingsson. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Diffprivlib: the IBM differential privacy library
Naoise Holohan, Stefano Braghin, Pól Mac Aonghusa, and Killian Levacher. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Model reconstruction from model explanations. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency . 1–9
Smitha Milli, Ludwig Schmidt, Anca D Dragan, and Moritz Hardt. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Counterfactual Explanations of Machine Learning Predictions: Opportunities and Challenges for AI Safety
Kacper Sokol and Peter A Flach. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Interpret federated learning with shapley values
Guan Wang. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
The what-if tool: Interactive probing of machine learning models
James Wexler, Mahima Pushkarna, Tolga Bolukbasi, Martin Wattenberg, Fernanda Viégas, and Jimbo Wilson. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Interpretable and differentially private predictions. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , Vol. 34. 4083–4090
Frederik Harder, Matthias Bauer, and Mijung Park. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Differentially Private k k k-Means Clustering With Convergence Guarantee
Zhigang Lu and Hong Shen. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Explaining machine learning classifiers through diverse counterfactual explanations. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency . 607–617
Ramaravind K Mothilal, Amit Sharma, and Chenhao Tan. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
FACE: feasible and actionable counterfactual explanations. In Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society . 344–350
Rafael Poyiadzi, Kacper Sokol, Raul Santos-Rodriguez, Tijl De Bie, and Peter Flach. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
The philosophical basis of algorithmic recourse. In Proceedings of the 2020 conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency . 284–293
The privacy issue of counterfactual explanations: explanation linkage attacks
Sofie Goethals, Kenneth Sörensen, and David Martens. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Counterfactual explanations and how to find them: literature review and benchmarking
Riccardo Guidotti. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
AI Bill of Rights
The White House. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
A survey of algorithmic recourse: contrastive explanations and consequential recommendations
Amir-Hossein Karimi, Gilles Barthe, Bernhard Schölkopf, and Isabel Valera. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Evaluating the Privacy Exposure of Interpretable Global Explainers. In 2022 IEEE 4th International Conference on Cognitive Machine Intelligence (CogMI) . IEEE, 13–19
Francesca Naretto, Anna Monreale, and Fosca Giannotti. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Suresh Venkatasubramanian and Mark Alfano. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Counterfactual explanations and algorithmic recourses for machine learning: A review
Sahil Verma, Varich Boonsanong, Minh Hoang, Keegan E Hines, John P Dickerson, and Chirag Shah. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Dp-xgboost: Private machine learning at scale
Nicolas Grislain and Joan Gonzalvez. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Robust counterfactual explanations for privacy-preserving SVM. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2021), Workshop on Socially Responsible Machine Learning
Rami Mochaourab, Sugandh Sinha, Stanley Greenstein, and Panagiotis Papapetrou. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Privacy-preserving generative adversarial network for case-based explainability in medical image analysis
Helena Montenegro, Wilson Silva, and Jaime S Cardoso. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Programming Differential Privacy
Joseph P Near and Chiké Abuah. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Carla: a python library to benchmark algorithmic recourse and counterfactual explanation algorithms
Martin Pawelczyk, Sascha Bielawski, Johannes van den Heuvel, Tobias Richter, and Gjergji Kasneci. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
On the privacy risks of model explanations. In Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society . 231–241
Reza Shokri, Martin Strobel, and Yair Zick. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Truc Nguyen, Phung Lai, NhatHai Phan, and My T Thai. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Amortized generation of sequential algorithmic recourses for black-box models. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , Vol. 36. 8512–8519
Sahil Verma, Keegan Hines, and John P Dickerson. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Differentially Private Counterfactuals via Functional Mechanism
Fan Yang, Qizhang Feng, Kaixiong Zhou, Jiahao Chen, and Xia Hu. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Nice: an algorithm for nearest instance counterfactual explanations
Dieter Brughmans, Pieter Leyman, and David Martens. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
The dark side of explanations: Poisoning recommender systems with counterfactual examples
Ziheng Chen, Fabrizio Silvestri, Jia Wang, Yongfeng Zhang, and Gabriele Tolomei. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Simple Steps to Success: Axiomatics of Distance-Based Algorithmic Recourse
Jenny Hamer, Jake Valladares, Vignesh Viswanathan, and Yair Zick. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Accurate, Explainable, and Private Models: Providing Recourse While Minimizing Training Data Leakage
Catherine Huang, Chelse Swoopes, Christina Xiao, Jiaqi Ma, and Himabindu Lakkaraju. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
k-Means SubClustering: A Differentially Private Algorithm with Improved Clustering Quality
Devvrat Joshi and Janvi Thakkar. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Balancing Privacy Protection and Interpretability in Federated Learning
Zhe Li, Honglong Chen, Zhichen Ni, and Huajie Shao. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
On the privacy risks of algorithmic recourse. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics . PMLR, 9680–9696
Martin Pawelczyk, Himabindu Lakkaraju, and Seth Neel. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Fast Private Kernel Density Estimation via Locality Sensitive Quantization
Tal Wagner, Yonatan Naamad, and Nina Mishra. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.