Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
In various work contexts, such as meeting scheduling, collaborating, and project planning, collective decision-making is essential but often challenging due to diverse individual preferences, varying work focuses, and power dynamics among members.
On the measure of concentration with special reference to income and statistics
Corrado Gini. 1936 · 1936
Earlier work this paper cites.
Meet your destiny: A non-manipulable meeting scheduler. In Proceedings of the 1994 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work . 359–371
Eithan Ephrati, Gilad Zlotkin, and Jeffrey S Rosenschein. 1994 · 1994
Earlier work this paper cites.
VERN: facilitating democratic group decision making online. In Proceedings of the 2005 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work . 116–119
Sarita Yardi, Benjamin Hill, and Stephen Chan. 2005 · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
groupTime: preference based group scheduling. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems . 1047–1056
Mike Brzozowski, Kendra Carattini, Scott R Klemmer, Patrick Mihelich, Jiang Hu, and Andrew Y Ng. 2006 · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
An agent-based approach to solve dynamic meeting scheduling problems with preferences
Ahlem BenHassine and Tu Bao Ho. 2007 · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
An experts approach to strategy selection in multiagent meeting scheduling
Elisabeth Crawford and Manuela Veloso. 2007 · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Learning to improve negotiation in semi-cooperative agreement problems
Elisabeth Crawford. 2009 · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
When the people speak: Deliberative democracy and public consultation
James Fishkin. 2009 · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Doodle around the world: Online scheduling behavior reflects cultural differences in time perception and group decision-making. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work . 45–54
Katharina Reinecke, Minh Khoa Nguyen, Abraham Bernstein, Michael Näf, and Krzysztof Z Gajos. 2013 · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Hootle+: A group recommender system supporting preference negotiation. In Collaboration and Technology: 22nd International Conference, CRIWG 2016, Kanazawa, Japan, September 14-16, 2016, Proceedings 22 . Springer, 151–166
Jesús Omar Álvarez Márquez and Jürgen Ziegler. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Calendar. help: Designing a workflow-based scheduling agent with humans in the loop. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 2382–2393
Justin Cranshaw, Emad Elwany, Todd Newman, Rafal Kocielnik, Bowen Yu, Sandeep Soni, Jaime Teevan, and Andrés Monroy-Hernández. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Attentive group recommendation. In The 41st International ACM SIGIR conference on research & development in information retrieval . 645–654
Da Cao, Xiangnan He, Lianhai Miao, Yahui An, Chao Yang, and Richang Hong. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Minimizing polarization and disagreement in social networks. In Proceedings of the 2018 world wide web conference . 369–378
Cameron Musco, Christopher Musco, and Charalampos E Tsourakakis. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
A chat-based group recommender system for tourism
Thuy Ngoc Nguyen and Francesco Ricci. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Characterizing online public discussions through patterns of participant interactions
Justine Zhang, Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, Christina Sauper, and Sean J Taylor. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Fine-tuning language models from human preferences
Daniel M Ziegler, Nisan Stiennon, Jeffrey Wu, Tom B Brown, Alec Radford, Dario Amodei, Paul Christiano, and Geoffrey Irving. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Open democracy: Reinventing popular rule for the twenty-first century
Hélène Landemore. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Privacy Considerations in Large Language Models
Nicholas Carlini. 2020 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
A case-based reasoning approach for supporting facilitation in online discussions
Wen Gu, Ahmed Moustafa, Takayuki Ito, Minjie Zhang, and Chunsheng Yang. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Scaling language models: Methods, analysis & insights from training gopher
