Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Peer review is the method employed by the scientific community for evaluating research advancements.
Wolpert, D.H.: Stacked generalization. Neural networks 5
1992
Earlier work this paper cites.
Hochreiter, S., Schmidhuber, J.: Long short-term memory. Neural computation 9
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
Baxt, W.G., Waeckerle, J.F., Berlin, J.A., Callaham, M.L.: Who reviews the reviewers? feasibility of using a fictitious manuscript to evaluate peer reviewer performance. Annals of emergency medicine 32
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
Larkey, L.S.: Automatic essay grading using text categorization techniques. In: SIGIR. vol. 98, pp. 90–95 (1998)
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
Chawla, N.V., Bowyer, K.W., Hall, L.O., Kegelmeyer, W.P.: Smote: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. Journal of artificial intelligence research 16
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
Witten, I.H., Frank, E.: Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques with java implementations. Acm Sigmod Record 31
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
Polikar, R.: Ensemble based systems in decision making. IEEE Circuits and systems magazine 6
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Smith, R.: Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals. Journal of the royal society of medicine 99
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Bast, H., Weber, I.: The completesearch engine: Interactive, efficient, and towards ir & db integration. In: Third Biennial Conference on Innovative Data Systems. pp. 88–95 (2007)
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Collobert, R., Weston, J.: A unified architecture for natural language processing: Deep neural networks with multitask learning. In: Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning. pp. 160–167. Association for Computing Machinery, Helsinki, Finland (2008)
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Rokach, L.: Ensemble-based classifiers. Artificial intelligence review 33
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Von Bearnensquash, C.: Paper gestalt. Secret Proceedings of Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2010)
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Le, Q., Mikolov, T.: Distributed representations of sentences and documents. In: International conference on machine learning. pp. 1188–1196 (2014)
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Pimentel, M.A., Clifton, D.A., Clifton, L., Tarassenko, L.: A review of novelty detection. Signal processing 99
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Lan, A.S., Vats, D., Waters, A.E., Baraniuk, R.G.: Mathematical language processing: Automatic grading and feedback for open response mathematical questions. In: Proceedings of the Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale. pp. 167–176. ACM (2015)
2015
Cited alongside, same era.
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Bartoli, A., De Lorenzo, A., Medvet, E., Tarlao, F.: Your paper has been accepted, rejected, or whatever: Automatic generation of scientific paper reviews. In: International Conference on Availability, Reliability, and Security. pp. 19–28. Springer (2016)
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Taghipour, K., Ng, H.T.: A neural approach to automated essay scoring. In: Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. pp. 1882–1891 (2016)
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Bast, H.: How Objective is Peer Review? https://cacm.acm.org/blogs/blog-cacm/248824-how-objective-is-peer-review/fulltext (2020), accessed: 2022-05-20
2022
Later among the works it cites.
Cortes, C., Lawrence, N.: The NIPS Experiment. https://inverseprobability.com/2014/12/16/the-nips-experiment , (Accessed on 2022-05-29)
2022
Later among the works it cites.
Hutson, M.: Could AI help you to write your next paper? https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-03479-w (2022)
2022
Later among the works it cites.
Lawrence, N.: Blogs on the NIPS Experiment. https://inverseprobability.com/2015/01/16/blogs-on-the-nips-experiment , (Accessed on 2022-05-29)
2022
Later among the works it cites.
OpenAI: ChatGPT. https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt (2022)
2022
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Singh, A., Karayev, S., Gutowski, K., Abbeel, P.: Gradescope: a fast, flexible, and fair system for scalable assessment of handwritten work. In: Proceedings of the fourth (2017) acm conference on learning@ scale. pp. 81–88. ACM (2017)
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Amplayo, R.K., Hong, S., Song, M.: Network-based approach to detect novelty of scholarly literature. Information Sciences 422
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Huang, J.B.: Deep paper gestalt. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.08775 (2018)
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
pdfminer: pdfminer.six. https://github.com/pdfminer/pdfminer.six (2018)
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Shah, N.B., Tabibian, B., Muandet, K., Guyon, I., Von Luxburg, U.: Design and analysis of the nips 2016 review process. Journal of machine learning research (2018)
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Yang, P., Sun, X., Li, W., Ma, S.: Automatic academic paper rating based on modularized hierarchical convolutional neural network. In: Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2018, Melbourne, Australia, July 15-20, 2018, Volume 2: Short Papers (2018)
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Foltỳnek, T., Meuschke, N., Gipp, B.: Academic plagiarism detection: a systematic literature review. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 52
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Soneji, A., Kokulu, F.B., Rubio-Medrano, C.E., Bao, T., Wang, R., Shoshitaishvili, Y., Doupé, A.: Flawed, but like democracy we don’t have a better system: The experts’ insights on the peer review process of evaluating security papers. In: 2022 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) (2022)
2022
Later among the works it cites.
2023
Closest in time.
Bubeck, S., Chandrasekaran, V., Eldan, R., Gehrke, J., Horvitz, E., Kamar, E., Lee, P., Lee, Y.T., Li, Y., Lundberg, S., Nori, H., Palangi, H., Ribeiro, M.T., Zhang, Y.: Sparks of artificial general intelligence: Early experiments with gpt-4 (March 2023), https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/sparks-of-artificial-general-intelligence-early-experiments-with-gpt-4/
2023
Closest in time.
Gam, P.: Chatpaper. https://github.com/kaixindelele/ChatPaper/blob/main/chat_reviewer.py (2023)
2023
Closest in time.
Lin, J., Song, J., Zhou, Z., Chen, Y., Shi, X.: Automated scholarly paper review: Concepts, technologies, and challenges (2023)
2023
Closest in time.
Ni, S.: Chatreviewer. https://github.com/nishiwen1214/ChatReviewer/blob/main/readme_en.md (2023)
2023
Closest in time.
Srivastava, M.: A day in the life of chatgpt as an academic reviewer: Investigating the potential of large language model for scientific literature review (2023)
2023
Closest in time.
Stokel-Walker, C.: What ChatGPT and generative AI mean for science. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00107-z (2023)
2023
Closest in time.