Leveraging ChatGPT As Text Annotation Tool For Sentiment Analysis

T. Brown, B. Mann, N. Ryder, M. Subbiah, J. D. Kaplan, P. Dhariwal, A. Neelakantan, P. Shyam, G. Sastry, A. Askell, S. Agarwal, A. Herbert-Voss, G. Krueger, T. Henighan, R. Child, A. Ramesh, D. Ziegler, J. Wu, C. Winter, C. Hesse, M. Chen, E. Sigler, M. Litwin, S. Gray, B. Chess, J. Clark, C. Berner, S. McCandlish, A. Radford, I. Sutskever, and D. Amodei, “Language models are few-shot learners,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , H. Larochelle, M. Ranzato, R. Hadsell, M. Balcan, and H. Lin, Eds., vol. 33. Curran Associates, Inc., 2020, pp. 1877–1901

1901

Earlier work this paper cites.

B. Liu, M. Hu, and J. Cheng, “Opinion observer: Analyzing and comparing opinions on the web,” in Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on World Wide Web , ser. WWW ’05. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2005, p. 342–351. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/1060745.1060797

2005

Earlier work this paper cites.

X. Zhang, J. Zhao, and Y. LeCun, “Character-level convolutional networks for text classification,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , C. Cortes, N. Lawrence, D. Lee, M. Sugiyama, and R. Garnett, Eds., vol. 28. Curran Associates, Inc., 2015

2015

Earlier work this paper cites.

L. Yue, W. Chen, X. Li, W. Zuo, and M. Yin, “A survey of sentiment analysis in social media,” Knowl. Inf. Syst. , vol. 60, no. 2, p. 617–663, aug 2019

2019

Earlier work this paper cites.

M. Chmielewski and S. C. Kucker, “An mturk crisis? shifts in data quality and the impact on study results,” Social Psychological and Personality Science , vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 464–473, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619875149

2020

Cited alongside, same era.

S. Zhang, S. Roller, N. Goyal, M. Artetxe, M. Chen, S. Chen, C. Dewan, M. Diab, X. Li, X. V. Lin, T. Mihaylov, M. Ott, S. Shleifer, K. Shuster, D. Simig, P. S. Koura, A. Sridhar, T. Wang, and L. Zettlemoyer, “Opt: Open pre-trained transformer language models,” 2022

2022

Cited alongside, same era.

A. Chowdhery, S. Narang, J. Devlin, M. Bosma, G. Mishra, A. Roberts, P. Barham, H. W. Chung, C. Sutton, S. Gehrmann, P. Schuh, K. Shi, S. Tsvyashchenko, J. Maynez, A. Rao, P. Barnes, Y. Tay, N. Shazeer, V. Prabhakaran, E. Reif, N. Du, B. Hutchinson, R. Pope, J. Bradbury, J. Austin, M. Isard, G. Gur-Ari, P. Yin, T. Duke, A. Levskaya, S. Ghemawat, S. Dev, H. Michalewski, X. Garcia, V. Misra, K. Robinson, L. Fedus, D. Zhou, D. Ippolito, D. Luan, H. Lim, B. Zoph, A. Spiridonov, R. Sepassi, D. Dohan, S. Agrawal, M. Omernick, A. M. Dai, T. S. Pillai, M. Pellat, A. Lewkowycz, E. Moreira, R. Child, O. Polozov, K. Lee, Z. Zhou, X. Wang, B. Saeta, M. Diaz, O. Firat, M. Catasta, J. Wei, K. Meier-Hellstern, D. Eck, J. Dean, S. Petrov, and N. Fiedel, “Palm: Scaling language modeling with pathways,” 2022

H. Hettiarachchi, D. Al-Turkey, M. Adedoyin-Olowe, J. Bhogal, and M. M. Gaber, “TED-S: Twitter event data in sports and politics with aggregated sentiments,” Data , vol. 7, no. 7, 2022

2022

Later among the works it cites.

C. Qin, A. Zhang, Z. Zhang, J. Chen, M. Yasunaga, and D. Yang, “Is chatgpt a general-purpose natural language processing task solver?” 2023

2023

Closest in time.

F. Gilardi, M. Alizadeh, and M. Kubli, “Chatgpt outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks,” 2023

2023

Closest in time.