Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Relation extraction has the potential for large-scale knowledge graph construction, but current methods do not consider the qualifier attributes for each relation triplet, such as time, quantity or location.
Distilbert, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter
Victor Sanh, Lysandre Debut, Julien Chaumond, and Thomas Wolf. 2019 · 1910
Earlier work this paper cites.
Cyc: A large-scale investment in knowledge infrastructure
Douglas B. Lenat. 1995 · 1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
Constructing biological knowledge bases by extracting information from text sources
Mark Craven and Johan Kumlien. 1999 · 1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
Scaling laws for neural language models
Jared Kaplan, Sam McCandlish, Tom Henighan, Tom B. Brown, Benjamin Chess, Rewon Child, Scott Gray, Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, and Dario Amodei. 2020 · 2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
A review of relation extraction
Nguyen Bach and Sameer Badaskar. 2007 · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Dialogue relation extraction with document-level heterogeneous graph attention networks
Hui Chen, Pengfei Hong, Wei Han, Navonil Majumder, and Soujanya Poria. 2020 · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Distant supervision for relation extraction without labeled data
Mike Mintz, Steven Bills, Rion Snow, and Daniel Jurafsky. 2009 · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Modeling relations and their mentions without labeled text
Sebastian Riedel, Limin Yao, and Andrew McCallum. 2010 · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Dbpedia spotlight: Shedding light on the web of documents
Pablo N. Mendes, Max Jakob, Andrés García-Silva, and Christian Bizer. 2011 · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Wikipedia entity expansion and attribute extraction from the web using semi-supervised learning
Lidong Bing, Wai Lam, and Tak-Lam Wong. 2013 · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Collaboratively built semi-structured content and artificial intelligence: The story so far
Eduard Hovy, Roberto Navigli, and Simone Paolo Ponzetto. 2013 · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Introducing wikidata to the linked data web
Fredo Erxleben, Michael Günther, Markus Krötzsch, Julian Mendez, and Denny Vrandecic. 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
The Stanford CoreNLP natural language processing toolkit
Christopher Manning, Mihai Surdeanu, John Bauer, Jenny Finkel, Steven Bethard, and David McClosky. 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Modeling joint entity and relation extraction with table representation
Makoto Miwa and Yutaka Sasaki. 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Sequence to sequence learning with neural networks
Ilya Sutskever, Oriol Vinyals, and Quoc V Le. 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Improving distant supervision for information extraction using label propagation through lists
Lidong Bing, Sneha Chaudhari, Richard Wang, and William Cohen. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Table filling multi-task recurrent neural network for joint entity and relation extraction
Pankaj Gupta, Hinrich Schütze, and Bernt Andrassy. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
A review of relational machine learning for knowledge graphs
Maximilian Nickel, Kevin Murphy, Volker Tresp, and Evgeniy Gabrilovich. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
On the representation and embedding of knowledge bases beyond binary relations
Jianfeng Wen, Jianxin Li, Yongyi Mao, Shini Chen, and Richong Zhang. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Question answering with knowledge base, web and beyond
Wen-tau Yih and Hao Ma. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Knowledge graph embedding: A survey of approaches and applications
Quan Wang, Zhendong Mao, Bin Wang, and Li Guo. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Explicit semantic ranking for academic search via knowledge graph embedding
Chenyan Xiong, Russell Power, and Jamie Callan. 2017 · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Position-aware attention and supervised data improve slot filling
Yuhao Zhang, Victor Zhong, Danqi Chen, Gabor Angeli, and Christopher D. Manning. 2017 · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Scene graph parsing by attention graph
Martin Andrews, Yew Ken Chia, and Sam Witteveen. 2019 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
T-REx: A large scale alignment of natural language with knowledge base triples
Hady Elsahar, Pavlos Vougiouklis, Arslen Remaci, Christophe Gravier, Jonathon Hare, Frederique Laforest, and Elena Simperl. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
FewRel: A large-scale supervised few-shot relation classification dataset with state-of-the-art evaluation
