Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Learning a many-body Hamiltonian from its dynamics is a fundamental problem in physics.
Quantum-mechanical noise in an interferometer
Carlton M Caves · 1981
Earlier work this paper cites.
General theory of fractal path integrals with applications to many‐body theories and statistical physics
Masuo Suzuki · 1991
Earlier work this paper cites.
Spin squeezing and reduced quantum noise in spectroscopy
David J Wineland, John J Bollinger, Wayne M Itano, FL Moore, and Daniel J Heinzen · 1992
Earlier work this paper cites.
Interferometric detection of optical phase shifts at the heisenberg limit
MJ Holland and K Burnett · 1993
Earlier work this paper cites.
Optimal frequency measurements with maximally correlated states
John J Bollinger, Wayne M Itano, David J Wineland, and Daniel J Heinzen · 1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
Universal quantum simulators
Seth Lloyd · 1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
A quantum Rosetta stone for interferometry
Hwang Lee, Pieter Kok, and Jonathan P Dowling · 2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
Experimental demonstration of a squeezing-enhanced power-recycled michelson interferometer for gravitational wave detection
Kirk McKenzie, Daniel A Shaddock, David E McClelland, Ben C Buchler, and Ping Koy Lam · 2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
Robust method for estimating the Lindblad operators of a dissipative quantum process from measurements of the density operator at multiple time points
Nicolas Boulant, Timothy F. Havel, Marco A. Pravia, and David G. Cory · 2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
Distant clock synchronization using entangled photon pairs
Alejandra Valencia, Giuliano Scarcelli, and Yanhua Shih · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Toward heisenberg-limited spectroscopy with multiparticle entangled states
Dietrich Leibfried, Murray D Barrett, T Schaetz, Joseph Britton, J Chiaverini, Wayne M Itano, John D Jost, Christopher Langer, and David J Wineland · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Quantum process tomography of a controlled-not gate
Jeremy L O’Brien, Geoff J Pryde, Alexei Gilchrist, Daniel FV James, Nathan K Langford, Timothy C Ralph, and Andrew G White · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Competing density-wave orders in a one-dimensional hard-boson model
Paul Fendley, K. Sengupta, and Subir Sachdev · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Quantum methods for clock synchronization: Beating the standard quantum limit without entanglement
Mark de Burgh and Stephen D Bartlett · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Entanglement-free heisenberg-limited phase estimation
Brendon L Higgins, Dominic W Berry, Stephen D Bartlett, Howard M Wiseman, and Geoff J Pryde · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Efficient quantum algorithms for simulating sparse Hamiltonians
Dominic W. Berry, Graeme Ahokas, Richard Cleve, and Barry C. Sanders · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Finite difference methods for ordinary and partial differential equations: steady-state and time-dependent problems
Randall J LeVeque · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Quantum-process tomography: Resource analysis of different strategies
Masoud Mohseni, Ali T Rezakhani, and Daniel A Lidar · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Optimizing quantum process tomography with unitary 2-designs
A. J. Scott · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Randomized benchmarking of quantum gates
Emanuel Knill, Dietrich Leibfried, Rolf Reichle, Joe Britton, R Brad Blakestad, John D Jost, Chris Langer, Roee Ozeri, Signe Seidelin, and David J Wineland · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Advances in quantum metrology
Vittorio Giovannetti, Seth Lloyd, and Lorenzo Maccone · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Scalable and robust randomized benchmarking of quantum processes
Easwar Magesan, Jay M Gambetta, and Joseph Emerson · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Robust online hamiltonian learning
