Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
With Artificial Intelligence systems increasingly applied in consequential domains, researchers have begun to ask how these systems ought to act in ethically charged situations where even humans lack consensus.
Manipulation of voting schemes: a general result
Gibbard, A. (1973) · 1973
Earlier work this paper cites.
Voting systems, honest preferences and pareto optimality
Zeckhauser, R. (1973) · 1973
Earlier work this paper cites.
Manipulation of schemes that mix voting with chance
Gibbard, A. (1977) · 1977
Earlier work this paper cites.
On strategy-proofness and single peakedness
Moulin, H. (1980) · 1980
Earlier work this paper cites.
An investigation into the relative manipulability of four voting systems
Chamberlin, J. R. (1985) · 1985
Earlier work this paper cites.
The trolley problem
Thomson, J. J. (1985) · 1985
Earlier work this paper cites.
Combining expert judgment: On the performance of trimmed mean vote aggregation procedures in the presence of strategic voting
Hurley, W., & Lior, D. (2002) · 2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
Protecting minorities through the average voting rule
Renault, R., & Trannoy, A. (2005) · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
On optimal voting rules under homogeneous preferences
Costinot, A., & Kartik, N. (2007) · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Quadratic metric elicitation for fairness and beyond
Hiranandani, G., Mathur, J., Narasimhan, H., & Koyejo, O. (2020a) · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Strategy versus sincerity in mean voting
Marchese, C., & Montefiori, M. (2011) · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Assessing the extent of strategic manipulation: the average vote example
Renault, R., & Trannoy, A. (2011) · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Strategic voting and strategic candidacy
Brill, M., & Conitzer, V. (2015) · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Crowdsourcing societal tradeoffs
Conitzer, V., Brill, M., & Freeman, R. (2015) · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Deliberation and disagreement: Problem solving, prediction, and positive dissensus
Landemore, H., & Page, S. E. (2015) · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Approximately strategy-proof mechanisms for (constrained) facility location
Sui, X., & Boutilier, C. (2015) · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Machine bias: There’s software used across the country to predict future criminals. and it’s biased against blacks
Angwin, J., Larson, J., Mattu, S., & Kirchner, L. (2016) · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Rules for choosing societal tradeoffs
Conitzer, V., Freeman, R., Brill, M., & Li, Y. (2016) · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Webuildai: Participatory framework for algorithmic governance
Lee, M. K., Kusbit, D., Kahng, A., Kim, J. T., Yuan, X., Chan, A., See, D., Noothigattu, R., Lee, S., Psomas, A., et al. (2019) · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations
Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C., & Mullainathan, S. (2019) · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Privacy-preserving crowd-guided ai decision-making in ethical dilemmas
Wang, T., Zhao, J., Yu, H., Liu, J., Yang, X., Ren, X., & Shi, S. (2019) · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
A better algorithm for societal tradeoffs
Zhang, H., Cheng, Y., & Conitzer, V. (2019) · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Adapting a kidney exchange algorithm to align with human values
Freedman, R., Borg, J. S., Sinnott-Armstrong, W., Dickerson, J. P., & Conitzer, V. (2020) · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Metric learning for individual fairness
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Demographics and discussion influence views on algorithmic fairness
Pierson, E. (2017) · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
The moral machine experiment
Awad, E., Dsouza, S., Kim, R., Schulz, J., Henrich, J., Shariff, A., Bonnefon, J.-F., & Rahwan, I. (2018) · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification
Buolamwini, J., & Gebru, T. (2018) · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
A voting-based system for ethical decision making
Noothigattu, R., Gaikwad, S., Awad, E., Dsouza, S., Rahwan, I., Ravikumar, P., & Procaccia, A. (2018) · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Customer preferences and implicit tradeoffs in accident scenarios for self-driving vehicle algorithms
Pugnetti, C., & Schläpfer, R. (2018) · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Fair performance metric elicitation
Hiranandani, G., Narasimhan, H., & Koyejo, S. (2020b)
Cited in the paper.
Ilvento, C. (2020) · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Preference elicitation and aggregation to aid with patient triage during the covid-19 pandemic
Johnston, C. M., Blessenohl, S., & Vayanos, P. (2020) · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Enhancing collective estimates by aggregating cardinal and ordinal inputs
Kemmer, R., Yoo, Y., Escobedo, A., & Maciejewski, R. (2020) · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
On the strategyproofness of the geometric median
El-Mhamdi, E.-M., Farhadkhani, S., Guerraoui, R., & Hoang, L.-N. (2021) · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
An algorithmic framework for fairness elicitation
Jung, C., Kearns, M., Neel, S., Roth, A., Stapleton, L., & Wu, Z. S. (2021) · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Voluntary voting: Costs and benefits
Krishna, V., & Morgan, J. (2012) · 2083
Closest in time.