Built on

A. Krizhevsky, and G. Hinton, “Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images”, 2009
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Deng, W. Dong, R. Socher, L. Li, K. Li, L. Fei-Fei L, “Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database”, In: 2009 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2009. p. 248–55
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Z. Liu, P. Luo, X. Wang, and X. Tang, “Deep learning face attributes in the wild”. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision (pp. 3730-3738), 2015
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Sohl-Dickstein, E. Weiss, N. Maheswaranathan, and S. Ganguli, “Deep unsupervised learning using nonequilibrium thermodynamics,” in International Conference on Machine Learning . PMLR, 2015, pp. 2256–2265
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Y. Abouelnaga, O. S. Ali, H. Rady, and M. Moustafa, “Cifar-10: Knn-based ensemble of classifiers,” in 2016 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI) . IEEE, 2016, pp. 1192–1195
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Salimans, I. Goodfellow, W. Zaremba, V. Cheung, A. Radford, and X. Chen, “Improved techniques for training GANS”. Advances in neural information processing systems, 29, 2016
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Heusel, H. Ramsauer, T. Unterthiner, B. Nessler, and S. Hochreiter, “Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local Nash equilibrium”. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. M. Haut, S. Bernabé, M. E. Paoletti, R. Fernandez-Beltran, A. Plaza, and J. Plaza, “Low–high-power consumption architectures for deep-learning models applied to hyperspectral image classification,” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters , vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 776–780, 2018
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Xu, F. Han, and Q. Ta, “Deep learning at scale on nvidia v100 accelerators,” in 2018 IEEE/ACM Performance Modeling, Benchmarking and Simulation of High Performance Computer Systems (PMBS) . IEEE, 2018, pp. 23–32
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Barratt and R. Sharma, “A note on the inception score,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.01973 , 2018
Original
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Akhtar, J. Liu and A. Mian, “Defense against universal adversarial perturbations”. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 3389-3398), 2018
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Brock, J. Donahue, K. Simonyan, K., “Large scale GAN training for high fidelity natural image synthesis”. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.11096. 2018
Original
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. Alqahtani, M. Kavakli-Thorne, G. Kumar, and F. SBSSTC, “An analysis of evaluation metrics of gans,” in International Conference on Information Technology and Applications (ICITA) , vol. 7, 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Z. Pan, W. Yu, X. Yi, A. Khan, F. Yuan, and Y. Zheng, “Recent progress on generative adversarial networks (gans): A survey,” IEEE Access , vol. 7, pp. 36 322–36 333, 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Razavi, A. Van den Oord, and O. Vinyals, “Generating diverse high-fidelity images with vq-vae-2,” Advances in neural information processing systems , vol. 32, 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Ho, A. Jain, and P. Abbeel, “Denoising diffusion probabilistic models,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 33, pp. 6840–6851, 2020
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. Floridi and M. Chiriatti, “Gpt-3: Its nature, scope, limits, and consequences,” Minds and Machines , vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 681–694, 2020
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
I. Goodfellow, J. Pouget-Abadie, M. Mirza, B. Xu, D. Warde-Farley, S. Ozair, A. Courville, A. and Bengio, Y.. “Generative adversarial networks”. Communications of the ACM, 63(11), pp.139-144, 2020
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Ho, J., Jain, A. and Abbeel, P., 2020. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, pp.6840-6851
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Dhariwal and A. Nichol, “Diffusion models beat gans on image synthesis,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 34, pp. 8780–8794, 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. San-Roman, E. Nachmani, and L. Wolf, “Noise estimation for generative diffusion models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.02600 , 2021
Original
