Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
This paper introduces "GAIDE: Generative AI for Instructional Development and Education," a novel framework for using Generative AI (GenAI) to enhance educational content creation.
AMEE Guide No. 14: Outcome-based education: Part 1-An introduction to outcome-based education
R. M. Harden. 1999 · 1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
Depth-of-knowledge levels for four content areas
Norman L Webb. 2002 · 2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives complete edition
Jack Conklin. 2005 · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
A Phenomenographic Analysis of Course Design in the Academy
Donna Harp Ziegenfuss. 2007 · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)?
Matthew Koehler and Punya Mishra. 2009 · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
IDEA-based learning: A course design process to promote conceptual understanding
Edmund Hansen. 2011 · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Teachers’ use of technology and constructivism
Abbas Pourhosein Gilakjani, Leong Lai-Mei, and Hairul Nizam Ismail. 2013 · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Teaching and Learning STEM: A Practical Guide
Richard M Felder and Rebecca Brent. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Beyond fairness and consistency in grading: The role of rubrics in higher education
Kiruthika Ragupathi and Adrian Lee. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
From substitution to redefinition: A framework of machine learning-based science assessment
Xiaoming Zhai, Kevin Haudek, Lehong Shi, Ross Nehm, and Mark Urban-Lurain. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
The Robots Are Coming: Exploring the Implications of OpenAI Codex on Introductory Programming. In Proceedings of the 24th Australasian Computing Education Conference (Virtual Event, Australia) (ACE ’22) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 10–19
James Finnie-Ansley, Paul Denny, Brett A. Becker, Andrew Luxton-Reilly, and James Prather. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Automatic Generation of Programming Exercises and Code Explanations Using Large Language Models. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 1 (Lugano and Virtual Event, Switzerland) (ICER ’22) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 27–43
Sami Sarsa, Paul Denny, Arto Hellas, and Juho Leinonen. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
ChatGPT in the Workplace - A Legal Minefield! What You Need to Know to Protect Your Business
Devin Bates. 2023 · 2023
Earlier work this paper cites.
Programming Is Hard - Or at Least It Used to Be: Educational Opportunities and Challenges of AI Code Generation. In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1 (Toronto ON, Canada) (SIGCSE 2023) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 500–506
Brett A. Becker, Paul Denny, James Finnie-Ansley, Andrew Luxton-Reilly, James Prather, and Eddie Antonio Santos. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Generative AI Assistants in Software Development Education: A vision for integrating Generative AI into educational practice, not instinctively defending against it
Christopher Bull and Ahmed Kharrufa. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Best Practices for Using AI When Writing Scientific Manuscripts
Jillian M. Buriak, Deji Akinwande, Natalie Artzi, C. Jeffrey Brinker, Cynthia Burrows, Warren C. W. Chan, Chunying Chen, Xiaodong Chen, Manish Chhowalla, Lifeng Chi, William Chueh, Cathleen M. Crudden, Dino Di Carlo, Sharon C. Glotzer, Mark C. Hersam, Dean Ho, Tony Y. Hu, Jiaxing Huang, Ali Javey, Prashant V. Kamat, Il-Doo Kim, Nicholas A. Kotov, T. Randall Lee, Young Hee Lee, Yan Li, Luis M. Liz-Marzán, Paul Mulvaney, Prineha Narang, Peter Nordlander, Rahmi Oklu, Wolfgang J. Parak, Andrey L. Rogach, Mathieu Salanne, Paolo Samorì, Raymond E. Schaak, Kirk S. Schanze, Tsuyoshi Sekitani, Sara Skrabalak, Ajay K. Sood, Ilja K. Voets, Shu Wang, Shutao Wang, Andrew T. S. Wee, and Jinhua Ye. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Eng Lieh Ouh, Benjamin Kok Siew Gan, Kyong Jin Shim, and Swavek Wlodkowski. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Thrilled by Your Progress! Large Language Models (GPT-4) No Longer Struggle to Pass Assessments in Higher Education Programming Courses. In Proceedings of the The 19th ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER ’23, Vol. 1)
Jaromir Savelka, Arav Agarwal, Marshall An, Christopher Bogart, and Majd Sakr. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
The Use of Artificial Intelligence-Based Chat-GPT and Its Challenges For The World of Education; From the Viewpoint of the Development of Creative Writing Skills
Muhammad Shidiq. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT: A Framework for Applying Generative AI in Education
Jiahong Su and Weipeng Yang. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
The economic potential of Generative AI: The Next Productivity Frontier
Michael Chui, Eric Hazan, Roger Roberts, Alex Singla, Kate Smaje, Alex Sukharevsky, Lareina Yee, and Rodney Zemmel. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
The false positives and false negatives of generative AI detection tools in education and academic research: The case of ChatGPT
Doraid Dalalah and Osama M.A. Dalalah. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
These companies have banned or limited ChatGPT at work
Adam DeRose. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
ChatGPT in the Workplace: To Restrict or Embrace, That Is The Question
Karla Grossenbacher. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
4 Ways Teachers Can Harness the Power of ChatGPT
Stephen Anthony Guerriero. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Guidelines for the Use of Artificial Intelligence in University Courses
Juan David Gutiérrez. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Samia Kabir, David N. Udo-Imeh, Bonan Kou, and Tianyi Zhang. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
From "Ban It Till We Understand It" to "Resistance is Futile": How University Programming Instructors Plan to Adapt as More Students Use AI Code Generation and Explanation Tools such as ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 1 (Chicago, IL, USA) (ICER ’23) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 16 pages
Sam Lau and Philip J. Guo. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
The rise of ChatGPT: Exploring its potential in medical education
Hyunsu Lee. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Employees want ChatGPT at work. Bosses worry they’ll spill secrets
Taylor Telford and Pranshu Verma. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
I’m a Student. You Have No Idea How Much We’re Using ChatGPT
Owen Kichizo Terry. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education
Ahmed Tlili, Boulus Shehata, Michael Agyemang Adarkwah, Aras Bozkurt, Daniel T. Hickey, Ronghuai Huang, and Brighter Agyemang. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Testing of Detection Tools for AI-Generated Text
Debora Weber-Wulff, Alla Anohina-Naumeca, Sonja Bjelobaba, Tomáš Foltýnek, Jean Guerrero-Dib, Olumide Popoola, Petr Šigut, and Lorna Waddington. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Using GitHub Copilot to Solve Simple Programming Problems. In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1 (Toronto ON, Canada) (SIGCSE 2023) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 172–178
Michel Wermelinger. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
A Prompt Pattern Catalog to Enhance Prompt Engineering with ChatGPT
Jules White, Quchen Fu, Sam Hays, Michael Sandborn, Carlos Olea, Henry Gilbert, Ashraf Elnashar, Jesse Spencer-Smith, and Douglas C. Schmidt. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Augmented intelligence in programming learning: Examining student views on the use of ChatGPT for programming learning
Ramazan Yilmaz and Fatma Gizem Karaoglan Yilmaz. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Why Johnny Can’t Prompt: How Non-AI Experts Try (and Fail) to Design LLM Prompts. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI ’23) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 437, 21 pages
J.D. Zamfirescu-Pereira, Richmond Y. Wong, Bjoern Hartmann, and Qian Yang. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
AI-Lab: A Framework for Introducing Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools in Computer Programming Courses
Ethan Dickey, Andres Bejarano, and Chirayu Garg. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.