Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Large Language Models are cognitively biased judges.
Egocentric biases in availability and attribution
Michael Ross and Fiore Sicoly. 1979 · 1979
Earlier work this paper cites.
Exploiting the salience bias in designing taxes
Deborah Schenk. 2010 · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
A similarity measure for indefinite rankings
William Webber, Alistair Moffat, and Justin Zobel. 2010 · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Compassion fade: Affect and charity are greatest for a single child in need
Daniel Västfjäll, Paul Slovic, Marcus Mayorga, and Ellen Peters. 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Bandwagon Effect
Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Helping one or helping many? a theoretical integration and meta-analytic review of the compassion fade literature
Marcus M. Butts, Devin C. Lunt, Traci L. Freling, and Allison S. Gabriel. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
ELI5: long form question answering
Angela Fan, Yacine Jernite, Ethan Perez, David Grangier, Jason Weston, and Michael Auli. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Earlier isn’t always better: Sub-aspect analysis on corpus and system biases in summarization
Taehee Jung, Dongyeop Kang, Lucas Mentch, and Eduard Hovy. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Language models are few-shot learners
Tom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Sandhini Agarwal, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Gretchen Krueger, Tom Henighan, Rewon Child, Aditya Ramesh, Daniel M. Ziegler, Jeffrey Wu, Clemens Winter, Christopher Hesse, Mark Chen, Eric Sigler, Mateusz Litwin, Scott Gray, Benjamin Chess, Jack Clark, Christopher Berner, Sam McCandlish, Alec Radford, Ilya Sutskever, and Dario Amodei. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Superglue: A stickier benchmark for general-purpose language understanding systems
Alex Wang, Yada Pruksachatkun, Nikita Nangia, Amanpreet Singh, Julian Michael, Felix Hill, Omer Levy, and Samuel R. Bowman. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
A framework for few-shot language model evaluation
Leo Gao, Jonathan Tow, Stella Biderman, Sid Black, Anthony DiPofi, Charles Foster, Laurence Golding, Jeffrey Hsu, Kyle McDonell, Niklas Muennighoff, Jason Phang, Laria Reynolds, Eric Tang, Anish Thite, Ben Wang, Kevin Wang, and Andy Zou. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Did Aristotle Use a Laptop? A Question Answering Benchmark with Implicit Reasoning Strategies
Mor Geva, Daniel Khashabi, Elad Segal, Tushar Khot, Dan Roth, and Jonathan Berant. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Does BERT learn as humans perceive? understanding linguistic styles through lexica
Shirley Anugrah Hayati, Dongyeop Kang, and Lyle Ungar. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Measuring massive multitask language understanding
Dan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou, Mantas Mazeika, Dawn Song, and Jacob Steinhardt. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Calibrate before use: Improving few-shot performance of language models
Zihao Zhao, Eric Wallace, Shi Feng, Dan Klein, and Sameer Singh. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Capturing failures of large language models via human cognitive biases
Erik Jones and Jacob Steinhardt. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Are multilingual sentiment models equally right for the right reasons?
Rasmus Jørgensen, Fiammetta Caccavale, Christian Igel, and Anders Søgaard. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Holistic evaluation of language models
Percy Liang, Rishi Bommasani, Tony Lee, Dimitris Tsipras, Dilara Soylu, Michihiro Yasunaga, Yian Zhang, Deepak Narayanan, Yuhuai Wu, Ananya Kumar, Benjamin Newman, Binhang Yuan, Bobby Yan, Ce Zhang, Christian Cosgrove, Christopher D. Manning, Christopher Ré, Diana Acosta-Navas, Drew A. Hudson, Eric Zelikman, Esin Durmus, Faisal Ladhak, Frieda Rong, Hongyu Ren, Huaxiu Yao, Jue Wang, Keshav Santhanam, Laurel Orr, Lucia Zheng, Mert Yuksekgonul, Mirac Suzgun, Nathan Kim, Neel Guha, Niladri Chatterji, Omar Khattab, Peter Henderson, Qian Huang, Ryan Chi, Sang Michael Xie, Shibani Santurkar, Surya Ganguli, Tatsunori Hashimoto, Thomas Icard, Tianyi Zhang, Vishrav Chaudhary, William Wang, Xuechen Li, Yifan Mai, Yuhui Zhang, and Yuta Koreeda. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
What makes good in-context examples for GPT-3?
