Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Symbolic regression (SR) is a challenging task in machine learning that involves finding a mathematical expression for a function based on its values.
Practical Methods of Optimization
Roger Fletcher · 1987
Earlier work this paper cites.
Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine
Jerome H. Friedman · 2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
Bandit based monte-carlo planning
Levente Kocsis and Csaba Szepesvári · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Distilling free-form natural laws from experimental data
Michael Schmidt and Hod Lipson · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Sequence transduction with recurrent neural networks
Alex Graves · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Discovering governing equations from data by sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems
Steven L. Brunton, Joshua L. Proctor, and J. Nathan Kutz · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Sequence-to-sequence learning as beam-search optimization
Sam Wiseman and Alexander M. Rush · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Inference of compact nonlinear dynamic models by epigenetic local search
William La Cava, Kourosh Danai, and Lee Spector · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system
Tianqi Chen and Carlos Guestrin · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Data-driven discovery of partial differential equations
Samuel H. Rudy, Steven L. Brunton, Joshua L. Proctor, and J. Nathan Kutz · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Attention is all you need
Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Ł ukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Pmlb: a large benchmark suite for machine learning evaluation and comparison
Randal S. Olson, William La Cava, Patryk Orzechowski, Ryan J. Urbanowicz, and Jason H. Moore · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics for model predictive control in the low-data limit
E. Kaiser, J. N. Kutz, and S. L. Brunton · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Hierarchical neural story generation
Angela Fan, Mike Lewis, and Yann Dauphin · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
A general reinforcement learning algorithm that masters chess, shogi, and go through self-play
David Silver, Thomas Hubert, Julian Schrittwieser, Ioannis Antonoglou, Matthew Lai, Arthur Guez, Marc Lanctot, Laurent Sifre, Dharshan Kumaran, Thore Graepel, Timothy Lillicrap, Karen Simonyan, and Demis Hassabis · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Symbolic regression in materials science
Yiqun Wang, Nicholas Wagner, and James M. Rondinelli · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding
Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Execution-guided neural program synthesis
Xinyun Chen, Chang Liu, and Dawn Song · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Discovering symbolic models from deep learning with inductive biases
Miles Cranmer, Alvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez, Peter Battaglia, Rui Xu, Kyle Cranmer, David Spergel, and Shirley Ho · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Operon c++: An efficient genetic programming framework for symbolic regression
Bogdan Burlacu, Gabriel Kronberger, and Michael Kommenda · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Fast neural models for symbolic regression at scale
Allan Costa, Rumen Dangovski, Owen Dugan, Samuel Kim, Pawan Goyal, Marin Soljačić, and Joseph Jacobson · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Contemporary symbolic regression methods and their relative performance
William La Cava, Patryk Orzechowski, Bogdan Burlacu, Fabricio de Franca, Marco Virgolin, Ying Jin, Michael Kommenda, and Jason Moore · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Evolving symbolic density functionals
He Ma, Arunachalam Narayanaswamy, Patrick Riley, and Li Li · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Rethinking symbolic regression datasets and benchmarks for scientific discovery
Yoshitomo Matsubara, Naoya Chiba, Ryo Igarashi, Taniai Tatsunori, and Yoshitaka Ushiku · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Symbolic regression is NP-hard
Marco Virgolin and Solon P Pissis · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
CoNSole: Convex neural symbolic learning
Haoran Li, Yang Weng, and Hanghang Tong · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
End-to-end symbolic regression with transformers
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Guillaume Lample and François Charton · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Ai feynman 2.0: Pareto-optimal symbolic regression exploiting graph modularity
Silviu-Marian Udrescu, Andrew Tan, Jiahai Feng, Orisvaldo Neto, Tailin Wu, and Max Tegmark · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Data-driven identification of 2d partial differential equations using extracted physical features
Kazem Meidani and Amir Barati Farimani · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradients
Brenden K Petersen, Mikel Landajuela Larma, Terrell N. Mundhenk, Claudio Prata Santiago, Soo Kyung Kim, and Joanne Taery Kim · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Neural symbolic regression that scales
Luca Biggio, Tommaso Bendinelli, Alexander Neitz, Aurelien Lucchi, and Giambattista Parascandolo · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Symbolicgpt: A generative transformer model for symbolic regression
Mojtaba Valipour, Bowen You, Maysum Panju, and Ali Ghodsi · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Discovering symbolic policies with deep reinforcement learning
Mikel Landajuela, Brenden K Petersen, Sookyung Kim, Claudio P Santiago, Ruben Glatt, Nathan Mundhenk, Jacob F Pettit, and Daniel Faissol · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Pierre-Alexandre Kamienny, Stéphane d’Ascoli, Guillaume Lample, and Francois Charton · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Symformer: End-to-end symbolic regression using transformer-based architecture
Martin Vastl, Jonáš Kulhánek, Jirí Kubalík, Erik Derner, and Robert Babuška · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
A unified framework for deep symbolic regression
Mikel Landajuela, Chak Lee, Jiachen Yang, Ruben Glatt, Claudio P. Santiago, Ignacio Aravena, Terrell N. Mundhenk, Garrett Mulcahy, and Brenden K. Petersen · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
PPL-MCTS: Constrained textual generation through discriminator-guided MCTS decoding
Antoine Chaffin, Vincent Claveau, and Ewa Kijak · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Deep symbolic regression for recurrence prediction
Stéphane D’Ascoli, Pierre-Alexandre Kamienny, Guillaume Lample, and Francois Charton · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Identification of parametric dynamical systems using integer programming
Kazem Meidani and Amir Barati Farimani · 2023
Closest in time.
Symbolic physics learner: Discovering governing equations via monte carlo tree search
Fangzheng Sun, Yang Liu, Jian-Xun Wang, and Hao Sun · 2023
Closest in time.
Deep generative symbolic regression
Samuel Holt, Zhaozhi Qian, and Mihaela van der Schaar · 2023
Closest in time.
Execution-based code generation using deep reinforcement learning
Parshin Shojaee, Aneesh Jain, Sindhu Tipirneni, and Chandan K Reddy · 2023
Closest in time.
Planning with large language models for code generation
Shun Zhang, Zhenfang Chen, Yikang Shen, Mingyu Ding, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, and Chuang Gan · 2023
Closest in time.
Deep generative symbolic regression with Monte-Carlo-tree-search
Pierre-Alexandre Kamienny, Guillaume Lample, Sylvain Lamprier, and Marco Virgolin · 2023
Closest in time.