Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
One core capability of Large Language Models (LLMs) is to follow natural language instructions.
Language models are few-shot learners
Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, et al · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Evaluating large language models trained on code
Mark Chen, Jerry Tworek, Heewoo Jun, Qiming Yuan, Henrique Ponde de Oliveira Pinto, Jared Kaplan, Harri Edwards, Yuri Burda, Nicholas Joseph, Greg Brockman, et al · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Adapting language models for zero-shot learning by meta-tuning on dataset and prompt collections
Ruiqi Zhong, Kristy Lee, Zheng Zhang, and Dan Klein · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
PaLM: Scaling language modeling with pathways
Aakanksha Chowdhery, Sharan Narang, Jacob Devlin, Maarten Bosma, Gaurav Mishra, Adam Roberts, Paul Barham, Hyung Won Chung, Charles Sutton, Sebastian Gehrmann, et al · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Scaling instruction-finetuned language models
Hyung Won Chung, Le Hou, Shayne Longpre, Barret Zoph, Yi Tay, William Fedus, Eric Li, Xuezhi Wang, Mostafa Dehghani, Siddhartha Brahma, et al · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Cross-task generalization via natural language crowdsourcing instructions
Swaroop Mishra, Daniel Khashabi, Chitta Baral, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback
Long Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida, Carroll Wainwright, Pamela Mishkin, Chong Zhang, Sandhini Agarwal, Katarina Slama, Alex Ray, et al · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Multitask prompted training enables zero-shot task generalization
Sanh Victor, Webson Albert, Raffel Colin, Bach Stephen, Sutawika Lintang, Alyafeai Zaid, Chaffin Antoine, Stiegler Arnaud, Raja Arun, Dey Manan, et al · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Finetuned language models are zero-shot learners
Jason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y Zhao, Kelvin Guu, Adams Wei Yu, Brian Lester, Nan Du, Andrew M Dai, and Quoc V Le · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Rohan Anil, Andrew M Dai, Orhan Firat, Melvin Johnson, Dmitry Lepikhin, Alexandre Passos, Siamak Shakeri, Emanuel Taropa, Paige Bailey, Zhifeng Chen, et al · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
A survey on evaluation of large language models
Yupeng Chang, Xu Wang, Jindong Wang, Yuan Wu, Kaijie Zhu, Hao Chen, Linyi Yang, Xiaoyuan Yi, Cunxiang Wang, Yidong Wang, et al · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Can large language models be an alternative to human evaluations?
Cheng-Han Chiang and Hung-yi Lee · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Gptscore: Evaluate as you desire
Jinlan Fu, See-Kiong Ng, Zhengbao Jiang, and Pengfei Liu · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Gpt-4 passes the bar exam
Daniel Martin Katz, Michael James Bommarito, Shang Gao, and Pablo Arredondo · 2023
Baolin Peng, Chunyuan Li, Pengcheng He, Michel Galley, and Jianfeng Gao · 2023
Closest in time.
Are large language models good evaluators for abstractive summarization?
Chenhui Shen, Liying Cheng, Yang You, and Lidong Bing · 2023
Closest in time.
Towards better evaluation of instruction-following: A case-study in summarization
Ondrej Skopek, Rahul Aralikatte, Sian Gooding, and Victor Carbune · 2023
Closest in time.
Evaluating large language models on controlled generation tasks
Jiao Sun, Yufei Tian, Wangchunshu Zhou, Nan Xu, Qian Hu, Rahul Gupta, John Frederick Wieting, Nanyun Peng, and Xuezhe Ma · 2023
Closest in time.
Stanford alpaca: An instruction-following llama model
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Cited alongside, same era.
Gpt-4 vs. gpt-3.5: A concise showdown
Anis Koubaa · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Gpteval: Nlg evaluation using gpt-4 with better human alignment
Yang Liu, Dan Iter, Yichong Xu, Shuohang Wang, Ruochen Xu, and Chenguang Zhu · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Automated evaluation of written discourse coherence using gpt-4
Ben Naismith, Phoebe Mulcaire, and Jill Burstein · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
OpenAI · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Rohan Taori, Ishaan Gulrajani, Tianyi Zhang, Yann Dubois, Xuechen Li, Carlos Guestrin, Percy Liang, and Tatsunori B. Hashimoto · 2023
Closest in time.
Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models
Hugo Touvron, Louis Martin, Kevin Stone, Peter Albert, Amjad Almahairi, Yasmine Babaei, Nikolay Bashlykov, Soumya Batra, Prajjwal Bhargava, Shruti Bhosale, et al · 2023
Closest in time.
Large language models are not fair evaluators
Peiyi Wang, Lei Li, Liang Chen, Dawei Zhu, Binghuai Lin, Yunbo Cao, Qi Liu, Tianyu Liu, and Zhifang Sui · 2023
Closest in time.
Large language models are diverse role-players for summarization evaluation
Ning Wu, Ming Gong, Linjun Shou, Shining Liang, and Daxin Jiang · 2023
Closest in time.
Judging llm-as-a-judge with mt-bench and chatbot arena, 2023
Lianmin Zheng, Wei-Lin Chiang, Ying Sheng, Siyuan Zhuang, Zhanghao Wu, Yonghao Zhuang, Zi Lin, Zhuohan Li, Dacheng Li, Eric. P Xing, Hao Zhang, Joseph E. Gonzalez, and Ion Stoica · 2023
Closest in time.