Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
This study highlights the potential of fine-tuned ChatGPT (GPT-3.5) for automatically scoring student written constructed responses using example assessment tasks in science education.
Language models are few-shot learners
Brown, T., B. Mann, N. Ryder, M. Subbiah, J.D. Kaplan, P. Dhariwal, A. Neelakantan, P. Shyam, G. Sastry, A. Askell, et al. 2020 · 1901
Earlier work this paper cites.
Language models and automated essay scoring
Rodriguez, P.U., A. Jafari, and C.M. Ormerod. 2019 · 1909
Earlier work this paper cites.
c-rater: Automatic content scoring for short constructed responses
Sukkarieh, J.Z. and J. Blackmore 2009 · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Reporting statistics in apa style
Kahn, J. 2010 · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Next generation science standards: For states, by states
Council, N.R. et al. 2013 · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Computer-guided inquiry to improve science learning
Linn, M.C., L. Gerard, K. Ryoo, K. McElhaney, O.L. Liu, and A.N. Rafferty. 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Using automated scores of student essays to support teacher guidance in classroom inquiry
Gerard, L.F. and M.C. Linn. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Student facing dashboards: One size fits all?
Teasley, S.D. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Attention is all you need
Vaswani, A., N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A.N. Gomez, Ł. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding
Devlin, J., M.W. Chang, K. Lee, and K. Toutanova. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
The influence of variance in learner answers on automatic content scoring
Horbach, A. and T. Zesch 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
A hypothetical learning progression for quantifying phenomena in science
Jin, H., C. Delgado, M.I. Bauer, E.C. Wylie, D. Cisterna, and K.F. Llort. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
A validation framework for science learning progression research
Jin, H., P. van Rijn, J.C. Moore, M.I. Bauer, Y. Pressler, and N. Yestness. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
A systematic review of empirical studies on learning analytics dashboards: A self-regulated learning perspective
Matcha, W., D. Gašević, A. Pardo, et al. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Gpt-3: Its nature, scope, limits, and consequences
Floridi, L. and M. Chiriatti. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
The affordances of ai-enabled automatic scoring applications on learners’ continuous learning intention: An empirical study in china
Fu, S., H. Gu, and B. Yang. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Attention mechanism, transformers, bert, and gpt: tutorial and survey
Ghojogh, B. and A. Ghodsi. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
A systematic review of automatic question generation for educational purposes
Kurdi, G., J. Leo, B. Parsia, U. Sattler, and S. Al-Emari. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
A review of ai teaching and learning from 2000 to 2020
Ng, D.T.K., M. Lee, R.J.Y. Tan, X. Hu, J.S. Downie, and S.K.W. Chu. 2023 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
An empirical investigation of neural methods for content scoring of science explanations
Riordan, B., S. Bichler, A. Bradford, J.K. Chen, K. Wiley, L. Gerard, and M.C. Linn 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
From substitution to redefinition: A framework of machine learning-based science assessment
Zhai, X., K. C Haudek, L. Shi, R. H Nehm, and M. Urban-Lurain. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Applying machine learning in science assessment: a systematic review
Zhai, X., Y. Yin, J.W. Pellegrino, K.C. Haudek, and L. Shi. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
A systematic review of the effects of automatic scoring and automatic feedback in educational settings
Hahn, M.G., S.M.B. Navarro, L.D.L.F. Valentín, and D. Burgos. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Automated essay scoring using efficient transformer-based language models
Ormerod, C.M., A. Malhotra, and A. Jafari. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Mathbert: A pre-trained language model for general nlp tasks in mathematics education
Shen, J.T., M. Yamashita, E. Prihar, N. Heffernan, X. Wu, B. Graff, and D. Lee. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Ai in education: A systematic literature review
Tahiru, F. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
A review of artificial intelligence (ai) in education from 2010 to 2020
Zhai, X., X. Chu, C.S. Chai, M.S.Y. Jong, A. Istenic, M. Spector, J.B. Liu, J. Yuan, and Y. Li. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
A meta-analysis of machine learning-based science assessments: Factors impacting machine-human score agreements
Zhai, X., L. Shi, and R.H. Nehm. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
State of the art and practice in ai in education
Holmes, W. and I. Tuomi. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Automatic scoring of students’ science writing using hybrid neural network
Latif, E. and X. Zhai. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Ai gender bias, disparities, and fairness: Does training data matter?