Jack W Rae, Sebastian Borgeaud, Trevor Cai, Katie Millican, Jordan Hoffmann, Francis Song, John Aslanides, Sarah Henderson, Roman Ring, Susannah Young, et al · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Using Large Language Models to Simulate Multiple Humans
Gati Aher, Rosa I Arriaga, and Adam Tauman Kalai. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Out of One, Many: Using Language Models to Simulate Human Samples
Lisa P Argyle, Ethan C Busby, Nancy Fulda, Joshua Gubler, Christopher Rytting, and David Wingate. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Training a helpful and harmless assistant with reinforcement learning from human feedback
Yuntao Bai, Andy Jones, Kamal Ndousse, Amanda Askell, Anna Chen, Nova DasSarma, Dawn Drain, Stanislav Fort, Deep Ganguli, Tom Henighan, et al · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Fine-tuning language models to find agreement among humans with diverse preferences
Michiel Bakker, Martin Chadwick, Hannah Sheahan, Michael Tessler, Lucy Campbell-Gillingham, Jan Balaguer, Nat McAleese, Amelia Glaese, John Aslanides, Matt Botvinick, et al · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
What does it mean for a language model to preserve privacy?. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency . 2280–2292
Hannah Brown, Katherine Lee, Fatemehsadat Mireshghallah, Reza Shokri, and Florian Tramèr. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Preference dynamics under personalized recommendations. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation . 795–816
Sarah Dean and Jamie Morgenstern. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Sparks: Inspiration for science writing using language models. In Designing interactive systems conference . 1002–1019
Katy Ilonka Gero, Vivian Liu, and Lydia Chilton. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Deduplicating training data mitigates privacy risks in language models. In International Conference on Machine Learning . PMLR, 10697–10707
AI and the transformation of social science research
Igor Grossmann, Matthew Feinberg, Dawn C Parker, Nicholas A Christakis, Philip E Tetlock, and William A Cunningham. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Large language models as simulated economic agents: What can we learn from homo silicus?
John J Horton. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Do LLMs Understand User Preferences? Evaluating LLMs On User Rating Prediction
Wang-Cheng Kang, Jianmo Ni, Nikhil Mehta, Maheswaran Sathiamoorthy, Lichan Hong, Ed Chi, and Derek Zhiyuan Cheng. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
PRD: Peer Rank and Discussion Improve Large Language Model based Evaluations
Ruosen Li, Teerth Patel, and Xinya Du. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debate
Tian Liang, Zhiwei He, Wenxiang Jiao, Xing Wang, Yan Wang, Rui Wang, Yujiu Yang, Zhaopeng Tu, and Shuming Shi. 2023 · 2023
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Nikhil Kandpal, Eric Wallace, and Colin Raffel. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Evaluating Human-Language Model Interaction
Mina Lee, Megha Srivastava, Amelia Hardy, John Thickstun, Esin Durmus, Ashwin Paranjape, Ines Gerard-Ursin, Xiang Lisa Li, Faisal Ladhak, Frieda Rong, et al · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Holistic evaluation of language models
Percy Liang, Rishi Bommasani, Tony Lee, Dimitris Tsipras, Dilara Soylu, Michihiro Yasunaga, Yian Zhang, Deepak Narayanan, Yuhuai Wu, Ananya Kumar, et al · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
An empirical evaluation of GitHub copilot’s code suggestions. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories . 1–5
Nhan Nguyen and Sarah Nadi. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Hierarchical text-conditional image generation with clip latents
Aditya Ramesh, Prafulla Dhariwal, Alex Nichol, Casey Chu, and Mark Chen. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Photorealistic text-to-image diffusion models with deep language understanding
Chitwan Saharia, William Chan, Saurabh Saxena, Lala Li, Jay Whang, Emily L Denton, Kamyar Ghasemipour, Raphael Gontijo Lopes, Burcu Karagol Ayan, Tim Salimans, et al · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Chain of thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models
Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Ed Chi, Quoc Le, and Denny Zhou. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
The Future of Information Work
Longqi Yang, David Holtz, Sonia Jaffe, and Siddharth Suri. 2022a · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Closest in time.
