Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Large language models (LLMs) such as GPT-4, PaLM, and Llama have significantly propelled the generation of AI-crafted text.
M. Koppel, J. Schler, and S. Argamon, “Computational methods in authorship attribution,” Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology , vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 9–26, 2009
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Alsulami et al. , “Source code authorship attribution using long short-term memory based networks,” in Computer Security–ESORICS 2017: 22nd European Symposium on Research in Computer Security, Oslo, Norway, September 11-15, 2017, Proceedings, Part I 22 . Springer, 2017, pp. 65–82
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. M. Lundberg and S.-I. Lee, “A unified approach to interpreting model predictions,” NeurIPS , vol. 30, 2017
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Boumber, Y. Zhang, and A. Mukherjee, “Experiments with convolutional neural networks for multi-label authorship attribution,” in LREC’18 , May 2018
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Uchendu, T. Le, K. Shu, and D. Lee, “Authorship attribution for neural text generation,” in EMNLP , Nov. 2020
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. Fröhling and A. Zubiaga, “Feature-based detection of automated language models: tackling gpt-2, gpt-3 and grover,” PeerJ Computer Science , vol. 7, p. e443, 2021
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
OpenAI, “Gpt-4 technical report,” 2023
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
J. A. Goldstein, J. Chao, S. Grossman, A. Stamos, and M. Tomz, “Can ai write persuasive propaganda?” 2023
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Subbiah et al. , “Towards detecting harmful agendas in news articles,” in Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment, & Social Media Analysis , 2023, pp. 110–128
2023
Closest in time.
A. Uchendu, T. Le, and D. Lee, “Attribution and obfuscation of neural text authorship: A data mining perspective,” ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter , vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2023
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
M. Foley et al. , “Matching pairs: Attributing fine-tuned models to their pre-trained large language models,” in ACL , Jul. 2023
2023
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…