Jiachang Liu, Dinghan Shen, Yizhe Zhang, Bill Dolan, Lawrence Carin, and Weizhu Chen. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Fantastically ordered prompts and where to find them: Overcoming few-shot prompt order sensitivity
Yao Lu, Max Bartolo, Alastair Moore, Sebastian Riedel, and Pontus Stenetorp. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Rank list sensitivity of recommender systems to interaction perturbations
Sejoon Oh, Berk Ustun, Julian McAuley, and Srijan Kumar. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback
Long Ouyang, Jeff Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida, Carroll L. Wainwright, Pamela Mishkin, Chong Zhang, Sandhini Agarwal, Katarina Slama, Alex Ray, John Schulman, Jacob Hilton, Fraser Kelton, Luke Miller, Maddie Simens, Amanda Askell, Peter Welinder, Paul Christiano, Jan Leike, and Ryan Lowe. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Falcon-40B: an open large language model with state-of-the-art performance
Ebtesam Almazrouei, Hamza Alobeidli, Abdulaziz Alshamsi, Alessandro Cappelli, Ruxandra Cojocaru, Merouane Debbah, Etienne Goffinet, Daniel Heslow, Julien Launay, Quentin Malartic, Badreddine Noune, Baptiste Pannier, and Guilherme Penedo. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
G-eval: Nlg evaluation using gpt-4 with better human alignment
Yang Liu, Dan Iter, Yichong Xu, Shuohang Wang, Ruochen Xu, and Chenguang Zhu. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Chatgpt as a factual inconsistency evaluator for text summarization
Zheheng Luo, Qianqian Xie, and Sophia Ananiadou. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
OpenAI. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Coedit: Text editing by task-specific instruction tuning
Vipul Raheja, Dhruv Kumar, Ryan Koo, and Dongyeop Kang. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
PEER: A collaborative language model
Timo Schick, Jane A. Yu, Zhengbao Jiang, Fabio Petroni, Patrick Lewis, Gautier Izacard, Qingfei You, Christoforos Nalmpantis, Edouard Grave, and Sebastian Riedel. 2023 · 2023
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Yushi Bai, Jiahao Ying, Yixin Cao, Xin Lv, Yuze He, Xiaozhi Wang, Jifan Yu, Kaisheng Zeng, Yijia Xiao, Haozhe Lyu, Jiayin Zhang, Juanzi Li, and Lei Hou. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Open llm leaderboard
Edward Beeching, Clémentine Fourrier, Nathan Habib, Sheon Han, Nathan Lambert, Nazneen Rajani, Omar Sanseviero, Lewis Tunstall, and Thomas Wolf. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Yi Chen, Rui Wang, Haiyun Jiang, Shuming Shi, and Ruifeng Xu. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Vicuna: An open-source chatbot impressing gpt-4 with 90%* chatgpt quality
Wei-Lin Chiang, Zhuohan Li, Zi Lin, Ying Sheng, Zhanghao Wu, Hao Zhang, Lianmin Zheng, Siyuan Zhuang, Yonghao Zhuang, Joseph E. Gonzalez, Ion Stoica, and Eric P. Xing. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Lm vs lm: Detecting factual errors via cross examination
Roi Cohen, May Hamri, Mor Geva, and Amir Globerson. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Free dolly: Introducing the world’s first truly open instruction-tuned llm
Mike Conover, Matt Hayes, Ankit Mathur, Jianwei Xie, Jun Wan, Sam Shah, Ali Ghodsi, Patrick Wendell, Matei Zaharia, and Reynold Xin. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Faith and fate: Limits of transformers on compositionality
Nouha Dziri, Ximing Lu, Melanie Sclar, Xiang Lorraine Li, Liwei Jiang, Bill Yuchen Lin, Peter West, Chandra Bhagavatula, Ronan Le Bras, Jena D. Hwang, Soumya Sanyal, Sean Welleck, Xiang Ren, Allyson Ettinger, Zaid Harchaoui, and Yejin Choi. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Gptscore: Evaluate as you desire
Jinlan Fu, See-Kiong Ng, Zhengbao Jiang, and Pengfei Liu. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Closest in time.
Are large language models good evaluators for abstractive summarization?
