Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
The coherent superposition of quantum states is an important resource for quantum information processing which distinguishes quantum dynamics and information from their classical counterparts.
H. Araki and E. H. Lieb, “Entropy inequalities,” Commun. Math. Phys. 18
1970
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. H. Bennett, H. J. Bernstein, S. Popescu, and B. Schumacher, “Concentrating partial entanglement by local operations,” Phys. Rev. A 53
1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. R. Calderbank and P. W. Shor, “Good quantum error-correcting codes exist,” Phys. Rev. A 54
1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. M. Steane, “Error correcting codes in quantum theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 77
1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Schumacher, “Sending entanglement through noisy quantum channels,” Phys. Rev. A 54
1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
V. Zelevinsky, “Quantum chaos and complexity in nuclei,” Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 46
1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
V. Vedral, M. B. Plenio, M. A. Rippin, and P. L. Knight, “Quantifying entanglement,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 78
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Lloyd, “Capacity of the noisy quantum channel,” Phys. Rev. A 55
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
Y. Alhassid, “The statistical theory of quantum dots,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 72
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. E. Shannon, “A mathematical theory of communication,” ACM SIGMOBILE mobile computing and communications review 5
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Aaronson and D. Gottesman, “Improved simulation of stabilizer circuits,” Phys. Rev. A 70
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
I. Devetak, “The private classical capacity and quantum capacity of a quantum channel,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 51
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Aberg, “Quantifying superposition,” (2006), arXiv:quant-ph/0612146
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Piani and J. Watrous, “All entangled states are useful for channel discrimination,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 102
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum computation and quantum information , 10th ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge ; New York, 2010)
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Bravyi, B. M. Terhal, and B. Leemhuis, “Majorana fermion codes,” New J. Phys. 12
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Gallego, L. E. Würflinger, A. Acín, and M. Navascués, “Operational framework for nonlocality,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 109
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Fröwis and W. Dür, “Measures of macroscopicity for quantum spin systems,” New J. Phys. 14
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. I. de Vicente, “On nonlocality as a resource theory and nonlocality measures,” J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 47
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Baumgratz, M. Cramer, and M. B. Plenio, “Quantifying coherence,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Åberg, “Catalytic coherence,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
V. Veitch, S. A. H. Mousavian, D. Gottesman, and J. Emerson, “The resource theory of stabilizer quantum computation,” New Journal of Physics 16
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Streltsov, U. Singh, H. S. Dhar, M. N. Bera, and G. Adesso, “Measuring quantum coherence with entanglement,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
I. Marvian and R. W. Spekkens, “How to quantify coherence: Distinguishing speakable and unspeakable notions,” Phys. Rev. A 94
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Chitambar and G. Gour, “Comparison of incoherent operations and measures of coherence,” Phys. Rev. A 94
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Yadin and V. Vedral, “General framework for quantum macroscopicity in terms of coherence,” Phys. Rev. A 93
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Napoli, T. R. Bromley, M. Cianciaruso, M. Piani, N. Johnston, and G. Adesso, “Robustness of coherence: An operational and observable measure of quantum coherence,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Yadin, J. Ma, D. Girolami, M. Gu, and V. Vedral, “Quantum processes which do not use coherence,” Phys. Rev. X 6
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
U. Singh, L. Zhang, and A. K. Pati, “Average coherence and its typicality for random pure states,” Phys. Rev. A 93
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. D'Alessio, Y. Kafri, A. Polkovnikov, and M. Rigol, “From quantum chaos and eigenstate thermalization to statistical mechanics and thermodynamics,” Adv. Phys. 65
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Streltsov, G. Adesso, and M. B. Plenio, “Colloquium: Quantum coherence as a resource,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 89
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Giorda and M. Allegra, “Two-qubit correlations revisited: average mutual information, relevant (and useful) observables and an application to remote state preparation,” J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 50
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Nahum, J. Ruhman, S. Vijay, and J. Haah, “Quantum entanglement growth under random unitary dynamics,” Phys. Rev. X 7
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Howard and E. Campbell, “Application of a resource theory for magic states to fault-tolerant quantum computing,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
I. Kukuljan, S. Grozdanov, and T. Prosen, “Weak quantum chaos,” Phys. Rev. B 96
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Y. Huang, Y.-L. Zhang, and X. Chen, “Out-of-time-ordered correlators in many-body localized systems,” Annalen der Physik 529
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
X. Chen, T. Zhou, D. A. Huse, and E. Fradkin, “Out-of-time-order correlations in many-body localized and thermal phases,” Annalen der Physik 529
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
R.-Q. He and Z.-Y. Lu, “Characterizing many-body localization by out-of-time-ordered correlation,” Phys. Rev. B 95
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
V. Katariya and M. M. Wilde, “Evaluating the advantage of adaptive strategies for quantum channel distinguishability,” Phys. Rev. A 104
2021
Later among the works it cites.
S. Kim, L. Li, A. Kumar, C. Xiong, S. Das, U. Sen, A. K. Pati, and J. Wu, “Protocol for unambiguous quantum state discrimination using quantum coherence,” Quantum Information and Computation 21
2021
Later among the works it cites.
R. Fan, S. Vijay, A. Vishwanath, and Y.-Z. You, “Self-organized error correction in random unitary circuits with measurement,” Phys. Rev. B 103
2021
Later among the works it cites.
