Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Natural laws are often described through differential equations yet finding a differential equation that describes the governing law underlying observed data is a challenging and still mostly manual task.
ODEPACK, a Systematized Collection of ODE Solvers
A. Hindmarsh and L. L. Laboratory · 1982
Earlier work this paper cites.
Genetic programming - on the programming of computers by means of natural selection
J. R. Koza · 1993
Earlier work this paper cites.
Genetic programming II: automatic discovery of reusable programs
J. R. Koza · 1994
Earlier work this paper cites.
Improving symbolic regression with interval arithmetic and linear scaling
M. Keijzer · 2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
Order of nonlinearity as a complexity measure for models generated by symbolic regression via pareto genetic programming
E. J. Vladislavleva, G. F. Smits, and D. Den Hertog · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Semantically-based crossover in genetic programming: application to real-valued symbolic regression
N. Q. Uy, N. X. Hoai, M. O’Neill, R. I. McKay, and E. Galván-López · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Genetic programming needs better benchmarks
J. McDermott, D. R. White, S. Luke, L. Manzoni, M. Castelli, L. Vanneschi, W. Jaskowski, K. Krawiec, R. Harper, K. De Jong, et al · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Discovering governing equations from data by sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems
S. L. Brunton, J. L. Proctor, and J. N. Kutz · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Sympy: symbolic computing in python
A. Meurer, C. P. Smith, M. Paprocki, O. Čertík, S. B. Kirpichev, M. Rocklin, A. Kumar, S. Ivanov, J. K. Moore, S. Singh, T. Rathnayake, S. Vig, B. E. Granger, R. P. Muller, F. Bonazzi, H. Gupta, S. Vats, F. Johansson, F. Pedregosa, M. J. Curry, A. R. Terrel, v. Roučka, A. Saboo, I. Fernando, S. Kulal, R. Cimrman, and A. Scopatz · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Neural ordinary differential equations
R. T. Chen, Y. Rubanova, J. Bettencourt, and D. Duvenaud · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Learning equations for extrapolation and control
S. Sahoo, C. Lampert, and G. Martius · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Data-driven discovery of free-form governing differential equations
S. Atkinson, W. Subber, L. Wang, G. Khan, P. Hawi, and R. Ghanem · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Deep learning for symbolic mathematics
G. Lample and F. Charton · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Pde-net 2.0: Learning pdes from data with a numeric-symbolic hybrid deep network
Z. Long, Y. Lu, and B. Dong · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Pysindy: A python package for the sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems from data
B. de Silva, K. Champion, M. Quade, J.-C. Loiseau, J. N. Kutz, and S. Brunton · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Rode-net: learning ordinary differential equations with randomness from data
SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python
P. Virtanen, R. Gommers, T. E. Oliphant, M. Haberland, T. Reddy, D. Cournapeau, E. Burovski, P. Peterson, W. Weckesser, J. Bright, S. J. van der Walt, M. Brett, J. Wilson, K. J. Millman, N. Mayorov, A. R. J. Nelson, E. Jones, R. Kern, E. Larson, C. J. Carey, İ. Polat, Y. Feng, E. W. Moore, J. VanderPlas, D. Laxalde, J. Perktold, R. Cimrman, I. Henriksen, E. A. Quintero, C. R. Harris, A. M. Archibald, A. H. Ribeiro, F. Pedregosa, P. van Mulbregt, and SciPy 1.0 Contributors · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Big bird: Transformers for longer sequences
M. Zaheer, G. Guruganesh, K. A. Dubey, J. Ainslie, C. Alberti, S. Ontanon, P. Pham, A. Ravula, Q. Wang, L. Yang, et al · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Neural symbolic regression that scales
L. Biggio, T. Bendinelli, A. Neitz, A. Lucchi, and G. Parascandolo · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Fast neural models for symbolic regression at scale, 2021
A. Costa, R. Dangovski, O. Dugan, S. Kim, P. Goyal, M. Soljačić, and J. Jacobson · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradients
B. K. Petersen, M. Landajuela, T. N. Mundhenk, C. P. Santiago, S. K. Kim, and J. T. Kim · 2021
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
J. Liu, Z. Long, R. Wang, J. Sun, and B. Dong · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Mastering atari, go, chess and shogi by planning with a learned model
J. Schrittwieser, I. Antonoglou, T. Hubert, K. Simonyan, L. Sifre, S. Schmitt, A. Guez, E. Lockhart, D. Hassabis, T. Graepel, et al · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Ai feynman: A physics-inspired method for symbolic regression
S.-M. Udrescu and M. Tegmark · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Ai feynman 2.0: Pareto-optimal symbolic regression exploiting graph modularity
S.-M. Udrescu, A. Tan, J. Feng, O. Neto, T. Wu, and M. Tegmark · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Later among the works it cites.
SymbolicGPT: A Generative Transformer Model for Symbolic Regression
M. Valipour, M. Panju, B. You, and A. Ghodsi · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Inferring the structure of ordinary differential equations
J. Weilbach, S. Gerwinn, C. Weilbach, and M. Kandemir · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
End-to-end symbolic regression with transformers
P.-A. Kamienny, S. d’Ascoli, G. Lample, and F. Charton · 2022
Closest in time.
Symformer: End-to-end symbolic regression using transformer-based architecture
M. Vastl, J. Kulhánek, J. Kubalík, E. Derner, and R. Babuška · 2022
Closest in time.