Christopher E Granade, Christopher Ferrie, Nathan Wiebe, and David G Cory · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Self-consistent quantum process tomography
Seth T Merkel, Jay M Gambetta, John A Smolin, Stefano Poletto, Antonio D Córcoles, Blake R Johnson, Colm A Ryan, and Matthias Steffen · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Suppressing qubit dephasing using real-time Hamiltonian estimation
Michael D. Shulman, S. P. Harvey, J. M. Nichol, S. D. Bartlett, A. C. Doherty, V. Umansky, and A. Yacoby · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Quantum hamiltonian learning using imperfect quantum resources
Nathan Wiebe, Christopher Granade, Christopher Ferrie, and David Cory · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Hamiltonian learning and certification using quantum resources
Nathan Wiebe, Christopher Granade, Christopher Ferrie, and D. G. Cory · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Robust calibration of a universal single-qubit gate set via robust phase estimation
Shelby Kimmel, Guang Hao Low, and Theodore J Yoder · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Crystallization in ising quantum magnets
P. Schauß, J. Zeiher, T. Fukuhara, S. Hild, M. Cheneau, T. Macrì, T. Pohl, I. Bloch, and C. Gross · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Procedure for systematically tuning up cross-talk in the cross-resonance gate
Sarah Sheldon, Easwar Magesan, Jerry M. Chow, and Jay M. Gambetta · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Atom-by-atom assembly of defect-free one-dimensional cold atom arrays
Manuel Endres, Hannes Bernien, Alexander Keesling, Harry Levine, Eric R Anschuetz, Alexandre Krajenbrink, Crystal Senko, Vladan Vuletic, Markus Greiner, and Mikhail D Lukin · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Tunable two-dimensional arrays of single rydberg atoms for realizing quantum ising models
Henning Labuhn, Daniel Barredo, Sylvain Ravets, Sylvain de Léséleuc, Tommaso Macrì, Thierry Lahaye, and Antoine Browaeys · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Erik Nielsen, John King Gamble, Kenneth Rudinger, Travis Scholten, Kevin Young, and Robin Blume-Kohout · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Many-body physics with individually controlled Rydberg atoms
Antoine Browaeys and Thierry Lahaye · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Quantum Phases of Matter on a 256-Atom Programmable Quantum Simulator
Sepehr Ebadi, Tout T. Wang, Harry Levine, Alexander Keesling, Giulia Semeghini, Ahmed Omran, Dolev Bluvstein, Rhine Samajdar, Hannes Pichler, Wen Wei Ho, Soonwon Choi, Subir Sachdev, Markus Greiner, Vladan Vuletic, and Mikhail D. Lukin · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Programmable quantum simulation of 2D antiferromagnets with hundreds of Rydberg atoms
Pascal Scholl, Michael Schuler, Hannah J. Williams, Alexander A. Eberharter, Daniel Barredo, Kai-Niklas Schymik, Vincent Lienhard, Louis-Paul Henry, Thomas C. Lang, Thierry Lahaye, Andreas M. Läuchli, and Antoine Browaeys · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Evolution-Free Hamiltonian Parameter Estimation through Zeeman Markers
Daniel Burgarth and Ashok Ajoy · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Experimental quantum hamiltonian learning
Jianwei Wang, Stefano Paesani, Raffaele Santagati, Sebastian Knauer, Antonio A. Gentile, Nathan Wiebe, Maurangelo Petruzzella, Jeremy L. O’Brien, John G. Rarity, Anthony Laing, and et al · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Achieving the heisenberg limit in quantum metrology using quantum error correction
Sisi Zhou, Mengzhen Zhang, John Preskill, and Liang Jiang · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Quantum sensing
Christian L Degen, Friedemann Reinhard, and Paola Cappellaro · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Extremal eigenvalues of local hamiltonians
Aram W Harrow and Ashley Montanaro · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Demonstration of qubit operations below a rigorous fault tolerance threshold with gate set tomography