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Meng, Y. He, Y. Song, J. Song, J. Wu, J.-Y. Zhu, and S. Ermon, “Sdedit: Guided image synthesis and editing with stochastic differential equations,” in International Conference on Learning Representations , 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
X. Liu, D. H. Park, S. Azadi, G. Zhang, A. Chopikyan, Y. Hu, H. Shi, A. Rohrbach, and T. Darrell, “More control for free! image synthesis with semantic diffusion guidance,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.05744 , 2021
Original
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Watson, J. Ho, M. Norouzi, and W. Chan, “Learning to efficiently sample from diffusion probabilistic models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.03802 , 2021
Original
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Z. Kong and W. Ping, “On fast sampling of diffusion probabilistic models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.00132 , 2021
Original
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
V. De Bortoli, J. Thornton, J. Heng, and A. Doucet, “Diffusion schrödinger bridge with applications to score-based generative modeling,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 34, pp. 17 695–17 709, 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. W. Lam, J. Wang, R. Huang, D. Su, and D. Yu, “Bilateral denoising diffusion models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.11514 , 2021
Original
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Dockhorn, A. Vahdat, and K. Kreis, “Score-based generative modeling with critically-damped langevin diffusion,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.07068 , 2021
Original
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Watson, W. Chan, J. Ho, and M. Norouzi, “Learning fast samplers for diffusion models by differentiating through sample quality,” in International Conference on Learning Representations , 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Y. Song, C. Durkan, I. Murray, and S. Ermon, “Maximum likelihood training of score-based diffusion models,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 34, pp. 1415–1428, 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Jolicoeur-Martineau, K. Li, R. Piché-Taillefer, T. Kachman, and I. Mitliagkas, “Gotta go fast when generating data with score-based models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.14080 , 2021
Original
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Choi, S. Kim, Y. Jeong, Y. Gwon, and S. Yoon, “Ilvr: Conditioning method for denoising diffusion probabilistic models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.02938 , 2021
Original
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Nichol, P. Dhariwal, A. Ramesh, P. Shyam, P. Mishkin, B. McGrew, I. Sutskever, and M. Chen, “Glide: Towards photorealistic image generation and editing with text-guided diffusion models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.10741 , 2021
Original
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Vahdat, K. Kreis, and J. Kautz, “Score-based generative modeling in latent space,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 34, pp. 11 287–11 302, 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Hoogeboom, A. A. Gritsenko, J. Bastings, B. Poole, R. v. d. Berg, and T. Salimans, “Autoregressive diffusion models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.02037 , 2021
Original
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
V. De Bortoli, J. Thornton, J. Heng, and A. Doucet, “Diffusion schrödinger bridge with applications to score-based generative modeling,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 34, pp. 17 695–17 709, 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Hoogeboom, D. Nielsen, P. Jaini, P. Forré, and M. Welling, “Argmax flows and multinomial diffusion: Learning categorical distributions,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 34, pp. 12 454–12 465, 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Nachmani, R. S. Roman, and L. Wolf, “Denoising diffusion gamma models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.05948 , 2021
Original
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. San-Roman, E. Nachmani, and L. Wolf, “Noise estimation for generative diffusion models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.02600 , 2021
Original
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Nachmani, R. S. Roman, and L. Wolf, “Non gaussian denoising diffusion models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.07582 , 2021
Original
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Q. Zhang and Y. Chen, “Diffusion normalizing flow,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 34, pp. 16 280–16 291, 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.

