Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Projected entangled pair states (PEPS) offer memory-efficient representations of some quantum many-body states that obey an entanglement area law, and are the basis for classical simulations of ground states in two-dimensional (2d) condensed matter systems.
Steven R. White, “Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups,” Physical Review Letters 2863
1992
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Fannes, B. Nachtergaele, and R. F. Werner, “Finitely correlated states on quantum spin chains,” Communications in Mathematical Physics 144
1992
Earlier work this paper cites.
Tomotoshi Nishino and Kouichi Okunishi, “Corner transfer matrix algorithm for classical renormalization group,” Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 66
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
Thomas Guhr, Axel Müller-Groeling, and Hans A Weidenmüller, “Random-matrix theories in quantum physics: common concepts,” Physics Reports 299
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
Guifré Vidal, “Efficient classical simulation of slightly entangled quantum computations,” Physical Review Letters 91
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Verstraete and J. I. Cirac, “Renormalization algorithms for quantum-many body systems in two and higher dimensions,” (2004)
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Scott Aaronson and Daniel Gottesman, “Improved simulation of stabilizer circuits,” Physical Review A 70
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
David Fattal, Toby S Cubitt, Yoshihisa Yamamoto, Sergey Bravyi, and Isaac L Chuang, “Entanglement in the stabilizer formalism,” arXiv preprint quant-ph/0406168 (2004)
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Norbert Schuch, Michael M. Wolf, Frank Verstraete, and J. Ignacio Cirac, “Computational complexity of projected entangled pair states,” Physical Review Letters 98
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
R J Baxter, “Corner transfer matrices in statistical mechanics,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 40
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Michael Levin and Cody P. Nave, “Tensor renormalization group approach to two-dimensional classical lattice models,” Physical Review Letters 99
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Verstraete, V. Murg, and J.I. Cirac, “Matrix product states, projected entangled pair states, and variational renormalization group methods for quantum spin systems,” Advances in Physics 57
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Jordan, R. Orús, G. Vidal, F. Verstraete, and J. I. Cirac, “Classical simulation of infinite-size quantum lattice systems in two spatial dimensions,” Physical Review Letters 101
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Orús and G. Vidal, “Infinite time-evolving block decimation algorithm beyond unitary evolution,” Physical Review B 78
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Román Orús and Guifré Vidal, “Simulation of two-dimensional quantum systems on an infinite lattice revisited: Corner transfer matrix for tensor contraction,” Physical Review B 80
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Ulrich Schollwöck, “The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states,” Annals of Physics 326
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Philippe Corboz and Frédéric Mila, “Crystals of bound states in the magnetization plateaus of the shastry-sutherland model,” Physical Review Letters 112
2014
Cited alongside, same era.
Philippe Corboz, T. M. Rice, and Matthias Troyer, “Competing states in the t-j model: uniform d-wave state versus stripe state,” Physical Review Letters 113
2014
Cited alongside, same era.
Michael Lubasch, J Ignacio Cirac, and Mari-Carmen Bañuls, “Unifying projected entangled pair state contractions,” New Journal of Physics 16
2014
Cited alongside, same era.
Patrick Hayden, Sepehr Nezami, Xiao-Liang Qi, Nathaniel Thomas, Michael Walter, and Zhao Yang, “Holographic duality from random tensor networks,” Journal of High Energy Physics 2016
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Ido Niesen and Philippe Corboz, “A tensor network study of the complete ground state phase diagram of the spin-1 bilinear-biquadratic heisenberg model on the square lattice,” SciPost Physics 3
He Ma, Marco Govoni, and Giulia Galli, “Quantum simulations of materials on near-term quantum computers,” npj Computational Materials 6
2020
Later among the works it cites.
Kyungjoo Noh, Liang Jiang, and Bill Fefferman, “Efficient classical simulation of noisy random quantum circuits in one dimension,” Quantum 4
2020
Later among the works it cites.
