Recentering Validity Considerations through Early-Stage Deliberations Around AI and Policy Design

Unremarkable AI: Fitting intelligent decision support into critical, clinical decision-making processes

Original

Qian Yang, Aaron Steinfeld, and John Zimmerman. 2019 · 1904

Earlier work this paper cites.

On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B

Steven Kerr. 1975 · 1975

Earlier work this paper cites.

The policy knot: Re-integrating policy, practice and design in CSCW studies of social computing. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing . 588–602

Steven J Jackson, Tarleton Gillespie, and Sandy Payette. 2014 · 2014

Earlier work this paper cites.

Investigating the heart pump implant decision process: opportunities for decision support tools to help. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 4477–4488

Qian Yang, John Zimmerman, Aaron Steinfeld, Lisa Carey, and James F Antaki. 2016 · 2016

Earlier work this paper cites.

A case study of algorithm-assisted decision making in child maltreatment hotline screening decisions

Alexandra Chouldechova, Emily Putnam-Hornstein, Suzanne Dworak-Peck, Diana Benavides-Prado, Oleksandr Fialko, Rhema Vaithianathan, Sorelle A Friedler, and Christo Wilson. 2018 · 2018

Earlier work this paper cites.

Toward algorithmic accountability in public services: A qualitative study of affected community perspectives on algorithmic decision-making in child welfare services. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–12

Anna Brown, Alexandra Chouldechova, Emily Putnam-Hornstein, Andrew Tobin, and Rhema Vaithianathan. 2019 · 2019

Earlier work this paper cites.

The principles and limits of algorithm-in-the-loop decision making

Ben Green and Yiling Chen. 2019 · 2019

Earlier work this paper cites.

A case for humans-in-the-loop: Decisions in the presence of erroneous algorithmic scores

Maria De-Arteaga, Riccardo Fogliato, and Alexandra Chouldechova. 2020 · 2020

Cited alongside, same era.

Shifting concepts of value: Designing algorithmic decision-support systems for public services

Naja Holten Møller, Irina Shklovski, and Thomas T. Hildebrandt. 2020 · 2020

Cited alongside, same era.

Soliciting stakeholders’ fairness notions in child maltreatment predictive systems. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–17

Hao-Fei Cheng, Logan Stapleton, Ruiqi Wang, Paige Bullock, Alexandra Chouldechova, Zhiwei Steven Steven Wu, and Haiyi Zhu. 2021 · 2021

Cited alongside, same era.

Leveraging expert consistency to improve algorithmic decision support

Original

Maria De-Arteaga, Artur Dubrawski, and Alexandra Chouldechova. 2021 · 2021

Cited alongside, same era.

Designing for human-AI complementarity in K-12 education

Algorithms and Decision-Making in the Public Sector

Karen Levy, Kyla E Chasalow, and Sarah Riley. 2021 · 2021

Later among the works it cites.

A Validity Perspective on Evaluating the Justified Use of Data-driven Decision-making Algorithms

Original

Amanda Coston, Anna Kawakami, Haiyi Zhu, Ken Holstein, and Hoda Heidari. 2022 · 2022

Later among the works it cites.

Improving Human-AI Partnerships in Child Welfare: Understanding Worker Practices, Challenges, and Desires for Algorithmic Decision Support. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–18

Anna Kawakami, Venkatesh Sivaraman, Hao-Fei Cheng, Logan Stapleton, Yanghuidi Cheng, Diana Qing, Adam Perer, Zhiwei Steven Wu, Haiyi Zhu, and Kenneth Holstein. 2022 · 2022

Later among the works it cites.

The fallacy of AI functionality. In 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency . 959–972

Inioluwa Deborah Raji, I Elizabeth Kumar, Aaron Horowitz, and Andrew Selbst. 2022 · 2022

Later among the works it cites.