Similar

A. Q. Nichol and P. Dhariwal, “Improved denoising diffusion probabilistic models,” in International Conference on Machine Learning . PMLR, 2021, pp. 8162–8171
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
E. Hoogeboom, A. A. Gritsenko, J. Bastings, B. Poole, R. v. d. Berg, and T. Salimans, “Autoregressive diffusion models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.02037 , 2021
Original
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
E. Luhman and T. Luhman, “Knowledge distillation in iterative generative models for improved sampling speed,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.02388 , 2021
Original
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Shen, L. H. Li, H. Tan, M. Bansal, A. Rohrbach, K.-W. Chang, Z. Yao, and K. Keutzer, “How much can clip benefit vision-and-language tasks?” arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.06383 , 2021
Original
2021
Cited alongside, same era.

Then

Beyond the bibliography

alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.

Open on alphaXiv

alphaXiv is searching for related work…

Reading the bibliography…

2022

Efficient Diffusion Models for Vision: A Survey

Ulhaq, Anwaar, Akhtar, Naveed

Understand

Diffusion Models (DMs) have demonstrated state-of-the-art performance in content generation without requiring adversarial training.

These models are trained using a two-step process.
First, a forward - diffusion - process gradually adds noise to a datum (usually an image).
Then, a backward - reverse diffusion - process gradually removes the noise to turn it into a sample of the target distribution being modelled.

Built on

A. Krizhevsky, and G. Hinton, “Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images”, 2009
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Deng, W. Dong, R. Socher, L. Li, K. Li, L. Fei-Fei L, “Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database”, In: 2009 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2009. p. 248–55
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Z. Liu, P. Luo, X. Wang, and X. Tang, “Deep learning face attributes in the wild”. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision (pp. 3730-3738), 2015
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Sohl-Dickstein, E. Weiss, N. Maheswaranathan, and S. Ganguli, “Deep unsupervised learning using nonequilibrium thermodynamics,” in International Conference on Machine Learning . PMLR, 2015, pp. 2256–2265
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Y. Abouelnaga, O. S. Ali, H. Rady, and M. Moustafa, “Cifar-10: Knn-based ensemble of classifiers,” in 2016 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI) . IEEE, 2016, pp. 1192–1195
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Salimans, I. Goodfellow, W. Zaremba, V. Cheung, A. Radford, and X. Chen, “Improved techniques for training GANS”. Advances in neural information processing systems, 29, 2016
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Heusel, H. Ramsauer, T. Unterthiner, B. Nessler, and S. Hochreiter, “Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local Nash equilibrium”. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. M. Haut, S. Bernabé, M. E. Paoletti, R. Fernandez-Beltran, A. Plaza, and J. Plaza, “Low–high-power consumption architectures for deep-learning models applied to hyperspectral image classification,” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters , vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 776–780, 2018
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Xu, F. Han, and Q. Ta, “Deep learning at scale on nvidia v100 accelerators,” in 2018 IEEE/ACM Performance Modeling, Benchmarking and Simulation of High Performance Computer Systems (PMBS) . IEEE, 2018, pp. 23–32
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Barratt and R. Sharma, “A note on the inception score,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.01973 , 2018
Original
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Akhtar, J. Liu and A. Mian, “Defense against universal adversarial perturbations”. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 3389-3398), 2018
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Brock, J. Donahue, K. Simonyan, K., “Large scale GAN training for high fidelity natural image synthesis”. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.11096. 2018
Original
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. Alqahtani, M. Kavakli-Thorne, G. Kumar, and F. SBSSTC, “An analysis of evaluation metrics of gans,” in International Conference on Information Technology and Applications (ICITA) , vol. 7, 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Z. Pan, W. Yu, X. Yi, A. Khan, F. Yuan, and Y. Zheng, “Recent progress on generative adversarial networks (gans): A survey,” IEEE Access , vol. 7, pp. 36 322–36 333, 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Razavi, A. Van den Oord, and O. Vinyals, “Generating diverse high-fidelity images with vq-vae-2,” Advances in neural information processing systems , vol. 32, 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Ho, A. Jain, and P. Abbeel, “Denoising diffusion probabilistic models,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 33, pp. 6840–6851, 2020
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. Floridi and M. Chiriatti, “Gpt-3: Its nature, scope, limits, and consequences,” Minds and Machines , vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 681–694, 2020
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
