Understand
Many questions that we ask about the world do not have a single clear answer, yet typical human annotation set-ups in machine learning assume there must be a single ground truth label for all examples in every task.
- The divergence between reality and practice is stark, especially in cases with inherent ambiguity and where the range of different subjective judgments is wide.
- Here, we examine the implications of subjective human judgments in the behavioral task of labeling images used to train machine vision models.
- We identify three primary sources of ambiguity arising from (i) depictions of labels in the images, (ii) raters' backgrounds, and (iii) the task definition.
Built on
Nothing clear enough to list yet.
Similar
Nothing clear enough to list yet.
Then
Nothing clear enough to list yet.
Beyond the bibliography
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…