Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has significantly enhanced the capabilities of text generators.
G. A. Miller, “Wordnet: A lexical database for english,” Commun. ACM , vol. 38, no. 11, p. 39–41, nov 1995. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/219717.219748
1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Ou, “Text watermarking for text document copyright protection,” Computer Science , vol. 725, 2003
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Bird, E. Klein, and E. Loper, Natural Language Processing with Python . O’Reilly Media, 2009. [Online]. Available: https://www.nltk.org/book/
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Mikolov, I. Sutskever, K. Chen, G. S. Corrado, and J. Dean, “Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality,” Advances in neural information processing systems , vol. 26, 2013
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. V. Ghag and K. Shah, “Comparative analysis of effect of stopwords removal on sentiment classification,” in 2015 International Conference on Computer, Communication and Control (IC4) , 2015, pp. 1–6
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, L. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, “Attention is all you need,” in Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems , ser. NIPS’17. Red Hook, NY, USA: Curran Associates Inc., 2017, p. 6000–6010
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Cer, Y. Yang, S. yi Kong, N. Hua, N. Limtiaco, R. S. John, N. Constant, M. Guajardo-Cespedes, S. Yuan, C. Tar, Y.-H. Sung, B. Strope, and R. Kurzweil, “Universal sentence encoder,” 2018
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. S. Kamaruddin, A. Kamsin, L. Y. Por, and H. Rahman, “A review of text watermarking: Theory, methods, and applications,” IEEE Access , vol. 6, pp. 8011–8028, 2018
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. G. Rizzo, F. Bertini, and D. Montesi, “Fine-grain watermarking for intellectual property protection,” EURASIP Journal on Information Security , vol. 2019, no. 1, p. 10, Jul 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13635-019-0094-2
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
——, “Bidirectional convolutional recurrent neural network architecture with group-wise enhancement mechanism for text sentiment classification,” Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences , vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 2098–2117, 2022
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
H. Fang, Z. Jia, Z. Ma, E.-C. Chang, and W. Zhang, “Pimog: An effective screen-shooting noise-layer simulation for deep-learning-based watermarking network,” in Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Multimedia , 2022, pp. 2267–2275
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
W. Wan, J. Wang, Y. Zhang, J. Li, H. Yu, and J. Sun, “A comprehensive survey on robust image watermarking,” Neurocomputing , vol. 488, pp. 226–247, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925231222002533
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
“ChatGPT,” https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt, 2023, last accessed on Jul 10, 2023
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
“Testing gptzero: A trending CHATGPT detection tool,” https://michaelsheinman.medium.com/testing-gptzero-a-trending-chatgpt-detection-tool-3ee14a056543, 2023, last accessed on Jul 10, 2023
2023
Closest in time.
J. Kirchenbauer, J. Geiping, Y. Wen, J. Katz, I. Miers, and T. Goldstein, “A watermark for large language models,” in Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning , ser. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, A. Krause, E. Brunskill, K. Cho, B. Engelhardt, S. Sabato, and J. Scarlett, Eds., vol. 202. PMLR, 23–29 Jul 2023, pp. 17 061–17 084
2023
Closest in time.
“How the ChatGPT Watermark Works and Why it Could be Defeated,” https://www.searchenginejournal.com/chatgpt-watermark/475366/#close, 2023, last accessed on Jul 10, 2023
2023
Closest in time.
E. Mitchell, Y. Lee, A. Khazatsky, C. D. Manning, and C. Finn, “Detectgpt: Zero-shot machine-generated text detection using probability curvature,” 2023
2023
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
“New AI classifier for indicating AI-written text,” https://openai.com/blog/new-ai-classifier-for-indicating-ai-written-text, 2023, last accessed on May 02, 2023
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Onan, “Gtr-ga: Harnessing the power of graph-based neural networks and genetic algorithms for text augmentation,” Expert Systems with Applications , p. 120908, 2023
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Onan, “Srl-aco: A text augmentation framework based on semantic role labeling and ant colony optimization,” Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences , p. 101611, 2023
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
“GPTZero,” https://gptzero.me/, 2023, last accessed on Jul 10, 2023
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
“Is gptzero accurate? can it detect chatgpt? here’s what our tests revealed,” https://nerdschalk.com/is-gptzero-accurate-detect-chat-gpt-detector-tested/, 2023, last accessed on Jul 10, 2023
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
V. S. Sadasivan, A. Kumar, S. Balasubramanian, W. Wang, and S. Feizi, “Can ai-generated text be reliably detected?” 2023
2023
Closest in time.
databrickslab. (2023) Dolly 15k dataset. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/databrickslabs/dolly/tree/master/data
2023
Closest in time.
A. Onan and K. F. Balbal, “Improving turkish text sentiment classification through task-specific and universal transformations: an ensemble data augmentation approach,” IEEE Access , 2024
2024
Closest in time.
P. Dyson, “Inflect,” https://pypi.org/project/inflect/ , accessed: August 24, 2026
2026
Closest in time.
Hugging Face, “Hugging face datasets,” https://huggingface.co/datasets/c4 , accessed: August 24, 2026
2026
Closest in time.