I. Goodfellow, J. Pouget-Abadie, M. Mirza, B. Xu, D. Warde-Farley, S. Ozair, A. Courville, A. and Bengio, Y.. “Generative adversarial networks”. Communications of the ACM, 63(11), pp.139-144, 2020
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Ho, J., Jain, A. and Abbeel, P., 2020. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, pp.6840-6851
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Dhariwal and A. Nichol, “Diffusion models beat gans on image synthesis,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 34, pp. 8780–8794, 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. San-Roman, E. Nachmani, and L. Wolf, “Noise estimation for generative diffusion models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.02600 , 2021
Original
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Meng, Y. He, Y. Song, J. Song, J. Wu, J.-Y. Zhu, and S. Ermon, “Sdedit: Guided image synthesis and editing with stochastic differential equations,” in International Conference on Learning Representations , 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
X. Liu, D. H. Park, S. Azadi, G. Zhang, A. Chopikyan, Y. Hu, H. Shi, A. Rohrbach, and T. Darrell, “More control for free! image synthesis with semantic diffusion guidance,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.05744 , 2021
Original
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Watson, J. Ho, M. Norouzi, and W. Chan, “Learning to efficiently sample from diffusion probabilistic models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.03802 , 2021
Original
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Z. Kong and W. Ping, “On fast sampling of diffusion probabilistic models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.00132 , 2021
Original
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
V. De Bortoli, J. Thornton, J. Heng, and A. Doucet, “Diffusion schrödinger bridge with applications to score-based generative modeling,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 34, pp. 17 695–17 709, 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. W. Lam, J. Wang, R. Huang, D. Su, and D. Yu, “Bilateral denoising diffusion models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.11514 , 2021
Original
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Dockhorn, A. Vahdat, and K. Kreis, “Score-based generative modeling with critically-damped langevin diffusion,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.07068 , 2021
Original
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Watson, W. Chan, J. Ho, and M. Norouzi, “Learning fast samplers for diffusion models by differentiating through sample quality,” in International Conference on Learning Representations , 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Y. Song, C. Durkan, I. Murray, and S. Ermon, “Maximum likelihood training of score-based diffusion models,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 34, pp. 1415–1428, 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Jolicoeur-Martineau, K. Li, R. Piché-Taillefer, T. Kachman, and I. Mitliagkas, “Gotta go fast when generating data with score-based models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.14080 , 2021
Original
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Choi, S. Kim, Y. Jeong, Y. Gwon, and S. Yoon, “Ilvr: Conditioning method for denoising diffusion probabilistic models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.02938 , 2021
Original
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Nichol, P. Dhariwal, A. Ramesh, P. Shyam, P. Mishkin, B. McGrew, I. Sutskever, and M. Chen, “Glide: Towards photorealistic image generation and editing with text-guided diffusion models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.10741 , 2021
Original
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Vahdat, K. Kreis, and J. Kautz, “Score-based generative modeling in latent space,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 34, pp. 11 287–11 302, 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Hoogeboom, A. A. Gritsenko, J. Bastings, B. Poole, R. v. d. Berg, and T. Salimans, “Autoregressive diffusion models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.02037 , 2021
Original
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
V. De Bortoli, J. Thornton, J. Heng, and A. Doucet, “Diffusion schrödinger bridge with applications to score-based generative modeling,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 34, pp. 17 695–17 709, 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Hoogeboom, D. Nielsen, P. Jaini, P. Forré, and M. Welling, “Argmax flows and multinomial diffusion: Learning categorical distributions,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 34, pp. 12 454–12 465, 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Nachmani, R. S. Roman, and L. Wolf, “Denoising diffusion gamma models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.05948 , 2021
Original
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. San-Roman, E. Nachmani, and L. Wolf, “Noise estimation for generative diffusion models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.02600 , 2021
Original
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Nachmani, R. S. Roman, and L. Wolf, “Non gaussian denoising diffusion models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.07582 , 2021
Original
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Q. Zhang and Y. Chen, “Diffusion normalizing flow,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 34, pp. 16 280–16 291, 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.

