Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
In this paper, we present findings from an semi-experimental exploration of rater diversity and its influence on safety annotations of conversations generated by humans talking to a generative AI-chat bot.
The unreasonable effectiveness of data
Alon Halevy, Peter Norvig, and Fernando Pereira · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Truth is a lie: Crowd truth and the seven myths of human annotation
Lora Aroyo and Chris Welty · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Addressing age-related bias in sentiment analysis
Mark Díaz, Isaac Johnson, Amanda Lazar, Anne Marie Piper, and Darren Gergle · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Detecting stance in media on global warming
Yiwei Luo, Dallas Card, and Dan Jurafsky · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
On releasing annotator-level labels and information in datasets
Vinodkumar Prabhakaran, Aida Mostafazadeh Davani, and Mark Diaz · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
"everyone wants to do the model work, not the data work": Data cascades in high-stakes ai
Nithya Sambasivan, Shivani Kapania, Hannah Highfill, Diana Akrong, Praveen Kumar Paritosh, and Lora Aroyo · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Is your toxicity my toxicity? exploring the impact of rater identity on toxicity annotation
Nitesh Goyal, Ian Kivlichan, Rachel Rosen, and Lucy Vasserman · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…