Javier Lopez-Piqueres, Brayden Ware, and Romain Vasseur, “Mean-field entanglement transitions in random tree tensor networks,” Phys. Rev. B 102
2020
Later among the works it cites.
Chao-Ming Jian, Yi-Zhuang You, Romain Vasseur, and Andreas W. W. Ludwig, “Measurement-induced criticality in random quantum circuits,” Phys. Rev. B 101
2020
Later among the works it cites.
Yimu Bao, Soonwon Choi, and Ehud Altman, “Theory of the phase transition in random unitary circuits with measurements,” Phys. Rev. B 101
2020
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Bo-Xiao Zheng, Chia-Min Chung, Philippe Corboz, Georg Ehlers, Ming-Pu Qin, Reinhard M. Noack, Hao Shi, Steven R. White, Shiwei Zhang, and Garnet Kin-Lic Chan, “Stripe order in the underdoped region of the two-dimensional hubbard model,” Science 358
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Adam Nahum, Jonathan Ruhman, Sagar Vijay, and Jeongwan Haah, “Quantum entanglement growth under random unitary dynamics,” Phys. Rev. X 7
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Adam Nahum, Sagar Vijay, and Jeongwan Haah, “Operator spreading in random unitary circuits,” Phys. Rev. X 8
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Yaodong Li, Xiao Chen, and Matthew P. A. Fisher, “Quantum zeno effect and the many-body entanglement transition,” Phys. Rev. B 98
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Boris Ponsioen, Sangwoo S. Chung, and Philippe Corboz, “Period 4 stripe in the extended two-dimensional hubbard model,” Physical Review B 100
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Romain Vasseur, Andrew C. Potter, Yi-Zhuang You, and Andreas W. W. Ludwig, “Entanglement transitions from holographic random tensor networks,” Phys. Rev. B 100
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Tianci Zhou and Adam Nahum, “Emergent statistical mechanics of entanglement in random unitary circuits,” Phys. Rev. B 99
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Later among the works it cites.
2021
Later among the works it cites.
Cécilia Lancien and David Pérez-García, “Correlation length in random MPS and PEPS,” Annales Henri Poincaré 23
2021
Later among the works it cites.
Adam Nahum, Sthitadhi Roy, Brian Skinner, and Jonathan Ruhman, “Measurement and entanglement phase transitions in all-to-all quantum circuits, on quantum trees, and in landau-ginsburg theory,” PRX Quantum 2
2021
Later among the works it cites.
2021
Later among the works it cites.
Zhi-Cheng Yang, Yaodong Li, Matthew P. A. Fisher, and Xiao Chen, “Entanglement phase transitions in random stabilizer tensor networks,” Physical Review B 105
2022
Later among the works it cites.
Andrew C. Potter and Romain Vasseur, “Entanglement dynamics in hybrid quantum circuits,” in Entanglement in Spin Chains: From Theory to Quantum Technology Applications , edited by Abolfazl Bayat, Sougato Bose, and Henrik Johannesson (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2022) pp. 211–249
2022
Later among the works it cites.
John C. Napp, Rolando L. La Placa, Alexander M. Dalzell, Fernando G. S. L. Brandão, and Aram W. Harrow, “Efficient classical simulation of random shallow 2d quantum circuits,” Phys. Rev. X 12
2022
Later among the works it cites.
2022
Later among the works it cites.
Seunghoon Lee, Joonho Lee, Huanchen Zhai, Yu Tong, Alexander M Dalzell, Ashutosh Kumar, Phillip Helms, Johnnie Gray, Zhi-Hao Cui, Wenyuan Liu, et al. , “Evaluating the evidence for exponential quantum advantage in ground-state quantum chemistry,” Nature Communications 14
2023
Closest in time.
Zhi Li, Shengqi Sang, and Timothy H. Hsieh, “Entanglement dynamics of noisy random circuits,” Phys. Rev. B 107
2023
Closest in time.
Matthew P.A. Fisher, Vedika Khemani, Adam Nahum, and Sagar Vijay, “Random quantum circuits,” Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 14
2023
Closest in time.