Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
With the advent of powerful neural language models, AI-based systems to assist developers in coding tasks are becoming widely available; Copilot is one such system.
S. N. Woodfield, H. E. Dunsmore, and V. Y. Shen, “The effect of modularization and comments on program comprehension,” in Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Software engineering , 1981, pp. 215–223
1981
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. P. Lientz, “Issues in software maintenance,” ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) , vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 271–278, 1983
1983
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Tenny, “Program readability: Procedures versus comments,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering , vol. 14, no. 9, p. 1271, 1988
1988
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. S. Hartzman and C. F. Austin, “Maintenance productivity: Observations based on an experience in a large system environment,” in Proceedings of the 1993 conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative research: software engineering-Volume 1 , 1993, pp. 138–170
1993
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Becker, M. Fowler, K. Beck, J. Brant, W. Opdyke, and D. Roberts, Refactoring: improving the design of existing code . Addison-Wesley Professional, 1999
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. K. Roy and J. R. Cordy, “A survey on software clone detection research,” Queen’s School of computing TR , vol. 541, no. 115, pp. 64–68, 2007
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Hindle, E. T. Barr, M. Gabel, Z. Su, and P. Devanbu, “On the naturalness of software,” Communications of the ACM , vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 122–131, 2016
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
X. Hu, G. Li, X. Xia, D. Lo, and Z. Jin, “Deep code comment generation,” in 2018 IEEE/ACM 26th International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC) . IEEE, 2018, pp. 200–20 010
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Z. Chen, S. Kommrusch, M. Tufano, L.-N. Pouchet, D. Poshyvanyk, and M. Monperrus, “Sequencer: Sequence-to-sequence learning for end-to-end program repair,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering , vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 1943–1959, 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Allamanis, “The adverse effects of code duplication in machine learning models of code,” in Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGPLAN International Symposium on New Ideas, New Paradigms, and Reflections on Programming and Software , 2019, pp. 143–153
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Wen, C. Nagy, G. Bavota, and M. Lanza, “A large-scale empirical study on code-comment inconsistencies,” in 2019 IEEE/ACM 27th International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC) . IEEE, 2019, pp. 53–64
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Y. Huang, X. Hu, N. Jia, X. Chen, Y. Xiong, and Z. Zheng, “Learning code context information to predict comment locations,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability , vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 88–105, 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
R.-M. Karampatsis and C. Sutton, “How often do single-statement bugs occur? the manysstubs4j dataset,” in Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories , 2020, pp. 573–577
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Kanade, P. Maniatis, G. Balakrishnan, and K. Shi, “Learning and evaluating contextual embedding of source code,” in International Conference on Machine Learning . PMLR, 2020, pp. 5110–5121
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Ziegler, “https://github.blog/2021-06-30-github-copilot-research-recitation/.” [Online]. Available: https://github.blog/2021-06-30-github-copilot-research-recitation/
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
B. Mosolygó, N. Vándor, G. Antal, and P. Hegedűs, “On the rise and fall of simple stupid bugs: a life-cycle analysis of sstubs,” in 2021 IEEE/ACM 18th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR) . IEEE, 2021, pp. 495–499
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
P. Vaithilingam, T. Zhang, and E. L. Glassman, “Expectation vs. experience: Evaluating the usability of code generation tools powered by large language models,” in CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts , 2022, pp. 1–7
2022
Later among the works it cites.
2022
Later among the works it cites.
L. Tunstall, L. von Werra, and T. Wolf, Natural language processing with transformers . " O’Reilly Media, Inc.", 2022
2022
Later among the works it cites.
F. F. Xu, U. Alon, G. Neubig, and V. J. Hellendoorn, “A systematic evaluation of large language models of code,” in Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGPLAN International Symposium on Machine Programming , 2022, pp. 1–10
2022
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
J. Latendresse, R. Abdalkareem, D. E. Costa, and E. Shihab, “How effective is continuous integration in indicating single-statement bugs?” in 2021 IEEE/ACM 18th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR) . IEEE, 2021, pp. 500–504
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Hua and H. Wang, “On the effectiveness of deep vulnerability detectors to simple stupid bug detection,” in 2021 IEEE/ACM 18th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR) . IEEE, 2021, pp. 530–534
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
W. Zhu and M. W. Godfrey, “Mea culpa: How developers fix their own simple bugs differently from other developers,” in 2021 IEEE/ACM 18th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR) . IEEE, 2021, pp. 515–519
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
F. Madeiral and T. Durieux, “A large-scale study on human-cloned changes for automated program repair,” in 2021 IEEE/ACM 18th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR) . IEEE, 2021, pp. 510–514
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Peruma and C. D. Newman, “On the distribution of" simple stupid bugs" in unit test files: An exploratory study,” in 2021 IEEE/ACM 18th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR) . IEEE, 2021, pp. 525–529
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
E. Mashhadi and H. Hemmati, “Applying codebert for automated program repair of java simple bugs,” in 2021 IEEE/ACM 18th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR) . IEEE, 2021, pp. 505–509
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
A. V. Kamienski, L. Palechor, C.-P. Bezemer, and A. Hindle, “Pysstubs: Characterizing single-statement bugs in popular open-source python projects,” in 2021 IEEE/ACM 18th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR) . IEEE, 2021, pp. 520–524
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
2022
Later among the works it cites.
2022
Later among the works it cites.
B. Yetistiren, I. Ozsoy, and E. Tuzun, “Assessing the quality of github copilot’s code generation,” in Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Predictive Models and Data Analytics in Software Engineering , 2022, pp. 62–71
2022
Later among the works it cites.
N. Nguyen and S. Nadi, “An empirical evaluation of github copilot’s code suggestions,” in Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories , 2022, pp. 1–5
2022
Later among the works it cites.
2022
Later among the works it cites.
2022
Later among the works it cites.
H. Pearce, B. Ahmad, B. Tan, B. Dolan-Gavitt, and R. Karri, “Asleep at the keyboard? assessing the security of github copilot’s code contributions,” in 2022 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) . IEEE, 2022, pp. 754–768
2022
Later among the works it cites.
2022
Later among the works it cites.
I. Drori, S. Zhang, R. Shuttleworth, L. Tang, A. Lu, E. Ke, K. Liu, L. Chen, S. Tran, N. Cheng et al. , “A neural network solves, explains, and generates university math problems by program synthesis and few-shot learning at human level,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , vol. 119, no. 32, p. e2123433119, 2022
2022
Later among the works it cites.
2022
Later among the works it cites.
2022
Later among the works it cites.
2022
Later among the works it cites.
C. Wang, Y. Yang, C. Gao, Y. Peng, H. Zhang, and M. R. Lyu, “No more fine-tuning? an experimental evaluation of prompt tuning in code intelligence,” in Proceedings of the 30th ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering , 2022, pp. 382–394
2022
Later among the works it cites.
2022
Later among the works it cites.
2022
Later among the works it cites.