Similar

A. Q. Nichol and P. Dhariwal, “Improved denoising diffusion probabilistic models,” in International Conference on Machine Learning . PMLR, 2021, pp. 8162–8171
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
E. Hoogeboom, A. A. Gritsenko, J. Bastings, B. Poole, R. v. d. Berg, and T. Salimans, “Autoregressive diffusion models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.02037 , 2021
Original
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
E. Luhman and T. Luhman, “Knowledge distillation in iterative generative models for improved sampling speed,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.02388 , 2021
Original
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Shen, L. H. Li, H. Tan, M. Bansal, A. Rohrbach, K.-W. Chang, Z. Yao, and K. Keutzer, “How much can clip benefit vision-and-language tasks?” arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.06383 , 2021
Original
2021
Cited alongside, same era.

Then

Beyond the bibliography

alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.

Open on alphaXiv

alphaXiv is searching for related work…

P. Esser, R. Rombach, and B. Ommer, “Taming transformers for high-resolution image synthesis”. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (pp. 12873-12883). 2021

2021

Cited alongside, same era.

J. Song, C. Meng, and S. Ermon, “Denoising Diffusion Implicit Models,” in Proceedings of ICLR, 2021

2021

Cited alongside, same era.

G. Batzolis, J. Stanczuk, C.-B. Schonlieb, and C. Etmann, “Conditional image generation with score-based diffusion models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.13606, 2021

Original

2021

Cited alongside, same era.

P. Esser, R. Rombach, A. Blattmann, and B. Ommer, “ImageBART: Bidirectional Context with Multinomial Diffusion for Autoregressive Image Synthesis,” in Proceedings of NeurIPS, vol. 34, pp. 3518– 3532, 2021

2021

Cited alongside, same era.

N. Akhtar, A. Mian, N. Kardan, N. and M. Shah,“Advances in adversarial attacks and defenses in computer vision: A survey”. IEEE Access, 9, pp. 155161-155196, 2021

2021

Cited alongside, same era.

L. Regenwetter, A. H. Nobari, and F. Ahmed, “Deep generative models in engineering design: A review,” Journal of Mechanical Design , vol. 144, no. 7, p. 071704, 2022

2022

Cited alongside, same era.

H. Cao, C. Tan, Z. Gao, G. Chen, P.-A. Heng, and S. Z. Li, “A survey on generative diffusion model,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.02646 , 2022

Original

2022

Cited alongside, same era.

L. Yang, Z. Zhang, and S. Hong, “Diffusion models: A comprehensive survey of methods and applications,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.00796 , 2022

Original

2022

Cited alongside, same era.

G. Franzese, S. Rossi, L. Yang, A. Finamore, D. Rossi, M. Filippone, and P. Michiardi, “How much is enough? a study on diffusion times in score-based generative models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.05173 , 2022

Original

2022

Closest in time.

T. Salimans and J. Ho, “Progressive distillation for fast sampling of diffusion models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.00512 , 2022

Original

2022

Closest in time.

Z. Lyu, X. Xu, C. Yang, D. Lin, and B. Dai, “Accelerating diffusion models via early stop of the diffusion process,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.12524 , 2022

Original

2022

Closest in time.

G. Batzolis, J. Stanczuk, C.-B. Schönlieb, and C. Etmann, “Non-uniform diffusion models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.09786 , 2022

Original

2022

Closest in time.

W. Peebles and S. Xie. “Scalable diffusion models with transformers”. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.09748, 2022

Original

2022

Closest in time.

M. Ye, L. Wu, and Q. Liu, “First hitting diffusion models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.01170 , 2022

Original

2022

Closest in time.

T. Karras, M. Aittala, T. Aila, and S. Laine, “Elucidating the design space of diffusion-based generative models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.00364 , 2022

Original

2022

Closest in time.

O. Ashual, S. Sheynin, A. Polyak, U. Singer, O. Gafni, E. Nachmani, and Y. Taigman, “Knn-diffusion: Image generation via large-scale retrieval,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.02849 , 2022

Original

2022

Closest in time.

A. Blattmann, R. Rombach, K. Oktay, and B. Ommer, “Retrieval-augmented diffusion models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.11824 , 2022

Original

2022

Closest in time.

R. Rombach, A. Blattmann, and B. Ommer, “Text-guided synthesis of artistic images with retrieval-augmented diffusion models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.13038 , 2022

Original

2022

Closest in time.

R. Rombach, A. Blattmann, and B. Ommer, “Text-guided synthesis of artistic images with retrieval-augmented diffusion models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.13038 , 2022

Original

2022

Closest in time.

W. Chen, H. Hu, C. Saharia, and W. W. Cohen, “Re-imagen: Retrieval-augmented text-to-image generator,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14491 , 2022

Original

2022

Closest in time.

T. Kynkäänniemi, T. Karras, M. Aittala, T. Aila, and J. Lehtinen, “The role of imagenet classes in fr \ \backslash ’echet inception distance,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.06026 , 2022

Original

2022

Closest in time.

A. Romero, A. Castillo, J. Abril-Nova, R. Timofte, R. Das, S. Hira, Z. Pan, M. Zhang, B. Li, D. He, et al. , “Ntire 2022 image inpainting challenge: Report,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2022, pp. 1150–1182

2022

Closest in time.

