Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Whilst fact verification has attracted substantial interest in the natural language processing community, verifying misinforming statements against data visualizations such as charts has so far been overlooked.
The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data
J Richard Landis and Gary G Koch. 1977 · 1977
Earlier work this paper cites.
Bleu: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation
Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, Todd Ward, and Wei-Jing Zhu. 2002 · 2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
ROUGE: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries
Chin-Yew Lin. 2004 · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Low-level components of analytic activity in information visualization
Robert A. Amar, James Eagan, and John T. Stasko. 2005 · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
METEOR: An automatic metric for MT evaluation with improved correlation with human judgments
Satanjeev Banerjee and Alon Lavie. 2005 · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Information graphics: An untapped resource for digital libraries
Sandra Carberry, Stephanie Elzer, and Seniz Demir. 2006 · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
FIVE Dimensions of Visual Misinformation in the Emerging Media Landscape , pages 91–106. University of Texas Press, New York, USA
Jeff Hemsley and Jaime Snyder. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
DVQA: understanding data visualizations via question answering
Kushal Kafle, Brian L. Price, Scott Cohen, and Christopher Kanan. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
FEVER: a large-scale dataset for fact extraction and verification
James Thorne, Andreas Vlachos, Christos Christodoulopoulos, and Arpit Mittal. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
A broad-coverage challenge corpus for sentence understanding through inference
Adina Williams, Nikita Nangia, and Samuel Bowman. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
MultiFC: A real-world multi-domain dataset for evidence-based fact checking of claims
Isabelle Augenstein, Christina Lioma, Dongsheng Wang, Lucas Chaves Lima, Casper Hansen, Christian Hansen, and Jakob Grue Simonsen. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Tabfact: A large-scale dataset for table-based fact verification
Wenhu Chen, Hongmin Wang, Jianshu Chen, Yunkai Zhang, Hong Wang, Shiyang Li, Xiyou Zhou, and William Yang Wang. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Tapas: Weakly supervised table parsing via pre-training
Jonathan Herzig, Pawel Krzysztof Nowak, Thomas Müller, Francesco Piccinno, and Julian Martin Eisenschlos. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
spaCy: Industrial-strength Natural Language Processing in Python
Matthew Honnibal, Ines Montani, Sofie Van Landeghem, and Adriane Boyd. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Answering questions about data visualizations using efficient bimodal fusion
Kushal Kafle, Robik Shrestha, Brian L. Price, Scott Cohen, and Christopher Kanan. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Answering questions about charts and generating visual explanations
Dae Hyun Kim, Enamul Hoque, and Maneesh Agrawala. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Explainable automated fact-checking for public health claims
Neema Kotonya and Francesca Toni. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Plotqa: Reasoning over scientific plots
Nitesh Methani, Pritha Ganguly, Mitesh M. Khapra, and Pratyush Kumar. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
BLEURT: Learning robust metrics for text generation
Thibault Sellam, Dipanjan Das, and Ankur Parikh. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
STL-CQA: Structure-based transformers with localization and encoding for chart question answering
Hrituraj Singh and Sumit Shekhar. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Bertscore: Evaluating text generation with BERT
Tianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger, and Yoav Artzi. 2020 · 2020
Misinformed by visualization: What do we learn from misinformative visualizations?
Leo Yu-Ho Lo, Ayush Gupta, Kento Shigyo, Aoyu Wu, Enrico Bertini, and Huamin Qu. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
ChartQA: A benchmark for question answering about charts with visual and logical reasoning
Ahmed Masry, Xuan Long Do, Jia Qing Tan, Shafiq Joty, and Enamul Hoque. 2022a · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Chartqa: A benchmark for question answering about charts with visual and logical reasoning
Ahmed Masry, Do Xuan Long, Jia Qing Tan, Shafiq R. Joty, and Enamul Hoque. 2022b · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models
Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Brian Ichter, Fei Xia, Ed H. Chi, Quoc V. Le, and Denny Zhou. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Reading and reasoning over chart images for evidence-based automated fact-checking
Mubashara Akhtar, Oana Cocarascu, and Elena Simperl. 2023a · 2023
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Cited alongside, same era.
FEVEROUS: fact extraction and verification over unstructured and structured information
Rami Aly, Zhijiang Guo, Michael Sejr Schlichtkrull, James Thorne, Andreas Vlachos, Christos Christodoulopoulos, Oana Cocarascu, and Arpit Mittal. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Deberta: decoding-enhanced bert with disentangled attention
Pengcheng He, Xiaodong Liu, Jianfeng Gao, and Weizhu Chen. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Vilt: Vision-and-language transformer without convolution or region supervision
Wonjae Kim, Bokyung Son, and Ildoo Kim. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Viral visualizations: How coronavirus skeptics use orthodox data practices to promote unorthodox science online
Crystal Lee, Tanya Yang, Gabrielle D. Inchoco, Graham M. Jones, and Arvind Satyanarayan. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
PubHealthTab: A public health table-based dataset for evidence-based fact checking
Mubashara Akhtar, Oana Cocarascu, and Elena Simperl. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
A survey on automated fact-checking
Zhijiang Guo, Michael Schlichtkrull, and Andreas Vlachos. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Multimodal automated fact-checking: A survey
Mubashara Akhtar, Michael Schlichtkrull, Zhijiang Guo, Oana Cocarascu, Elena Simperl, and Andreas Vlachos. 2023b · 2023
Closest in time.
Misleading beyond visual tricks: How people actually lie with charts
Maxim Lisnic, Cole Polychronis, Alexander Lex, and Marina Kogan. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
MMC: advancing multimodal chart understanding with large-scale instruction tuning
Fuxiao Liu, Xiaoyang Wang, Wenlin Yao, Jianshu Chen, Kaiqiang Song, Sangwoo Cho, Yaser Yacoob, and Dong Yu. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
UniChart: A universal vision-language pretrained model for chart comprehension and reasoning
Ahmed Masry, Parsa Kavehzadeh, Xuan Long Do, Enamul Hoque, and Shafiq Joty. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
OpenAI. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Flan-moe: Scaling instruction-finetuned language models with sparse mixture of experts
Sheng Shen, Le Hou, Yanqi Zhou, Nan Du, Shayne Longpre, Jason Wei, Hyung Won Chung, Barret Zoph, William Fedus, Xinyun Chen, Tu Vu, Yuexin Wu, Wuyang Chen, Albert Webson, Yunxuan Li, Vincent Zhao, Hongkun Yu, Kurt Keutzer, Trevor Darrell, and Denny Zhou. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Structchart: Perception, structuring, reasoning for visual chart understanding
Renqiu Xia, Bo Zhang, Haoyang Peng, Ning Liao, Peng Ye, Botian Shi, Junchi Yan, and Yu Qiao. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
UReader: Universal OCR-free visually-situated language understanding with multimodal large language model
Jiabo Ye, Anwen Hu, Haiyang Xu, Qinghao Ye, Ming Yan, Guohai Xu, Chenliang Li, Junfeng Tian, Qi Qian, Ji Zhang, Qin Jin, Liang He, Xin Lin, and Fei Huang. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Why change my design: Explaining poorly constructed visualization designs with explorable explanations
Leo Yu-Ho Lo, Yifan Cao, Leni Yang, and Huamin Qu. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.