Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Speech is a fundamental means of communication that can be seen to provide two channels for transmitting information: the lexical channel of which words are said, and the non-lexical channel of how they are spoken.
C. E. Shannon, “A mathematical theory of communication,” Bell Syst. Tech. J. , vol. 27, pp. 623–656, 1948
1948
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Cohen, “The pragmatics of referring and the modality of communication,” Computational Linguistics , vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 97–146, 1984
1984
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. J. Godfrey, E. C. Holliman, and J. McDaniel, “Switchboard: Telephone speech corpus for research and development,” vol. 1. IEEE Computer Society, 1992, pp. 517–520
1992
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. W. Black, “Predicting the intonation of discourse segments from examples in dialogue speech,” in Computing Prosody , 1997
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Pfau, R. L. Holbert, S. J. Zubric, N. H. Pasha, and W. K. Lin, “Role and Influence of Communication Modality in the Process of Resistance to Persuasion,” Media Psychology , vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–33, 2000
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. G. Ward and W. Tsukahara, “Prosodic features which cue back-channel responses in English and Japanese,” Journal of Pragmatics , vol. 32, pp. 1177–1207, 2000
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. E. F. Tree and P. J. A. Meijer, “Untrained speakers’ use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation and listeners’ interpretations,” Psychological Research , vol. 63, pp. 1–13, 2000
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Hale, “A probabilistic earley parser as a psycholinguistic model,” in NAACL , 2001
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. R. Yager, “Dissonance: a measure of variability for ordinal random variables,” International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems , vol. 9, pp. 39–53, 2001
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. H. Clark and J. E. F. Tree, “Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking,” Cognition , vol. 84, pp. 73–111, 2002
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Gahl and S. M. Garnsey, “Knowledge of grammar, knowledge of usage: Syntactic probabilities affect pronunciation variation,” Language , vol. 80, pp. 748 – 775, 2004
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. Johnson, “Massive reduction in conversational american english,” 2004
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. A. Hebets and D. R. Papaj, “Complex signal function: developing a framework of testable hypotheses,” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology , vol. 57, pp. 197–214, 2004
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. P. de Ruiter, H. Mitterer, and N. J. Enfield, “Projecting the end of a speaker’s turn: A cognitive cornerstone of conversation,” Language , vol. 82, pp. 515 – 535, 2006
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Chater, J. B. Tenenbaum, and A. L. Yuille, “Probabilistic models of cognition: Conceptual foundations,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences , vol. 10, pp. 287–291, 2006
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Levy, “Expectation-based syntactic comprehension,” Cognition , vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 1126–1177, 2008
2008
Cited alongside, same era.
A. K. Syrdal and Y.-J. Kim, “Dialog speech acts and prosody: considerations for TTS,” in Speech Prosody , 2008, pp. 661–665
2008
Cited alongside, same era.
N. Ward and B. Walker, “Estimating the potential of signal and interlocutor-track information for language modeling,” in Interspeech , 2009
2009
Cited alongside, same era.
C. Lai, “What do you mean, you’re uncertain?: The interpretation of cue words and rising intonation in dialogue,” in Interspeech , 2010
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Calhoun, J. Carletta, J. M. Brenier, N. Mayo, D. Jurafsky, M. Steedman, and D. I. Beaver, “The nxt-format switchboard corpus: a rich resource for investigating the syntax, semantics, pragmatics and prosody of dialogue,” Language Resources and Evaluation , vol. 44, pp. 387–419, 2010
C. Y. Tzeng, L. L. Namy, and L. C. Nygaard, “Communicative context affects use of referential prosody,” Cognitive science , vol. 43 11, 2019
2019
Later among the works it cites.
D. Cuesta-Frau, A. Molina-Picó, B. Vargas, and P. González, “Permutation entropy: Enhancing discriminating power by using relative frequencies vector of ordinal patterns instead of their shannon entropy,” Entropy , vol. 21, no. 10, p. 1013, 2019
2019
Later among the works it cites.
M. Fröhlich, C. Sievers, S. W. Townsend, T. Gruber, and C. P. van Schaik, “Multimodal communication and language origins: integrating gestures and vocalizations,” Biological Reviews , vol. 94, 2019
2019
Later among the works it cites.
V. M. Silva, J. Holler, A. Ozyurek, and S. G. Roberts, “Multimodality and the origin of a novel communication system in face-to-face interaction,” Royal Society Open Science , vol. 7, no. 1, 2020
2020
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
S. H. Fraundorf and D. G. Watson, “The disfluent discourse: Effects of filled pauses on recall.” Journal of memory and language , vol. 65 2, pp. 161–175, 2011
2011
Cited alongside, same era.
H. Mixdorff, J. Cole, and S. Shattuck-Hufnagel, “Prosodic similarity–evidence from an imitation study,” in Speech Prosody 2012 , 2012
2012
Cited alongside, same era.
M. H. Christiansen and N. Chater, The Now-or-Never bottleneck: A fundamental constraint on language . Cambridge University Press, 2015, vol. 39
2015
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Bögels and F. Torreira, “Listeners use intonational phrase boundaries to project turn ends in spoken interaction,” Journal of Phonetics , vol. 52, pp. 46–57, 2015
2015
Cited alongside, same era.
I. Klein, B. Mangold, and M. Doll, “Cumulative paired ϕ \phi -entropy,” Entropy , vol. 18, p. 248, 2016
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
J. H. Lau, A. Clark, and S. Lappin, “Grammaticality, Acceptability, and Probability: A Probabilistic View of Linguistic Knowledge,” Cognitive Science , vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1202–1241, 2017
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
P.-C. Bürkner, “brms: An R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan,” Journal of Statistical Software , vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 1–28, 2017
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
E. G. Wilcox, J. Gauthier, J. Hu, P. Qian, and R. P. Levy, “On the predictive power of neural language models for human real-time comprehension behavior,” in CogSci , 2020, p. 1707–1713
2020
Later among the works it cites.
S. Wallbridge, P. Bell, and C. Lai, “It’s not what you said, it’s how you said it: discriminative perception of speech as a multichannel communication system,” Interspeech , 2021
2021
Later among the works it cites.
S. Bögels and F. Torreira, “Turn-end estimation in conversational turn-taking: The roles of context and prosody,” Discourse Processes , vol. 58, pp. 903 – 924, 2021
2021
Later among the works it cites.
C. Meister, T. Pimentel, P. Haller, L. Jäger, R. Cotterell, and R. Levy, “Revisiting the uniform information density hypothesis,” in EMNLP , 2021
2021
Later among the works it cites.
M. Giulianelli and R. Fernández, “Analysing human strategies of information transmission as a function of discourse context,” in CoNLL , 2021, pp. 647–660
2021
Later among the works it cites.
J. Han, T. Hong, B. Kim, Y. Ko, and J. Seo, “Fine-grained post-training for improving retrieval-based dialogue systems,” in NAACL , 2021
2021
Later among the works it cites.
C. Meister, G. Wiher, T. Pimentel, and R. Cotterell, “High probability or low information? The probability–quality paradox in language generation,” in ACL , 2022, pp. 36–45
2022
Later among the works it cites.
S. Wallbridge, P. Bell, and C. Lai, “Investigating perception of spoken dialogue acceptability through surprisal,” in Interspeech , 2022
2022
Later among the works it cites.
S. Wallbridge, P. Bell, and C. Lai, “Do dialogue representations align with perception? an empirical study,” in EACL . Association for Computational Linguistics, May 2023, pp. 2696–2713
2023
Closest in time.
R. V. Lenth, emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means , 2023, r package version 1.8.4-1. [Online]. Available: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans
2023
Closest in time.