Robin Blume-Kohout, John King Gamble, Erik Nielsen, Kenneth Rudinger, Jonathan Mizrahi, Kevin Fortier, and Peter Maunz · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator
Hannes Bernien, Sylvain Schwartz, Alexander Keesling, Harry Levine, Ahmed Omran, Hannes Pichler, Soonwon Choi, Alexander S Zibrov, Manuel Endres, Markus Greiner, et al · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Efficient learning of quantum noise
Robin Harper, Steven T Flammia, and Joel J Wallman · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Emergent quantum state designs from individual many-body wavefunctions
Jordan S Cotler, Daniel K Mark, Hsin-Yuan Huang, Felipe Hernandez, Joonhee Choi, Adam L Shaw, Manuel Endres, and Soonwon Choi · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Emergent randomness and benchmarking from many-body quantum chaos
Joonhee Choi, Adam L Shaw, Ivaylo S Madjarov, Xin Xie, Jacob P Covey, Jordan S Cotler, Daniel K Mark, Hsin-Yuan Huang, Anant Kale, Hannes Pichler, et al · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Optimal learning of quantum hamiltonians from high-temperature gibbs states
Jeongwan Haah, Robin Kothari, and Ewin Tang · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Precise hamiltonian identification of a superconducting quantum processor, 2021
Dominik Hangleiter, Ingo Roth, Jens Eisert, and Pedram Roushan · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Optimal short-time measurements for hamiltonian learning
Assaf Zubida, Elad Yitzhaki, Netanel H Lindner, and Eyal Bairey · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Improved approximation algorithms for bounded-degree local hamiltonians
Anurag Anshu, David Gosset, Karen J Morenz Korol, and Mehdi Soleimanifar · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Concentration for random product formulas
Chi-Fang Chen, Hsin-Yuan Huang, Richard Kueng, and Joel A Tropp · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Theory of Trotter error with commutator scaling
Andrew M. Childs, Yuan Su, Minh C. Tran, Nathan Wiebe, and Shuchen Zhu · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Faster digital quantum simulation by symmetry protection
Minh C. Tran, Yuan Su, Daniel Carney, and Jacob M. Taylor · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Classical shadows for quantum process tomography on near-term quantum computers
Ryan Levy, Di Luo, and Bryan K Clark · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Xueyue Zhang, Eunjong Kim, Daniel K Mark, Soonwon Choi, and Oskar Painter · 2022
Closest in time.
Practical and efficient hamiltonian learning, 2022
Wenjun Yu, Jinzhao Sun, Zeyao Han, and Xiao Yuan · 2022
Closest in time.
Efficient and robust estimation of many-qubit hamiltonians
Daniel Stilck Franca, Liubov A Markovich, VV Dobrovitski, Albert H Werner, and Johannes Borregaard · 2022
Closest in time.
Practical black box hamiltonian learning
Andi Gu, Lukasz Cincio, and Patrick J Coles · 2022
Closest in time.
Scalably learning quantum many-body hamiltonians from dynamical data, 2022
Frederik Wilde, Augustine Kshetrimayum, Ingo Roth, Dominik Hangleiter, Ryan Sweke, and Jens Eisert · 2022
Closest in time.
Quantum algorithmic measurement
Dorit Aharonov, Jordan Cotler, and Xiao-Liang Qi · 2022
Closest in time.
Exponential separations between learning with and without quantum memory
Sitan Chen, Jordan Cotler, Hsin-Yuan Huang, and Jerry Li · 2022
Closest in time.
Foundations for learning from noisy quantum experiments
Hsin-Yuan Huang, Steven T Flammia, and John Preskill · 2022
Closest in time.
Quantum advantage in learning from experiments
Hsin-Yuan Huang, Michael Broughton, Jordan Cotler, Sitan Chen, Jerry Li, Masoud Mohseni, Hartmut Neven, Ryan Babbush, Richard Kueng, John Preskill, et al · 2022
Closest in time.
One bound to rule them all: from Adiabatic to Zeno
Daniel Burgarth, Paolo Facchi, Giovanni Gramegna, and Kazuya Yuasa · 2022
Closest in time.
The randomized measurement toolbox
Andreas Elben, Steven T Flammia, Hsin-Yuan Huang, Richard Kueng, John Preskill, Benoît Vermersch, and Peter Zoller · 2022
Closest in time.