Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Developing an educational test can be expensive and time-consuming, as each item must be written by experts and then evaluated by collecting hundreds of student responses.
Statistical methods for research workers
Ronald A. Fisher. 1925 · 1925
Earlier work this paper cites.
Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems
Frederic M Lord. 1980 · 1980
Earlier work this paper cites.
An automated test development of parallel tests from a seed test
Ronald D Armstrong, Douglas H Jones, and Ing-Long Wu. 1992 · 1992
Earlier work this paper cites.
Automated parallel test construction using classical test theory
Ronald D Armstrong, Douglas H Jones, and Zhaobo Wang. 1994 · 1994
Earlier work this paper cites.
Generating random parallel test forms using ctt in a computer-based environment
Wade M Gibson and John A Weiner. 1998 · 1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis
Lynn S Fuchs, Douglas Fuchs, Michelle K Hosp, and Joseph R Jenkins. 2001 · 2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
A statistical model for scientific readability
Luo Si and Jamie Callan. 2001 · 2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
Computer-aided generation of multiple-choice tests
Ruslan Mitkov and Le An Ha. 2003 · 2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
Reading level assessment using support vector machines and statistical language models
Sarah E Schwarm and Mari Ostendorf. 2005 · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Using the lltm to evaluate an item-generating system for reading comprehension
Philipp Sonnleitner. 2008 · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Creating irt-based parallel test forms using the genetic algorithm method
Koun-Tem Sun, Yu-Jen Chen, Shu-Yen Tsai, and Chien-Fen Cheng. 2008 · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Automatic question generation using discourse cues
Manish Agarwal, Rakshit Shah, and Prashanth Mannem. 2011 · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Validity evidence for the test of silent reading efficiency and comprehension (tosrec)
E. S. Johnson, J. L. Pool, and D. R. Carter. 2011 · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Relations among oral reading fluency, silent reading fluency, and reading comprehension: A latent variable study of first-grade readers
Young-Suk Kim, Richard K Wagner, and Elizabeth Foster. 2011 · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Developmental relations between reading fluency and reading comprehension: A longitudinal study from grade 1 to grade 2
Young-Suk Kim, Richard K. Wagner, and Dina Lopez. 2012 · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Deep knowledge tracing
Chris Piech, Jonathan Bassen, Jonathan Huang, Surya Ganguli, Mehran Sahami, Leonidas J Guibas, and Jascha Sohl-Dickstein. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
An examination of the relationship of oral reading fluency, silent reading fluency, reading comprehension, and the Colorado State Reading Assessment
Christy L Bloomquist. 2017 · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Question generation for language learning: From ensuring texts are read to supporting learning
Maria Chinkina and Detmar Meurers. 2017 · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Learning to ask: Neural question generation for reading comprehension
Xinya Du, Junru Shao, and Claire Cardie. 2017 · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Building an english vocabulary knowledge dataset of japanese english-as-a-second-language learners using crowdsourcing
Yo Ehara. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
A semantic role-based approach to open-domain automatic question generation
Michael Flor and Brian Riordan. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Parametrizable exercise generation from authentic texts: Effectively targeting the language means on the curriculum
Tanja Heck and Detmar Meurers. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models
Edward J Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, Lu Wang, and Weizhu Chen. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Educational multi-question generation for reading comprehension
Manav Rathod, Tony Tu, and Katherine Stasaski. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Measuring reading comprehension with the lexile framework
A Jackson Stenner. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Automated generation of sentence reading fluency test items
Julia White, Amy Burkhardt, Jason Yeatman, and Noah Goodman. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Measuring text readability with machine comprehension: a pilot study
Marc Benzahra and François Yvon. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Interpolating between optimal transport and mmd using sinkhorn divergences
Jean Feydy, Thibault Séjourné, François-Xavier Vialard, Shun-ichi Amari, Alain Trouve, and Gabriel Peyré. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Sentence-bert: Sentence embeddings using siamese bert-networks
Nils Reimers and Iryna Gurevych. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Machine learning–driven language assessment
Burr Settles, Geoffrey T. LaFlair, and Masato Hagiwara. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Training verifiers to solve math word problems
Karl Cobbe, Vineet Kosaraju, Mohammad Bavarian, Mark Chen, Heewoo Jun, Lukasz Kaiser, Matthias Plappert, Jerry Tworek, Jacob Hilton, Reiichiro Nakano, et al. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
The effect of covid on oral reading fluency during the 2020–2021 academic year
Benjamin W Domingue, Madison Dell, David Lang, Rebecca Silverman, Jason Yeatman, and Heather Hough. 2022 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
A survey on problem formulations and (meta) heuristic-based solutions in automated assembly of parallel test forms
Miroslava M Ignjatović, Dragan M Bojić, and Igor I Tartalja. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Susan Zhang, Stephen Roller, Naman Goyal, Mikel Artetxe, Moya Chen, Shuohui Chen, Christopher Dewan, Mona Diab, Xian Li, Xi Victoria Lin, et al. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Automatic true/false question generation for educational purpose
Bowei Zou, Pengfei Li, Liangming Pan, and Aiti Aw. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Knowledge tracing: A survey
Ghodai Abdelrahman, Qing Wang, and Bernardo Nunes. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Developing items for a silent reading efficiency task (2023 ncme)
Amy Burkhardt, Maya. Yablonski, Jamie Mitchell, Liesbeth Gijbels, and Jason D. Yeatman. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Qlora: Efficient finetuning of quantized llms
Tim Dettmers, Artidoro Pagnoni, Ari Holtzman, and Luke Zettlemoyer. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Openllama: An open reproduction of llama
Xinyang Geng and Hao Liu. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Gpt-4 technical report
OpenAI. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Whose opinions do language models reflect?
Shibani Santurkar, Esin Durmus, Faisal Ladhak, Cinoo Lee, Percy Liang, and Tatsunori Hashimoto. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models
Hugo Touvron, Thibaut Lavril, Gautier Izacard, Xavier Martinet, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Timothée Lacroix, Baptiste Rozière, Naman Goyal, Eric Hambro, Faisal Azhar, et al. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Fine-tuning language models with advantage-induced policy alignment
Banghua Zhu, Hiteshi Sharma, Felipe Vieira Frujeri, Shi Dong, Chenguang Zhu, Michael I Jordan, and Jiantao Jiao. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.