Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Denoising diffusion models have emerged as the go-to generative framework for solving inverse problems in imaging.
L. I. Rudin, S. Osher, and E. Fatemi, “Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms,” Physica D , vol. 60, no. 1-4, pp. 259–268, 1992
1992
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Natterer, The Mathematics of Computerized Tomography . SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 2001
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Natterer and F. Wübbeling, Mathematical Methods in Image Reconstruction . SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 2001
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. K. Kalra, M. M. Maher, R. D’Souza, and S. Saini, “Multidetector computed tomography technology: current status and emerging developments,” J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. , vol. 28, pp. S2–S6, 2004
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Z. Wang, A. C. Bovik, H. R. Sheikh, and E. P. Simoncelli, “Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity,” IEEE Trans. Image Process. , vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 600–612, 2004
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Aubert-Broche, M. Griffin, G. B. Pike, A. C. Evans, and D. L. Collins, “Twenty new digital brain phantoms for creation of validation image data bases,” IEEE transactions on medical imaging , vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 1410–1416, 2006
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. M. Stuart, “Inverse problems: a Bayesian perspective,” Acta numerica , vol. 19, pp. 451–559, 2010
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Efron, “Tweedie’s formula and selection bias,” Journal of the American Statistical Association , vol. 106, no. 496, pp. 1602–1614, 2011
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. H. Menze, A. Jakab, S. Bauer, J. Kalpathy-Cramer, K. Farahani, J. Kirby, Y. Burren, N. Porz, J. Slotboom, R. Wiest et al. , “The multimodal brain tumor image segmentation benchmark (brats),” IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. , vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 1993–2024, 2014
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Uecker, P. Lai, M. J. Murphy, P. Virtue, M. Elad, J. M. Pauly, S. S. Vasanawala, and M. Lustig, “Espirit—an eigenvalue approach to autocalibrating parallel mri: where sense meets grappa,” Magn. Reson. Imaging , vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 990–1001, 2014
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Sohl-Dickstein, E. Weiss, N. Maheswaranathan, and S. Ganguli, “Deep unsupervised learning using nonequilibrium thermodynamics,” in ICML . PMLR, 2015, pp. 2256–2265
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, “Adam: A method for stochastic optimization,” in ICLR 2015, San Diego, CA, USA, May 7-9, 2015, Conference Track Proceedings , Y. Bengio and Y. LeCun, Eds., 2015
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Kang, J. Min, and J. C. Ye, “A deep convolutional neural network using directional wavelets for low-dose x-ray ct reconstruction,” Medical physics , vol. 44, no. 10, pp. e360–e375, 2017
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Adler, H. Kohr, and O. Öktem, “Odl 0.6.0,” Apr. 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.556409
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Adler and O. Öktem, “Learned primal-dual reconstruction,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging , vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 1322–1332, 2018
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Ulyanov, A. Vedaldi, and V. Lempitsky, “Deep image prior,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF CVPR , 2018, pp. 9446–9454
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Arridge, P. Maass, O. Öktem, and C.-B. Schönlieb, “Solving inverse problems using data-driven models,” Acta Numer. , vol. 28, pp. 1–174, 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Knoll, K. Hammernik, E. Kobler, T. Pock, M. P. Recht, and D. K. Sodickson, “Assessment of the generalization of learned image reconstruction and the potential for transfer learning,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine , vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 116–128, 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Recht, R. Roelofs, L. Schmidt, and V. Shankar, “Do imagenet classifiers generalize to imagenet?” in International Conference on Machine Learning . PMLR, 2019, pp. 5389–5400
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Heckel and P. Hand, “Deep decoder: Concise image representations from untrained non-convolutional networks,” ICLR , 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. Der Sarkissian, F. Lucka, M. van Eijnatten, G. Colacicco, S. B. Coban, and K. J. Batenburg, “A cone-beam x-ray computed tomography data collection designed for machine learning,” Scientific data , vol. 6, no. 1, p. 215, 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Knoll, T. Murrell, A. Sriram, N. Yakubova, J. Zbontar, M. Rabbat, A. Defazio, M. J. Muckley, D. K. Sodickson, C. L. Zitnick et al. , “Advancing machine learning for MR image reconstruction with an open competition: Overview of the 2019 fastMRI challenge,” Magn. Reson. Imaging , vol. 84, no. 6, pp. 3054–3070, 2020
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Ongie, A. Jalal, C. A. Metzler, R. G. Baraniuk, A. G. Dimakis, and R. Willett, “Deep learning techniques for inverse problems in imaging,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Inform. Theory , vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 39–56, 2020
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
G. Wang, J. C. Ye, and B. D. Man, “Deep learning for tomographic image reconstruction,” Nat. Mach. Intell. , vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 737–748, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-020-00273-z
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Ho, A. Jain, and P. Abbeel, “Denoising diffusion probabilistic models,” NeurIPS , vol. 33, pp. 6840–6851, 2020
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
D. O. Baguer, J. Leuschner, and M. Schmidt, “Computed tomography reconstruction using deep image prior and learned reconstruction methods,” Inverse Problems , vol. 36, no. 9, p. 094004, 2020
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
H. Chung, J. Kim, M. T. McCann, M. L. Klasky, and J. C. Ye, “Diffusion posterior sampling for general noisy inverse problems,” in ICLR , 2023
2023
Closest in time.
N. Ruiz, Y. Li, V. Jampani, Y. Pritch, M. Rubinstein, and K. Aberman, “Dreambooth: Fine tuning text-to-image diffusion models for subject-driven generation,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF CVPR , 2023, pp. 22 500–22 510
2023
Closest in time.
