Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Large Language Models (LLMs) and chatbots show significant promise in streamlining the legal intake process.
Normalized Legal Drafting and the Query Method
Allen L, Engholm C · 1978
Earlier work this paper cites.
The British Nationality Act as a logic program
Sergot MJ, Sadri F, Kowalski RA, Kriwaczek F, Hammond P, Cory HT · 1986
Earlier work this paper cites.
Reasoning with cases and hypotheticals in HYPO
Ashley KD · 1991
Earlier work this paper cites.
A hybrid rule – neural approach for the automation of legal reasoning in the discretionary domain of family law in Australia
Stranieri A, Zeleznikow J, Gawler M, Lewis B · 1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
Using Web-based Legal Decision Support Systems to Improve Access to Justice
Zeleznikow J · 2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
Automatically classifying case texts and predicting outcomes
Ashley KD, Brüninghaus S · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Creating New Pathways to Justice Using Simple Artificial Intelligence and Online Dispute Resolution [SSRN Scholarly Paper]
Thompson D · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Online legal advice and conflict support: a Dutch experience
Bickel EA, Dijk MAJv, Giebels E · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
A methodology for designing systems to reason with legal cases using Abstract Dialectical Frameworks
Al-Abdulkarim L, Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Semantic Types for Decomposing Evidence Assessment in Decisions on Veterans’ Disability Claims for PTSD
Walker V, Okpara N, Hemendinger A, Ahmed T · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Predicting trade secret case outcomes using argument schemes and learned quantitative value effect tradeoffs
Grabmair M · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Using Factors to Predict and Analyze Landlord-Tenant Decisions to Increase Access to Justice
Westermann H, Walker VR, Ashley KD, Benyekhlef K · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Determining Worker Type from Legal Text Data using Machine Learning
Yin Y, Zulkernine F, Dahan S · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Scalable and Explainable Legal Prediction
Branting LK, Pfeifer C, Brown B, Ferro L, Aberdeen J, Weiss B, et al · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Predicting Employment Notice Period with Machine Learning: Promises and Limitations [SSRN Scholarly Paper]
GPT-4 Passes the Bar Exam
Katz DM, Bommarito MJ, Gao S, Arredondo P · 2023
Closest in time.
JusticeBot: A Methodology for Building Augmented Intelligence Tools for Laypeople to Increase Access to Justice
Westermann H, Benyekhlef K · 2023
Closest in time.
Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4
Bubeck S, Chandrasekaran V, Eldan R, Gehrke J, Horvitz E, Kamar E, et al · 2023
Closest in time.
Forum: There’s potential for AI chatbots to increase access to justice
greggwirth · 2023
Closest in time.
Legal AI-d to Your Service: Making Access to Justice a Reality
Holt A · 2023
Closest in time.
Zero-Shot Goal-Directed Dialogue via RL on Imagined Conversations
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Dahan S, Touboul J, Lam J, Sfedj D · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Towards Human-Centered Standards for Legal Help AI [SSRN Scholarly Paper]
Hagan M · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
OpenAI · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Hong J, Levine S, Dragan A · 2023
Closest in time.
Eliciting Human Preferences with Language Models
Li BZ, Tamkin A, Goodman N, Andreas J · 2023
Closest in time.
Practical Guidance for the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in the Practice of Law
Committee on Professional Responsibility SBoC · 2023
Closest in time.