Xu Han, Hao Zhu, Pengfei Yu, Ziyun Wang, Yuan Yao, Zhiyuan Liu, and Maosong Sun. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Dice loss for data-imbalanced NLP tasks
Xiaoya Li, Xiaofei Sun, Yuxian Meng, Junjun Liang, Fei Wu, and Jiwei Li. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Web-Scale Knowledge Collection , page 888–889. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA
Colin Lockard, Prashant Shiralkar, Xin Luna Dong, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Effective modeling of encoder-decoder architecture for joint entity and relation extraction
Tapas Nayak and Hwee Tou Ng. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Beyond Triplets: Hyper-Relational Knowledge Graph Embedding for Link Prediction , page 1885–1896. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA
Paolo Rosso, Dingqi Yang, and Philippe Cudré-Mauroux. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Temporal reasoning in natural language inference
Siddharth Vashishtha, Adam Poliak, Yash Kumar Lal, Benjamin Van Durme, and Aaron Steven White. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Ceres: Distantly supervised relation extraction from the semi-structured web
Colin Lockard, Xin Luna Dong, Arash Einolghozati, and Prashant Shiralkar. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
FEVER: a large-scale dataset for fact extraction and VERification
James Thorne, Andreas Vlachos, Christos Christodoulopoulos, and Arpit Mittal. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Cross-sentence n-ary relation extraction using lower-arity universal schemas
Kosuke Akimoto, Takuya Hiraoka, Kunihiko Sadamasa, and Mathias Niepert. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Matching the blanks: Distributional similarity for relation learning
Livio Baldini Soares, Nicholas FitzGerald, Jeffrey Ling, and Tom Kwiatkowski. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding
Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Link prediction on n-ary relational data
Saiping Guan, Xiaolong Jin, Yuanzhuo Wang, and Xueqi Cheng. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Document-level n-ary relation extraction with multiscale representation learning
Robin Jia, Cliff Wong, and Hoifung Poon. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Two are better than one: Joint entity and relation extraction with table-sequence encoders
Jue Wang and Wei Lu. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
CIDER: Commonsense inference for dialogue explanation and reasoning
Deepanway Ghosal, Pengfei Hong, Siqi Shen, Navonil Majumder, Rada Mihalcea, and Soujanya Poria. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
REBEL: Relation extraction by end-to-end language generation
Pere-Lluís Huguet Cabot and Roberto Navigli. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Improving distantly supervised relation extraction with self-ensemble noise filtering
Tapas Nayak, Navonil Majumder, and Soujanya Poria. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Structured prediction as translation between augmented natural languages
Giovanni Paolini, Ben Athiwaratkun, Jason Krone, Jie Ma, Alessandro Achille, RISHITA ANUBHAI, Cicero Nogueira dos Santos, Bing Xiang, and Stefano Soatto. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Learning span-level interactions for aspect sentiment triplet extraction
Lu Xu, Yew Ken Chia, and Lidong Bing. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
CodRED: A cross-document relation extraction dataset for acquiring knowledge in the wild
Yuan Yao, Jiaju Du, Yankai Lin, Peng Li, Zhiyuan Liu, Jie Zhou, and Maosong Sun. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Aspect sentiment triplet extraction using reinforcement learning
Samson Yu Bai Jian, Tapas Nayak, Navonil Majumder, and Soujanya Poria. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
A frustratingly easy approach for entity and relation extraction
Zexuan Zhong and Danqi Chen. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
IAM: A comprehensive and large-scale dataset for integrated argument mining tasks
Liying Cheng, Lidong Bing, Ruidan He, Qian Yu, Yan Zhang, and Luo Si. 2022 · 2022
Closest in time.
RelationPrompt: Leveraging prompts to generate synthetic data for zero-shot relation triplet extraction
Yew Ken Chia, Lidong Bing, Soujanya Poria, and Luo Si. 2022 · 2022
Closest in time.
Time-aware language models as temporal knowledge bases
Bhuwan Dhingra, Jeremy R. Cole, Julian Martin Eisenschlos, Daniel Gillick, Jacob Eisenstein, and William W. Cohen. 2022 · 2022
Closest in time.
MReD: A meta-review dataset for structure-controllable text generation
Chenhui Shen, Liying Cheng, Ran Zhou, Lidong Bing, Yang You, and Luo Si. 2022 · 2022
Closest in time.
Document-level relation extraction with adaptive focal loss and knowledge distillation
Qingyu Tan, Ruidan He, Lidong Bing, and Hwee Tou Ng. 2022a · 2022
Closest in time.
Revisiting docred - addressing the overlooked false negative problem in relation extraction
Qingyu Tan, Lu Xu, Lidong Bing, and Hwee Tou Ng. 2022b · 2022
Closest in time.