L. Zhang, A. Rao, and M. Agrawala, “Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF ICCV , 2023, pp. 3836–3847
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
J. Leuschner, M. Schmidt, P. S. Ganguly, V. Andriiashen, S. B. Coban, A. Denker, D. Bauer, A. Hadjifaradji, K. J. Batenburg, P. Maass et al. , “Quantitative comparison of deep learning-based image reconstruction methods for low-dose and sparse-angle CT applications,” Journal of Imaging , vol. 7, no. 3, p. 44, 2021
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Z. Darestani, A. S. Chaudhari, and R. Heckel, “Measuring robustness in deep learning based compressive sensing,” in ICML 2021 . PMLR, 2021, pp. 2433–2444
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
P. Dhariwal and A. Nichol, “Diffusion models beat gans on image synthesis,” NeurIPS , vol. 34, pp. 8780–8794, 2021
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Y. Song, J. Sohl-Dickstein, D. P. Kingma, A. Kumar, S. Ermon, and B. Poole, “Score-based generative modeling through stochastic differential equations,” in ICLR , 2021
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Jalal, M. Arvinte, G. Daras, E. Price, A. G. Dimakis, and J. Tamir, “Robust compressed sensing mri with deep generative priors,” NeurIPS , vol. 34, pp. 14 938–14 954, 2021
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
D. Gilton, G. Ongie, and R. Willett, “Model adaptation for inverse problems in imaging,” IEEE Trans. Comput. Imaging , vol. 7, pp. 661–674, 2021
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Song, C. Meng, and S. Ermon, “Denoising diffusion implicit models,” in ICLR 2021, Virtual Event, Austria, May 3-7, 2021 , 2021
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Y. Song, L. Shen, L. Xing, and S. Ermon, “Solving inverse problems in medical imaging with score-based generative models,” in NeurIPS 2021 Workshop on Deep Learning and Inverse Problems , 2021
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Closest in time.
Y. Zhu, K. Zhang, J. Liang, J. Cao, B. Wen, R. Timofte, and L. Van Gool, “Denoising diffusion models for plug-and-play image restoration,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2023, pp. 1219–1229
2023
Closest in time.
S. Ravula, B. Levac, A. Jalal, J. Tamir, and A. Dimakis, “Optimizing sampling patterns for compressed sensing MRI with diffusion generative models,” in NeurIPS 2023 Workshop on Deep Learning and Inverse Problems , 2023
2023
Closest in time.
H. Chung, J. Kim, and J. C. Ye, “Direct diffusion bridge using data consistency for inverse problems,” in NeurIPS , 2023
2023
Closest in time.
B. Poole, A. Jain, J. T. Barron, and B. Mildenhall, “Dreamfusion: Text-to-3d using 2d diffusion,” in ICLR , 2023
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
H. Chung, D. Ryu, M. T. McCann, M. L. Klasky, and J. C. Ye, “Solving 3d inverse problems using pre-trained 2d diffusion models,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF CVPR , 2023, pp. 22 542–22 551
2023
Closest in time.
Y. Wang, J. Yu, and J. Zhang, “Zero-shot image restoration using denoising diffusion null-space model,” in ICLR , 2023
2023
Closest in time.
J. Yu, Y. Wang, C. Zhao, B. Ghanem, and J. Zhang, “Freedom: Training-free energy-guided conditional diffusion model,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , 2023, pp. 23 174–23 184
2023
Closest in time.
M. Mardani, J. Song, J. Kautz, and A. Vahdat, “A variational perspective on solving inverse problems with diffusion models,” in ICLR , 2024
2024
Closest in time.
L. Wu, B. Trippe, C. Naesseth, D. Blei, and J. P. Cunningham, “Practical and asymptotically exact conditional sampling in diffusion models,” NeurIPS , vol. 36, 2024
2024
Closest in time.
I. R. Singh, A. Denker, R. Barbano, Z. Kereta, B. Jin, K. Thielemans, P. Maass, and S. Arridge, “Score-based generative models for pet image reconstruction,” Machine Learning for Biomedical Imaging , vol. 2, pp. 547–585, 2024
2024
Closest in time.
A. Denker, F. Vargas, S. Padhy, K. Didi, S. V. Mathis, R. Barbano, V. Dutordoir, E. Mathieu, U. J. Komorowska, and P. Lio, “DEFT: Efficient fine-tuning of diffusion models by learning the generalised h h -transform,” in NeurIPS , 2024
2024
Closest in time.
B. Kawar, N. Elata, T. Michaeli, and M. Elad, “GSURE-based diffusion model training with corrupted data,” Transactions on Machine Learning Research , 2024
2024
Closest in time.
G. Daras, K. Shah, Y. Dagan, A. Gollakota, A. Dimakis, and A. Klivans, “Ambient diffusion: Learning clean distributions from corrupted data,” NeurIPS , vol. 36, 2024
2024
Closest in time.
H. Chung, S. Lee, and J. C. Ye, “Decomposed diffusion sampler for accelerating large-scale inverse problems,” in ICLR , 2024
2024
Closest in time.
M. Duff, N. D. Campbell, and M. J. Ehrhardt, “Regularising inverse problems with generative machine learning models,” J. Math. Imag. Vis. , vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 37–56, 2024
2024
Closest in time.
X. Peng, Z. Zheng, W. Dai, N. Xiao, C. Li, J. Zou, and H. Xiong, “Improving diffusion models for inverse problems using optimal posterior covariance,” in Forty-first International Conference on Machine Learning , 2024
2024
Closest in time.
B. Song, S. M. Kwon, Z. Zhang, X. Hu, Q. Qu, and L. Shen, “Solving inverse problems with latent diffusion models via hard data consistency,” in ICLR , 2024
2024
Closest in time.