Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Before deploying a black-box model in high-stakes problems, it is important to evaluate the model's performance on sensitive subpopulations.
Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife
Bradley Efron · 1979
Earlier work this paper cites.
A course on empirical processes
Richard M Dudley · 1984
Earlier work this paper cites.
Some limit theorems for empirical processes
Evarist Giné and Joel Zinn · 1984
Earlier work this paper cites.
Relationships between donsker classes and sobolev spaces
David J Marcus · 1985
Earlier work this paper cites.
Bootstrapping general empirical measures
Evarist Giné and Joel Zinn · 1990
Earlier work this paper cites.
On the bootstrap of U and V statistics
Miguel A Arcones and Evarist Gine · 1992
Earlier work this paper cites.
Consistency of the generalized bootstrap for degenerate U-statistics
Marie Huskova and Paul Janssen · 1993
Earlier work this paper cites.
Weak convergence and empirical processes
Aad W van der Vaart and Jon A Wellner · 1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
Asymptotic statistics , volume 3
Aad W van der Vaart · 2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency
Yoav Benjamini and Daniel Yekutieli · 2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
Testing statistical hypotheses , volume 3
Erich Leo Lehmann, Joseph P Romano, and George Casella · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Universal kernels
Charles A Micchelli, Yuesheng Xu, and Haizhang Zhang · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
On continuity and strict increase of the cdf for the sup-functional of a gaussian process with applications to statistics
Peter Gaenssler, Péter Molnár, and Daniel Rost · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Introduction to empirical processes and semiparametric inference
Michael R Kosorok · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Support vector machines
Ingo Steinwart and Andreas Christmann · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Fairness through awareness
Cynthia Dwork, Moritz Hardt, Toniann Pitassi, Omer Reingold, and Richard Zemel · 2012
Cited alongside, same era.
Integrated public use microdata series
Sarah Flood · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Machine bias
Julia Angwin, Jeff Larson, Surya Mattu, and Lauren Kirchner · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Compas risk scales: Demonstrating accuracy equity and predictive parity
William Dieterich, Christina Mendoza, and Tim Brennan · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
False positives, false negatives, and false analyses: A rejoinder to machine bias: There’s software used across the country to predict future criminals. and it’s biased against blacks
Anthony W Flores, Kristin Bechtel, and Christopher T Lowenkamp · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Equality of opportunity in supervised learning
Moritz Hardt, Eric Price, and Nati Srebro · 2016
Conformalized quantile regression
Yaniv Romano, Evan Patterson, and Emmanuel Candes · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Toward trustworthy ai development: mechanisms for supporting verifiable claims
Miles Brundage, Shahar Avin, Jasmine Wang, Haydn Belfield, Gretchen Krueger, Gillian Hadfield, Heidy Khlaaf, Jingying Yang, Helen Toner, Ruth Fong, et al · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Evaluating fairness using permutation tests
Cyrus DiCiccio, Sriram Vasudevan, Kinjal Basu, Krishnaram Kenthapadi, and Deepak Agarwal · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Auditing ml models for individual bias and unfairness
Songkai Xue, Mikhail Yurochkin, and Yuekai Sun · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Retiring adult: New datasets for fair machine learning
Frances Ding, Moritz Hardt, John Miller, and Ludwig Schmidt · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Cited alongside, same era.
Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairness
Sam Corbett-Davies, Emma Pierson, Avi Feller, Sharad Goel, and Aziz Huq · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Fairtest: Discovering unwarranted associations in data-driven applications
Florian Tramer, Vaggelis Atlidakis, Roxana Geambasu, Daniel Hsu, Jean-Pierre Hubaux, Mathias Humbert, Ari Juels, and Huang Lin · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Learning non-discriminatory predictors
Blake Woodworth, Suriya Gunasekar, Mesrob I Ohannessian, and Nathan Srebro · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification
Joy Buolamwini and Timnit Gebru · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Amazon scraps secret ai recruiting tool that showed bias against women
Jeffrey Dastin · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Multicalibration: Calibration for the (computationally-identifiable) masses
Ursula Hébert-Johnson, Michael Kim, Omer Reingold, and Guy Rothblum · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
John C Duchi and Hongseok Namkoong · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Testing group fairness via optimal transport projections
Nian Si, Karthyek Murthy, Jose Blanchet, and Viet Anh Nguyen · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
A statistical test for probabilistic fairness
Bahar Taskesen, Jose Blanchet, Daniel Kuhn, and Viet Anh Nguyen · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Conditional calibration for false discovery rate control under dependence
William Fithian and Lihua Lei · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Stanford launches AI audit challenge, Jul 2022
Marietje Schaake and Jack Clark · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Locating disparities in machine learning
Moritz von Zahn, Oliver Hinz, and Stefan Feuerriegel · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Active fairness auditing
Tom Yan and Chicheng Zhang · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Fairness uncertainty quantification: How certain are you that the model is fair?
Abhishek Roy and Prasant Mohapatra · 2023
Closest in time.
The limits of distribution-free conditional predictive inference
Rina Foygel Barber, Emmanuel J Candès, Aaditya Ramdas, and Ryan J Tibshirani · 2049
Closest in time.