Chenhui Shen, Liying Cheng, Yang You, and Lidong Bing. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Large language models can be easily distracted by irrelevant context
Freda Shi, Xinyun Chen, Kanishka Misra, Nathan Scales, David Dohan, Ed Chi, Nathanael Schärli, and Denny Zhou. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Beyond the imitation game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language models
Aarohi Srivastava, Abhinav Rastogi, Abhishek Rao, Abu Awal Md Shoeb, Abubakar Abid, Adam Fisch, Adam R. Brown, Adam Santoro, Aditya Gupta, and Adrià Garriga-Alonso et al. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Is chatgpt good at search? investigating large language models as re-ranking agent
Weiwei Sun, Lingyong Yan, Xinyu Ma, Pengjie Ren, Dawei Yin, and Zhaochun Ren. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Alaina N. Talboy and Elizabeth Fuller. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Stanford alpaca: An instruction-following llama model
Rohan Taori, Ishaan Gulrajani, Tianyi Zhang, Yann Dubois, Xuechen Li, Carlos Guestrin, Percy Liang, and Tatsunori B. Hashimoto. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Introducing mpt-7b: A new standard for open-source, commercially usable llms
MosaicML NLP Team. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models
Hugo Touvron, Louis Martin, Kevin Stone, Peter Albert, Amjad Almahairi, Yasmine Babaei, Nikolay Bashlykov, Soumya Batra, Prajjwal Bhargava, Shruti Bhosale, Dan Bikel, Lukas Blecher, Cristian Canton Ferrer, Moya Chen, Guillem Cucurull, David Esiobu, Jude Fernandes, Jeremy Fu, Wenyin Fu, Brian Fuller, Cynthia Gao, Vedanuj Goswami, Naman Goyal, Anthony Hartshorn, Saghar Hosseini, Rui Hou, Hakan Inan, Marcin Kardas, Viktor Kerkez, Madian Khabsa, Isabel Kloumann, Artem Korenev, Punit Singh Koura, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Thibaut Lavril, Jenya Lee, Diana Liskovich, Yinghai Lu, Yuning Mao, Xavier Martinet, Todor Mihaylov, Pushkar Mishra, Igor Molybog, Yixin Nie, Andrew Poulton, Jeremy Reizenstein, Rashi Rungta, Kalyan Saladi, Alan Schelten, Ruan Silva, Eric Michael Smith, Ranjan Subramanian, Xiaoqing Ellen Tan, Binh Tang, Ross Taylor, Adina Williams, Jian Xiang Kuan, Puxin Xu, Zheng Yan, Iliyan Zarov, Yuchen Zhang, Angela Fan, Melanie Kambadur, Sharan Narang, Aurelien Rodriguez, Robert Stojnic, Sergey Edunov, and Thomas Scialom. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Style over substance: Evaluation biases for large language models
Minghao Wu and Alham Fikri Aji. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Judging llm-as-a-judge with mt-bench and chatbot arena
Lianmin Zheng, Wei-Lin Chiang, Ying Sheng, Siyuan Zhuang, Zhanghao Wu, Yonghao Zhuang, Zi Lin, Zhuohan Li, Dacheng Li, Eric. P Xing, Hao Zhang, Joseph E. Gonzalez, and Ion Stoica. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Large language models are state-of-the-art evaluators of code generation
Terry Yue Zhuo. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Under the surface: Tracking the artifactuality of llm-generated data
Debarati Das, Karin De Langis, Anna Martin-Boyle, Jaehyung Kim, Minhwa Lee, Zae Myung Kim, Shirley Anugrah Hayati, Risako Owan, Bin Hu, Ritik Parkar, Ryan Koo, Jonginn Park, Aahan Tyagi, Libby Ferland, Sanjali Roy, Vincent Liu, and Dongyeop Kang. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Olmo: Accelerating the science of language models
Dirk Groeneveld, Iz Beltagy, Pete Walsh, Akshita Bhagia, Rodney Kinney, Oyvind Tafjord, Ananya Harsh Jha, Hamish Ivison, Ian Magnusson, Yizhong Wang, Shane Arora, David Atkinson, Russell Authur, Khyathi Raghavi Chandu, Arman Cohan, Jennifer Dumas, Yanai Elazar, Yuling Gu, Jack Hessel, Tushar Khot, William Merrill, Jacob Morrison, Niklas Muennighoff, Aakanksha Naik, Crystal Nam, Matthew E. Peters, Valentina Pyatkin, Abhilasha Ravichander, Dustin Schwenk, Saurabh Shah, Will Smith, Emma Strubell, Nishant Subramani, Mitchell Wortsman, Pradeep Dasigi, Nathan Lambert, Kyle Richardson, Luke Zettlemoyer, Jesse Dodge, Kyle Lo, Luca Soldaini, Noah A. Smith, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.