Latif, E., X. Zhai, and L. Liu. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Applying large language models and chain-of-thought for automatic scoring
Lee, G.G., E. Latif, X. Wu, N. Liu, and X. Zhai. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Multimodality of ai for education: Towards artificial general intelligence
Lee, G.G., L. Shi, E. Latif, Y. Gao, A. Bewersdorf, M. Nyaaba, S. Guo, Z. Wu, Z. Liu, H. Wang, et al. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Limna, P., S. Jakwatanatham, S. Siripipattanakul, P. Kaewpuang, and P. Sriboonruang. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
A comprehensive overview of artificial intelligence tends in education
Namatherdhala, B., N. Mazher, and G.K. Sriram. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Self-instruct: Aligning language model with self generated instructions
Wang, Y., Y. Kordi, S. Mishra, A. Liu, N.A. Smith, D. Khashabi, and H. Hajishirzi. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Automatic scoring for translations based on language models
Wu, D., M. Wang, and X. Li. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Chatgpt user experience: Implications for education
Zhai, X. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Applying machine learning to automatically assess scientific models
Zhai, X., P. He, and J. Krajcik. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Revolutionizing education with ai: Exploring the transformative potential of chatgpt
Adiguzel, T., M.H. Kaya, and F.K. Cansu. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Liu, J., C. Liu, R. Lv, K. Zhou, and Y. Zhang. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Context matters: A strategy to pre-train language model for science education
Liu, Z., X. He, L. Liu, T. Liu, and X. Zhai. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
An overview of bard: an early experiment with generative ai
Manyika, J. and S. Hsiao. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Open ai in education, the responsible and ethical use of chatgpt towards lifelong learning
Mhlanga, D. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Beyond semantic distance: automated scoring of divergent thinking greatly improves with large language models
Organisciak, P., S. Acar, D. Dumas, and K. Berthiaume. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Supporting instructional decision making: Potential of an automatically scored three-dimensional assessment system
PASTA, P.T. November, 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Automatic scoring of student feedback for teaching evaluation based on aspect-level sentiment analysis
Ren, P., L. Yang, and F. Luo. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Automatic essay exam scoring system: A systematic literature review
Susanti, M.N.I., A. Ramadhan, and H.L.H.S. Warnars. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Gemini: A family of highly capable multimodal models
Team, G. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Pandalm: An automatic evaluation benchmark for llm instruction tuning optimization
Wang, Y., Z. Yu, Z. Zeng, L. Yang, C. Wang, H. Chen, C. Jiang, R. Xie, J. Wang, X. Xie, et al. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Instructiongpt-4: A 200-instruction paradigm for fine-tuning minigpt-4
Wei, L., Z. Jiang, W. Huang, and L. Sun. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Zero-shot information extraction via chatting with chatgpt
Wei, X., X. Cui, N. Cheng, X. Wang, X. Zhang, S. Huang, P. Xie, J. Xu, Y. Chen, M. Zhang, et al. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Matching exemplar as next sentence prediction (mensp): Zero-shot prompt learning for automatic scoring in science education
Wu, X., X. He, T. Liu, N. Liu, and X. Zhai 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Yan, L., L. Sha, L. Zhao, Y. Li, R. Martinez-Maldonado, G. Chen, X. Li, Y. Jin, and D. Gašević. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Ai and formative assessment: The train has left the station
Zhai, X. and R.H. Nehm. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Technology-based innovative assessment
Zhai, X. and E. Wiebe. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Creating and using instructionally supportive assessments in NGSS classrooms
Harris, C.J., J.S. Krajcik, and J.W. Pellegrino. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Guiding teacher use of artificial intelligence-based knowledge-in-use assessment to improve instructional decisions: A conceptual framework, In
He, P., N. Shin, X. Zhai, and J. Krajcik. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Pseudo artificial intelligence bias, In
Zhai, X. and J. Krajcik. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.