C. Saharia, W. Chan, H. Chang, C. Lee, J. Ho, T. Salimans, D. Fleet, and M. Norouzi, “Palette: Image-to-image diffusion models,” in ACM SIGGRAPH 2022 Conference Proceedings , 2022, pp. 1–10

2022

Closest in time.

G. Daras, M. Delbracio,H. Talebi,A. Dimakis, and P. Milanfar, “Soft diffusion: Score matching for general corruptions,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.05442, 2022

Original

2022

Closest in time.

N. Ruiz, Y. Li, V. Jampani, Y. Pritch, M. Rubinstein, and K. Aberman, “Dreambooth: Fine tuning text-to-image diffusion models for subject-driven generation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.12242 , 2022

Original

2022

Closest in time.

J. Ho, T. Salimans, A. Gritsenko, W. Chan, M. Norouzi, and D. J. Fleet, “Video diffusion models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.03458 , 2022

Original

2022

Closest in time.

U. Singer, A. Polyak, T. Hayes, X. Yin, J. An, S. Zhang, Q. Hu, H. Yang, O. Ashual, O. Gafni, et al. , “Make-a-video: Text-to-video generation without text-video data,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14792 , 2022

Original

2022

Closest in time.

D. Kim, Y. Kim, W. Kang, I. Moon, “Refining Generative Process with Discriminator Guidance in Score-based Diffusion Models”, arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.17091, 2022

Original

2022

Closest in time.

G. Tevet, S. Raab, B. Gordon, Y. Shafir, A. H. Bermano, and D. Cohen-Or, “Human motion diffusion model,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14916 , 2022

Original

2022

Closest in time.

M. Zhang, Z. Cai, L. Pan, F. Hong, X. Guo, L. Yang, and Z. Liu, “Motiondiffuse: Text-driven human motion generation with diffusion model,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.15001 , 2022

Original

2022

Closest in time.

D. Baranchuk, I. Rubachev, A. Voynov, V. Khrulkov, and A. Babenko, “Label-Efficient Semantic Segmentation with Diffusion Models,” in Proceedings of ICLR, 2022

2022

Closest in time.

A. Graikos, N. Malkin, N. Jojic, and D. Samaras, “Diffusion models as plug-and-play priors,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.09012, 2022

Original

2022

Closest in time.

J. Wolleb, R. Sandkuhler, F. Bieder, P. Valmaggia, and P. C. Cattin, ¨ “Diffusion Models for Implicit Image Segmentation Ensembles,” in Proceedings of MIDL, 2022

2022

Closest in time.

A. Sauer, K. Schwarz,and A. Geiger, “Stylegan-xl: Scaling stylegan to large diverse datasets”, In ACM SIGGRAPH 2022 conference proceedings, 2022

2022

Closest in time.

Li, H., Yang, Y., Chang, M., Chen, S., Feng, H., Xu, Z., Li, Q. and Chen, Y., 2022. Srdiff: Single image super-resolution with diffusion probabilistic models. Neurocomputing, 479, pp.47-59

2022

Closest in time.

Lugmayr, A., Danelljan, M., Romero, A., Yu, F., Timofte, R. and Van Gool, L., 2022. Repaint: Inpainting using denoising diffusion probabilistic models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 11461-11471)

2022

Closest in time.

C. Saharia, W. Chan, S. Saxena, L. Li, J. Whang, E. Denton, S. K. S. Ghasemipour, B. K. Ayan, S. S. Mahdavi, R. G. Lopes, et al., “Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understanding,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.11487, 2022

Original

2022

Closest in time.

Ho, J., Chan, W., Saharia, C., Whang, J., Gao, R., Gritsenko, A., Kingma, D.P., Poole, B., Norouzi, M., Fleet, D.J. and Salimans, T., 2022. Imagen Video: High Definition Video Generation with Diffusion Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02303

Original

2022

Closest in time.

Y. Xu, S. Tong, and T. Jaakkola, “Stable Target Field for Reduced Variance Score Estimation in Diffusion Models”. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.00670, 2023

Original