Training Socially Aligned Language Models in Simulated Human Society
Ruibo Liu, Ruixin Yang, Chenyan Jia, Ge Zhang, Denny Zhou, Andrew M Dai, Diyi Yang, and Soroush Vosoughi. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Challenging but Connective: Large-Scale Characteristics of Synchronous Collaboration Across Time Zones. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA
Lillio Mok, Lu Sun, Shilad Sen, and Bahareh Sarrafzadeh. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
GPT-4 technical report
OpenAI. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Generative agents: Interactive simulacra of human behavior
Joon Sung Park, Joseph C O’Brien, Carrie J Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris, Percy Liang, and Michael S Bernstein. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
The impact of ai on developer productivity: Evidence from github copilot
Sida Peng, Eirini Kalliamvakou, Peter Cihon, and Mert Demirer. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Communicative agents for software development
Chen Qian, Xin Cong, Cheng Yang, Weize Chen, Yusheng Su, Juyuan Xu, Zhiyuan Liu, and Maosong Sun. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Focus Time for Wellbeing and Work Engagement of Information Workers. In Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA
Koustuv Saha and Shamsi T Iqbal. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Can artificial intelligence help for scientific writing?
Michele Salvagno, Fabio Silvio Taccone, Alberto Giovanni Gerli, et al · 2023
Closest in time.
Large Language Models are Competitive Near Cold-start Recommenders for Language-and Item-based Preferences. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems . 890–896
Scott Sanner, Krisztian Balog, Filip Radlinski, Ben Wedin, and Lucas Dixon. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Opportunities and Risks of LLMs for Scalable Deliberation with Polis
Christopher T. Small, Ivan Vendrov, Esin Durmus, Hadjar Homaei, Elizabeth Barry, Julien Cornebise, Ted Suzman, Deep Ganguli, and Colin Megill. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models
Hugo Touvron, Louis Martin, Kevin Stone, Peter Albert, Amjad Almahairi, Yasmine Babaei, Nikolay Bashlykov, Soumya Batra, Prajjwal Bhargava, Shruti Bhosale, Dan Bikel, Lukas Blecher, Cristian Canton Ferrer, Moya Chen, Guillem Cucurull, David Esiobu, Jude Fernandes, Jeremy Fu, Wenyin Fu, Brian Fuller, Cynthia Gao, Vedanuj Goswami, Naman Goyal, Anthony Hartshorn, Saghar Hosseini, Rui Hou, Hakan Inan, Marcin Kardas, Viktor Kerkez, Madian Khabsa, Isabel Kloumann, Artem Korenev, Punit Singh Koura, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Thibaut Lavril, Jenya Lee, Diana Liskovich, Yinghai Lu, Yuning Mao, Xavier Martinet, Todor Mihaylov, Pushkar Mishra, Igor Molybog, Yixin Nie, Andrew Poulton, Jeremy Reizenstein, Rashi Rungta, Kalyan Saladi, Alan Schelten, Silva Ruan, Smith Eric Michael, Subramanian Ranjan, Tan Xiaoqing Ellen, Tang Binh, Taylor Ross, Williams Adina, Xiang Jian, Xu Kuan Puxin, Yan Zheng, Zarov Iliyan, Zhang Yuchen, Fan Angela, Kambadur Melanie, Narang Sharan, Rodriguez Aurelien, Stojnic Robert, Edunov Sergey, and Scialom Thomas. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Veniamin Veselovsky, Manoel Horta Ribeiro, and Robert West. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Autogen: Enabling next-gen llm applications via multi-agent conversation framework
Qingyun Wu, Gagan Bansal, Jieyu Zhang, Yiran Wu, Shaokun Zhang, Erkang Zhu, Beibin Li, Li Jiang, Xiaoyun Zhang, and Chi Wang. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Large language models as optimizers
Chengrun Yang, Xuezhi Wang, Yifeng Lu, Hanxiao Liu, Quoc V Le, Denny Zhou, and Xinyun Chen. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Large-Scale Analysis of New Employee Network Dynamics. In Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 . 2719–2730
Yulin Yu, Longqi Yang, Siân Lindley, and Mengting Wan. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
A survey of large language models
Wayne Xin Zhao, Kun Zhou, Junyi Li, Tianyi Tang, Xiaolei Wang, Yupeng Hou, Yingqian Min, Beichen Zhang, Junjie Zhang, Zican Dong, et al · 2023
Closest in time.
“I Want It That Way”: Enabling Interactive Decision Support Using Large Language Models and Constraint Programming
Connor Lawless, Jakob Schoeffer, Lindy Le, Kael Rowan, Shilad Sen, Cristina St. Hill, Jina Suh, and Bahareh Sarrafzadeh. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.