A. Nahum, S. Roy, B. Skinner, and J. Ruhman, “Measurement and entanglement phase transitions in all-to-all quantum circuits, on quantum trees, and in landau-ginsburg theory,” PRX Quantum 2
2021
Later among the works it cites.
S. Sang and T. H. Hsieh, “Measurement-protected quantum phases,” Phys. Rev. Research 3
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
B. Dóra and R. Moessner, “Out-of-time-ordered density correlators in luttinger liquids,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
N. Tsuji, P. Werner, and M. Ueda, “Exact out-of-time-ordered correlation functions for an interacting lattice fermion model,” Phys. Rev. A 95
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Preskill, “Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond,” Quantum 2
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Y. Li, X. Chen, and M. P. A. Fisher, “Quantum zeno effect and the many-body entanglement transition,” Phys. Rev. B 98
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Nahum, S. Vijay, and J. Haah, “Operator spreading in random unitary circuits,” Phys. Rev. X 8
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
B. Bertini, P. Kos, and T. c. v. Prosen, “Exact spectral form factor in a minimal model of many-body quantum chaos,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Takahashi and E. Chitambar, “Comparing coherence and entanglement under resource non-generating unitary transformations,” J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 51
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
2021
Later among the works it cites.
O. Lunt, M. Szyniszewski, and A. Pal, “Measurement-induced criticality and entanglement clusters: A study of one-dimensional and two-dimensional clifford circuits,” Phys. Rev. B 104
2021
Later among the works it cites.
Y. Bao, S. Choi, and E. Altman, “Symmetry enriched phases of quantum circuits,” Annals of Physics 435
2021
Later among the works it cites.
O. Alberton, M. Buchhold, and S. Diehl, “Entanglement transition in a monitored free-fermion chain: From extended criticality to area law,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126
2021
Later among the works it cites.
M. Buchhold, Y. Minoguchi, A. Altland, and S. Diehl, “Effective theory for the measurement-induced phase transition of dirac fermions,” Phys. Rev. X 11
2021
Later among the works it cites.
X. Turkeshi, A. Biella, R. Fazio, M. Dalmonte, and M. Schiró, “Measurement-induced entanglement transitions in the quantum ising chain: From infinite to zero clicks,” Phys. Rev. B 103
2021
Later among the works it cites.
M. Ippoliti and V. Khemani, “Postselection-Free Entanglement Dynamics via Spacetime Duality,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126
2021
Later among the works it cites.
S.-K. Jian, C. Liu, X. Chen, B. Swingle, and P. Zhang, “Measurement-induced phase transition in the monitored sachdev-ye-kitaev model,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127
2021
Later among the works it cites.
A. Mekala and U. Sen, “All entangled states are quantum coherent with locally distinguishable bases,” Phys. Rev. A 104
2021
Later among the works it cites.
N. P. Breuckmann and J. N. Eberhardt, “Quantum low-density parity-check codes,” PRX Quantum 2
2021
Later among the works it cites.
A. W. Harrow, L. Kong, Z.-W. Liu, S. Mehraban, and P. W. Shor, “Separation of out-of-time-ordered correlation and entanglement,” PRX Quantum 2
2021
Later among the works it cites.
2022
Closest in time.
S. Sharma, X. Turkeshi, R. Fazio, and M. Dalmonte, “Measurement-induced criticality in extended and long-range unitary circuits,” SciPost Phys. Core 5
2022
Closest in time.
Z. Weinstein, Y. Bao, and E. Altman, “Measurement-induced power-law negativity in an open monitored quantum circuit,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129
2022
Closest in time.
T. Müller, S. Diehl, and M. Buchhold, “Measurement-induced dark state phase transitions in long-ranged fermion systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 128
2022
Closest in time.
P. Sierant and X. Turkeshi, “Universal behavior beyond multifractality of wave functions at measurement-induced phase transitions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 128
2022
Closest in time.
U. Agrawal, A. Zabalo, K. Chen, J. H. Wilson, A. C. Potter, J. Pixley, S. Gopalakrishnan, and R. Vasseur, “Entanglement and Charge-Sharpening Transitions in U(1) Symmetric Monitored Quantum Circuits,” Phys. Rev. X 12
2022
Closest in time.
2022
Closest in time.
2022
Closest in time.
2022
Closest in time.
M. Szyniszewski, O. Lunt, and A. Pal, “Disordered monitored free fermions,” (2022), arXiv:2211.02534
2022
Closest in time.
2022
Closest in time.
2022
Closest in time.
J. Willsher, S.-W. Liu, R. Moessner, and J. Knolle, “Measurement-induced phase transition in a chaotic classical many-body system,” Phys. Rev. B 106
2022
Closest in time.
2022
Closest in time.
2022
Closest in time.
T. Jin and D. G. Martin, “Kardar-parisi-zhang physics and phase transition in a classical single random walker under continuous measurement,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129
2022
Closest in time.
G. Piccitto, A. Russomanno, and D. Rossini, “Entanglement transitions in the quantum ising chain: A comparison between different unravelings of the same lindbladian,” Phys. Rev. B 105
2022
Closest in time.
S. Murciano, P. Calabrese, and L. Piroli, “Symmetry-resolved page curves,” Phys. Rev. D 106
2022
Closest in time.
B. Bhattacharjee, X. Cao, P. Nandy, and T. Pathak, “Krylov complexity in saddle-dominated scrambling,” Journal of High Energy Physics 2022
2022
Closest in time.